Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Badanie inkubacji przedsiębiorczości przemysłu kreatywnego
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
The study seeks to explore the key start-up facilitation services of the incubation and co-working market in Toronto that are most in demand by individuals from creative industries services. The study aims to increase understanding of the market, the competitive features, and success factors while helping better define a sustainable value proposition. Primary data were collected through online surveys with students enrolled in Ryerson University creative programs and in-depth interviews with representatives of current incubator users in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. The five tiers (physical infrastructure, office support, access to capital, process support and networking) along with suggested optional services in conjunction to constant adaptation to the emerging future condition represent the basis for successful operation of a new entrant in the market place. The results provide a deeper understanding of the core services business incubation milieu generates for target clients.
Badanie ma na celu zapoznanie się z kluczowymi usługami ułatwiającymi rozpoczęcie działalności na rynku inkubacji i współpracy w Toronto, których najbardziej potrzebują jednostki świadczące usługi w branżach kreatywnych. Celem badania jest lepsze zrozumienie rynku, konkurencyjności i czynników sukcesu, pomagając jednocześnie lepiej zdefiniować propozycję zrównoważonej wartości. Podstawowe dane zebrano za pomocą kwestionariuszy online z udziałem studentów uczestniczących w programach kreatywnych Uniwersytetu w Ryerson oraz pogłębionych wywiadów z przedstawicielami obecnych użytkowników inkubatorów w Toronto, Ontario w Kanadzie. Pięć poziomów (infrastruktura fizyczna, wsparcie biura, dostęp do kapitału, wsparcie procesów i łączność sieciowa) wraz z sugerowanymi opcjonalnymi usługami w połączeniu z ciągłą adaptacją do wyłaniającego się przyszłego stanu, stanowi podstawę pomyślnego działania nowego podmiotu na rynku. Rezultaty dostarczają głębszego zrozumienia podstawowych usług środowiska inkubacji przedsiębiorstw generowanych dla klientów docelowych.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
250--261
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 36 poz., tab.
Twórcy
autor
- University of Prešov in Prešov, Faculty of Management
autor
- Ryerson University, Toronto
- Ph.D. Candidate at University of Prešov in Prešov, Faculty of Management
Bibliografia
- 1. Aernoudt R., 2004, Incubators: Tool for Entrepreneurship?, “Small Business Economics”, 23.
- 2. Aerts K., Matthyssens P., Vandenbempt K., 2007, Critical Role And Screening Practices Of European Business Incubators, “Technovation”, 27.
- 3. Allen D.N., McCluskey R., 1990, Structure, Policy, Services, and Performance in the Business Incubator Industry , “Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice”, 15(2).
- 4. Bergek A., Norrman C., 2008, Incubator Best Practice: A Framework, “Technovation”, 28.
- 5. Bøllingtoft A., Ulhøi J.P., 2005, The Networked Business Incubator-Leveraging Entrepreneurial Agency?, “Journal of Business Venturing”, 20(2).
- 6. Bruneel J., Ratinho T., Clarysse B., Groen A., 2012, The Evolution of Business Incubators: Comparing Demand And Supply Of Business Incubation Services Across Different Incubator Generations, “Technovation”, 32(2).
- 7. Chan K.F., Lau T., 2005, Assessing Technology Incubator Programs In The Science Park: The Good, The Bad And The Ugly, “Technovation”, 25.
- 8. Clarysse B., Bruneel J., 2007, Nurturing And Growing Innovative Start-Ups: The Role of Policy as Integrator, “R&D Management”, 37.
- 9. Conference Board of Canada, 2008, Valuing Culture: Measuring and Understanding Canada’s Creative Economy.
- 10. Cukier W., Fox V., Rahnama H., 2012, Building Human Infrastructure for the Digital Economy: Ryerson’s Digital Media Zone, [In] M. Hercheui, D. Whitehouse, W. McIver, Jr., J. Phahlamohlaka (Eds.), “ICT Critical Infrastructures and Society”, Springer Berlin, Heidelberg.
- 11. Dahl D., 2011, How to Choose An Incubator, New York Times.
- 12. Essig L., 2014, Arts Incubators: A Typology, “The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society”, 44.
- 13. Freeman J., Carroll G.R., Hannan M.T., 1983, The Liability of Newness: Age Dependence in Organizational Death Rates, “American Sociological Review”, 48.
- 14. Grimaldi R., Grandi A., 2005, Business Incubators And New Venture Creation: An Assessment Of Incubating Models, “Technovation”, 25.
- 15. Hansen M.T., Chesbrough H.W., Nohria N., Sull D.N., 2000, Networked Incubators: Hothouses of the New Economy, “Harvard Business Review”, 78.
- 16. Hellmann T., and Puri M., 2002, Venture Capital and the Professionalization of Start-Up Firms: Empirical Evidence, “The Journal of Finance”, 57.
- 17. Koraus A., 2015, Personal Management For Praxis, Ekonomicky casopis, „Journal of Economics”, 51(2).
- 18. Kot S., Ślusarczyk B., 2014, Outsourcing Reasons and Results - Survey Outcomes Discussion, “The Journal of American Business Review”, 2(2).
- 19. Lee S.S., Osteryoung J.S., 2004, A Comparison of Critical Success Factors for Effective Operations of University Business Incubators in the United States and Korea, “Journal of Small Business Management”, 42.
- 20. Leslie D., Brail S., Hunt M., 2014, Crafting an Antidote to Fast Fashion: The Case of Toronto’s Independent Fashion Design Sector, “Growth and Change”, 45.
- 21. Maxwell A., Levesque M., 2011, Technology Incubators: Facilitating Technology Transfer Or Creating Regional Wealth?, “International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management”, 13.
- 22. Merkel J., 2015, Coworking in the City, “Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization”, 15.
- 23. Monkman D., 2010, Hearing on “Business Incubators and Their Role in Job Creation”, Washington, D. C.
- 24. Ontario Ministry of Tourism, 2010, Ontario’s Entertainment and Creative Cluster: A Framework for Growth Report.
- 25. Peters L., Rice M., Sundararajan M., 2004, The Role of Incubators in the Entrepreneurial Process, “The Journal of Technology Transfer”, 29.
- 26. Rajnoha R., Novak P., Merkova M., 2016, Relationships Between Investment Effectivenesss Controlling And Business Performance, “Montenegrin Journal of Economics”, 12 (2).
- 27. Reich R.B., 1991, The Work Of Nations: Preparing Ourselves For 21st-Century Capitalism, New York, A.A. Knopf.
- 28. Scillitoe J.L., Chakrabarti A.K., 2010, The Role Of Incubator Interactions In Assisting New Ventures, “Technovation”, 30.
- 29. Sminor R.W., Gill M.G., 1986, The New Business Incubator: Linking Talent, Technology, Capital, And Know-How, Lexington, Mass, Lexington Books.
- 30. Sucháček J., 2015, Large Enterprise Branches: The Case of the Czech Republic, “Economics & Sociology”, 8(4).
- 31. Thorburn L., (Lalkaka R., Bishop J., eds.), 1998, Business Incubators in Economic Development: An Initial Assessment in Industrializing Countries, “Prometheus”, 16(1).
- 32. Vochozka M., 2010, Development of methods for comprehensive evaluation of business performance, “Politická Ekonomie”, 58(5).
- 33. von Zedtwitz M., 2003, Classification and Management of Incubators: Aligning Strategic Objectives and Competitive Scope for New Business Facilitation, “Int. J. Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management”, 3.
- 34. von Zedtwitz M., Grimaldi R., 2006, Are Service Profiles Incubator-Specific? Results from an Empirical Investigation in Italy, “The Journal of Technology Transfer”, 31.
- 35. Yli-Renko H., Autio E., Sapienza H.J., 2001, Social Capital, Knowledge Acquisition, and Knowledge Exploitation in Young Technology-Based Firms, “Strategic Management Journal”, 22.
- 36. Zhao L., Aram J.D., 1995, Networking And Growth Of Young Technology-Intensive Ventures In China, “Journal of Business Venturing”, 10.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2018).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-8b678a07-cecd-4d91-842a-cf6fd90f07ca