Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
The effect of reach levels, horizontal angles, and vertical angles on isometric pull and push strengths of male and female was determined. Highly significant increases in men’s push strength were found between extreme to maximum reaches, and from extreme to normal reaches. However, for women’s push strength, a significant increase was found only between extreme to maximum reach. Significant or highly significant increases were found in men’s and women’s pull strength between the horizontal angle (0) sagittal through the active shoulder (90°) and other angles (0, 45, and 135°). However, for men’s push strength, highly significant increases were found between the horizontal angle 45° from the frontal plane, and other angles. For women’s push strength, significant or highly significant increases were found between the horizontal angles 0° and angles of 90 and 135°. For men’s and women’s pull strength, significant or highly significant increases were found between the vertical angle (), 90°, and other angles (-20, 0, and 45°). Similar increases were found for women’s push strength between the 45° angle and other angles. In the design of a workstation for paraplegics that requires pull and push forces, consideration must be given to the spatial factors.
Wydawca
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
67--80
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 11 poz., tab.
Twórcy
autor
- Department of Industrial Engineering Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
autor
- Ecole de genie, Secteur genie industriel Universite de Moncton, Moncton, NB, Canada
Bibliografia
- 1.Abdel-Moty, E., & Khalil, T.M. (1989). Computer-aided design and analysis of the sitting workplace for the disabled. In A. Mital (Ed.), Advances in industrial ergonom ics and safety I (pp. 863-870). London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
- 2.Buchanan, L.E., & Nawoczenski, S.A. (1987). Spinal cord injury: Concepts and management approaches. Baltimore, M D, USA: Williams & Wilkins.
- 3.Chaffin, D .B., Herrin, G.D., & Keyserling, W.M. (1978). Pre-employment strength testing. Journal of Occupational Medicine, 20, 403-409.
- 4.Das, B., & Black, N.L. (2000). Isometric pull and push strengths of paraplegics in the workspace: 1. Strength measurement profiles. International Journal o f Occupational Safety and Ergonomics 6(1) 47-65 .
- 5.Davis, P.R., & Stubbs, D.A. (1977). Safe levels of manual forces for young males (2). Applied Ergonomics, 8, 141-150.
- 6.Duval-Beaupere, G„ & Robain, G. (1991). Upward displacement of the centre of gravity in paraplegic patients. Paraplegia, 29, 309-317.
- 7.Evans, W.A. (1990). The relationship between isometric strength of Cantonese males and the US NIOSH guide for manual lifting. Applied Ergonomics, 21, 135-142.
- 8.Floyd, W.F., Gutlmann, L., Wycliffe-Noble, C., Parkes, K.R., & Ward, J. (1966). A study of the space requirements of wheelchair users. Paraplegia, 5, 24-37.
- 9.Hunsicker, P. (1955). Arm strength at selected degrees of elbow flexion (Wright Air Development Center Technical Report 54-548, Project 7214). Dayton, OH, USA: U.S. Air Force.
- 10.Niebel, B.W ., & Freivalds, A. (1999). Methods, standards, and work design (10th ed.). New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill.
- 11.Sale, D.G., & Norman, R.W. (1982). Testing strength and power. In J.D. MacDougall, H.A. Wenger, & H.J. Green (Eds.), Physiological testing of the elite athlete (pp. 7-37). Ottawa, Ont., Canada: Canadian Association of Sport Sciences and the Sport Medicine Council of Canada.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-8b3d60c7-db7e-4fe7-9009-c4fe3b1d5c1b