Development of environmental conditions in free-stall cattle barns

• Autorzy: Romaniuk W. , Mazur K.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Kształtowanie warunków środowiskowych w oborach wolnostanowiskowych dla bydła

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of this study was to define influence of different housing systems and barns on costs and energetic inputs in milk production and assessment of microclimate conditions. There were twelve free-stall cattle barns for dairy cows tested and the analysis contains: investment costs of buildings, equipment for mechanization of technological treatments (milking and milk cooling, forage preparing and feeding, manure removing and storing and other works), electric and mechanical energy inputs, labour inputs, exploitation costs of equipment and buildings, concentration of harmful gases, temperature of air and relative humidity inside and outside of barns. The limitations to the choice of the best technical- technological solution were assumed: average investment cost ≤ 19000 PLN, average labour inputs ≤ 4,6 working minutes, electric energy inputs ≤ 0,40 kWh, mechanic energy inputs ≤ 2,006 HP, NH3 concentration ≤ 10,9 ppm and CO2 concentration ≤ 1500,8 ppm. These values are per day and per LU. The best functional - technological solutions were in two barns, which fulfilled all limitations. It were: one boxed cattle barn with litter and one boxed non-littered barn, both with high number of animals, 144 LU and 109 LU respectively. Simultaneously in these two barns the lowest unitary exploitation costs were calculated and amounted to 1710,98 PLN∙LU-1 and 2088,57 PLN∙LU-1.

PL

Celem badań było określenie wpływu różnych systemów utrzymania na koszty i nakłady energetyczne w produkcji mleka oraz ocena warunków mikroklimatu. Zbadano 12 obór wolnostanowiskowych dla krów mlecznych i analiza obejmowała: koszty inwestycyjne budynków oraz wyposażenia dla mechanizacji zabiegów technologicznych (dój i wstępna obróbka mleka, przygotowanie i zadawanie pasz, usuwanie i magazynowanie nawozu i prace różne), nakłady energii elektrycznej i mechanicznej, nakłady pracy, koszty eksploatacji budynków stężenia szkodliwych gazów, temperaturę i wilgotność powietrza, koszty eksploatacji wyposażenia i budynków. Zostały ustalone graniczne wartości: średnie koszty inwestycyjne ≤ 19000 PLN, średnie nakłady robocizny≤ 4,6 roboczominut, nakłady energii elektrycznej ≤ 0,40 kWh, nakłady energii mechanicznej ≤ 2,006 KMh, stężenie NH3 ≤ 10,9 ppm, stężenie CO2 ≤1500,8 ppm. Wszystkie te wartości były w odniesieniu do 1 doby i 1 DJP. Najlepszymi rozwiązaniami technologiczno – funkcjonalnymi były dwie obory, które spełniły wszystkie ograniczenia. Były to: obora boksowa ściółkowa oraz boksowa bezściółkowa, obie z dużą obsadą, odpowiednio 144 DJP oraz 109 DJP. Jednocześnie, w tych dwóch oborach odnotowano najniższe jednostkowe koszty eksploatacji, które wynosiły 1710,98 PLN∙DJP-1 oraz 2088,57 PLN∙DJP-1.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

housing system; investment; exploitation costs; dairy cow; energy input

PL

system utrzymania; inwestycja; koszt eksploatacji; krowa dojna; nakład energetyczny

• Wydawca: Sieć Badawcza Łukasiewicz - Poznański Instytut Technologiczny
• Czasopismo: Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: Vol. 59, nr 1
• Strony: 109--115
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 27 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Romaniuk W.

• Department of Exploitation and Rural Buildings, Institute of Technology and Life Sciences in Falenty, Warsaw Branch, ul. Rakowiecka 32, 02-532 Warszawa, Poland

autor

Mazur K.

• Department of Exploitation and Rural Buildings, Institute of Technology and Life Sciences in Falenty, Warsaw Branch, ul. Rakowiecka 32, 02-532 Warszawa, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] Aubel E., Busemas R.: Baulösungen für die ökologische Milchviehhaltung. KTBL- Schrift, 2003, No 426, p. 235-240.
• [2] Burton C.H., Turner C.: Manure Management: Treatment Strategies for Sustainable Agriculture. Silsoe Research Inst., Bedford, UK, 2003, pp. 450.
• [3] Collier R. J., Hall L. W., Zimbleman R. B.: Quantifying Heat Stress and Its Impact on Metabolism and Performance. Department of Animal Sciences University of Arizona, 2012, pp. 68.
• [4] DAAS, Housing Design for cattle. Danish Recommendations. Third edition, Danish Agricultural Advisory Center, Skejby, Denmark, 2001, pp. 122.
• [5] Fernandez M.E.: Relationship between layout and timber structures in freestall dairy cattle barns: influence of internal features. Biosystems Engineering, 2008, vol. 100, p. 266-280.
• [6] Fiedorowicz: Technics in cattle breeding with basic zootechnics elements (in Polish), IBMER, Warsaw, 2007, pp. 290.
• [7] Freiberger F., Klindtworht, K., Baumeister, J., Gierse, A., Lehman, B., Ohnesorge, M.,Harms, J., & Wendl, G.: Automatische Melken in modernen Milchviehställe. KTBL, Darmstadt, 2005, pp. 141.
• [8] Gazzarin Ch.: Maschinenkosten ART–Bericht 747, Tänikon, 2011, pp. 56.
• [9] Hogeveen H., Meijering A.: Robotic milking. Proc. Int. Symp. Wageningen Pers, the Netherlands, 2000, p. 201-211.
• [10] Jorgensen H.: Development of Polish farm standards, XIIth International Conference „Agricultural engineering and the Environment”, Międzyzdroje, 2004, p. 76-77.
• [11] de Koning C.J.A.M.: Automatic milking – Common practice on dairy farms, 2011. www.milkproduction.com/Library/ Scientific-articles
• [12] de Koning C.J.A.M.: Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences, (Second Edition), 2011, p. 952-958, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374407-4.00360-5.
• [13] Lautner M., Miller A.M.: Kühe lieben keine heißen Tage sondern kühlen Kopf, Nachrichtsblatt Besammungsbv Neustadt a. d. Aisch., 2003, 149: 23-25. [In:] Jaśkowski M., Urbaniak K., Olechnowicz J.: Fertility disturbances caused by heat stress in cows – prophylactic measurements (in Polish), Życie Weter., 2005, 80 (1), p. 18-21.
• [14] Muzalewski A.: Exploitation costs of machines (in Polish), No 25. ITP, Falenty, 2010. ISBN 978-83-62416-05-9, pp. 56.
• [15] Næss, G. Bøe K. E.: Labour input in small cubicle dairy barns with different layouts and mechanization levels. Biosystems Engineering, 2011, 110 (2), p. 83-89.
• [16] Næss G., Stokstad G.: Dairy barn layout and construction: Effects on initial building costs. Biosystems Engineering, July, 2011, vol. 109, Iss. 3, pp. 196-202.
• [17] Ngwabie N.M., Jeppsson K.-H., Gustafsson G. and Nimmermark S.: Effects of animal activity and air temperature on methane and ammonia emissions from a naturally ventilated
• building for dairy cows. Atmospheric Environment, December, 2011, vol. 45, Issue: 37, p. 6760-6768.
• [18] Romaniuk W., Overby T.: Housing systems for cattle. Reference book Common work. (in Polish and English), Institute for Building, Mechanization and Electrification of Agriculture, Danish Agriculture Advisory Service, 2005, pp. 172.
• [19] Romaniuk W., Domasiewicz T., Łukaszuk M.: Design, evaluation and choice of the livestock building solutions, Problems of Agricultural Engineering, 2007, 1 (55), ISSN 1231-0093, p. 57-65.
• [20] Romaniuk W.: Current directions in the scope of building and technical equipment of modern cattle barns. (in Polish). 3rd Conference – Exhibition Cattle Farm. High School of Agribusiness, November 20-21, 2010. Łomża, Poland, p. 23-25.
• [21] Rozporządzenie 2010. Ordinance of Ministry of Agriculture and Land Development from 12th February 2010. in the scope of requirements and ways of procedings with farm animals breeds, to which protection norms in EU regulations were established, (in Polish), Dz.U. No. 56 item 344 and No 171 item. 1157, with changes from 15 December 2011, Dz.U. 2011 No 282 item 1652.
• [22] Rozporządzenie 2010. Ordinance of Ministry of Agriculture and Land Development from 28th June 2010. in the scope of minimal conditions of housing of these breeds of farm animals, different from for which protection norms in EU regulations were established (in Polish) Dz.U. 2010 No 116 item 778.
• [23] Samer M., Loebsin C., von Bobrutzki K., Fiedler M., Ammon C.; Berg W., Sanftleben, P., Brunsch, R.: A computer program for monitoring and controlling ultrasonic anemometers for aerodynamic measurements in animal buildings. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2011, vol. 79, Issue1, pp. 1-12.
• [24] Schick M., Volet M.R., Kaufmann R.: Modelling of time requirements and milking capacity in automatic milking systems with one or two milking stalls, 2000, p. 32-37.
• [25] Sonck B.R.: Labour organisation on robotic milking dairy farms. PhD thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, 1996, pp. 201.
• [26] Veissier I., Capdeville J., Delval E.: Cubicle housing systems for cattle: Comfort of dairy cows depends on cubicle adjustment, Journal of Animal Science, 2004, vol. 82 (11), p. 3321-3337.
• [27] Wechsler B.: An authorisation procedure for mass-produced farm animal housing systems with regard to animal welfare. Livestock Production Science, 2005, vol. 94, Issue 1-2, 2005, pp. 71-79.