Simulation of strong ground motions of 1991 Uttarkashi (M 7) and 1999 Chamoli (M 6.6) earthquakes using modified hybrid technique

Sharma, Anjali; Kumar, Dinesh; Paul, Ajay; Teotia, Satybir Singh

doi:10.1007/s11600-023-01125-1

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Simulation of strong ground motions of 1991 Uttarkashi (M 7) and 1999 Chamoli (M 6.6) earthquakes using modified hybrid technique

Autorzy

Sharma Anjali , Kumar Dinesh , Paul Ajay , Teotia Satybir Singh

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma

https://www.springer.com/journal/11600

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1007/s11600-023-01125-1

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

In the present study, 1991 Uttarkashi (M 7) and 1999 Chamoli (M 6.6) earthquakes that occurred on October 19, 1991, at 21:23:14 h and March 28, 1999, at 19:05:11 h, respectively, have been simulated using the modified hybrid technique. Hybrid technique is the combination of two existing techniques, i.e., envelope technique and composite source model technique. In the present modified technique, site amplification functions and kappa factor have also been incorporated. The simulated waveforms and their corresponding response and Fourier spectra for each site have been generated. In this study, simulation has been done at 11 and 9 recorded stations of Uttarkashi and Chamoli earthquakes, respectively. Important frequency - and time-domain parameters, i.e., Fourier spectra, response spectra, peak ground acceleration (PGA) and duration at stations, have been estimated and compared with the observed accelerograms. It has been observed that the simulated PGA (231 cm/s²) at the closest distance Bhatwari (22 km) matched with the observed one (248 cm/s²) for the Uttarkashi earthquake. The same has been observed at the nearest most station Gopeshwar (19 km) of the Chamoli earthquake. The simulated PGA (347 cm/s²) for this station has been found well matched with the observed PGA value (352 cm/s²). Similar matching has been observed for other stations also. The present technique is independent of velocity-Q structure of earth’s layered model and past events data of small earthquakes. This study brings light on the site effect and high-frequency decay parameter. This study can be very helpful in the estimation of seismic hazard in a specific region and designing earthquake-resistant buildings.

Słowa kluczowe

simulation strong ground motion earthquake peak ground acceleration seismic hazard analysis

Wydawca

Instytut Geofizyki PAN
Springer

Czasopismo

Acta Geophysica

Rocznik

2023

Tom

Vol. 71, no. 6

Strony

2573--2602

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 94 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Sharma Anjali

anjali.11587@gmail.com

Department of Geophysics, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, 136119, India
Wadia Institute Himalayan Geology, Dehradun, 248001, India

autor

Kumar Dinesh

Department of Geophysics, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, 136119, India

autor

Paul Ajay

Wadia Institute Himalayan Geology, Dehradun, 248001, India

autor

Teotia Satybir Singh

Department of Geophysics, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, 136119, India

Bibliografia

1. Abrahamson NA, Litehiser JJ (1989) Attenuation of vertical peak acceleration. Bull Seism Soc Am 79:549–580
2. Anderson JG, Yu G (1994) Predictability of strong ground motions from the Northridge, California Earthquake, 1994 SSA meeting, Northridge special section
3. Anderson JG, Hough SE (1984) A model for the shape of the Fourier amplitude spectrum of acceleration at high frequencies. Bull Seismol Soc Am 74(5):1969–1993
4. Anderson JG, Humphrey JR Jr (1947) A least squares method for objective determination of earthquake source parameters. Seismol Res Lett 62(3–4):201–209
5. Anderson JG (1991) Strong motion seismology, reviews of geophysics, seismology supplement, US national report to the international union of Geology and Geophysics 1987–1990, pp 700–720
6. Ascher U, Spudich P (1986) A hybrid collocation method for calculating complete theoretical seismograms in vertically varying media. Geophys J Int 86(1):19–40
7. Atkinson GM, Cassidy JF (2000) Integrated use of seismograph and strong-motion data to determine soil amplification: Response of the Fraser River Delta to the Duvall and Georgia Strait earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 90(4):1028–1040. https://doi.org/10.1785/0119990098
8. Bard PY, the SESAME Team (2005) Guidelines for the implementation of the H/V spectral ratio technique on ambient vibrations: measurements, processing and interpretation. SESAME European Research Project
9. Biasi GP, Smith KD (2001) Site effects for seismic monitoring stations in the vicinity of Yucca Mountain, Nevada. MOL20011204. 0045, A Report Prepared for the US DOE/University and Community College System of Nevada (UCCSN) Cooperative Agreement.
10. Boore DM (1983) Stochastic simulation of high-frequency ground motions based on seismological models of the radiated spectra. Bull Seismol Soc Am 73(6A):1865–1894
11. Boore DM (2003) Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method. Pure Appld Geophys 160:635–676
12. Boore DM, Atkinson GM (1987) Stochastic prediction of ground motion and spectral response parameters at hard-rock sites in eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 77(2):440–467
13. Bouchon M (1987) Numerical simulation of earthquake ground motion. In: Strong ground motion seismology. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 185–207
14. Brune JN (1970) Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes. J Geophys Res 75(26):4997–5009
15. Castro RR, Mucciarelli MF, Petrungaro C (1997) S-wave site response using horizontal to vertical spectral ratios. Bull Seismol Soc Am 87:256–260
16. Chopra S, Kumar D, Rastogi BK, Choudhury P, Yadav RBS (2013) Estimation of site amplification functions in Gujarat region. India Natural Hazards 65(2):1135–1155
17. Dan K, Tanaka T, Watanabe T (1987) Simulation and prediction of strong ground motion in epicentral region of 1979 imperial Valley earthquake by semi-empirical method. J Struct Construct Eng 373:50–62
18. Dan K, Watanabe T, Tanaka T (1990) Estimation of strong ground motion in epicentral region of the 1976 Tangshan, China, earthquake (Ms 7.8) by semi-empirical method. J Struct Construct Eng 407:23–33
19. Douglas J, Gehl P, Bonilla LF, Gélis C (2010) A κ model for mainland France. Pure Appl Geophys 167(11):1303–1315
20. Frankel A (1991) High-frequency spectral fall off earthquakes, fractal dimension of complex rupture, b-value, and the scaling of strength on faults. J Geophy Res 96:6291–6302
21. Hamzehloo H (2005) Strong ground motion modelling of causative fault for the 2002 Avaj earthquake, Iran. Tectonophysics 409:159–174
22. Hanks TC (1982) f max. Bull Seismol Soc Am 72(6A):1867–1879
23. Hartzell SH (1978) Earthquake aftershocks as Green’s functions. Geophys Res Lett 5:1–4
24. Imagawa K, Mikumo T (1982) Near-field seismic waveforms from major earthquakes and consideration on the rupture process on the fault, Zisin. J Seismol Soc Jpn 35:575–590
25. Irikura K (1983) Semi-empirical estimation of strong ground motions during large earthquakes. Bull Disaster Prevent Res Inst 33(2):63–104
26. Irikura K (1986) Prediction of strong acceleration motion using empirical Green’s function. In: Proceedings of 7th Japan earthquake engineering symposium, vol 151, pp 151–156
27. Joshi A (2003) Predicting strong motion parameters for the Chamoli earthquake of 28th March, 1999, Garhwal Himalaya, India, from simplified finite fault model. J Seismol 7:1–17
28. Joshi A (2014) Modeling of strong motion generation areas of the 2011 Tohoku, Japan earthquake using modified semi-empirical technique. Nat Hazards 71(1):587–609
29. Joshi A, Mohan K (2008) Simulation of accelerograms from simplified deterministic approach for the 23rd October 2004 Niigata-ken Chuetsu, Japan earthquake. J Seismolog 12(1):35–51
30. Joshi A, Kumar B, Sinvhal A, Sinvhal H (1999) Generation of Synthetic accelerograms by modeling of rupture plane, ISET. J Earthquake Technology 36:43–60
31. Joshi A, Singh S, Giroti KAVITA (2001) The simulation of ground motions using envelope summations. Pure Appl Geophys 158(5):877–901
32. Joshi A, Kumari P, Sharma ML, Ghosh AK, Agarwal MK, Ravikiran A (2012a) A strong motion model of the 2004 great Sumatra earthquake: simulation using a modified semi empirical method. J Earthq Tsunami 6(04):1250023
33. Joshi A, Kumari P, Singh S, Sharma ML (2012b) Near-field and far-field simulation of accelerograms of Sikkim earthquake of September 18, 2011 using modified semi-empirical approach. Nat Hazards 64(2):1029–1054
34. Kameda H, Sugito M (1978) Prediction of strong earthquake motions by evolutionary process model. In: Proceedings of the sixth Japan earthquake engineering symposium, pp 41–48
35. Kanamori H, Anderson DL (1975) Theoretical basis of some empirical relations in Seismology. Bull Seism Soc Am 65:1073–1095
36. Karimzadeh S, Askan A, Yakut A, Ameri G (2017) Assessment of alternative simulation techniques in nonlinear time history analyses of multi-story frame buildings: a case study. Soil Dyn
37. Khattri KN (1998) A seismic hazard and risk scenario for Himalaya and Ganga plains due to a future great earthquake. Nat Acad Sci Lett 21:193–220
38. Ktenidou OJ, Gélis C, Bonilla LF (2013) A study on the variability of kappa (κ) in a borehole: Implications of the computation process. Bull Seismol Soc Am 103(2A):1048–1068
39. Kumar D, Khattri KN (2002) A study of observed peak ground accelerations and prediction of accelerograms of 1999 Chamoli earthquake. Himalayan Geol 23(1):51–61
40. Kumar D, Ram VS, Khattri KN (2006) A study of source parameters, site amplification functions and average effective shear wave quality factor Q seff from analysis of accelerograms of the 1999 Chamoli earthquake. Himalaya Pure Appl Geophys 163(7):1369–1398
41. Kumar D, Teotia SS, Sriram V (2011) Modelling of strong ground motions from 1991 Uttarkashi, India, earthquake using a hybrid technique. Pure Appl Geophys 168(10):1621–1643
42. Kumar D, Khattri KN, Teotia SS, Rai SS (1999) Modelling of accelerograms of two Himalayan earthquakes using a novel semi-empirical method and estimation of accelerogram for a hypothetical great earthquake in the Himalaya. Curr Sci pp 819–830.
43. Kumar D (2001) A new technique for simulating accelerograms: Applications to the modeling of empirical accelerograms and evaluation of seismic hazard in Himalaya. Ph.D. thesis
44. Lai SSP (1982) Statistical characterization of strong ground motions using power spectral density function. Bull Seismol Soc Am 72(1):259–274
45. Latečki H, Molinari I, Stipčević J (2022) 3D physics-based seismic shaking scenarios for city of Zagreb, Capital of Croatia. Bull Earthq Eng 20(1):167–192
46. Lermo J, Chávez-García FJ (1993) Site efect evaluation using spectral ratios with only one station. Bull Seismol Soc Am 83(5):1574–1594
47. Li J, Cheng F, Lin G, Wu C (2022) Improved hybrid method for the generation of ground motions compatible with the multi-damping design spectra. J Earthq Eng, pp 1–27
48. Luco JE, Apsel RJ (1983) On the Green's functions for a layered half-space. Part I. Bull Seismol Soc Am 73(4):909–929
49. Margaris BN, Boore DM (1998) Determination of Δσ and κ 0 from response spectra of large earthquakes in Greece. Bull Seismol Soc Am 88(1):170–182
50. Midorikawa S (1993) Semi empirical estimation of peak ground acceleration from large earthquakes. Tectonophysics 218:287–295
51. Mikumo T, Irikura K, Imagawa K (1982) Near field strong motion synthesis from foreshock and aftershock records and rupture process of the main shock fault (abs.). IASPEI 21st general assembly, London
52. Mittal H, Wu YM, Chen DY, Chao WA (2016) Stochastic finite modeling of ground motion for March 5, 2012, Mw 4.6 earthquake and scenario greater magnitude earthquake in the proximity of Delhi. Nat Hazards 82(2):1123–1146
53. Motazedian D (2006) Region-Specific Key Seismic Parameters for Earthquakes in Northern Iran. Bull Seism Soc Am 96(4A):1383–1395
54. Motazedian D, Atkinson GM (2005) Stochastic finite-fault modeling based on a dynamic corner frequency. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95(3):995–1010
55. Mukhopadyay S, Sharma J, Del-Pezzo E, Kumar N (2010) Study of attenuation mechanism for Garwhal-Kumaun Himalayas from analysis of coda of local earthquakes. Phy Earth Plan Int 180:7–15
56. Mundepi AK, Mahajan AK (2010) Site response evolution and sediment mapping using horizontal to vertical spectral ratios (HVSR) of ground ambient noise in Jammu City, NW India. J Geol Soc India 75(6):799–806
57. Nakamura Y (1989) A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface. Quart Rep 30(1)
58. Nakata T, Otsuki K, Khan SH (1990) Active faults, stress field, and plate motion along the Indo Eurasian plate boundary. Tectonophysics 181:83–95
59. Nath S (2002) Determination of S-wave site response in the Garhwal Himalaya from the aftershock sequence of the 1999 chamoli earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92(3):1072–1081
60. Nath SK, Shukla K, Vyas M (2008) Seismic hazard scenario and attenuation model of the Garhwal Himalaya using near-field synthesis from weak motion seismometry. J Earth Syst Sci 117(2):649–670
61. Ni J, Barazangi M (1984) Seismotectonics of the Himalayan collision zone: geometry of the underthrusting Indian plate beneath the Himalaya. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 89(B2):1147–1163
62. Ordaz M, Arboleda J, Singh SK (1995) A scheme of random summation of an empirical Green’s function to estimate ground motions from future large earthquakes. Bull Seism Soc Am 85:1635–1647
63. Oth A, Bindi D, Parolai S, Di Giacomo D (2011) Spectral analysis of K-NET and KiK-net data in Japan, Part II: on attenuation characteristics, source spectra, and site response of borehole and surface stations. Bull Seismol Soc Am 101(2):667–687
64. Ou GB, Herrmann RB (1990) A statistical model for ground motion produced by earthquakes at local and regional distances. Bull Seism Soc Am 80:1397–1417
65. Porsani MJ, Stoffa PL, Sen MK, Chunduru RK, Wood WT (1993) A combined genetic and linear inversion algorithm for seismic waveform inversion. In: Proceedings of social exploration geophysicists. 63rd annual international meeting and exposition, Washington, DC, pp 692–695
66. Rezaeian S, Der Kiureghian A (2008) A stochastic ground motion model with separable temporal and spectral nonstationarities. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 37(13):1565–1584
67. Sandeep JA, Kamal KP, Kumari P (2014) Modeling of strong motion generation area of the Uttarkashi earthquake using modified semi- empirical approach. Nat Hazards 73:2041–2066
68. Sandhu M, Kumar D, Teotia SS (2011) Seismic hazard based on simulated accelerograms due to moderate/strong earthquakes in National Capital (Delhi) region. J Ind Geophys Union 15(1):77–83
69. Seeber L, Armbruster J, Quittmeyer R (1981) Seismicity and continental subduction in the Himalayan Arc. In: Gupta HK, Delany FM (eds) Hindu Kush Himalaya: Geodynamic Evolution Geodyn. Ser. 3. Am Geophys Union, Washington DC, pp 215–242
70. Sen M, Stoffa PL (1995) Global optimization methods in geophysical inversion. Elsevier, New York, p 281p
71. Shakiba S, Rahimi H, Pakzad M (2018) Simulation of strong ground motion of bam earthquake using stochastic finite fault method. In: Proceedings of the 18th Iranian geophysical conference, pp 642–645
72. Sharma A, Kumar D, Paul A (2020) Estimation of site response functions for the Kumaun-Garhwal region of Himalaya, India. J Seismolog 24:655–678
73. Sharma A, Yadav R, Kumar D, Paul A, Teotia SS (2021) Estimation of site response functions for the central seismic gap of Himalaya India. Nat Hazards 109(2):1899–1933
74. Si H, Midorikawa S (1999) New attenuation relationship for peak ground acceleration and velocity considering effects of fault type and site condition. J Struct Constr Eng AIJ 523:63–70 (in Japanese with English Caption and Abstract)
75. Silva WJ, Wong IG, Darragh RB (1991) Engineering characterization of earthquake strong ground motions with applications to the Pacific Northwest (No. 91–441-H). US Geological Survey
76. Spudich P, Archuleta RJ (1987) Techniques for earthquake groundmotion calculation with applications to source parameterization of finite faults. Seismic Strong Motion Synth 37:205–265
77. Sriram V, Khattri KN (1999) Modelling of strong ground motions from Dharmsala earthquake of 1986 (mb 5.7). Curr Sci 76:429–438
78. Srivastava P, Mitra G (1994) Thrust geometries and deep structure of the outer and lesser Himalaya, Kumaon and Garhwal (India): implications for evolution of the Himalayan fold-and-thrust-belt. Tectonics 13:89–109
79. Stafford PJ, Rodriguez-Marek A, Edwards B, Kruiver PP, Bommer JJ (2017) Scenario dependence of linear site-efect factors for short-period response spectral ordinates. Bull Seismol Soc Am 107(6):2859–2872
80. Su F, Zeng Y, Anderson JG (1994) Simulation of Landers earthquake strong ground motion using a composite source model. Seism Res Lett 65:p52
81. Sun X, Tao X, Wang G, Liu T (2009) Dynamic corner frequency in source spectral model for stochastic synthesis of ground motion. Earthq Sci 22(3):271–276
82. Suzuki Y, Koyamada K, Tokimatsu K (1995) Empirical correlation of soil liquefaction based on cone penetration test. Earthq Geotech Eng, pp 369–374
83. Tahghighi H (2012) Simulation of strong ground motion using the stochastic method: application and validation for near-fault region. J Earthq Eng 16(8):1230–1247
84. Toni M (2017) Simulation of strong ground motion parameters of the 1 June 2013 Gulf of Suez earthquake. Egypt NRIAG J Astron Geophys 6(1):30–40
85. Valdiya KS (1980) The two intracrustal boundary thrusts of the Himalaya. Tectonophysics 66(4):323–348
86. Yadav R, Kumar D (2021) Evaluating the seismic hazard to sikkim region of Himalaya using simulated accelerograms. J Earth Syst Sci
87. Yadav R (2019) Modelling of empirical accelerograms of 2011 Sikkim Earthquake (M 6.9), Kappa (κ)- Model For NE Region (India) and Scenerio Seismic Hazard Maps for Sikkim Region of Himalaya. Ph.D. Thesis, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, Haryana, India
88. Yu G, Khattri KN, Anderson JG, Brune JN, Zeng Y (1995) Strong ground motion from Uttarkashi, Himalaya, India, earthquake: Comparison of observations with synthetics using the composite source model. Bull Seism Soc Am 85:31–50
89. boundaries; Composite source model for estimation of strong ground motion and nonlinear soil response modelling, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nevada, Reno, USA
90. Zandieh A, Pezeshk S (2011) A study of horizontal-to-vertical component spectral ratio in the New Madrid seismic zone. Bull Seismol Soc Am 101(1):287–296
91. Zare M, Bard PY, Ghafory-Ashtiany M (1999) Site characterizations for the Iranian strong motion network. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 18(2):101–123
92. Zeng Y, Anderson JG, Yu G (1994) A composite source model for computing realistic synthetic strong ground motions. Geophys Res Lett 21:725–728
93. Zhang L, Chen G, Wu Y, Jiang H (2016) Stochastic ground-motion simulations for the 2016 Kumamoto, Japan, earthquake. Earth Planets Space 68(1):1–13
94. Zhu C, Cotton F, Pilz M (2020) Detecting site resonant frequency using HVSR: Fourier versus response spectrum and the first versus the highest peak frequency. Bull Seismol Soc Am 110(2):427–440

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-8acc768b-b9ff-4d0c-a9fa-be64c20150f1