Tytuł artykułu
Autorzy
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Wydajnosść architektury ASON/GMPLS w warunkach konwersji i braku konwersji długości fali
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
The paper regards the problem of ASON/GMPLS performance in condition of wavelength and without wavelength conversion. The authors present influence analysis in condition of wavelength and non-wavelength conversion on the ASON/GMPLS control plane performance represented by mean Connection Set-up Time E (CST) and request loss probabilities. The offered traffic to the transport layer and request intensity have been changed for evaluation process. The influence analysis is performed with simulation method by using OMNeT4 -t- discrete-event simulator for Poland single domain structure.
Przedstawiono problem wydajności architektury ASON/ GMPLS w warunkach konwersji i braku konwersji długości fali. Dokonano analizy wpływu konwersji i braku konwersji na wydajność płaszczyzny sterowania architektury ASON/ GMPLS. Wydajność płaszczyzny sterowania oceniana jest na podstawie uzyskanych wartości średniego czasu zestawiania połącznia E (CST) i prawdopodobienstwa strat zadania. Oceny wydajności dokonano w warunkach zmiany natężenia ruchu oferowanego do warstwy transportowej i intensywności żądań. Analizy wydajności przeprowadzono metody symulacji z wykorzystaniem środowiska symulatora zdarzeń dyskretnych OMNeT++ dla polskiej jednodomenowej struktury sieci.
Wydawca
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
653--657
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 19 poz., rys.
Twórcy
autor
- Gdańsk University of Technology, Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics, Department of Teleinformation Networks
autor
- Gdańsk University of Technology, Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics, Department of Teleinformation Networks
autor
- Gdańsk University of Technology, Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics, Department of Teleinformation Networks
Bibliografia
- [1] Barry R., R Humblet. 1996. “Models of Blocking Probability in All-Optical Networks with and without Wavelength Changers". IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., 14 (5): 858-867.
- [2] Gerstel O., G. Sasaki, S. Kutten, R. Ramaswami. 1999. ,,Worst-Case Analysis of Dynamic Wavelength Allocation in Optical Networks". IEEEI ACM Transactions on Networking, 7 (6): 833-845.
- [3] Xiaowen Chu, Bo Li, Zhensheng Zhang. 2003. “A dynamic RWA algorithm in a wavelength-routed all-optical network with wavelength converters". INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-Second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications. IEEE Societies, 3 (3): 1795-1804.
- [4] Lee Y, G. Bernstein, D. LJ, W. Imajuku. 2015. “Routing and Wavelength Assignment Information Model for Wavelength Switched Optical Networks", RFC 7446. IETF.
- [5] Lee Y, G. Bernstein, D. LJ, W. Imajuku. 2011. “Framework for GMPLS and Path Computation Element (PCE) Control of Wavelength Switched Optical Networks (WSONs)", RFC 6163. IETF.
- [6] ITU-T Recommendation G.8080/Y1304. 2012 “Architecture for the Automatically Switched Optical Network (ASON)".
- [7] Mannie E. 2004. “Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Architecture". RFC 3945. IETF.
- [8] Parrel A., I. Bryskin. 2006. “GMPLS, Architecture and applications". Morgan Kaufmann Publisher.
- [9] Cavazzoni C., V. Barosco, et al. 2003. ,,The IP/MPLS Over ASON/ GMPLS Test Bed of the 1ST Project UON". Journal of Lightwave Technology, 21 (11): 279-2803.
- [10] Munoz R., et al. 2004. “Experimental demonstration of two new GMPLS lightpath setup protocols for soft-permanent connections over Metro-DWDM DPRing implemented on EMPIRICO ASON testbed", Global Telecommunications Conference. GLOBECOM W. IEEE (3): 1798-1802.
- [11] Spath J., G. Maier, G., et al. 2006. “Mupbed: a pan-European prototype for multidomain research networks", Photonics in Switching. 2006. PS W. International Conference.
- [12] Mart'inez R., R. Munoz, J. Sorribes, J. Cornelias and G. Junyent. 2005. “Experimental GMPLS-based dynamic routing in all-optical wavelength-routed networks", 7th IEEE International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON2005).
- [13] Kaczmarek S., M. Młynarczuk, R Zieńko. 2013. “Influence analysis of selected parameters on the ASON/GMPLS control plane performance". Telecommunication Review + Telecommunication News 86 (8-9): 696-701.
- [14] ITU-T Recommendation G.7713.2/Y 1704.2. 2003. ..Distributed Call and Connection Management: Signalling mechanism using GMPLS RSVP-TE".
- [15] ITU-T Recommendation G.7715.1/Y1706.1. 2004. ,,ASON routing architecture and requirements for link state protocols".
- [16] OIF Guideline Document. 2008. ..Signaling Protocol Interworking of ASON/GMPLS Network Domains".
- [17] Kompella K., Y Rekhter.2005. ,,OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)", RFC 4203. IETF [18] OMNet++ Network Simulation Framework, www.omnetpp.org.
- [19] Kaczmarek S., M. Młynarczuk, R Zieńko., 2013. ”Call and Connections Times in ASON/GMPLS Architecture", Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology, (3): 80-88.
Uwagi
PL
Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-8a618834-3a0f-4e8f-ba7a-8b0c10957c8f