Development and financing of infrastructure investments to shape sustainable and resilient mobility

• Autorzy: Motowidlak Urszula , Motowidlak Tomasz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2023.170.22

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The aim of the study is to identify the essential attributes that determine the development of a sustainable, innovative and resistant to disruption transport infrastructure and to answer two research questions: How to shape models for the development of sustainable and innovative transport infrastructure, while maintaining the logistic continuity of mobility and transport systems? and What actions should organizations take in the conditions of permanent change in order to maintain operational efficiency and cost-effectiveness of implemented investments, not only thinking about the possible return of the pandemic, but also about increasingly difficult access to resources, climate change and social needs? Design/methodology/approach: The research methods and techniques used included, among others: content analysis, cause and effect analysis, selected methods of qualitative and quantitative analysis, which were used to present and discuss the results of the study. Findings: Searching for methods of operationalization of the implementation of the assumptions of the new development paradigm, a conceptual framework for the model of sustainable development of transport infrastructure was developed. EU programs and instruments supporting the financing of activities in the field of development of sustainable, innovative and resilient transport infrastructure were reviewed. Attributes were indicated so that the development would strive for the simultaneous implementation of economic, social and environmental goals. Research limitations/implications: The study did not measure the sustainability of infrastructure investments in transport. The precondition for successfully performing such a task is the availability of an accurate data set and the selection of appropriate measurement indicators. This has implications for future research. Practical implications: One of the key challenges in cities is making decisions about investments in the development of economically effective, environmentally safe and socially important transport infrastructure. Hence, the development of algorithmic approaches that allow the use of the proposed qualitative model may contribute to improving the efficiency in making investment decisions.Originality/value: The originality of the conducted research was achieved through its measurable character. The proposed model can contribute to the improvement of decision-making tools in the field of allocation of public and other funds for investments, so that they contribute to the sustainability of mobility systems.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

transport infrastructure; sustainable development; financial instruments

PL

infrastruktura transportowa; zrównoważony rozwój; instrumenty finansowe

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: z. 170
• Strony: 349--370
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 51 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Motowidlak Urszula

• Institute of Logistics and Informatics, Faculty of Economics and Sociology, University of Lodz

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2777-9451

autor

Motowidlak Tomasz

• Institute of International Economics, Faculty of Economics and Sociology, University of Lodz

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9948-4591

Bibliografia

• 1. Action Plan: Financing Sustainable Growth, Communication From The Commission to The European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and The Committee of The Regions. COM(2018) 97, (2018).
• 2. Adamczyk, J. (2001). Koncepcja zrównoważonego rozwoju w zarządzaniu przedsiębiorstwem. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej w Krakowie.
• 3. Ahern, J. (2011). From fail-safe to safe-to-fail: Sustainability and resilience in the new urban world. Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 100, Iss. 4, pp. 341-343, doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021.
• 4. Bhattacharya, A., Meltzer, J.P., Oppenheim, J., Qureshi, Z., Stern, N. (2016). Delivering Sustainable Infrastructure for Better Development and Better Climate. Washington: The Global Commission on the Economy on Climate.
• 5. Bhattacharya, A., Oppenheim, J., Stern, N. (2015). Driving Sustainable Development Through Better Infrastructure: Key Elements of a Transformation Program. Program Working Paper, 91. Washington: Global Economy and Development.
• 6. Champagne, M., Dubé, J. (2023). The impact of transport infrastructure on firms’ location decision: A meta-analysis based on a systematic literature review. Transport Policy, vol. 131, pp. 139-155, doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.11.015.
• 7. Chen, Z. (27.08.2013). Spatial impact of transportation infrastructure: a spatial econometric CGE approach. The 53rd European Regional Science Association Congress, Palermo, Italy.
• 8. Cho, S., Choi, K. (2021). Transport accessibility and economic growth: Implications for sustainable transport infrastructure investments. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, vol. 15, Iss. 8, pp. 641-652, doi: 10.1080/15568318.2020.1774946.
• 9. Climate risk and response. physical hazards and socioeconomic impacts (2020). Washington: McKinsey Global Institute, pp. 1-164.
• 10. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139 of 4 June 2021 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council by establishing technical screening criteria to determine the conditions under which a given economic activity qualifies as making a significant contribution to mitigation climate change or adaptation to climate change, as well as determining whether this economic activity does not cause serious damage to any of the other environmental objectives, EU L 442 (2021).
• 11. Commission Work Programme 2022. Making Europe stronger together, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and The Committee of The Regions, COM(2021) 645, (2021).
• 12. Connecting Europe Facility. Retrieved from https://transport.ec.europa.eu/transport-themes/infrastructure-and-investment/connecting-europe-facility_en, 20.10.2022.
• 13. Crossing the Bridge to Sustainable Infrastructure Investing: Exploring Ways to Make it Across. (2017). Washington DC: Mercer and Inter-American Development Bank.
• 14. Czyżewski, A., Staniszewski, J. (2018). Dylematy operacjonalizacji paradygmatu zrównoważonego rozwoju rolnictwa z wykorzystaniem pojęcia ekoefektywności. Zeszyty Naukowe Szkoły Głównej Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie. Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, tom 18(XXXIII), zeszyt 2, pp. 44-56, doi.10.22630/PRS.2018.18.2.33.
• 15. Delivering TEN-T: Facts & figures (2017). Brussels: DG MOVE.
• 16. Eadie, R., Browne, M., Odeyinka, H., McKeown, C., McNiff, S. (2013). BIM implementation throughout the UK construction project lifecycle: an analysis. Automation in Construction, vol. 36, pp. 145–151, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2013.09.001.
• 17. EU and the Paris Climate Agreement: Taking stock of progress at Katowice COP, Report From The Commission to The European Parliament and The Council, COM(2018) 716 (2018).
• 18. EU funds and financing for resilient local mobility, to climate change (2022). EU Policy Paper.
• 19. European Commission (2019). Transport in the European Union: Current Trends and Issues.
• 20. European Green Deal, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, 2019, the European Council, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2019) 640 (2019).
• 21. Greenhouse gas emissions from transport in Europe (2022). Retrieved from: https://www.eea.europa.eu/ims/greenhouse-gas-emissions-from-transport, 9.09.2022.
• 22. Horizon Europe (2021). Research & Innovation. EU Program for 2021-2027. European Commission. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/horizon-europe, 20.10.2022.
• 23. Kwasniok, R. European Investment Bank (EIB). Changing Transport. Facilitating climate actions in mobility. Retrieved from: https://changing-transport.org/european-investment-bank-eib/, 21.10.2022.
• 24. Kyriacou, A.P, Muinelo-Gallo, L., Roca-Sagalés, O. (2019). The efficiency of transport infrastructure investment and the role of government quality: An empirical analysis. Transport Policy, vol. 74, pp. 93-102, doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.11.017.
• 25. Las Palmas saves the climate one MetroGuagua at a time (2017). Retrieved from: https://www.eib.org/en/stories/las-palmas-metroguagua.htm, 23.10.2022.
• 26. Lipińska-Słota, A., Mutwil, A. (2019). Elementy infrastruktury systemów logistycznych. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach.
• 27. Marcinek, K. (2018). Infrastruktura zrównoważona – rozważania o istocie i cechach w kontekście zrównoważonego rozwoju. Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, nr 374, pp. 92-110.
• 28. Munyasya, B.M., Chileshe, N. (2018). Towards sustainable infrastructure development: Drivers, barriers, strategies, and coping mechanisms. Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 12, 4341, pp. 1-18, doi: 10.3390/su10124341.
• 29. OECD (2020). Building back better: A sustainable, resilient recovery after COVID-19. Paris: OECD Publishing.
• 30. Polyzos, S., Tsiotas, D. (2020). The Contribution of Transport Infrastructures to the Economic and Regional Development: A Review of the Conceptual Framework. Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, vol. 15, pp. 5-23, doi: 10.2307/26868292.
• 31. Proposal for a Regulation of The European Parliament and of The Council on European green bonds, COM(2021) 391 (2021).
• 32. Przybyłowski, A., Podbielska, M. (2017). Publiczny transport zbiorowy w Gdańsku w kontekście równoważenia rozwoju miast. Studia i Prace Wydziału Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarządzania Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, nr 47, tom 2, pp. 253-264.
• 33. PwC (2022). Global infrastructure trends. Retrieved from: https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/ industries/capital-projects-infrastructure/publications/infrastructure-trends.html, 11.12.2022.
• 34. Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2020 on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investments, amending Regulation (EU) 2019/2088, EU L 198 (2020).
• 35. Regulation (EU) 2021/1058 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 June 2021 on the European Regional Development Fund and the Cohesion Fund, UE L 231/60 (2021).
• 36. Rogall, H. (2010). Ekonomia zrównoważonego rozwoju. Teoria i praktyka. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Zysk i S-ka.
• 37. Serrano, W. (2015). Big Data in Smart Infrastructure. In: Y. Bi, S. Kapoor, R. Bhatia (eds.), Intelligent Systems and Applications (pp. 703-732). London: Springer.
• 38. Stanley, Jo., Stanley, J. Everyone aboard: Integrating social inclusion values into planning transport projects. Retrieved from: https://www.gihub.org/articles/everyone-aboard-integrating-social-inclusion-values-into-planning-transport-projects/, 2.03.2022.
• 39. Strategy for Financing the Transition to a Sustainable Economy, Communication From The Commission to The European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic And Social Committee and The Committee of The Regions, COM(2021) 390 (2021).
• 40. Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy – putting European transport on track for the future, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2020) 789 (2020).
• 41. Sustainable Europe Investment Plan. European Green Deal Investment Plan, Communication From The Commission to The European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and The Committee of The Regions, COM(2020) 21 (2020).
• 42. Transport infrastructure: EUR 292.5 million of EU funding for projects contributing to greener mobility. European Climate Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency. Retrieved from https://cinea.ec.europa.eu/news-events/news/transport-infrastructure-eur-2925-million-eu-funding-projects-contributing-greener-mobility-2022-09-12_en, 20.10.2022.
• 43. Transport infrastructure: projects receive EUR 425 million in EU funding to boost green mobility and to adapt the network for dual civil/defence use. European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency. Retrieved from: https://cinea.ec.europa.eu/news-events/news/transport-infrastructure-projects-receive-eur-425-million-eu-funding-boost-green-mobility-and-adapt-2022-04-08_en, 9.08.2022.
• 44. UN (2015). Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A/RES/70/1.
• 45. Weber, B., Alfen, H., Staub-Bisang, M. (2016). Infrastructure as an Asset Class: Investment Strategy, Sustainability. Project Finance and PPP. Wiley: Chichester, UK.
• 46. White Paper. Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area – Towards a Competitive and Resource Efficient Transport System, 2011, COM(2011) 144 (2011).
• 47. World Economic Forum (2021). Retrieved from: https://www.theglobaleconomy.com/ rankings/roads_quality/, 17.03.2022.
• 48. Yannis, G., Chaziris, A. (2022). Transport System and Infrastructure. Transportation Research Procedia, vol. 60, pp. 6-11, doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2021.12.002.
• 49. Zaremba, T. (2014). Inwestycje infrastrukturalne w teorii makroekonomii i badaniach ekonometrycznych. In: J. Gajewski, W. Paprocki (eds.), Dylematy rozwoju infrastruktury (pp. 26-47). Gdańsk: Instytut Badań nad Gospodarką – Gdańska Akademia Bankowa.
• 50. Zhou, J., Raza, A., Sui, H. (2021). Infrastructure Investment and Economic Growth Quality: Empirical Analysis of China’s Regional Development. Applied Economics, vol. 53, Iss. 23, pp. 2615-2630, doi: 10.1080/00036846.2020.1863325.
• 51. Zielone obligacje przyciągają ekologiczne inwestycje (2021). PFR dla miast. Retrieved from: https://pfrdlamiast.pl/baza-miejskich-innowacji/zielone-obligacje-przyciagaja-, 17.10.2022.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).