PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

A revision of Campyloprion Eastman, 1902 (Chondrichthyes, Helicoprionidae), including new occurrences from the Upper Pennsylvanian of New Mexico and Texas, USA

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Konferencja
Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Early and Lower Vertebrates
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Campyloprion Eastman, 1902 is a chondrichthyan having an arched symphyseal tooth whorl similar to that of Helicoprion Karpinsky, 1899, but less tightly coiled. The holotype of Campyloprion annectans Eastman, 1902, the type species of Campyloprion, is of unknown provenance, but is presumed to be from the Pennsylvanian of North America. Campyloprion ivanovi (Karpinsky, 1922) has been described from the Gzhelian of Russia. A partial symphyseal tooth whorl, designated as Campyloprion cf. C. ivanovi, is reported from the Missourian Tinajas Member of the Atrasado Formation of Socorro County, New Mexico, USA. Partial tooth whorls from the Virgilian Finis Shale and Jacksboro Limestone Members of the Graham Formation of northern Texas, USA, are designated as Campyloprion sp. Two partial tooth whorls from the Gzhelian of Russia that were previously referred to C. ivanovi are designated as Campyloprion cf. C. annectans. The age of Toxoprion lecontei (Dean, 1898), from Nevada, USA, is corrected from the Carboniferous to the early Permian. An alternative interpretation of the holotype of T. lecontei is presented, resulting in a reversal of its anterior-to-posterior orientation. The genera Helicoprion, Campyloprion, and Shaktauites Tchuvashov, 2001 can be distinguished by their different spiral angles.
Rocznik
Strony
403--419
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 57 poz., rys.
Twórcy
autor
  • Natural History Museum, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
autor
  • New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87104, USA
Bibliografia
  • 1. Barrick, J.E., Lucas, S.G. and Krainer, K. 2013. Conodonts of the Atrasado Formation (uppermost Middle to Upper Pennsylvanian), Cerros de Amado region, central New Mexico, U.S.A. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin, 59, 239-252.
  • 2. Bendix-Almgreen, S.E. 1966. New investigations of Helicoprion from the Phosphoria Formation of south-east Idaho, U.S.A. Biologiske Skrifter udgivet af Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab, 14, 1-54.
  • 3. Boardman, D.R., II and Heckel, P.H. 1989. Glacial-eustatic sea-level curve for early Late Pennsylvanian sequence in north-central Texas and biostratigraphic correlation with curve for midcontinent North America. Geology, 17, 802-805.
  • 4. Buzas-Stephens, P. and Kocurko, M.J. 1993. Non-fusulinid foraminifera of the Upper Pennsylvanian Finis Shale, including the description of an enigmatic taxon. Tulane Studies in Geology and Paleontology, 26, 27-33.
  • 5. Davydov, V.I., Snyder, W.S. and Spinosa, C. 1997. Permian foraminiferal biostratigraphy and sequence stratigraphy of Nevada. Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, Special Publication, 36, 31-34.
  • 6. Dean, B. 1898. On a new species of Edestus, E. lecontei from Nevada. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 16, 61-69.
  • 7. Duffin, C.J. 2016. Cochliodonts and chimaeroids: Arthur Smith Woodward and the Holocephalians. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 430, 137-154.
  • 8. Eastman, C.R. 1902a. On Campyloprion, a new form of Edestus-like dentition. Geological Magazine, 9, 148-152.
  • 9. Eastman, C.R. 1902b. Some Carboniferous cestraciont and acanthodian sharks. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 39, 55-99.
  • 10. Eastman, C.R. 1903. On the nature of Edestus and related forms. In: Parker, G.H. (Ed.), Mark Anniversary Volume, pp. 279-289. Henry Holt; New York.
  • 11. Ellison, S.P. 1941. Revision of the Pennsylvanian conodonts. Journal of Paleontology, 15, 107-143.
  • 12. Enault, S., Guinot, G., Koot, M.B. and Cuny, G. 2015. Chondrichthyan tooth enameloid: past, present, and future. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 174, 549-570.
  • 13. Gillis, J.A. and Donoghue, P.C.J. 2007. The homology and phylogeny of chondrichthyan tooth enameloid. Journal of Morphology, 268, 33-49.
  • 14. Ginter, M., Hampe, O. and Duffin, C.J. 2010. Chondrichthyes: Paleozoic Elasmobranchii: Teeth. In: Schultze, H.-P. (Ed.), Handbook of Paleoichthyology 3D, pp. 1-168. Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil; Munich.
  • 15. Hay, O.P. 1907. A new genus and species of fossil shark related to Edestus Leidy. Science, 26, 22-24.
  • 16. Hay, O.P. 1910. On the nature of Edestus and related genera, with descriptions of one new genus and three new species. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 37, 43-61.
  • 17. Hay, O.P. 1912. On an important specimen of Edestus; with description of a new species, Edestus mirus. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 42, 31-38.
  • 18. Hay, O.P. 1929. Second bibliography and catalogue of the fossil Vertebrata of North America. Volume 1, 1-934. Carnegie Institution; Washington, D.C.
  • 19. Hess, J.W. (Ed.) 2013. Visitor Guide. Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colorado, USA. http://www.geosociety. org/documents/gsa/about/VisitorGuide.pdf.
  • 20. Huxley, T.H. 1880. On the application of the laws of evolution to the arrangement of the Vertebrata, and more particularly of the Mammalia. Proceedings of the Scientific Meetings of the Zoological Society of London for 1880, 649-662.
  • 21. Itano, W.M. 2014. Edestus, the strangest shark? First report from New Mexico, North American paleobiogeography, and a new hypothesis on its method of predation. Mountain Geologist, 51, 201-221.
  • 22. Itano, W.M. 2015. An abraded tooth of Edestus (Chondrichthyes, Eugeneodontiformes): evidence for a unique mode of predation. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science, 118, 1-9.
  • 23. Itano, W.M. 2018. A tooth whorl of Edestus heinrichi (Chondrichthyes, Eugeneodontiformes) displaying progressive macrowear. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science, 121, 125-133.
  • 24. Itano, W.M., Houck, K.J. and Lockley, M.G. 2012. Systematics and occurrences of Edestus (Chondrichthyes) worldwide and new occurrences from Colorado and Texas. Historical Biology, 24, 397-410.
  • 25. Jaekel, O. 1899. Ueber die Organisation der Petalodonten. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft, 51, 258-298.
  • 26. Karpinsky, A.P. 1899. Über die Reste von Edestiden und die neue Gattung Helicoprion. Verhandlungen der Russisch-Kaiserlichen Mineralogischen Gesellschaft, 36, 361-475.
  • 27. Karpinsky, A.P. 1911. On Helicoprion and other Edestidae. Bulletin de l’Académie Impériale des Sciences de St. Pétersbourg, 5 (16), 1105-1122. [In Russian]
  • 28. Karpinsky, A.P. 1922. Helicoprion ivanovi, n. sp. Bulletin de l’Académie des Sciences de Russie, 16, 369-378. [In Russian]
  • 29. Kimberley, M.M. 1989. Fitting a logarithmic spiral to a headland- bay beach. Computers and Geosciences, 15, 1089-1108.
  • 30. Kulagina, E.I., Skuin, I.A. and Kossovaya, O.L. 2015. Permian reef Shakhtau, 1-72. Belaya Reka; Ufa. [In Russian]
  • 31. Lebedev, O.A. 2001. Chapter 7. Vertebrates. In: Makhlina, M.K., Alekseev, A.S., Goreva, A.S., Gorjunova, R.V., Isakova, T.N. , Kosovaya, O.L., Lazarev, S.S., Lebedev, O.A. and Shkolin, A.A. (Eds), Srednij karbon Moskovskoy sineklizy (yuzhnaya chast’). Tom 2, pp. 92-104. Nauchnyi Mir; Moscow. [In Russian]
  • 32. Lebedev, O.A. 2009. A new specimen of Helicoprion Karpinsky, 1899 from Kazakhstanian Cisurals and a new reconstruction of its tooth whorl position and function. Acta Zoologica (Stockholm), 90 (Suppl. 1), 171-182.
  • 33. Leidy, J. 1856. Indications of five species, with two new genera, of extinct fishes. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 7, 414.
  • 34. Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema naturae: per regna tria natura, ed. 10, vol. 1, iii + 1–824. Laurentii Salvii; Stockholm, Holmiae.
  • 35. Lucas, S.G., Krainer, K. and Barrick, J.E. 2009. Pennsylvanian stratigraphy and conodont biostratigraphy in the Cerros de Amado, Socorro County, New Mexico. New Mexico Geological Society, Guidebook, 60, 183-212.
  • 36. Lund, R. and Grogan, E.D. 1997. Relationships of the Chimaeriformes and the basal radiation of the Chondrichthyes. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 7, 65-123.
  • 37. McKinzie, M. 2003. Late Pennsylvanian marine sharks of Texas. Occasional Papers of the Dallas Paleontological Society, 6, 111-128.
  • 38. McKinzie, M. and McLeod, J. 2003. Finis Shale. Occasional Papers of the Dallas Paleontological Society, 6, 75-110.
  • 39. Nielsen, E. 1932. Permo-Carboniferous fishes from East Greenland. Meddelelser om Grønland, 86, 1-63.
  • 40. Nielsen, E. 1952. On new or little known Edestidae from the Permian and Triassic of East Greenland. Meddelelser om Grønland, 144 (5), 1-55.
  • 41. Nolan, T.B., Merriam, C.W. and Blake, M.C., Jr. 1974. Geologic map of the Pinto Summit Quadrangle, Eureka and White Pine Counties, Nevada. Miscellaneous Investigations Series, Map I-793, US Geological Survey.
  • 42. Nolan, T.B., Merriam, C.W. and Brew, D.A. 1971. Geologic Map of the Eureka Quadrangle, Eureka and White Pine Counties, Nevada. Miscellaneous Geologic Investigations, Map I-612, US Geological Survey.
  • 43. Obruchev, D.V. 1953. A study of the edestids and the work of A. P. Karpinskii. Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta Akademii Nauk SSSR, 45, 1-85. [In Russian]
  • 44. Obruchev, D.V. 1964. Subclass Holocephali (Chimeras). In: Obruchev, D.V. (Ed.), Fundamentals of Paleontology. Vol. 11: Agnatha, Pisces, pp. 238-266. Izdatel’stvo Nauka; Moscow. [In Russian]
  • 45. OED Online. 2018. “spiral, n.” Oxford University Press. http:// www.oed.com/view/Entry/186804. Accessed 23 May 2018.
  • 46. Petukhov, S.V., Petrov, G.S. and Pakhomov, I.O. 2011. First record of eugeneodntiformes (Chondrichthyes) in the Middle Carboniferous of the lower Volga region. In: Lebedev, O. and Ivanov, A. (Eds), Abstract Volume of the II International Obruchev Symposium “Paleozoic Early Vertebrates”, p. 39. St. Petersburg University; St. Petersburg.
  • 47. Radinsky, L. 1981. Tooth histology as a taxonomic criterion for cartilaginous fishes. Journal of Morphology, 109, 73-92.
  • 48. Raup, D.M. 1961. The geometry of coiling in gastropods. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 47, 602-609.
  • 49. Raup, D.M. 1966. Geometric analysis of shell coiling: General problems. Journal of Paleontology, 40, 1178-1190.
  • 50. Sommer, H.J. III. 1998. fit_logspiral.m, Version 08.10.14, Version 08.10.14. Matlab Central File Exchange, https://www. mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/21749-fit- logarithmic-spiral-to-x-y-data. Accessed 23 May 2018.
  • 51. Stevens, C.H., Wagner, D.B. and Sumsion, R.S. 1979. Permian fusulinid biostratigraphy, central Cordilleran miogeosyncline. Journal of Paleontology, 53, 29-36.
  • 52. Strawson, F.M. Jr. 1981. The geology of the Permian Carbon Ride Formation, east-central Nevada, 1-221. Unpublished. University of Nevada; Reno, Nevada, USA.
  • 53. Tapanila, L. and Pruitt, J. 2013. Unraveling species concepts for the Helicoprion tooth whorl. Journal of Paleontology, 87, 965-983.
  • 54. Tapanila, L., Pruitt, J., Pradel, A., Wilga, C.D., Ramsay, J.B., Schlader, R. and Didier, D.A. 2013. Jaws for a spiral-tooth whorl: CT images reveal novel adaptation and phylogeny in fossil Helicoprion. Biology Letters, 9, 20130057.
  • 55. Tchuvashov, B.I. 2001. Permian sharks of the family Helicoprionidae: stratigraphic and geographic distribution, ecology, a new member. Materialy po stratigrafii i palaeontologii Urala, 6, 12-27. [In Russian]
  • 56. Woodward, H. 1886. On a remarkable ichthyodorulite from the Carboniferous Series, Gascoyne, Western Australia. Geological Magazine, 3, 1-7.
  • 57. Zangerl, R. 1981. Chondrichthyes I: Paleozoic elasmobranchii. In: Schultze, H.-P. (Ed.), Handbook of Paleoichthyology 3A, pp. 1-115. Gustav Fischer Verlag; Stuttgart.
Uwagi
PL
Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2018).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-89fea6a1-d124-4bbb-82f6-16c1252c5e88
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.