Influence of composition of curing agent and sand ratio of engineering excavated soil on mechanical properties of fluidized solidified soil

• Autorzy: Liu Shuai , Zhang Jinsheng , Wang Xiaoli

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/msp-2023-0007

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

With the continuous expansion of the urban scale, the development of engineering construction has been accelerated. In this process, excavated engineered soils produced in the construction process are facing the problem of difficult treatment. In this work, the influence of the composition ratio of different curing agents on the strength of fluidized solidified soil was studied. It was found that when the proportion of fly ash and quicklime in the curing agent was 1:1, and the percentage of the curing agent in the soil was 15%, the 28 days unconfined compressive strength of fluidized solidified soil reached the maximum value. When the composition and content of the curing agent and the slump of the fluidized solidified soil remained unchanged, the strength and water stability of the fluidized solidified soil increased with the increase of the sand ratio of the excavated engineered soil. X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showed that with the increase of sand in the soil ratio, more needle-like ettringite crystals were produced in the fluidized solidified soil, which were more compact, had fewer voids, and had higher overall compactness. The carbon emissions of the prepared fluidized solidified soil and the common backfill materials were calculated, and it proved that the carbon emissions of the fluidized solidified soil were the lowest. Therefore, this work offers a new method for resource utilization of excavated soil and provides a carbon emission reference for green low-carbon building materials. Finally, it was recommended to choose engineered excavation soil with high sand content to obtain higher performance from fluidized solidified soil.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

engineered excavated soil; fluidized solidified soil; composition ratio; mechanical properties; carbon emission

• Wydawca: De Gruyter
• Czasopismo: Materials Science Poland
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: Vol. 41, No. 1
• Strony: 57--67
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 32 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Liu Shuai

• China Construction Eighth Engineering Division Corp., Ltd. Southwest Branch, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China

autor

Zhang Jinsheng

• China Construction Eighth Engineering Division Corp., Ltd. Southwest Branch, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
• School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China

autor

Wang Xiaoli

• China Construction Eighth Engineering Division Corp., Ltd. Southwest Branch, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China

Bibliografia

• [1] Zhang N, Duan HB, Sun PW, Li JB, Zuo J, MaoRC, et al. Characterizing the generation and environmental impacts of subway-related excavatedsoil and rock in China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020;248: 119242.1–119242.11. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119242
• [2] Duan HB, Wang JY, Huang QF. Encouraging the environmentally sound management of C&D waste in China: An integrative review and research agenda. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2015;43: 611–620. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.069
• [3] Duan HB, Miller TR, Liu G, Tam VWY. Construction debris becomes growing concern of growing cities. Waste Management. 2019;83:1–5. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.10.044
• [4] Wu LB, Zhan LT, Zhang S, Song X, Lu JY, Wang Y. Decision analysis on disposal of large quantities of excavated soft soil in abandoned mines using a Bayesian network. International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment. 2022;36(6): 419–442. DOI: 10.1080/17480930.2022.2059868
• [5] Huang T, Kou SC, Liu DY, Li DW, Xing F. A BIM-GIS-IoT-Based system for excavated soil recycling. Buildings. 2022;12(4): 457. DOI: 10.3390/buildings12040457
• [6] Guo QM, Zhan LT, Shen YY, Wu LB, Chen YM. Classification and quantification of excavated soil and construction sludge: A case study inWenzhou, China. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering. 2022;16(2): 202–213. DOI: 10.1007/s11709-021-0795-8
• [7] Wang JN, Xu H, Zhan LT, Li SZ,Wang LN. Stability satisfied design and construction of excavated soil dumps in a soft soil region in China. Frontiers in Earth Science. 2022;(9): 822511. DOI: 10.3389/feart.2021.822511
• [8] Lafhaj Z, Samara M, Agostini F, Boucard L, Skoczylas F, Depelsenaire G. Polluted river sediments from the north region of France: Treatment with Novosol R process and valorization in clay bricks. Construction and Building Materials. 2008;22(5): 755–762. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.01.023
• [9] Zhang N, Zhang H, Schiller G, Feng HB, Gao XF, Li EM, et al. Unraveling the global warming mitigation potential From recycling subway-related excavated soil and rock in China via life cycle assessment. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management. 2021;17(3): 639–650. DOI: 10.1002/ieam.4376
• [10] Abadel AA, Alghamdi H, Alharbi YR, Alamri M, Khawaji M, Abdulaziz MAM, et al. Investigation of alkali-activated slag-based composite incorporating dehydrated cement powder and red mud. Materials. 2023;16(4): 1551. DOI: 10.3390/ma16041551
• [11] De Godoy LGG, Rohden AB, Garcez MR, Da Dalt S, Gomes LB. Production of supplementary cementitious material as a sustainable management strategy for water treatment sludge waste. Case Studies in Construction Materials. 2020;12: e00329. DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2020.e00329
• [12] Priyadharshini P, Ramamurthy K, Robinson RG. Sustainable reuse of excavation soil in cementitious composites. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018;176: 999– 1011. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.256
• [13] Wasim M, Abadel A, Abu Bakar BH, Alshaikh IMH. Future directions for the application of zero carbon concrete in civil engineering: A review. Case Studies in Construction Materials. 2022;17: e01318. DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01318
• [14] Priyadharshini P, Ramamurthy K, Robinson RG. Excavated soil waste as fine aggregate in fly ash based geopolymer mortar. Applied Clay Science. 2017;146: 81–91. DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2017.05.038
• [15] Priyadharshini P, Ramamurthy K, Robinson RG. Reuse potential of stabilized excavation soil as fine aggregate in cement mortar. Construction and Building Materials. 2018;192: 141–152. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.141
• [16] Qian JS, Hu YY, Zhang JK, Xiao WX, Ling JM. Evaluation of the performance of controlled low strength material made of excess excavated soil. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;214: 79–88. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.171
• [17] Ding GY, Xu J, Wei Y, Chen R, Li X. Engineered reclamation fill material created from excavated soft material and granulated blast furnace slag. Resources Conservation and Recycling. 2019:150. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104428
• [18] Ren HM, Liu WB. Macro and micro analysis of shear strength of solidified silty soils with different phosphogypsum content. Science of Advanced Materials. 2020;12(12): 1824–1832. DOI: 10.1166/sam.2020.3883
• [19] Zhang XH, Zhang XZ, Dong ZL. Study on the preparation of non-fired bricks by solidified dredged soil. Advanced Materials Research. 2013;781–784: 2157–2161. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.781-784.2157.
• [20] Ni JF, Hu XQ, Liu FY, Zhu CA, Li MF, Jin JQ, et al. Cement replacement with brick powder and concrete powder in sludge solidification. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology. 2022;40(5): 630–638. DOI: 10.1080/1064119X.2021.1930299
• [21] Finney AJ, Shorey EF, Anderson J. Use of native soil in place of aggregate in controlled low strength material (CLSM). American Society of Civil Engineers International Pipelines Conference 2008. 2008:1–13. DOI: 10.1061/40994(321)124
• [22] Lee KH, Kim JD. Performance evaluation of modified marine dredged soil and recycled in-situ soil as controlled low strength materials for underground pipe. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering. 2013;17(4): 674. DOI: 10.1007/s12205-013-0178-3
• [23] Qian JS, Hu YY, Zhang JK, Xiao WX, Ling JM. Evaluation of the performance of controlled low strength material made of excess excavated soil. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;214: 79–88. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.171
• [24] Shen JS, Xu YD, Chen J, Wang Y. Study on the stabilization of a new type of waste solidifying agent for soft soil. Materials. 2019;12(5). DOI: 10.3390/ma12050826
• [25] Sheen YN, Zhang LH, Le DH. Engineering properties of soil-based controlled low-strength materials as slag partially substitutes to Portland cement. Construction and Building Materials. 2013;48: 822–829. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.07.046
• [26] Gabr MA, Bowders JJ. Controlled low-strength material using fly ash and AMD sludge. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2000;76(2–3): 251–263. DOI:10.1016/S0304-3894(00)00202-8
• [27] Wei GQ, Wang YS, Hong SX, Dong BQ, Xing F. Research progress of resource reutilization of engineering excavated soil. Materials Reports. 2022;36(13): 9. DOI:10.11896/cldb.20110138 [in Chinese]
• [28] Ministry of Housing and Urban Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. GB/T 51366-2019 Calculation standard of building carbon emission, 2019. www.mohurd.gov.cn/000013338/2019-00178 (in Chinese)
• [29] Turner LK, Collins FG. Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2) emissions: A comparison between geopolymerand OPC cement concrete. Construction and Building Materials. 2013;43(6): 125–130. DOI:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.023
• [30] Luo Z, Yang L, Liu J. Embodied carbon emissions of office building: A case study of China’s 78 office buildings. Building and Environment. 2016;95: 365–371. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.09.018
• [31] Habert G, Lacaillerie JB, Roussel N. An environmental evaluation of geopolymer based concrete production: reviewing current research trends. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2011;19(11): 1229–1238. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.03.012
• [32] Jiang JJ, Ye B, Ma XM. The construction of Shenzhen’s carbon emission trading scheme. Energy Policy. 2014;75: 17–21. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.02.030

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).