Application of response surface methodology to improve methane production from jerusalem artichoke straw

• Autorzy: Meng Yan , Li Yi , Chen Laisheng , Han Rui

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/aep.2022.142691

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Anaerobic digestion (AD) converts organic matter and biomass waste into biogas, making it an environmentally friendly technology to improve energy resources for a wide range of applications. Jerusalem artichoke straw (JAS) has an enriched content of cellulose and exhibits a high potential for methane production. AD-based production of methane can eff ectively utilize waste JAS. This study investigated the AD performance of JAS to explore the enhancement of methane yields by employing a Box-Behnken experimental design (BBD) of response surface methodology (RSM). The overall goal was to identify the optimal levels of pretreatment factors, including HCl concentration, pretreatment time, and pretreatment temperature, for producing optimal biomethane yields from JAS. The highest value of methane production achieved was 256.33 mL g-1VS by using an optimal concentration of HCl as 0.25 M, a pretreatment time of 10 h, and a pretreatment temperature of 25°C. These results inform the future application of JAS in enhanced methane production.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Jerusalem artichoke straw; anaerobic digestion; response surface methodology; methane production

PL

topinambur; słonecznik bulwiasty; fermentacja beztlenowa; produkcja metanu; RSM

• Wydawca: Institute of Environmental Engineering, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Archives of Environmental Protection
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Vol. 48, no. 3
• Strony: 70--79
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 43 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Meng Yan

• Qinghai Key Laboratory of Vegetable Genetics and Physiology, Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai 810016, China

autor

Li Yi

• Qinghai Key Laboratory of Vegetable Genetics and Physiology, Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai 810016, China

autor

Chen Laisheng

• Qinghai Key Laboratory of Vegetable Genetics and Physiology, Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai 810016, China

autor

Han Rui

• Qinghai Key Laboratory of Vegetable Genetics and Physiology, Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai 810016, China

Bibliografia

• 1. Adeleke, A.O., Latiff, A.A.A., Al-Gheethi, A.A. & Daud, Z. (2017). Optimization of operating parameters of novel composite adsorbent for organic pollutants removal from POME using response surface methodology,Chemosphere, 174, pp. 232–242, DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.01.110
• 2. APHA. (2005). Standard methods for the examination of water & wastewater, American Public Health (Association. ed.), Washington DC: American Public Health Association.
• 3. Cai, Y., Zhao, X., Zhao, Y., Wang, H., Yuan, X., Zhu, W., Cui, Z. & Wang, X. (2018). Optimization of Fe2+ supplement in anaerobic digestion accounting for the Fe-bioavailability, Bioresource Technology, 250, pp. 163–170, DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.151
• 4. Cai, Y., Gallegos, D., Zheng, Z., Stinner, W., Wang, X., Pröter, J. & Schäfer, F. (2021). Exploring the combined effect of total ammonia nitrogen, pH and temperature on anaerobic digestion of chicken manure using response surface methodology and two kinetic models, Bioresource Technology, 337, 125328, DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125328.
• 5. Ciccoli, R., Sperandei, M., Petrazzuolo, F., Broglia, M., Chiarini, L., Correnti, A., Farneti, A., Pignatelli, V. & Tabacchioni, S. (2018). Anaerobic digestion of the above ground biomass of Jerusalem Artichoke in a pilot plant: Impact of the preservation method on the biogas yield and microbial community,Biomass and Bioenergy, 108, pp. 190–197, DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.11.003
• 6. Gabriel, S.A, Funmilayo, D.F. & Evariste, G.K. (2020). Process Optimisation of Enzymatic Saccharification of Soaking Assisted and Thermal Pretreated Cassava Peels Waste for Bioethanol Production, Waste and Biomass Valorization, 11, 4, pp. 2409–2420, DOI: 10.1007/s12649-018-00562-0
• 7. Gnansounou, E. & Dauriat, A. (2010). Techno-economic analysis of lignocellulosic ethanol: A review, Bioresource Technology, 101, 13, pp. 4980–4991, DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.009
• 8. Gunnarsson, I.B., Svensson, S.E., Johansson, E., Karakashev, D. & Angelidaki, I. (2014). Potential of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthustuberosus L.) as a biorefinery crop, Industrial Crops & Products, 56, pp. 231–240, DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.03.010
• 9. Günerhan, Ü., Us, E., Dumlu, L., Yılmaz, V., Carrère, H. & Perendeci, A.N. (2020). Impacts of Chemical-Assisted Thermal Pretreatments on Methane Production from Fruit and Vegetable Harvesting Wastes: Process Optimization, Molecules, 23, 25, 500, DOI: 10.3390/molecules25030500
• 10. Hassan, T.M., Hossain, M.S., Kassim, M.H., Ibrahim, M., Mohammad, N.F. & Hussin, M.H. (2020). Optimizing the Acid Hydrolysis Process for the Isolation of Microcrystalline Cellulose from Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunches Using Response Surface Methods, Waste and Biomass Valorization, 11, 6, pp. 2755–2770, DOI: 10.1007/s12649-019-00627-8
• 11. Hossain, M.Z., Suely, A., Yun, J., Zhang, G., Faisal, N.A., Qi, X. & J.N.S. (2019). Recent advances in biological pretreatment of microalgae and lignocellulosic biomass for biofuel production, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 105, pp. 105–128, DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.048
• 12. Kafle, Gopi Krishna, Kim & Sang Hun. (2013). Anaerobic treatment of apple waste with swine manure for biogas production: batch and continuous operation, Applied Energy, 103, pp. 61–72, DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.10.018
• 13. Khalid, H., Cai, F., Zhang, J., Zhang, R., Wang, W., Liu, G. & Chen, C. (2019). Optimizing key factors for biomethane production from KOH-pretreated switchgrass by response surface methodology, Environmental science and pollution research international, 26, 24, pp. 25084–25091, DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-05615-y
• 14. Kim, M., Kim, B., Nam, K. & Choi, Y. (2018). Effect of pretreatment solutions and conditions on decomposition and anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass in rice straw, Biochemical Engineering Journal, 140, pp. 108–114, DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2018.09.012
• 15. Kim, S., Park, J.M. & Kim, C.H. (2013). Ethanol production using whole plant biomass of Jerusalem artichoke by Kluyveromycesmarxianus CBS1555, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology, 169, 5, pp. 1531–1545, DOI: 10.1007/s12010-013-0094-5
• 16. Kozłowski, K., Dach, J., Lewicki, A., Malińska, K., Isaias Emilio Paulino do Carmo. & Czekała, W. (2019). Potential of biogas production from animal manure in Poland, Archives of Environmental Protection, 45, 3, pp. 98–108, DOI: 10.24425/aep.2019.128646
• 17. Kreuger, E., Sipos, B., Zacchi, G., Svensson, S.E., Bjornsson, L. (2011). Bioconversion of industrial hemp to ethanol and methane: The benefits of steam pretreatment and co-production, Bioresource Technology, 102, pp. 3457–3465, DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.126
• 18. Li, C., Liu, G., Nges, I.A. & Liu, J. (2016). Enhanced biomethane production from Miscanthuslutarioriparius using steam explosion pretreatment, Fuel, 179, pp. 267–273, DOI: 10.1016/j. fuel.2016.03.087
• 19. Liu, J., Yang, M., Zhang, J., Zheng, J., Xu, H., Wang, Y. & Wei, Y. (2018). A comprehensive insight into the effects of microwave-H2O2 pretreatment on concentrated sewage sludge anaerobic digestion based on semi-continuous operation, Bioresource Technology, 256, pp. 118–127, DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.126
• 20. Li, W., Zhang, J., Yu, C., Li, Q., Dong, F., Wang, G., Gu, G. & Guo, Z. (2015). Extraction, degree of polymerization determination and prebiotic effect evaluation of inulin from Jerusalem artichoke, Carbohydrate Polymers, 121, pp. 315–319, DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.12.055
• 21. Long, X., Shao, H., Liu, L., Liu, L. & Liu, Z. (2016). Jerusalem artichoke: A sustainable biomass feedstock for biorefinery, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54, pp. 1382–1388, DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.063
• 22. Monlau, F., Sambusiti, C., Barakat, A., Guo, X.M., Latrille, E., Trably, E., Steyer, J.P., Carrere, H. (2012). Predictive models of biohydrogen and biomethane production based on the compositional and structural features of lignocellulosic materials, Environmental science & technology, 6, 46, pp. 12217–12225, DOI: 10.1021/es303132t
• 23. Nges, A.I., Li, C., Wang, B., Xiao, L., Yi, Z., Liu, J. (2016). Physio-chemical pretreatments for improved methane potential of Miscanthuslutarioriparius, Fuel, 166, pp. 29–35, DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.10.108
• 24. Nowicka, A., Zieliński, M., Dębowski, M., Dudek, M. (2021). Progress in the Production of Biogas from Maize Silage after Acid-Heat Pretreatment, Energies, 14, 8018, DOI: 10.3390/EN14238018
• 25. Oh, S.Y., Yoo, D.I., Shin, Y., Kim, H.C., Kim, H.Y., Chung, Y.S., Park, W.H. & Youk, J.H. (2005). Crystalline structure analysis of cellulose treated with sodium hydroxide and carbon dioxide by means of X-ray diffraction and FTIR spectroscopy, Carbohydrate Research, 340, 15, pp. 2376–2391, DOI: 10.1016/j.carres.2005.08.007
• 26. Oyekanmi, A.A., Ahmad,A., MohdSetapar, S.H., Alshammari, M.B., Jawaid, M., Hanafiah, M.M., Abdul Khalil, H.P.S. & Vaseashta, A. (2021a). Sustainable Duriozibethinus-Derived Biosorbents for Congo Red Removal from Aqueous Solution: Statistical Optimization, Isotherms and Mechanism Studies, Sustainability, 13, 13264, DOI: 10.3390/SU132313264
• 27. Oyekanmi, A.A., Alshammari, M.B., Ibrahim, M.N.M., Hanafiah, 27. M.M., Elnaggar, A.Y., Ahmad, A., Oyediran, A.T., Rosli, M.A., Mohd, Setapar, S.H., Nik, Daud, N.N. & Hussein, E.E. (2021b). Highly Effective Cow Bone Based Biocomposite for the Sequestration of Organic Pollutant Parameter from Palm Oil Mill Effluent in a Fixed Bed Column Adsorption System, Polymers (Basel), 27, 14, 86, DOI: 10.3390/polym14010086
• 28. Passos, F., Felix, L., Rocha, H., Pereira, Jde, O., de, Aquino, S. (2016). Reuse of microalgae grown in full-scale wastewater treatment ponds: Thermochemical pretreatment and biogas production, Bioresource Technology, 209, pp. 305–312, DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.006
• 29. Passos, F., Ortega, V. & Donoso-Bravo, A. (2017). Thermochemical pretreatment and anaerobic digestion of dairy cow manure: Experimental and economic evaluation, Bioresource Technology, 227, pp. 239–246, DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.12.034
• 30. Paudel, S.R., Banjara, S.P., Choi, O.K., Park, K.Y., Kim, Y.M. & Lee, J.W. (2017). Pretreatment of agricultural biomass for anaerobic digestion: Current state and challenges, Bioresource Technology, 245, pp. 1194–1205, DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.182
• 31. Pfariso, M., Eugéne, R., Annie, F.A.C & Johann, F.G. (2021). Maximising the Benefits of Enzyme Synergy in the Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation of Jerusalem Artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) Tuber Residues into Ethanol, Waste and Biomass Valorization.Waste Biomass Valor, 13, pp. 535–546, DOI: 10.1007/S12649-021-01488-W
• 32. Pokój, T., Gusiatin, M.Z., Bułkowska, K. & Dubis, B. (2014). Production of biogas using maize silage supplemented with residual glycerine from biodiesel manufacturing, Archives of Environmental Protection, 40, 4, pp. 17–29, DOI: 10.2478/aep-2014-0035
• 33. Shen, J., Zhang, J., Wang, W., Liu, G. & Chen, Ch. (2019). Assessment of pretreatment effects on anaerobic digestion of switchgrass: Economics-energy-environment (3E) analysis, Industrial Crops & Products, 145, 111957, DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111957
• 34. Song, Z., Yang, G., Liu, X., Yan, Z., Yuan, Y. & Liao, Y. (2014). Comparison of seven chemical pretreatments of corn straw for improving methane yield by anaerobic digestion, PLoS One, 2, 9, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093801
• 35. Tian, W., Li, J., Zhu, L., Li, W., He, L., Gu, L., Deng, R., Shi, D., Chai, H. & Gao M. (2021). Insights of enhancing methane production under high-solid anaerobic digestion of wheat straw by calcium peroxide pretreatment and zero valent iron addition, Renewable Energy, 177, pp. 21–32, DOI: 10.1016/J.RENENE.2021.06.042
• 36. Van Soest P.J., Robertson J.B. & Lewis B.A. (1991). Methods for Dietary Fiber, Neutral Detergent Fiber, and Nonstarch Polysaccharides in Relation to Animal Nutrition, Journal of Dairy Science, 74, 10, pp. 3583–3597, DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
• 37. Wang, D.L., Ai, P., Yu, L., Tan, Z.X. & Zhang, Y.L. (2015). Comparing the hydrolysis and biogas production performance of alkali and acid pretreatments of rice straw using two-stage anaerobic fermentation, Biosystems Engineering, 132, pp. 47–55, DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2015.02.007
• 38. Wu, Z., Nguyen, D., Lam, T.Y.C., Zhuang, H., Shrestha, S., Raskin, L., Khanal, S.K. & Lee, P.H. (2021). Synergistic association between cytochrome bd-encoded Proteiniphilum and reactive oxygen species (ROS)-scavenging methanogens in microaerobic- -anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass, WaterResearch, 15, 190, 116721, DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116721
• 39. Yang, S., Sun, X., Jiang, X., Wang, L., Tian, J., Li, L., Zhao, M. & Zhong, Q. (2019). Characterization of the Tibet plateau Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) transcriptome by de novo assembly to discover genes associated with fructan synthesis and SSR analysis, Hereditas, 6, 156, 9, DOI: 10.1186/s41065-019-0086-8
• 40. Zhang, H., Khalid, H., Li, W., He, Y., Liu, G. & Chen, C. (2018a). Employing response surface methodology (RSM) to improve methane production from cotton stalk, Environmental science and pollution research international, 25,8, pp. 7618–7624, DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-0682-y
• 41. Zhang, H., Ning, Z., Khalid, H., Zhang, R., Liu, G. & Chen, C. (2018b). Enhancement of methane production from Cotton Stalk using different pretreatment techniques, Scientific reports, 8, 1, 3463 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-21413-x
• 42. Zhang, H., Wang, L., Dai, Z., Zhang, R., Chen, C. & Liu, G. (2019). Effect of organic loading, feed-to-inoculum ratio, and pretreatment on the anaerobic digestion of tobacco stalks, Bioresource Technology, 298, 122474, DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122474
• 43. Zhao, C., Cui, X., Liu, Y., Zhang, R., He, Y., Wang, W., Chen, C. & Liu, G. (2017). Maximization of the methane production from durian shell during anaerobic digestion, Bioresource Technology, 238, pp. 433–438, DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.03.184