Human oriented corporate actions: stakeholders and CSR

• Autorzy: Mazur Barbara , Cichorzewska Marzena , Mazur-Małek Marta

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1899-6116.2020.50.9

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Introduction/background: The paper builds on the organization’s stakeholders theory by adding a new relation. It stipulates that separate groups of stakeholders can co-operate and influence each other in beneficial terms, which is important especially to local leaders, corporations and academic specialists in the CSR field. Aim of the paper: The purpose is to contribute to humanistic management by focusing on how corporations become more human oriented and present on the social arena. The aim of this research is to build on the organization’s stakeholders theory, especially within the scope of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Materials and methods: The paper combines a theoretical aspect, in the form of the stakeholders theory, and a research one, in the form of a case study. The subject of the study is CSR action taken by Santander Consumer Bank in Poland during recent years in the form of the Santander Orchestra. The objectives are achieved by applying the method of a case study. Results and conclusions: The stakeholders theory is further developed to include interaction between different groups of stakeholders. It demonstrates how those groups benefit each other and how their interaction can be beneficial for the society. Ways to improve CSR activities are identified. The study includes a thorough analysis of the Santander Orchestra. It explains and points to best practices. The research can be treated as a set of guidelines for other corporations to use when creating their CSR activities. This research can help to make the public understand that corporations can have a great and positive impact on the social arena

Słowa kluczowe

EN

social responsibility; humanistic management; stakeholder theory; Santander Orchestra

PL

odpowiedzialność społeczna; zarządzanie humanistyczne; teoria interesariuszy; Santander Orchestra

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Organizacja i Zarządzanie : kwartalnik naukowy
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: nr 2
• Strony: 113--132
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 35 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Mazur Barbara

• Faculty of Management, Lublin University of Technology, Lublin, Poland

autor

Cichorzewska Marzena

• Faculty of Management, Lublin University of Technology, Lublin, Poland

autor

Mazur-Małek Marta

• Department of Tourism Studies, Tartu University, Estonia

Bibliografia

• 1. Ackerman, R.W., and Bauer, R.A. (1976). Corporate Social Responsiveness. Reston: Reston Publishing Co.
• 2. Babbie, E. (2013). Podstawy badań społecznych. Warszawa: PWN.
• 3. Backman, J. (Ed.) (1975). Social Responsibility and Accountability. New York University Press.
• 4. Bowden, C., and Galindo-Gonzalez, S. (2015). Interviewing When You’re Not Face–To–Face: The Use of Email Interviews in a Phenomenological Study. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 10, 79-92. Retrieved from http://ijds.org/Volume10/IJDSv10p079–092Bowden0684.pdf.
• 5. Bowen, H.R. (1953). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. University of Iowa Press.
• 6. Donaldson, T., and Preston, L. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, pp. 65-91.
• 7. Eelis, R. and Walton, C. (1961). Conceptual Foundations of Business. Homewood: Richard D. Irwin.
• 8. Forum Odpowiedzialnego Biznesu (2018). Odpowiedzialny biznes w Polsce 2018. Dobre praktyki (Report). [Responsible Business in Poland 2018. Best Practices]. Warszawa: Forum Odpowiedzialnego Biznesu. http://odpowiedzialnybiznes.pl/baza-wiedzy-o-csr/.
• 9. Frederick, W.C. (1994). From CSR1 to CSR2. Business & Society, 33, pp. 150-164.
• 10. Frederick, W.C. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility: deep roots, flourishing growth, promising future. In: A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, D. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility (pp. 522-531). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• 11. Freeman, R.E., and Evan, W.M. (1990). Corporate Governance: A Stakeholder Interpretation. Journal of Behavioural Economics, 19(4), 337-359.
• 12. Freeman, R.E., Kujala, J., Sachs, S. (2017). Stakeholder Engagement: Clinical Research Cases. Springer.
• 13. Jan Paweł II [John Paul II] (2017). Centesimus Annus. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Wrocławskiej Księgarni Archidiecezjalnej TUM.
• 14. Johnson, H.L. (1971). Business in Contemporary Society: Framework and Issues. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
• 15. Ketokivi, M., and Choi, T. (2014). Renaissance of case research as a scientific method. Journal of Operations Management, 32, 5, pp. 232-240.
• 16. Koehler, I. and Raithel, S. (2018). Internal, external, and media stakeholders’ evaluations during transgressions. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 23, 4, pp. 512-527. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-10-2017-0096.
• 17. Kuc, B.R. (2004). Od zarządzania do przywództwa. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Menedżerskie PTM.
• 18. Manne, H.G., and Wallich, H.C. (1972). The modern corporation and social responsibility. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
• 19. McGuire, J.W. (1963). Business and Society. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
• 20. Meho, L.I. (2006). E-mail interviewing in qualitative research: A methodological discussion. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(10), 1284-1295. doi:10.1002/asi.20416.
• 21. Mitchell, R., Agle, B., & Wood, D. (1997). Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886. Retrieved December 12, 2019, from www.jstor.org/stable/259247.
• 22. Mizera, K. (2014). CSR – ewolucja w kierunku efektywności. In: M. Noga (ed.), Współczesne determinanty rozwoju gospodarczego. Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Bankowej we Wrocławiu, 2, 40. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Wyższej Szkoły Bankowej.
• 23. Paliwoda-Matolańska, A. (2009). Odpowiedzialność społeczna w procesie zarządzania przedsiębiorstwem. Warszawa: CH Beck.
• 24. Parmar, B., Freeman, R., Harrison, J., Purnell, A., De Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. The Academy of Management Annals, 3, 403-445. 10.1080/19416520.2010.495581.
• 25. Salmons, J. (2012). Cases in online interview research. Retrieved from http://www.betterevaluation.org/sites/default/files/43888_1.pdf.
• 26. Santander Bank Polska (2019). Wywiad z Michałem Gajewskim, CEO Santander Bank Polska. https://raport.santander.pl/santander-bank-polska1/wywiad-z-prezesem/, 26.11.2019.
• 27. Stahla, G.K., Brewsterb, C.J., Collingsd,D.G., Hajro, A. (2019). Enhancing the role of human resource management in corporate sustainability and social responsibility: A multi-stakeholder, multidimensional approach to HRM. Human Resource Management Review. 100708. 10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100708.
• 28. Stake, R.E. (1997). Studium przypadku. In: L. Korporowicz (Ed.), Ewaluacja w edukacji. Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa.
• 29. Starman, A.B. (2013). The case study as a type of qualitative research. Journal of Contemporary Educational Studies, 1, 28-43.
• 30. Styśko-Kunkowska, M. (2014). Interviews as a qualitative research method in management and economics sciences, Warsaw: Warsaw School of Economics.
• 31. Suska, M. (2016). Społeczna odpowiedzialność biznesu: studium porównawcze reżimów prawnych. Roczniki Administracji i Prawa, 16, 2, pp. 299-322.
• 32. Yin, R.K. (2004). The case study anthology. California: Thousand Oaks.
• 33. Zainal, Z. (2007). Case study as a research method. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 9, 1-6.
• 34. Żelazna-Blicharz, A. (2013). Społeczna odpowiedzialność w procesie gospodarowania a zrównoważona produkcja i konsumpcja. Lublin: Politechnika Lubelska.
• 35. Żemigała, M. (2007). Społeczna odpowiedzialność przedsiębiorstwa. Kraków: Oficyna a Wolters Kluwer business.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).