The ecological and economic analysis of using Thermopor plaster for thermal insulation

• Autorzy: Adamczyk J. , Dylewski R.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Plaster plays an important role in the building industry. Besides an aesthetic function it provides the protection of external walls from weather conditions. In the paper thermo insulating Thermopor plaster was described. Its chemical and physical properties and manner of using were defined. The impact on the environment with the use of LCA technique was examined. Thermopor plaster can fulfil a thermo insulating function. The economic and ecological analysis of applying this plaster in the thermo insulation of the external walls of the building was conducted. The use of Thermopor plaster on external walls brings ecological benefits. The reimbursement of ecological cost related to the use of this plaster appears already after 2 to 5 years, depending on the source of heat used, which results from the decrease of thermal energy consumption for heating the building. For economic reasons, the partial reimbursement of cost is obtained as a result of the reduction of heating cost. Although Thermopor plaster has thermo insulating properties similar to typical insulating materials, such as polystyrene or mineral wool, the economic cost of using the plaster for thermo insulation becomes several times higher.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

plaster; thermal insulation; life cycle assessment (LCA); ecological benefits; economic benefits

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Akademii Morskiej w Szczecinie
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe / Akademia Morska w Szczecinie
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: nr 34 (106)
• Strony: 5--11
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 23 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Adamczyk J.

• University of Zielona Góra Faculty of Economics and Management, 65 - 417 Zielona Góra, ul. Licealna 9

autor

Dylewski R.

• University of Zielona Góra Faculty of Mathematics, Computer Science and Econometrics 65 - 417 Zielona Góra, ul. Licealna 9

Bibliografia

• 1. ERLANDSSON M., BORG M.: Generic LCA-methodology applicable for buildings, constructions and operation services – today practice and development needs. Building and Environment 38, 2003 919–938.
• 2. ORITZ O., CASTELLS F., SONNEMANN G.: Sustainability in the construction industry: A review of recent developments based on LCA. Construction and Building Materials 23, 2009, 28–39.
• 3. AUDENAERT A., DE CLEYN S.H., BUYLE M.: LCA of lowenergy flats using the Eco-indicator 99 method: Impact of insulation materials. Energy and Buildings 47, 2012, 68–73.
• 4. DYLEWSKI R., ADAMCZYK J.: Economic and environmental benefits of thermal insulation of building external walls. Building and Environment 46, 2011, 2615–2623.
• 5. YAN H., SHEN Q., FAN L.C.H., WANG Y., ZHANG L.: Greenhouse gas emissions in building construction: A case study of One Peking in Hong Kong. Building and Environment 45, 2010, 949–955.
• 6. ŻMIJEWSKI K., SOKOŁOWSKI M.M.: Efektywnie o energetyce (cz. 1). Analiza zapisów Mapy Drogowej Efektywności. Energia i Budynek 38(07), 2010, 12–15.
• 7. OZEL M.: Effect of wall orientation on the optimum insulation thickness by using a dynamic method. Applied Energy 88, 2011, 2429–2435.
• 8. SPRINGER M., ADAMCZYK J.: Analiza środowiskowa tynku termoizolacyjnego Thermopor. Ciepłownictwo Ogrzewnictwo Wentylacja 5, 2010, 178–181.
• 9. JASICZAK J.: Zaczyny i zaprawy budowlane. In: B. Stefańczyk. (Eds.), Budownictwo ogólne, materiały i wyroby budowlane. Tom 1, Wyd. ARKADY, 2007.
• 10. HAUCKE D.: Bauelemente aus Bims und Leichtbeton, DBZ 52(6), 2004, 70–74.
• 11. IRB-Bibliothek: Bims der Naturbaustoff aus dem Inneren der Erde T1+2. Baustofftechnik 25(7), 2006, 26–27.
• 12. ADAMCZYK J., SPRINGER M.: Analiza porównawcza tynku cementowego oraz termoizolacyjnego. Thermopor w kontekście wpływu na środowisko. Przegląd Budowlany 7–9, 2010, 47–50.
• 13. Flyer of Proiso GmbH Company – commercial materials.
• 14. Guidelines for Life-Cycle Assessment: A Code of Practice. SETAC (Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry), Brussels/Pensacola, 1993.
• 15. HEIJUNGS R., GUINEE J.B., HUPPES G.: Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of products. Guide, NOH Report 9266, Leiden 1992.
• 16. ANDERSSON K., HÙGAAS E.M., LUNDQVIST U., MATTSSON B.: The feasibility of including sustainability in LCA for product development. Journal of Cleaner Production 6, 1998, 289–298.
• 17. LASKOWSKI L.: Ochrona cieplna i charakterystyka energetyczna budynku. Of. Wyd. Politechniki Warszawskiej, Warszawa 2005.
• 18. Rozporządzenie Ministra Infrastruktury z dnia 6 listopada 2008 roku zmieniające rozporządzenie w sprawie warunków technicznych, jakim powinny odpowiadać budynki i ich usytuowanie. Dz.U. 2008 nr 201, poz. 1238 z póź. zm.
• 19. Główny Urząd Statystyczny. Informacje i opracowania statystyczne. Warszawa 2011 (http://www.stat.gov.pl/gus/ index_ PLK_HTML.htm) (27.04.2012).
• 20. GIKAS A., KEENAN R.: Statistical aspects of the energy economy in 2004. Eurostat. Environment and Energy 5, 2006.
• 21. http://file.favore.pl/store/2012/1/15/8/3861191326614002513.pdf (20.04.2012).
• 22. DYLEWSKI R., ADAMCZYK J.: Management of Thermal Energy in Buildings by Selecting Heat Sources and Choosing the Optimal Thermal-insulation Thickness. Management 12(1), 2008, 255–266.
• 23. CERULLI T., PISTOLESI C., MALTESE C., SALVIONI D.: Durability of traditional plasters with respect to blast furnace slag-based plaster. Cement and Concrete Research 33, 2003, 1375–1383