The application of design thinking methodology in architectural education in Ukraine: case study

• Autorzy: Holubchak Kateryna

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.21307/ACEE-2020-027

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The relationship between different aspects that challenge architectural education in Ukraine and new pedagogical strategies, in particular application of the innovative approach based on Design Thinking, are analysed and described in the paper. The case study illustrated in the article is based on author’s personal experiment held with the 3rd year students at the Institute of Architecture, Construction and Energy (Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas, Ukraine). A qualitative analysis of the Design Thinking methodology, alongside the literature review, has been presented . Particular emphasis is put on the implementation of the Lego® Serious Play® methodology, as an effective tool for facilitating students’ creative potential, self-expression and ability to generate innovative ideas at the conceptual stage of architectural design. The suggested methodology can be successfully applied in other higher educational courses.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

design thinking models; architectural education; innovative pedagogy; higher education; architectural design; Lego serious play

PL

modele myślenia projektowego; edukacja architektoniczna; pedagogika innowacyjna; wyższa edukacja; styl architektoniczny; Lego

• Wydawca: Silesian University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Architecture Civil Engineering Environment
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: Vol. 13, no. 4
• Strony: 19--29
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 26 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Holubchak Kateryna

• PhD, Assoc. Prof.; Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas, Karpatska str. 15, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine, 76019 Ukraine

Bibliografia

• [1] Tepavčević, B. (2017). Design thinking models for architectural education. The Journal of Public Space, 2, 67-72. https://doi.org/10.5204/jps.v2i3.115
• [2] Kowalewska, J. and Sołtysik, M. (2017). From Creative Thinking Techniques to Innovative Design Solutions. The Educators’ Perspective, 5, 669-675. https://doi.org/10.12955/cbup.v5.1005
• [3] Shaheen, R. (2010). Creativity and education. Creative Education, 1(3), 166-169. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2010.13026
• [4] Augustinaitė, D. (2018). Challenges of innovative architecture: education and practice. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 42(1), 63-69. https://doi.org/10.3846/jau.2018.1989
• [5] Becerik-Gerber, B., Gerber, D. J, Ku, K. (2011). The pace of technological innovation in architecture, engineering, and construction education: integrating recent trends into the curricula. ITcon. 16, 411-432. https://www.itcon.org/2011/24
• [6] Danfulani, B. and Khairul A. K. Concept of Creativity and Innovation in Architectural Design Process. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 6(1), 16-24. http://www.ijimt.org/vol6/566-A10041.pdf
• [7] Tschimmel, K. (2012). Design Thinking as an effective Toolkit for Innovation. Action for Innovation: Innovating from Experience. ISBN 978-952-265-243-0
• [8] Salama, A.M. 2013. Seeking responsive forms of pedagogy in architectural education. Field Journal, 5(1), 9-30.
• [9] Asefi, M., Imani, E. (2018). Effects of Active Strategic Teaching Model (astm) In Creative and Critical Thinking Skills of Architecture Students. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 12(2), 209-222. https://doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v12i2.1340
• [10] Kalinska, O. and Sushentseva, L. (2017). The Development of Pedagogical Skills of the Teacher in the Modern Higher Education Institution. European Humanities Studies: State and Society, 4(1), 80-96.
• [11] Riekstins, A. (2018). Teaching parametricism as a standard skill for architecture. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 42(1), 34-39. https://doi.org/10.3846/jau.2018.1476
• [12] Kaidanovska, O. (2013) Creative methods of educational design in the professional training of architects: world experience. Comparative and pedagogical studies, 2, 166-172.
• [13] Cross, N. (2011) Design Thinking: Understanding how Designers Think and Work. Berg Publishers Ltd.
• [14] Brown, T. (2009). Change by Design. How Design Thinking transforms Organizations and inspires Innovation. Harper Collins Publishers.
• [15] Riverdale & Ideo (2012). Design Thinking for Educators. 2nd Edition. Retrieved 02/05 2020 from http://www. designthinkingforeducators.com/toolkit/.
• [16] Lawson, B. 2005. How Designers Think. Architectural Press.
• [17] Rowe, P. (1987). Design Thinking. The MIT Press.
• [18] Tschimmel, K., Santos, J. Loyens, D., Jacinto, A. Monteiro, R., and Valença, M. (2015). Research Report D-Think. Design Thinking Applied to Education and Training. Matosinhos: Ed. ESAD.
• [19] Diefenthaler, A., Moorhead, L., Speicher, S., Bear, C., & Cerminaro D. (2017). Thinking & Acting Like a Designer: How design thinking supports innovation in K-12 education. Ed. Wise & Ideo.
• [20] Simon, M. (2018). Design Thinking for the Global Community in an Era of Disruption. ARCC Conference Repository. https://doi.org/10.17831/rep:arcc%y468
• [21] Tymkiewicz, J. and Bielak-Zasadzka, M. (2016). Senior homes of the future in the eyes of students of architecture. Didactic experience from the application of the design thinking method. Architecture Civil Engineering Environment 9(1), 49-56.
• [22] Stangel M., Witeczek A. (2015). Design thinking and role-playing in education on brownfields regeneration. Experiences from Polish-Czech cooperation. Architecture Civil Engineering Environment 12(4), 19-28.
• [23] Hadida, A. L. (2013). “Let your hands do the thinking!: Lego bricks, strategic thinking and ideas generation within organizations”. Strategic Direction, 29(2), 3-5. https://doi.org/10.1108/02580541311297976
• [24] Nerantzi, C. and James, A. (2019). LEGO® for University Learning: Inspiring academic practice in higher education. Zenodo. DOI https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2813448
• [25] Peabody, M.A. and Turesky, E. F. (2018). Shared Leadership Lessons: Adapting LEGO® SERIOUS PLAY® in Higher Education. International Journal of Management and Applied Research, 5(4), 210-223. https://doi.org/10.18646/2056.54.18-015
• [26] Zenk, L.,Hynek, N., Schreder, G., Zenk, A., Pausits, A. and Steiner, G. (2018). Designing Innovation Courses In Higher Education Using LEGO® SERIOUS PLAY®. International Journal of Management and Applied Research, 5(4), 245-263. https://doi.org/10.18646/2056.54.18-019

Uwagi

EN

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).