Seismic Performance Evaluation of Historical Case Study of Armenian Architecture Tekor Church

• Autorzy: Şeker Burçin Şenol , Özkaynak Merve

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/ceer-2022-0018

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Masonry churches, which are one of the cultural heritages, show the historical background, cultural and religious characteristics of the cities and material properties. Churches in the earthquake zone, which are different from each other in terms of typology and have a special importance, are at risk. The aim of this study is to examine the earthquake behavior of a church sample in Turkey and to provide a guide for structures with similar typology. The building was modeled and subjected to dynamic loads using macro modeling technique. Free vibration mode shapes were determined by modal analysis, and it was determined that these modes were mainly in the form of translation of the upper part of the structure. In the time history analysis, the stress and deformation values were determined. It has been observed that the stresses take high values at the supports and top of the main columns and in the arches connecting these columns to the side walls. It was concluded that the deformations reached their maximum values at the apex of the triangular gable walls in the upper part of the building. The results obtained are consistent with the damage the church received in past earthquakes.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

cultural heritage; damage; FEM model; historical construction; masonry churches; Armenia architecture; Tekor; seismic vulnerability

PL

dziedzictwo kulturowe; szkody; modele MES; budowle historyczne; architektura Armenii; Tekor; trzęsienia ziemi

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Uniwersytetu Zielonogórskiego
• Czasopismo: Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Vol. 32, no. 2
• Strony: 36--52
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 50 poz., fot., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Şeker Burçin Şenol

• Amasya University, Architecture Faculty, Architecture Department, Amasya, Turkey

autor

Özkaynak Merve

• Amasya University, Architecture Faculty, Architecture Department, Amasya, Turkey

Bibliografia

• 1. Finite Element Analysis Program, 2019.
• 2. Argiento, LU, Celano, T, Ceroni, F and Casapulla, C 2020. Modelling Strategies for the In-plane Behaviour of Iron-framed Masonry Structures: Parametric Analysis on Simple Panels and a Church Façade. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 1-26. doi: 10.1080/15583058.2020.1858369.
• 3. Betti, M, Galano, L and Lourenço, PB 2021. Territorial seismic risk assessment of a sample of 13 masonry churches in Tuscany (Italy) through simplified indexes. Engineering Structures, 235(111479), 1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111479.
• 4. Casapulla, C, Celano, T, Rainieri, C, Fabbrocino, G and Ceroni, F. 2021. On the Dynamic Performance of the Santa Maria Maddalena Church, Ischia Island (Italy): Numerical and Experimental Comparative Analysis. In C. Rainieri, G. Fabbrocino, N. Caterino, F. Ceroni & M. A. Notarangelo (Eds.), Civil Structural Health Monitoring Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering 156, 699-723.
• 5. Casapulla, C, Ceroni, F, Rainieri, C, Argiento, LU, Arcamone, P and Fabbrocino, G 2019. Structural Assessment of Santa Maria Maddalena Church in Ischia Island (Italy) by Experimental Modal Analysis under Operational Conditions. Proceedings of 7th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (COMPDYN), Crete, Greece.
• 6. Cattari, S, Lagomarsino, S, Bosiljkov, V and D’Ayala, D 2015. Sensitivity analysis for setting up the investigation protocol and defining proper confidence factors for masonry buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 13, 129-151. doi: 10.1007/s10518-014-9648-3.
• 7. Cescatti, E, Salzano, P, Casapulla, C, Ceroni, F, da Porto, F and Prota, A 2020. Damages to masonry churches after 2016–2017 Central Italy seismic sequence and definition of fragility curves. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 18, 297-329. doi: 10.1007/s10518-019-00729-7.
• 8. Clementi, F, Ferrante, A, Giordano, E, Dubois, F and Lenci, S 2020. Damage assessment of ancient masonry churches stroked by the Central Italy earthquakes of 2016 by the non-smooth contact dynamics method. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 18, 455-486. doi: 10.1007/s10518-019- 00613-4.
• 9. Criber, E, Brando, G and De Matteis, G 2015. The effects of L’Aquila earthquake on the St. Gemma church in Goriano Sicoli: part - damage survey and kinematic analysis. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13, 3713-3732. doi: 10.1007/s10518-015-9792-4.
• 10. Demirtaş, RT 2019. Türkiye Diri Fayları ve Deprem Etkinlikleri Paleosismolojik Çalışmalar ve Gelecek Deprem Potansiyelleri. Ankara.
• 11. Donabédian, P 2007. L’âge d’or de l’architecture arménienne (VII esiècle) Armenia sacra; mémoire chrétienne des Arméniens (IVe-XVIIIesiècle). Paris: Muséedu Louvre 76-87.
• 12. Endo, Y, Pelà, L, Roca, P, da Porto, F and Modena, C 2015. Comparison of seismic analysis methods applied to a historical church struck by 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13(12), 3749- 3778. doi: 10.1007/s10518-015-9796-0.
• 13. Fabbrocino, F, Vaiano, G, Formisano, A and D’Amato, M 2019. Large Scale Seismic Vulnerability and Risk of Masonry Churches in Seismic-Prone Areas: Two Territorial Case Studies. Frontiers in Built Environment Earthquake Engineering 5. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2019.00102.
• 14. Fazzi, E, Galassi, S, Misseri, G and Rovero, L 2021. Seismic vulnerability assessment of the benedictine basilica typology in central Italy. Journal of Building Engineering 43, 102897. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102897.
• 15. Felice, Gd, Fugger, R and Gobbin, F 2021. Overturning of the façade in single-nave churches under seismic loading. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. doi: 10.1007/s10518-021-01243-5.
• 16. Ferrero, C, Cambiaggi, L, Vecchiattini, R and Calderini, C 2020. Damage Assessment of Historic Masonry Churches Exposed to Slow-moving Landslides. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 15, 1170-1195. doi: 10.1080/15583058.2020.1799259.
• 17. Kazaryan, A 2011. The Blind Arcade in Medieval Architecture of Armenia and Georgia. Springs of Ideas and Principal Stages of Development. In A. C. Erel, B. İşler, N. Peker & G. Sağır (eds.), Anadolu Kültürlerinde Süreklilik ve Değişim. Ankara: Rekmay 341-374.
• 18. Lagomarsino, S, Cattari, S, Ottonelli, D and Giovinazzi, S 2019. Earthquake damage assessment of masonry churches: proposal for rapid and detailed forms and derivation of empirical vulnerability curves. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 17, 3327-3364. doi: 10.1007/s10518-018- 00542-8.
• 19. Lang, K and Bachmann, H 2003. On The Seismic Vulnerability of Existing Unreinforced Masonry Buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 7, 407-426.
• 20. Marotta, A, Sorrentino, L, Liberatore, D and Ingham, JM 2016. Statistical seismic vulnerability of New Zealand unreinforced masonry churches. In V. B. Verstrynge (ed.), Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions – Anamnesis, diagnosis, therapy, controls. London: Taylor & Francis Group, 1536-1543.
• 21. Marotta, A, Sorrentino, L, Liberatore, D and Ingham, JM 2017. Vulnerability Assessment of Unreinforced Masonry Churches Following the 2010–2011 Canterbury Earthquake Sequence. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 21, 912-934. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2016.1206761.
• 22. Matteis, Gd, Corlito, V, Guadagnuolo, M and Tafuro, A 2020. Seismic Vulnerability Assessment and Retrofitting Strategies of Italian Masonry Churches of the Alife-Caiazzo Diocese in Caserta. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 14, 1180-1195. doi: 10.1080/15583058.2019.1594450.
• 23. Matteis, G d, Criber, E and Brando, G 2016. Damage Probability Matrices for Three-Nave Masonry Churches in Abruzzi After the 2009 L’Aquila Earthquake. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 10, 120-145. doi: 10.1080/15583058.2015.1113340.
• 24. Milani, G and Valente, M 2015. Failure analysis of seven masonry churches severely damaged during the 2012 Emilia-Romagna (Italy) earthquake: Non-linear dynamic analyses vs conventional static approaches. Engineering Failure Analysis 54, 13-56. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.03.016.
• 25. Monaco, M, Bergamasco, I and Betti, M 2018. A no-tension analysis for a brick masonry vault with lunette. Journal Mechanics of Materials and Structures 13, 703-714. doi: https://doi.org/10.2140/jomms.2018.13.703.
• 26. Morici, M, Canuti, C, Dall’Asta, A and Leoni, G 2020. Empirical predictive model for seismic damage of historical churches. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 18, 6015-6037. doi: 10.1007/s10518-020-00903-2.
• 27. Orlando, M, Betti, M and Spinelli, P 2020. Assessment of structural behaviour and seismic retrofitting for an Italian monumental masonry building. Journal of Building Engineering 29, 101115. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.101115.
• 28. Parisi, MA, Shesi, C and Papa, GS 2018. Damage Evolution in Churches Due To Repeated Earthquake Shocks. Proceedings of 16th Ejropean Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Thessaloniki.
• 29. Penna, A, et al. 2019. Damage to churches in the 2016 central Italy earthquakes. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 17, 5763-5790. doi: 10.1007/s10518-019-00594-4.
• 30. Porto, F d, Silva, B, Costa, C and Modena, C 2012. Macro-Scale Analysis of Damage to Churches after Earthquake in Abruzzo (Italy) on April 6, 2009. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 16, 739-758. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2012.685207.
• 31. Roca, P, Cervera, M, Pelà, L, Clemente, R and Chiumenti, M 2013. Continuum FE models for the analysis of Mallorca Cathedral. Engineering Structures, 46, 653-670. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.08.005.
• 32. Rodriguez, I, Vasconcelos, G and Lourenço, PB 2021. Morphological and Geometrical Characterization of Historical Churches of Yucatan, Mexico. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 1-32. doi: 10.1080/15583058.2021.1887966.
• 33. Romanazzi, H 2009. Domed medieval churches in Armenia: form and construction. Proceedings of Actas del Sexto Congreso Naional de Historia de la Construccion, Valencia.
• 34. Ruggieri, N 2021. New Insights on the Borbone Construction System: a Peculiar 18th Century Retrofitting Solution for Earthquake Damaged Churches. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 1-17. doi: 10.1080/15583058.2021.1881187.
• 35. Ruggieri, S, Tosto, C, Rosati, G, Uva, G and Ferro, G A 2020. Seismic vulnerability analysis of masonry churches in Piemonte after 2003 Valle Scrivia Earthquake: post-event screening and situation 17 years later. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 1-29. doi: 10.1080/15583058.2020.1841366.
• 36. Salzano, P, Casapulla, C, Ceroni, F and Prota, A 2020. Seismic Vulnerability and Simplified Safety Assessments of Masonry Churches in the Ischia Island (Italy) after the 2017 Earthquake. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 1-27. doi: 10.1080/15583058.2020.1759732.
• 37. Sánchez-Aparicio, L J, Mora, R, Conde, B, Maté-González, M Á, Sánchez Aparicio, M and González-Aguilera, D 2021. Integration of a Wearable Mobile Mapping Solution and Advance Numerical Simulations for the Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions: A Case of Study in San Pedro Church (Palencia, Spain). Remote Sensing 13, 1252. doi: 10.3390/rs13071252.
• 38. Sánchez-Aparicio, LJ, Riveiro, B, González-Aguilera, D and Ramos, LF 2014. The combination of geomatic approaches and operational modal analysis to improve calibration of finite element models: A case of study in Saint Torcato Church (Guimarães, Portugal). Construction and Building Materials 70, 118-129. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.106.
• 39. Sferrazza Papa, G, Tateo, V, Parisi, MA and Casolo, S 2020. Seismic response of a masonry church in Central Italy: the role of interventions on the roof. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 19, 1151-1179. doi: 10.1007/s10518-020-00995-w.
• 40. SOLID186. from: www.mm.bme.hu/~gyebro/files/anshelpv182/anselem/HlpESOLID186.html.
• 41. Sorrentino, L, D’Ayala, D, de Felice, G, Griffith, M C, Lagomarsino, S and Magenes, G 2017. Review of Out-of-Plane Seismic Assessment Techniques Applied To Existing Masonry Buildings. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 11, 2-21. doi: 10.1080/15583058.2016.1237586.
• 42. Şeker, B Ş and Büyükgüner, G 2021. An Assessment of the Performance of the Amasya Bayezid II Mosque Under Static and Dynamic Loads. Journal of Applied Engineering Sciences 11, 53-60. doi: doi:10.2478/jaes-2021-0008.
• 43. Tiberti, S and Milani, G 2017. Historic City Centers After Destructive Seismic Events, The Case of Finale Emilia During the 2012 Emilia Romagna Earthquake: Advanced Numerical Modelling on Four Case Studies. The Open Civil Engineering Journal 11, 1059-1078. doi: 10.2174/1874149501711011059.
• 44. Toramanyan, T 1911. Church of Tekor (in Armenian).
• 45. TYDRYK 2017. Tarihi Yapılar için Deprem Risklerinin Yönetimi Kılavuzu. Ankara, Turkey: General Directorate of Foundation in Turkey.
• 46. URL-1 Accessed Date: 13.12.2021, digor.gov.tr/tekor-kilisesi.
• 47. URL-2 Accessed Date: 13.12.2021. The Tekor Basilica: The Church of Saint Sargis. http://virtualani.org/tekor/index.htm.
• 48. URL-3 Accessed Date: 13.12.2021. https://www.simscale.com/docs/simwiki/fea-finite-element-analysis/what is-fea-finite-element-analysis/.
• 49. Valente, M, Barbieri, G and Biolzi, L 2017. Seismic assessment of two masonry Baroque churches damaged by the 2012 Emilia earthquake. Engineering Failure Analysis 79, 773-802. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.05.026.
• 50. Zizi, M, Corlito, V, Lourenço, PB and De Matteis, G 2021. Seismic vulnerability of masonry churches in Abruzzi region, Italy. Structures 32, 662-680. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.03.013.