Geothermal energy potential of Main Dolomite formation in SW Poland

• Autorzy: Słota-Valim Małgorzata , Lis-Śledziona Anita , Topór Tomasz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.7494/geol.2024.50.3.275

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper evaluates the geothermal potential of the Main Dolomite formation in an oil and gas field on the Fore-Sudetic Monocline (SW, Poland). The reservoir characterization included a well-logging interpretation and developed 3D petrophysical and temperature models that provided information on storage potential, transport properties, and temperature conditions in the analyzed carbonate formation. Geothermal energy potential was assessed using heat in place (HIP) and recoverable heat (Hrec) parameters for water and CO2 systems, considering a 50-year plant lifespan. Petrophysical and temperature data classify reservoirs using unsupervised machine learning, identifying zones with high and low geothermal potential, noting a strong limestone and do-lomite dichotomy. Dolomite horizon shows more promising reservoir quality with mean porosity and permeability of 0.045 and 0.4 mD, respectively, however, its mean thickness reaches 11.58 m at maximum. The calculated Hrec for a 50-year lifetime of a geothermal system varies across dolomite horizon. In the most promising areas of NNW, WSW, and E parts, the values of Hrec are 8.19, 3.47, and 1.34 MW for water, respectively, and 0.69, 0.29, and 0.11 MW for CO2 as working fluids. Remarkably, the energy locked in the NNW zone constitutes nearly 21% of the total geothermal energy potential within the entire dolomite horizons of the study area. The geothermal resources for the most perspective location within the dolomite horizon were estimated at 12.99 and 1.09 MW levels, using water and CO2 as working fluids, respectively, assuming 50 years of the project’s lifetime.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

geothermal resources; geothermal system modelling; 3D geological modelling; machine learning

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwa AGH
• Czasopismo: Geology, Geophysics and Environment
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: Vol. 50, no. 3
• Strony: 275--293
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. [57] poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Słota-Valim Małgorzata

• Oil and Gas Institute-National Research Institute, Krakow, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5915-7614+

autor

Lis-Śledziona Anita

• Oil and Gas Institute-National Research Institute, Krakow, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3067-3014

autor

Topór Tomasz

• Oil and Gas Institute-National Research Institute, Krakow, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5306-4636

Bibliografia

• Archie G.E., 1942. The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Transactions of the AIME, 146(1), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.2118/942054-G.
• Ahrens B., Lippert K. & Nehler M., 2022. Fluid flow properties of carbonate rocks under simulated in-situ conditions: Implications for geothermal reservoir quality [conference paper]. EGU General Assembly 2022, 23–27 May 2022, Vienna, Austria, EGU22-9858. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-9858.
• Bonto M., Welch M.J., Lüthje M., Andersen S.I., Vesh-areh M.J., Amour F., Afrough A., Mokhtari R., Hajiabadi M.R., Alizadeh M.R., Larsen C.N. & Nick H.M., 2021. Challenges and enablers for large-scale CO2 storage in chalk formations. Earth-Science Reviews, 222, 103826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103826.
• Bujakowski W. & Tomaszewska B. (red.), 2014. Atlas wykorzystania wód termalnych do skojarzonej produkcji energii elektrycznej i cieplnej przy zastosowaniu układów binarnych w Polsce: monografia [Atlas of the Possible Use Geothermal Waters for Combined Production of Electricity and Heat Using Binary Systems in Poland: Monograph]. Instytut Gospodarki Surowcami Mineralnymi i Energią Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Kraków.
• CBDG (Central Geological Database), n.d. Polish Geological Institute – National Research Institute. https://baza.pgi.gov.pl/en [access: 27.03.2023].
• Chomać-Pierzecka E., Sobczak A. & Soboń D., 2022. The potential and development of the geothermal energy market in Poland and the Baltic states – selected aspects. Energies, 15(11), 4142. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15114142.
• Czekański E., Kwolek K. & Mikołajewski Z., 2010. Złoża węglowodorów w utworach cechsztyńskiego dolomitu głównego (Ca2) na bloku Gorzowa. Przegląd Geologiczny, 58(8), 695–703.
• Esteves A.F., Santos F.M. & Magalhães Pires J.C., 2019. Carbon dioxide as geothermal working fluid: An overview. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 114, 109331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109331.
• Franco A. & Donatini F., 2017. Methods for the estimation of the energy stored in geothermal reservoirs. Journal of Physics: Conference Series [34th UIT Heat Transfer Conference 4–6 July 2016, Ferrata, Italy], 796, 012025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/796/1/012025.
• Górecki W. (red.), 2006. Atlas zasobów geotermalnych formacji paleozoicznej na Niżu Polskim [Atlas of Geothermal Re-sources of Paleozoic Formations in the Polish Lowlands]. Akademia Górniczo-Hutnicza im. S. Staszica, Kraków.
• Górecki W., Sowiżdżał A., Hajto M. & Wachowicz-Pyzik A., 2015. Atlases of geothermal waters and energy resources in Poland. Environmental Earth Sciences, 74(12), 74 87–7495.
• GUS (Główny Urząd Statystyczny), 2023. Gospodarka paliwowo-energetyczna w latach 2021 i 2022 [Energy Statistics in 2021 and 2022]. Główny Urząd Statystyczny – Statistics Poland, Urząd Statystyczny w Rzeszowie – Statistical Office in Rzeszów, Warszawa – Rzeszów. https://stat.gov.pl/en/topics/environment-energy/energy/energy-statis-tics-in-2021-and-2022,4,18.html [access: 22.03.2023].
• Hafiz I., Albesher Z., Kellogg J. & Saeid E., 2022. Detecting the fault and fracture systems by using 3D seismic attribute – Anttracking algorithm. [in:] SE G/A A P G IMAGE 2022: International Meeting for Applied Geoscience & Energy, 28 Aug – 1 Sep 2022, Houston, TX: Expanded Abstracts 2022 Technical Program, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Houston, 1374–1379. https://doi.org/10.1190/image2022-3738405.1.
• Hajto M., 2006. Wyniki kalkulacji zasobów geotermalnych na Niżu Polskim [Calculation results of geothermal resources in the Polish Lowlands]. [in:] Górecki W. (red.), Atlas zasobów geotermalnych formacji mezozoicznej na Niżu Polskim [Atlas of Geothermal Resources of Mesozoic Formations in the Polish Lowlands], Akademia Górniczo- Hutnicza im. Stanisława Staszica, Kraków, 183–197.
• Hartlieb P., Toif l M., Kuchar F., Meisels R. & Antretter T., 2015. Thermo-physical properties of selected hard rocks and relation to microwave-assisted comminution. Minerals Engineering, 91, 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mi neng.2015.11.0 08.
• Huang Y., Pang Z., Kong Y. & Watanabe N., 2021. Assessment of the high-temperature aquifer thermal energy storage (HT-ATES) potential in naturally fractured geothermal reservoirs with a stochastic discrete fracture network model. Journal of Hydrology, 603(part D), 127188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127188.
• Huang Y., Yuanzhi Ch., Ren L., Tian F., Pan S., Wang K., Wang J., Dong Y., Kong Y., Parsa M., Puppala H., Melnik O., Huang Y. & Cheng Y., 2022. Assessing the Geothermal Resource Potential of an Active Oil Field by Integrating a 3D Geological Model with the Hydro-Thermal Coupled Simulation. Frontiers in Earth Science, 9, 787057. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.787057.
• Jarzyna J., Bała M. & Zorski T., 1999. Metody geofizyki otworowej: pomiary i interpretacja. Uczelniane Wydawnictwa Naukowo-Dydaktyczne AGH, Kraków.
• Jaworowski K. & Mikołajewski Z., 2007. Oil- and gas-bearing sediments of the Main Dolomite (Ca2) in the Międzychód region: a depositional model and the problem of the boundary between the second and third depositional sequences in the Polish Zechstein Basin. Przegląd Geologiczny, 55(12/1), 1017–1024.
• Jolie E., Scott S., Faulds J., Chambefort I., Axelsson G., Gutiérrez-Negrín L.C., Regenspurg S., Ziegler M., Ayling, Richter B.A. & Zemedkun M.T., 2021. Geological controls on geothermal resources for power generation. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 2, 324–339. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00154-y.
• Kaminskaite I., Wang H., Liu Z. & Li H., 2021. Geothermal fluid flow in deep Carbonates and its impact on long-term reservoir performance: Natural systems [conference paper]. The 82nd EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition, October 18–21, 2021, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202112851.
• Karayiannis N.B., 1996. Generalized fuzzy c-means algorithms. [in:] Proceedings of the fifth IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems: FUZZ-IEEE ‘96; September 8-11, 1996, Hyatt Regency Hotel, New Orleans, Louisiana. Vol. 1, IEEE, 1036–1042. https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZY.1996.552321.
• Khasani, Itoi R., Tanaka T. & Fukuda M., 2004. A numerical study on the effects of initial water saturation of a geothermal reservoir on well characteristics. Memoirs of the Faculty of Engineering, Kyushu University, 64(1), 1–15.
• Khasani, Kusmono, Pri U. & Rachmawan B., 2021. Corrosion in geothermal facilities: Their causes, effects, mit-igation, and worldwide cases. AIP Conference Proceed-ings, 2338(1), 020007. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0066755.
• Kwolek K. & Mikołajewski Z., 2007. New stratigraphic scheme for Zechstein rocks in the Pogorzela High (Fore-sudetic Monocline) and its significance for hydrocarbon exploration. Przegląd Geologiczny, 55(12/1), 1037–1047.
• Lei H., 2022. Performance comparison of H2O and CO2 as the working f luid in coupled wellbore/reservoir systems for geothermal heat extraction. Frontiers in Earth Science, 10, 819778. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.819778.
• Li Y. & Sun J., 2016. 3D magnetization inversion using fuzzy c-means clustering with application to geology dif-ferentiation. Geophysics, 81(5), J61–J78. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2015-0636.1.
• Liu Y., Wang G., Yue G., Zhang W., Zhu X., & Zhang Q., 2019. Comparison of enhanced geothermal system with water and CO2 as working f luid: A case study in Zhacanggou, Northeastern Tibet, China. Energy Ex-ploration and Exploitation, 37(2), 736–755. https://doi.org/10.1177/0144598718795492.
• Mikołajewski Z. & Słowakiewicz M., 2008. Mikrofacje i diageneza utworów dolomitu głównego (Ca2) w rejonie bariery Międzychodu (Półwysep Grotowa, Polska Zachodnia). Biuletyn Państwowego Instytutu Geologicznego, 429, 91– 9 7.
• Moeck I.S., 2014. Catalog of geothermal play types based on geologic controls. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 37, 867–882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014. 05.032.
• Muffler P. & Cataldi R., 1977. Methods for regional assess-ment of geothermal resources. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 77-870, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado. https://doi.org/10.2172/6496850.
• Nathenson M., 1975. Physical factors determining the fraction of stored energy recoverable from hydrothermal convection systems and conduction-dominated areas. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 75-525, U.S. Geological Survey. Denver, Colorado. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr75525.
• Noga B., Biernat H., Kapuściński J., Martyka P., Nowak K. & Pijewski G., 2013. Perspektywy zwiększenia pozyskiwania ciepła geotermalnego w świetle nowych inwestycji zrealizowanych na terenie Niżu Polskiego. Te c h n i k a Poszukiwań Geologicznych, Geotermia, Zrównoważony Rozwój, 52(2/2), 75–84.
• Okoroafor E.R., Smith C.M., Ochie K.I., Nwosu C.J., Gud-mundsdottir H. & Aljubran M., 2022. Machine learning in subsurface geothermal energy: Two decades in review. Geothermics, 102, 102401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geo-thermics.2022.102401.
• Peryt T.M., 2010. Ewaporaty cechsztynu PZ1-PZ3 bloku Gorzowa. Przegląd Geologiczny, 58(8), 689–694.
• Peryt T.M. & Dyjaczyński K., 1991. An isolated carbonate bank in the Zechstein Main Dolomite Basin, Western Poland. Journal of Petroleum Geology, 14(4), 445–458. ht t ps://doi.org /10.1111/j.1747-5457.1991.tb01036.x.
• Peryt T.M. & Mikołajewski Z., 1997. Dokumentacja wynikowa z otworu Jarocin-8K [unpublished].
• PIG-PIB (Państwowy Instytut Geologiczny – Państwo-wy Instytut Badawczy), 2024. Geotermia [Geothermal Resources]. https://www.pgi.gov.pl/geotermia/przydatne/geotermia.html [access: 16.05.2024].
• Pikulski L., 1997. Dokumentacja wynikowa odwiertu Jarocin-7. Mapa strukturalna górnej części formacji dolomitu głównego na obszarze złoża ropy naftowej “Jarocin”[unpublished].
• Piris G., Herms I., Griera A., Colomer M., Arnó G. & Go-mez‐Rivas E., 2021. 3DHIP‐Calculator – a new tool to stochastically assess deep geothermal potential using the Heat‐In‐Place method from voxel‐based 3D geological models. Energies, 14(21), 7338. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14217338.
• Protas A. & Wojtkowiak Z., 2000. Blok Gorzowa: Geologia dolnego cechsztynu. [in:] Biernacka J. & Skoczylas J. (red.), Geologia i ochrona środowiska Wielkopolski: prze-wodnik LXXI Zjazdu Polskiego Towarzystwa Geologiczne-go, Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań, 163–171.
• Pruess K., 2006. Enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) us-ing CO2 as working fluid – A novel approach for generating renewable energy with simultaneous sequestra-tion of carbon. Geothermics, 35(4), 351–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2006.08.002.
• Ramalingam A. & Arumugam S., 2012. Experimental study on specific heat of hot brine for salt gradient solar pond application. International Journal of ChemTech Research, 4(3), 956–961.
• Robertson E.C., 1988. Thermal properties of rocks. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 88-441, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr88441.
• Sowiżdżał A., 2018. Geothermal energy resources in Poland – overview of the current state of knowledge. Re-newable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82(3), 4020–4027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.070.
• Sowiżdżał A., Hajto M. & Górecki W., 2016. The most pro-spective areas for geothermal energy utilization for heat-ing and power generation in Poland. [in:] EGC 2016: European Geothermal Congress 2016: Strasbourg, France, 19–24 September 2016, 1–7.
• Sowiżdżał A., Starczewska M. & Papiernik B., 2022a. Future technology mix – Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS) and Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) – an overview of selected projects as an example for future investments in Poland. Energies, 15(10), 3505. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15103505.
• Sowiżdżał A., Machowski G., Krzyżak A., Puskarczyk E., Krakowska-Madejska P. & Chmielowska A., 2022b. Pet-rophysical evaluation of the Lower Permian formation as a potential reservoir for CO2 – EGS – case study from NW Poland. Journal of Cleaner Production, 379(part 2), 134768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134768.
• Syukri M., Saad R., Marwan, Tarmizi, Fadhli Z. & Safitri R., 2018. Volcanic hazard implication based on magnetic signatures study of Seulawah Agam geothermal system, Indonesia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series [The 8th International Conference on Theoretical and Applied Physics, 20–21 September 2018, Medan, Indonesia], 1120, 012028. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1120/1/012028.
• Tagliaferri M., Gładysz P., Ungar P., Strojny M., Talluri L., Fi-aschi D., Manfrida G., Andresen T. & Sowiżdżał A., 2022. Techno-economic assessment of the supercritical carbon dioxide enhanced geothermal systems. Sustainability, 14(24), 16580. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416580.
• Topór T., Słota-Valim M. & Kudrewicz R., 2023. Assessing the geothermal potential of selected depleted oil and gas reservoirs based on geological modeling and machine learning tools. Energies, 16(13), 5211. https://doi.org /10.3390/en16135211.
• Wachowicz-Pyzik A., Sowiżdżał A., Maćkowski T. & Stefa-niuk M., 2024. A new approach to the development of geothermal water utilization in the context of identify-ing and meeting the social needs of local communities: A case study from the Mogilno–Łódź Trough, Central Poland. Sustainability, 16(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/s u16 010 0 37.
• Wagner R., 1994. Stratygrafia i rozwój basenu cechsztyńskie-go na Niżu Polskim. Prace Państwowego Instytutu Geologicznego, 146, PIG, Warszawa.
• Wagner R., Dyjaczyński K., Papiernik B., Peryt T.M. & Protas A., 2000. Mapa paleogeograficzna dolomitu głównego (Ca2) w Polsce. [in:] Kotarba M.J. (red.), Bilans i potencjał węglowodorowy dolomitu głównego basenu permskiego Polski, Archiwum WGGiOŚ AGH, Kraków.
• Zabihi M. & Akbarzadeh-T M.R., 2012. Generalized fuzzy c-means clustering with improved fuzzy partitions and shadowed sets. ISRN Artificial Intelligence, 2012, 92908.
• Zawisza L. & Nowak J., 2012. Metodyka określania parametrów filtracyjnych skał na podstawie kompleksowej analizy danych geofizyki otworowej. Wydawnictwa AGH, K ra ków.
• Zych I., 2009. Ropo-gazonośność dolomitu głównego na tle modelu miąższościowo-litofacjalnego cechsztynu w południowo-zachodniej części Niżu Polskiego. Akademia Górniczo-Hutnicza im. Stanisława Staszica, Wydział Geologii, Geofizyki i Ochrony Środowiska, Katedra Surowców Energetycznych, Kraków [PhD thesis, unpublished].

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).