PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Powiadomienia systemowe
  • Sesja wygasła!
Tytuł artykułu

Wykorzystanie danych satelitarnych i Systemu Informatycznego Lasów Państwowych w badaniach rozmieszczenia przestrzennego i wielkości szkód spowodowanych przez wiatr w drzewostanach wybranych obszarów Polski Północnej

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
EN
The use of satellite data and the System of National Forests in the study of spatial distribution and assessment of damages caused by wind storms in forests of chosen areas of Northern Poland
Języki publikacji
PL
Abstrakty
EN
The study presents the Geographic Information System created to analyse spatial distribution of wind-induced damages in forest stands of the Tuchola Forest, northern Poland, and in the vicinity of Toruń. It was used in several forest complexes mainly on the territory of the following Forest Districts in the Tuchola Forest: Woziwoda, Przymuszewo and Czersk, as well as in the Bory Tucholskie National Park. The following Forest Districts were analyzed in the vicinity of Toruń: Gniewkowo, Golub-Dobrzyń, Dobrzejewice and Toruń. The damages in Tuchola Forest were caused mainly by hurricanes in 26th of December 1999 and 22nd of June 2000. The dates of hurricanes caused the largest damages in the vicinity of Toruń were 17th of July 2001 and 28th of October 2002.
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
57--72
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 45 poz., rys., wykr.
Twórcy
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika Wydział Nauk o Ziemi, Katedra Geomatyki i Kartografii, ul. Lwowka 1, 187-100 Toruń
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika, Wydział Biologii i Ochrony Środowiska, Katedra Geobotaniki i Planowania Krajobrazu, ul. Lwowka 1, 187-100 Toruń
Bibliografia
  • ASTER G. P., PALACE M., KELLER M., PEREIRA R. jr., SILVA J. N. M., ZWEEDE J. C., 2002. Estimating canopy structure in an Amazon forest from laser range finder and IKONOS satellite observations. Biotropica, 34, SS. 483-492.
  • BOINSKI M., 1999. Podstawy geobotanicznej delimitacji Rezerwatu Biosfery „Bory Tucholskie”. W: A. Barcikowski, M. Boinski i A. Nienartowicz (red.), Wielofunkcyjna rola lasu. Ochrona przyrody – Gospodarka – Edukacja. O.W. „Turpress”, Toruń, ss. 19-40.
  • BOINSKI M., 2002. Roślinność leśna Tucholskiego Parku Krajobrazowego. W: M. Ławrynowicz, B. Rózga (red.), Tucholski Park Krajobrazowy 1985-2000, Stan wiedzy. Wyd. Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódz, ss. 245-355.
  • BRAUN S., SCHINDLER CH., VOLZ R., FLÜCKIGER W., 2003. Forest damages by the storm ‘Lothar’ in permanent observation plots in Switzerland: The significance of soil acidification and nitrogen deposition. Water, Air & Soil Pollution, 142, ss. 327-340.
  • CAMPBELL D. J., 1998, Salt-wind induced wave regeneration in coastal pine forests in New Zealand. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 28, ss. 953-960.
  • CLARKE R., 2001. Lothar and Martin. WMO Bulletin, 50, ss. 54-59.
  • COUTTS M.P., GRACE J. (eds.), 1995, Wind and Trees. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • FOSTER D. R., BOOSE E. R., 1992. Patterns of forest damage resulting from catastrophic wind in central New England, USA. Journal of Ecology, 80, ss. 79-98.
  • FRANKLIN S. E., WULDER M. A., GERYLO G. R., 2001. Texture analysis of IKONOS panchromatic data for Douglas-fir forest age class separability in British Columbia.
  • Interantional Journal of Remote Sensing, 22,ss. 2627-2632.
  • GARDINNER B., PELTOLA H., KELLOMÄKI S., 2000. Comparison of two models for predicting the critical wind speeds required to damage coniferous trees. Ecological Modellng, 129, ss. 1-23.
  • GORZELAK A., 1999. Zalesianie terenów porolnych. Instytut Badawczy Leśnictwa. Warszawa.
  • HASSINEN A., LEMETTINEN M., PELTOLA H., KELLOMÄKI S., GARDINER B., 1998. A prism-based system for monitoring the swaying of trees under wind loading. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 90, ss. 187-194.
  • HOSZOWSKI S. (red.), 1961. Lustracja województwa pomorskiego 1565. Gdańskie Towarzystwo Naukowe, Gdańsk.
  • KELLOMÄKI S., PELTOLA H., 1999. Silvicultural strtegie in forest management to optimize yield and growth in boreal forests while minimizing the risks of wind and snow damage. W: C.A. Brebbia & J.L. Usó (eds.), Ecosystems and Sustainable Development. Advances in Ecological Science – Volume 2.WIT Press, Joensuu, ss. 285-303.
  • KENNEDY P. (ed.), 1997. Application of Remote Sensing in European Forest Monitoring. Europaean Comission, Luxembourg. KONDRACKI J., 1980. Geografia fizyczna Polski. PWN, Warszawa.
  • KUNZ M., NIENARTOWICZ A., DEPTUŁA M., 2000. The use of satellite remote sensing imagery for detection of secondary forests on post-agricultural silos: A case study of Tuchola Forest, Northern Poland. W: J. L., Casanova (ed.) Remote Sensing in the 21st Century. Economic and Environmental Applications. Proceedings of the 19th EARSeL Symposium, Valladoid, Spain, 31 May – 2 June 1999, A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, Blookfield, 2000, ss. 61-66.
  • LAURANCE W. F., FERREIRA L. V., RANKIN DE-MERONA J. M., LAURANCE S. G., 1998. Rain forest fragmentation and the dynamics of Amazonian tree communities. Ecology, 79, ss. 2032-2040.
  • LEKES V., DANDUL I., 2000. Using airflow modeling and spatial analysis for defining wind damage risk classification (WINDARC). Forest Ecoloy and Managememnt, 135, ss. 331-344.
  • LINDEMANN J. D., BAKER W. L., 2001. Attributes of blowdown patches from a severe wind event in the southern Rocky Mountains. USA.
  • MAYER H., 1989, Windthrow. Philosophcal Transactions of The Royal Society B, 324, ss. 267-281.
  • MAYER H., SCHINDLER D., 2002. Forstmeteorologische Grundlagen zur Auslösung von Sturmschäden im Wald in Zusammenhang mit dem Orkan „Lothar“. Allgemeine Forst-und Jagdzeitug, ss. 173: 200-208.
  • MITCHELL S. J., 1995. The windthrow triangle: A relative windthrow hazard assessment procedure for forest managers. The Forestry Chronicle, 71, ss. 446-450.
  • MITCHELL S. J., 1998. A diagnostic framework for windthrow risk estimation. The Forestry Chronicle, 74, ss. 100-105.
  • MITCHELL S. J., HAILEMARIAM T., KULIS Y., 2001. Empirical modeling of cutblock edge windthrow risk on Vancouver Island, Canada, using stand level information. Forest Ecoloy and Managememnt, 154, 1-2, ss. 117-130.
  • NI DHUBHAIN A., WALSHE J., BULFIN M., KEANE M., MILLS P., 2001. The initial development of a windthrow risk model for Sitka spruce in Ireland. Forestry, 74, ss. 161-170.
  • NIENARTOWICZ A., KUNZ M., DOMIN D. J, DEPTUŁA M., 2002. Ecological consequences of changes in landscape structure in the neighbourhood of Brusy in 19th and 20th century. Ecological Questions, 1, ss. 117-135.
  • OUDEMANS P. V., POZDNYAKOVA L., HUGHES M. G., RAHMAN F., 2002. GIS and Remote Sensing for detecting yield loss in cranberry culture. Journal Nematology, 34: ss. 207-212.
  • PEARCE R., LLOYD D., MCCONNELL D., 2001. The post-Christmas ‘French’ storms of 1999. Weather, 56, ss. 81-91.
  • PELTOLA H., KELLOMÄKI S., HASSINEN A., GRANANDER M., 2000. Mechanical stability of Scots pine, Norway spruce and birch: an analysis of tree-pulling experiments in Finland. Forest Ecology Management, 135, ss. 143-153.
  • PETERSON CH. J., 2000. Catastrophic wind damage to North American forests and the potential impact of climate change. Science of the Total Environment, 262, ss. 287-311.
  • PETERSON CH.J., PICKETT S. T. A., 1990. Microsite and elevational influences on early forest regeneration after catastrophic windthrow. Journal of Vegetation Science, 1, ss. 657-662.
  • QUINE C. P., BELL P. D., 1998. Monitoring of windthrow occurrence and progression in spruce forests in Britain. Forestry, 71, ss. 87-97.
  • QUINE C. P., HUMPHREY J. W., FERRIS R., 1999. Should the wind disturbance patterns observed in natural forests be mimicked in planted forest in the British uplands? Forestry, 72, ss. 337-358.
  • RUEL J.-C., 2000. Factors influencing windthrow in balsam fir forests: from landscape studies to individual tree studies. Forest Ecology and Management, 135, ss. 169-178.
  • RUEL J.-C., PIN D., COOPER K., 1998. Effect of topography on wind behaviour in a complex terrain. Forestry, 71, ss. 261-265.
  • TANAKA S., SUGIMURA T., 2001. A new frontier of remote sensing from IKONOS images. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 22, ss. 1-5.
  • TRAMPLER T., KLICZKOWSKA A., DMYTERKO E., SIERPIŃSKA A., 1990. Regionalizacja przyrodniczo-leśna na podstawach ekologiczno-topograficznych. PWRiL, Warszawa.
  • ULBRICH U., FINK A.H., KLAWA M., PINTO J. G., 2001. Three extreme storms over Europe in December 1999. Weather, 56, ss. 70-80.
  • USTIN S. L., SMITCH M. O., JACKUEMOUD S., VERSTRAETE M., GOVAERTS Y., 1999. Geobotany: Vegetation Mapping for Earth Sciences. W: Remote Sensing for the Earth Sciences: Manual of Remote Sensing, 3rd ed., Vol. 3, New York, John Wiley & Sons, ss. 189-248.
  • WHIGHAM D. F., DICKINSON M. B., BROKAW N. V. L., 1999. Background canopy gap and catastrophic wind disturbances in tropical forests. W: L. R. Walker (ed.) EcosysElsevier, Amsterdam – Lausanne – New York – Oxford – Shannon – Singapore – Tokyo, ss. 223-252.
  • WESP U., 2000. Die Wahrheit über Lothar (die Weihnachtsorkan 1999). http://www.de-badner.de/lothar.htm
  • WILSON J. S., OLIVER C. D., 2000. Stability and density management in Douglas-fir plantations. Canadian Journal of Forest. Research, 30, ss. 910-920.
  • WRIGHT J. A., QUINE C. P., 1993. The use of a geographical information system to investigate storm damage to trees at Wykeham forest North Yorkshire. Scotish Forestry, 47, ss. 166-174.
  • ZAJĄCZKOWSKI J., 1991 Odporność lasu na szkodliwe działanie wiatru i śniegu. Wyd. Świat, Warszawa.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-85e12ae2-d22a-4f98-af48-f3332b0253e7
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.