Performance management system for primary healthcare services providers

• Autorzy: Korneta Piotr

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2021.153.17

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify critical areas of primary healthcare services providers and to develop a performance management framework for these organizations. Design/methodology/approach: Firstly, 12 semi-structured interviews with decision makers experienced with management of primary healthcare services providers are being conducted. Next, based on obtained results, holistic conclusions and the performance management system for primary healthcare services providers are being provided. Findings: Performance management of primary healthcare services providers is highly reliant on significant stakeholders, namely: patients, medical doctors, nurses and midwifes, stockholders and National Healthcare Fund. Failure to include any of stated stakeholders would result in considerable underperformance. The proposed framework postulates to focus on the performance management of the following 3 areas: (1) operations management, (2) risk and compliance and (3) development so that stated stakeholders are satisfied and provide, in exchange, their contribution to the organization. Research limitations/implications: The scope of this paper has been limited only to small and medium sized clinics located in Poland. Practical implications: Proposed in this study performance management framework, due to its simplicity, should be a useful tool for practitioners to adapt and apply in their organizations. Originality/value: The first performance management framework for primary healthcare services providers in Poland is being proposed. Since, the proposed framework acknowledges wider society, the developed concept should provide sustainable solutions for organizations willing to implement it.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

primary health care; performance management; performance management system; SME

PL

podstawowa opieka zdrowotna; zarządzanie wydajnością; system zarządzania wydajnością; MŚP

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: z. 153
• Strony: 239--257
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 44 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Korneta Piotr

• Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Management, Warsaw

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2726-8309

Bibliografia

• 1. Amaratunga, D., Baldry, D., and Sarshar, M. (2001). Process improvement through performance measurement: the balanced scorecard methodology. Work Study, Vol. 50, No. 5, pp. 179-188.
• 2. Andersen, B., Henriksen, B., and Aarseth, W. (2006). Holistic performance management: an integrated framework. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 61-78.
• 3. Atkinson, A.A., Banker, R.D., Kaplan, R.S., and Young, S.M. (1997). Management Accounting, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• 4. Borkowska, I. (2018). Evaluation of Public Health Care Condition in Poland. Studia i Prace Kolegium Zarządzania i Finansów, Vol. 165, No. 1.
• 5. Bowen, G. (2008). Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: A research note. Qualitative Research, Vol. 8, pp. 137-152.
• 6. Bresick, G., Christians, F., Makwero, M. et al. (2019). Primary health care performance: a scoping review of the current state of measurement in Africa. BMJ Global Health; 4:e001496. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001496.
• 7. Chau, V.S. (2008). The relationship of strategic performance management to team strategy, company performance and organizational effectiveness. Team Performance Management, Vol. 14, No. 3/4, pp. 113-117.
• 8. Chmiel, M. (2019). Quality Attributes of Primary Health Care Services. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization and Management, Vol. 134, pp. 7-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2019.134.1.
• 9. Cocca, P., Alberti, M. (2010). A framework to assess performance measurement in SMEs. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 59, No. 2, pp. 186-200.
• 10. Cross, K.F., and Lynch, R.L. (1988). The SMART way to define and sustain success. National Productivity Review, Vol. 8, No 1.
• 11. Curtright, J.W., Stolp-Smith, S.C., Edell, E.S. (2000). Strategic performance management: Development of a performance measurement system at the Mayo Clinic. Journal of Healthcare Management, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 58-68
• 12. Fontana, A., and Frey, J.H. (1998). Interviewing, the art of science. In: N.K. Denzin, and Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• 13. Garvin, D.A. (1991). How the Baldrige Award Really Works. Harvard Business Review, November/December.
• 14. Haczyński, J., and Buraczyńska, M. (2018). Emigration of Polish Nurses – Reality and Consequences. Management Issues, Vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 77-89.
• 15. Haczyński, J., Ryć, K., Skrzypczak, Z., and Suchecka, J. (2017). Physician Resources in the Health System – Comparison of Poland and Selected European Countries. Management Issues, Vol. 69, No. 3/1.
• 16. Haj-Ali, W., and Hutchison, B. (2017). Establishing a Primary Care Performance Measurement Framework for Ontario. Healthcare Policy, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 66-79.
• 17. Hennink, M.M., Kaiser, B.N., Marconi, V.C. (2017). Code Saturation Versus Meaning Saturation: How Many Interviews Are Enough? Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 591-608.
• 18. Kanji, G., and Moura, P. (2002). Kanji’s Business Scorecard. Total Quality Management, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 13-27.
• 19. Kaplan, R.S., and Norton, D.P. (1992). The balanced scorecard – measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, January/February.
• 20. Kates, N., Hutchison, B., O’Brien, P., Fraser, B., Wheeler, S. and Chapman, C. (2012). Framework for Advancing Improvement in Primary Care. Healthcare Papers, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 8-21.
• 21. Korczak, K., and Karlińska, M. (2018). The Use of Telemedicine among Polish Healthcare Providers. Roczniki Kolegium Analiz Ekonomicznych, Vol. 52, pp. 59-70.
• 22. Korneta, P. (2018). The Concept of Performance Measurement and Management System for Small and Medium Size Polish Healthcare Services Providers. Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie, Vol. 19, No. 12/1, pp. 211-222.
• 23. Korneta, P. (2019). Challenges of Performance Management Systems Implementations. Case Study. Przegląd Organizacji, Vol. 10, pp. 24-31.
• 24. Kwiatkowska, E.M., and Skórzewska-Amberg, M. (2019). Digitalisation of Healthcare and the Problem of Digital Exclusion. Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 48-63.
• 25. Leandri, S.J. (2001). Measures that matter: how to fine-tune your performance measures. Journal for Quality and Participation, Spring, pp. 39-41.
• 26. Lilford, R, Pronovost, P. (2010). Using hospital mortality rates to judge hospital performance: A bad idea that just won’t go away. British Medical Journal, Vol. 340.
• 27. Lincoln, Y.S., and Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
• 28. Marshal, C., and Rossman, G.B. (2011). Designing qualitative research (5th ed.). Sage.
• 29. McNair, C.J., Lynch, R.L., and Cross, K.F. (1990). Do financial and nonfinancial performance measures have to agree? Management Accounting Review, Vol. 75, No. 5.
• 30. Neely, A., Adams, C., and Crowe, P. (2001). The performance prism in practice. Measuring Business Excellence, Vol. 5, No. 2.
• 31. Nita, B. (2016). Krytyka zrównoważonej karty wyników. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, Vol. 442.
• 32. Rampersad, H.K. (2004). Kompleksowa karta wyników. Jak przekształcać zarządzanie, aby postępując uczciwie osiągać doskonałe wyniki. Warszawa: Placet.
• 33. Robson, I. (2005). Implementing a performance measurement system capable of creating a culture of high performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 54, No. 2.
• 34. Rogan, L., Boaden, R. (2017). Developing a new clinical governance framework for chronic diseases in primary care: an umbrella review. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 4-15.
• 35. Sandy, Q. Qu, John Dumay, (2011). The qualitative research interview. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 238-264.
• 36. Shiva, R.A., and Vishnu, P.S. (2019). Measuring hospitals performance: Applying the management approach in Nepal. International Journal of Healthcare Management, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 292-301.
• 37. Silva, P., Ferreira, A. (2010). Performance management in primary healthcare services: evidence from a field study. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 424-449.
• 38. Starfield, B., SHI, L., Macinko, J. (2005). Contribution of Primary Care to Health Systems and Health. Milbank Quarterly, Vol. 83, No. 3, pp. 457-502.
• 39. Sushil (2010). Flexible Strategy Game-card. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Vol. 11, No. 1/2.
• 40. Tangen, S. (2004). Performance measurement: from philosophy to practice. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 53, No. 8, pp. 726-737.
• 41. Taticchi, P., Tonelli, F., Cagnazzo, L. (2010). Performance measurement and management: a literature review and a research agenda. Measuring Business Excellence, Vol. 14, No. 1.
• 42. Tyagi, A., and Singh, P. (2019). Hospital performance management: A multi-criteria decision-making approach. International Journal of Healthcare Management, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 286-291.
• 43. Weiner, B.J., Alexander, J.A., Shortell, S.M. et al. (2006). Quality improvement implementation and hospital performance on quality indicators. Medical Care Research and Review, Vol. 63, No. 1, pp. 29-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558705283122.
• 44. Wouters, M. Sportel, M. (2005). The role of existing measures in developing and implementing performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 25, No. 11, pp. 1062-82.