PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Improving stability of an ecological 3D-printed house - a case study in Italy

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Purpose: The structure WASP’S GAIA house printed without beams and columns; therefore, it’s not safe enough against earthquake or wind. Moreover, the structure printed layer by layer doesn’t present a good stability for build other floor in seismic zones. The aim of this work is to study stability of this house and give new technique to improve stability of the ecological house printed in 3D. Design/methodology/approach: For resolving this problem we considered the structure printed in 3D is simulated with rammed earth characterized by a horizontaly striped and the basic principles of seismic justification are similar to unreinforced mansory, we use spectral analysis method in order to find a maximum displacement induced by a seismic excitation and robot structural analysis software to analyze the mechanical resistance of the studied structure. Findings: The center of gravity approaches the twist center, presented in the results, which prove a good stability of the structure when we use circular beams and columns fabricate with wood material. We carried out three analyses: A modal analysis with 4 vibration mode when the cumulative mass reaches 99.98%. A seismic analysis according to the moroccanearthquake construction regulations (RPS 2011). Use natural beams and culumns to improve the stability of a structure with one wall and two walls, in the case of with or without reinforcement can prove a good stability. Compromising between ecology, safety and technology. Increase the mechanical characteristics to increase safety and prevents collapse in the seismic zones. The possibility of exploiting our cultural heritage with the development of other complex design in the field of construction. Research limitations/implications: The possibility of exploiting our cultural heritage with the development of other complex design in the field of construction. Development the diameter of crane wasp 3D printer. Practical implications: Exploiting this technology in the case of a natural catastrophic (seism, inundation, pandemic) to build safe and ecological building in the seismic zones. Build safe schools in the poor area for children. Originality/value: Development the design of GAIA WASP printed in 3D with two walls and other zones to improve the stability of house. Add natural beams and columns made by wood or bamboo inside the house printed with one wall, and two walls. Study the stability of house to obtain the twist centre approaches to centre of gravity. We carried out three analyses: A modal analysis with 4 vibration mode when the cumulative mass reaches 99.98 %, a seismic analysis, and a spectral analysis of the maximum acceleration.
Rocznik
Strony
18--25
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 39 poz., rys., tab., wykr.
Twórcy
autor
  • Electronic Systems, Information Processing, Mechanics and Energetics Laboratory, Mechanical Groupe Physical Department, Ibn Tofail University Kenitra, Morocco
autor
  • Electronic Systems, Information Processing, Mechanics and Energetics Laboratory, Mechanical Groupe Physical Department, Ibn Tofail University Kenitra, Morocco
autor
  • Department of Civil, Chemical, Environmental and Materials Engineering, University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy
Bibliografia
  • [1] F2792-12a: Standard terminology for additive manufacturing technologies, ASTM International, 2013.
  • [2] United Nation Environment Programme, Catalysing science-based policy action on sustainable consumption and production: the value-chain approach and its application to food, construction and textiles, UNEP, 2021.
  • [3] United Nation Environment Programme, Ministry of national land use planning, townplaning, housing and urbain policy Morocco, UNEP, 2018.
  • [4] U.S. Department of Energy, Building Energy Data Book, 2012.
  • [5] Construction-3D, available from: https://www.constructions-3d.com/
  • [6] Iconbuild, available from: https://www.iconbuild.com/vulcan
  • [7] Designboom, available from: https://www.designboom.com/architecture/dus-architects-kamermaker-3d-printer-pavilion/
  • [8] 3DWasp, available from: https://www.3dwasp.com
  • [9] M. Murphy, A San Francisco startup is 3D-printing entire houses in just one day, available from: https://qz.com/924909/apis-cor-can-3d-print-and-entire-house-in-justone-day
  • [10] M. Xia, J. Sanjayan, Method of formulating geopolymer for 3D printing for construction applications, Materials and Design 110 (2016) 382-390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.07.136
  • [11] D. Hwang, B. Khoshnevis, Concrete Wall Fabrication by Contour Crafting, Proceedings of the 21st International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, Jeju, Korea, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22260/ISARC2004/0057
  • [12] B. Furet, P. Poullain, S. Garnier, 3D printing for construction based on a complex wall of polymer-foam and concrete, Additive Manufacturing 28 (2019) 58-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.04.002
  • [13] D-shape, available from: https://d-shape.com/3d-printing/
  • [14] NTE 0.80: Design and construction with reinforced earth, National Training Service for the Construction Industry, National Building Regulations, Lima, Peru, 2017 (in Spanish).
  • [15] J. Cid, F.R. Mazarron, I. Canas, The earth building normative documents in the world, Informes de la Construccion 523 (2011) 159-169 (in Spanish). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.10.011
  • [16] ASTM E2392/E2392M-10: Standard Guide for Design of Earthen Wall Building Systems, ASTM International, 2016.
  • [17] NZS 4299:2020: Earth buildings not requiring specific engineering design, Standards New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand, 2020.
  • [18] M. Blondet, J. Vargas, N. Tarque, C. Iwaki, Earthquake-resistant construction on land: the great contemporary experience of the Pontifical Catholic University of Peru, Informes De La Construcción 63/523 (2011) 41-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.10.017
  • [19] ASTM Volume 04.12. Building Constructions (II): E2167 - Latest; Asset Management; Sustainability; Technology and Underground Utilities, ASTM International, 2018.
  • [20] Decree n° 2-12-666 of 17 rejeb 1434 (28 May 2013) approving the paraseismic regulations for the earthen constructions and establishing the National Committee for earthen buildings, Morocco (in French).
  • [21] J. Vyncke, L. Kupers, N. Denies, Earth as Building Material - an overview of RILEM activities and recent Innovations in Geotechnics, MATEC Web of Conferences 149 (2018) 02001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201814902001
  • [22] E. Ferretti, Ropes and CFRP Strips to Provide Masonry Walls with Out-Of-Plane Strengthening, Materials 12/17 (2019) 2712. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12172712
  • [23] E. Ferretti, G. Pascale, Combined Strengthening Techniques to Improve the Out-of-Plane Performance of Masonry Walls, Materials 12/7 (2019) 1171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12071171
  • [24] M. Dai, C. Peng, H. Liu, J. Wang, I. Ali, I. Naz, Analysis and imitation of organic Sanhetu concreto discovered in an ancient Chinese tomb of Qing Dynasty, Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 26 (2019) 101918. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2019.101918
  • [25] D. Silveira, H. Varum, A. Costa, Influence of the testing procedures in the mechanical characterization of adobe bricks, Construction and Building Materials 40 (2013) 719-728. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.058
  • [26] J.M. Gere, B.J. Goodno, Mechanics of materials, Cengage Learning, Stamford, 2011.
  • [27] J. Weiss, Elastic properties, creep and relaxation, in J.F. Lamond, J.H. Pielert (eds), Significance of tests and properties of concrete and concretemaking materials, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2006, 194-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1520/STP37737S
  • [28] BIS IS 1725: Specification for Soil Based Blocks Used in General Building Construction, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India, 1982.
  • [29] 164-EBM: Mechanics of earth as a building material, RILEM Technical Committee.
  • [30] G. Ruiz, X. Zhang, W.F. Edris, I. Canas, L. Garijo, A comprehensive study of mechanical properties of compressed earth blocks, Construction and Building Materials 176 (2018) 566-572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.077
  • [31] J.-C. Morel, A. Pkla, P. Walker, Compressive strength testing of compressed earth blocks, Construction and Building Materials 21/2 (2007) 303-309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.08.021
  • [32] M. Olivier, A. Mesbah, Z. El Gharbi, J.C. Morel, Test method for strength tests on blocks of compressed earth, Materiaux et Constructions 30 (1997) 515-517 (in Fernch).
  • [33] S. Guimera, Tensile tests adapted to ground material, Final project, LGM-EcoleNationale des TPE, Vaulxen-Velin, France, 1992 (in French).
  • [34] Lavoc, Diametral Compression Test Applied to Hydrocarbon Coatings, Research Mandate OFR 27/81, Report No. 17.84, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland, 1984 (in French).
  • [35] J.M.P.Q. Delgado, A.S. Guimaraes, V.P. de Freitas, The Influence of Some Physical Variables in the Capillarity Rise of Different Monolithic Walls, Defect and Diffusion Forum 334-335 (2013) 37-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.334-335.37
  • [36] G. Ranzi, R.I. Gilbert, Structural analysis. Principles, Methods and Modelling, CRC Press, London, 2015, 29-30, 459-463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315275185
  • [37] T.K. Datta, Seismic analysis of structure, John Wiley & Sons (Asia) Pte Ltd, Singapore, 205-211.
  • [38] M.I. Gomes, M. Lopes, J. de Brito, Seismic resistance of earth construction in Portugal, Engineering Structures 33/3 (2010) 932-941. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.12.014
  • [39] J.N. Yang, S. Sarkani, F.X. Long, A response spectrum approach for seismic analysis of nonclassicaly damped structures, Engineering Structures 12/3 (1990) 173-184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0296(90)90004-C
Uwagi
PL
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-856498a5-a96c-449d-98e8-4fb679f24e4d
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.