Congruence and discrepancy between observation and teachers’ self-report of inquiry-based instruction

• Autorzy: Kotuľáková Katarína , Orolínová Mária , Priškinová Natália , Schubertová Romana , Tóthová Renáta

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/cdem-2022-0002

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Opportunities for self-reflection and collaborative reflection support inquiry-based teaching. The presented study focuses on retrospective self-reports of 14 science teachers about teaching inquiry lessons in their regular science classes. Their self-reports were compared with observation reports of researchers. Data from semi-structured interviews were added. The results indicate that teachers overestimated their performance in the class in all observed areas of inquiry instruction. The most misinterpreted and overestimated area by teachers seems to be formulating research questions, analysing data and drawing conclusions, which are the most effective processes in student learning. Based on the results of the study, several implications are suggested in order to focus on the self-reflective skills of teachers.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

self-report; teacher; reflection skills; inquiry-based instruction

PL

samoocena; nauczyciel; refleksja; odpowiadanie na zapytania

• Wydawca: Towarzystwo Chemii i Inżynierii Ekologicznej
• Czasopismo: Chemistry-Didactics-Ecology-Metrology
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: R. 27, NR 1-2
• Strony: 123--134
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 36 poz., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Kotuľáková Katarína

• Department of Chemistry, Trnava University, Priemyselná 4, P.O.BOX 9, 918 43 Trnava, Slovakia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9432-2630

autor

Orolínová Mária

• Department of Chemistry, Trnava University, Priemyselná 4, P.O.BOX 9, 918 43 Trnava, Slovakia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9231-6728

autor

Priškinová Natália

• Department of Chemistry, Trnava University, Priemyselná 4, P.O.BOX 9, 918 43 Trnava, Slovakia

autor

Schubertová Romana

• Department of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Matej Bel University, Tajovského 40, 974 01 Slovakia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9255-9252

autor

Tóthová Renáta

• Spojená škola Sv. rodiny, Grade School, Gercenova 10, 851 01 Bratislava, Slovakia

Bibliografia

• [1] Kaasila R, Lauriala A. Teach Teach Educ. 2010;26:854-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.023.
• [2] Máčejová M, Zajacová Z. INTED2019 Proceedings. 2019;8224-34. DOI: 10.21125/inted.2019.2035.
• [3] Wenger E. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1995. ISBN: 9780521663632.
• [4] Clarke D, Hollingsworth H. Teach Teach Educ. 2002;18:947-67. DOI: 10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00053-7.
• [5] Moore-Russo DA, Wilsey JN. Teach Teach Educ. 2014;37:76-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2013.10.002.
• [6] Hagevik R, Aydeniz M, Rowell CG. Teach Teach Educ. 2012;28:675-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2012.02.006.
• [7] Enderle P, Dentzau M, Roseler K, Southerland S, Granger E, Hughes R, et al. Sci Educ. 2014;98:1077-108. DOI: 10.1002/sce.21127.
• [8] van Driel JH. Professional Learning of Science Teachers. In: Bruguière C, Tiberghien A, Clément P, editors. Topics and Trends in Current Science Education. Contributions from Science Education Research. Lyon: Springer; 2014. Available from: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-94-007-7281-6.
• [9] Lin H, Hong, ZR, Yang K, Lee ST. Int J Sci Educ. 2013;35:3095-116. DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2012.689023.
• [10] Monet JA, Etkina E. J Sci Teach Educ. 2008;19:455-75. DOI: 10.1007/s10972-008-9106-7.
• [11] Capps DK, Crawford BA. J Sci Teach Educ. 2013;24:497-526. DOI: 10.1007/s10972-012-9314-z.
• [12] Stolp S, Zabrucky K. Int Electron J Elementary Educ. 2009;2:7-31. Available from: https://www.iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/255.
• [13] van Es EA, Sherin MG. J Math Teach Educ. 2010;13:155-76. DOI: 10.1007/s10857-009-9130-3.
• [14] Kruger J, Dunning DJ. Pers Soc Psychol. 1999;77:1121-34. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121.
• [15] Maderick JA, Zhang S, Hartley K, Marchand GJ. Educ Comput Res. 2016;54:326-51. DOI: 10.1177/0735633115620432.
• [16] Čiková E, Karolčík Š. Chem Didact Ecol Metrol. 2018;23(1-2):71-80. DOI: 10.1515/cdem-2018-0004.
• [17] Crawford BA, Capps DK. Teacher cognition of engaging children in scientific practices. In: Dori YJ, Mevarech ZM, Baker DR, editors. Cognition, Metacognition, and Culture in STEM Education. Heldelberg: Springer; 2018. Available from: https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319666570.
• [18] Feldman A, Özalp DJ. Sci Teach Educ. 2019;30:280-99. DOI: 10.1080/1046560X.2018.1560209.
• [19] Hutner TL, Markman AB. J Sci Teacher Educ. 2016;27:675-91. DOI: 10.1007/s10972-016-9480-5.
• [20] Maseko B, Khoza HC. J Balt Sci Educ. 2021; 20:456-70. DOI: 10.33225/jbse/21.20.456.
• [21] Kotuľáková K. Chem Didact Ecol Metrol. 2019;24:77-87. DOI: 10.2478/cdem-2019-0006.
• [22] Savasci F, Berlin DF. J Sci Teacher Educ. 2012;23:65-86. DOI: 10.1007/s10972-011-9262-z.
• [23] Meschede N, Fiebranz A, Möller K, Steffensky M. Teach Teach Educ. 2017;66:158-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2017.04.010.
• [24] Voss T, Kleickmann T, Kunter M, Hachfeld A. Mathematics teachers' beliefs. In: Kunter M, Baumert J, Blum W. Klusmann U, Krauss S, Neubrand M, editors. Cognitive Activation in the Mathematics Classroom and Professional Competence of Teachers. Results from the COACTIV Project. Boston: Springer; 2013. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5149-5.
• [25] Haney JJ, McArthur J. Sci Educ. 2002;86(6):783-802. DOI: 10.1002/sce.10038.
• [26] Borko H, Koellner K, Jacobs J, Seago N. ZDM - Int J Math Educ. 2011;43:175-87. DOI: 10.1007/s11858-010-0302-5.
• [27] Crawford BA. J Res Sci Teach. 2007;44:613-42. DOI: 10.1002/tea.20157.
• [28] Blömeke S, Gustafsson JE, Shavelson RJ. Z Psychol. 2015;223:3-13. DOI: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000194.
• [29] Borda Carulla S, editor. Tools for Enhancing Inquiry in Science Education. 2012. Available from: https://www.fondation-lamap.org/sites/default/files/upload/media/minisites/action_internationale/1-tools_for_enhancing_inquiry_in_science_education.pdf.
• [30] Capps DK, Crawford BA, Constas MA. J Sci Teach Educ. 2012;23:291-318. DOI: 10.1007/s10972-012-9275-2.
• [31] Forbes CT, Biggers M, Zangori L. Sch Sci Math. 2013;4:180-90. DOI: 10.1111/ssm.12014.
• [32] NRC. Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A Guide for Teaching and Learning. National Academy Press; 2000. Available from: https://www.nap.edu/catalog/9596/inquiry-and-the-national-scienceeducation-standards-a-guide-for.
• [33] Conway JM, Jako RA, Goodman D. J Appl Psychol. 1995;80:565-79. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.80.5.565.
• [34] Furtak EM, Seidel T, Iverson H, Briggs DC. Rev Educ Res. 2012;82:300-29. DOI: 10.3102/0034654312457206.
• [35] Zangori L, Forbes CT, Biggers M. J Res Sci Teach. 2013;50:989-1017. DOI: 10.1002/tea.21104.
• [36] McLaughlin CA, MacFadden BJ. Res Sci Educ. 2014;44:927-47. DOI: 10.1007/s11165-014-9408-z.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).