The instruments of evaluating the intensity of opposition to changes in an organization

• Autorzy: Chernova L. , Kunanets N.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

When analyzing the reasons of the previous programs`failure, we usually focus on the following questions: timeliness of the program results obtaining, keeping to the budget frames, and the results compliance with the quality parameters specified. In other cases, the analysis confirms that the program and the team’s activity have been successfully finished, the payments to suppliers completed and the interested persons and users quite satisfied. It is much less frequently when the question of selecting the most pertinent area of changes is raised, as well as thequestion of readiness of the organization for the changes to occur due to the implementation of the program. The process of introducing a program, that assure changes, into organization activities is the subject of this article. The objectives: development of an instrument for analyzing the possibility of implementation of changes into the work of an organization and for evaluating the intensity of resistance to changes. The task is to analyze factors having an impact on the results and possibility of introducing changes within an organization, to consider and to ground the main problems and the sources of resistance to the changes. In our research, we used such methods as logical summarizing, analysis and synthesis, structural analysis. The results: a model of calculating the resistance to changes has been developed. This model takes account of the program implementation intensity and allows determining the total level of resistance to changes after successful completion of the program. The research showed that the total level can be both high and low, as the organization personnel, especially its top management, may not recognize the need for changes, or may strive for achieving stability of the company situation. In the course of the research, the basic features of the changes introducing programs have been defined and the basic problems appearing at an organization presented, particularly, those relating to its personnel. The problems have been classified as relating to the organization top management and directly relating to the team working on the program. Conclusions: the instruments foranalyzing the implementation of the program of changes or transformations within an organization have been obtained. The results achieved in the research bring the statement that if the resistance to changes is stronger than the organizational potential of a company, any benefits from the implementation of the program are leveled down. Therefore, the reduction of the general resistance to changes within an organization isneeded first, and only after this, any programs and projects can be implemented.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

changes; resistance to changes; programs management; changes management; program top management; program team

• Wydawca: Polish Academy of Sciences, Branch in Lublin
• Czasopismo: ECONTECHMOD : An International Quarterly Journal on Economics of Technology and Modelling Processes
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: Vol. 8, No 1
• Strony: 11--20
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 34 poz., tab., wz.

Twórcy

autor

Chernova L.

• The Admiral Makarov National University of Shipbuilding 9, Heroiv Ukrainy ave., 54025 Mykolaiv, Ukraine

autor

Kunanets N.

• Lviv Polytechnic National University, St. Bandera str., 12, Lviv, Ukraine

Bibliografia

• 1. Glushkov V. M. 1975. Macroeconomic models and principles of building the Nation-Wide Automatic System of Management. Moscow, Statistika, 160. (in Russian).
• 2. Milner B. Z. 1980. The organization of program- and goal-oriented management. Moscow, Nauka, 376. (in Russian).
• 3. Pospelov G. S., Irikov V. A., Kurilov A. E. 1985. The procedures and algorithms of complex programs formation. Moscow, Nauka, 242. (in Russian).
• 4. Cleland D. 1974. Systemic analysis and target management / transl. from Engl. Moscow: B. i. M., 280. (in Russian).
• 5. Druzhynin Y. A. 2006. Methodological fundamentals of risk-oriented approach to management of technology development projects and programs resources: diss. … by doctor of techn. sceinces: 05.13.22 / Druzhynin Yevhen Anatoliiovych – Kharkiv, 593. (in Ukrainian).
• 6. Mesarovic M., Macko D., Takahara Y. 1973. Theory of Hierarchical Multilevel Systems. Moscow, Mir, 344. (transl. from Engl.).
• 7. Germeyer Y. B., Moiseev N. N. 1971. About some tasks of the theory of hierarchical management systems// Problems of applied mathematics and mechanics. Moscow, Nauka, 30-43. (in Russian).
• 8. Volkovich V. L. 1984. The models and algorithms of automated projecting of complicated management systems. Kyiv, Naukova dumka. (in Russian).
• 9. Mikhalevich V. S., Kuksa A. I. 1983. The methods of sequential optimization in discrete network tasks of optimum resources distribution. Moscow. (in Russian).
• 10. Voropaev V. I. 2014. Functional models of project activities management for various interested parties// Project and program management, No. 4. (in Russian).
• 11. Bushuev S. D. 2010. Creative technologies of project and program management Monograph / S.D. Bushuev, N.S. Bushueva and others. – Кyiv.: Sammit-Knyha, 768. (in Russian).
• 12. Belokon A. I. 2018. The analysis of project interested parties significance/ A.I. Belokon, S.A. Malanchiy, S.V. Antonenko, T.V. Kotsyuba, T.A.D. Alkubalayt// Bulletin of Prydniprovs’ka State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture, No. 2, 81-94. (in Russian).
• 13. Rach V .A. 2009. The problems of information protection in project management in the age of knowledge-driven economy/ V.A. Rach// Project management and manufacture development No. 2, 156-160. (in Ukrainian).
• 14. Tyan R. B., Ivanov S. B. 2009. Investment projects within strategic company management: monograph. Dnepropetrovsk, Makovetskiy, 404. (in Russian).
• 15. Mazur I. I., Shapiro V. D., Olderogge N. G., Polkovnikov A. V. 2014. Project management. Moscow, Omega-L, 959. (in Russian).
• 16. Bushuev S. D. 2006. Project management: Fundamentals of professional knowledge and the system for evaluating competence of project managers. (National Competence Baseline, NCB UA Version 3.0) / S.D. Bushuev, N.S. Bushueva. Kyiv: IRIDIUM, 208. (in Russian).
• 17. Bushueva N. S. 2007. Models and methods of proactive management of organizational development programs: Monograph. Kyiv: Nauk. svit, 199. (in Russian).
• 18. Hiroshi Tanaka. 2006. Complex multiproject management at contractors’ organizations// Project and program management, No. 2. (transl. into Rus.).
• 19. Shigenobu Ohara. 2005. The application of P2M methodology in civil construction and the analysis of results// Project and program management, No. 3. (transl. into Rus.).
• 20. Grashina M. 2006. Fundamentals of project management / М. Grashina, V. Dunkan. – St. Petersburg: Piter, 208. (in Russian).
• 21. Parkhomenko O. M. 2000. Management of a machine building company: functions, organizational structure, personnel: Training manual. / О. Parkhomenko, А. Osievskiy. – Kharkov: National Aerospace University “KhAI”, 160. (in Russian).
• 22. Bushueva S. D. 2009. The manual on management of innovative projects and programs: Volume 1, Version 1.2 / [transl. into Russian, edited by S. D. Bushueva]. – Kyiv: Nauk. svit, 173. (in Russian).
• 23. Miahkov Y. P. 2014. The model of realization of changing the structure of a project-oriented organization under restructuring conditions / Y.P. Miahkov, О.І. Mazurkevych// Theory and praxis of metallurgy. The national scientific and technical journal No. 3 (98), 127-131. (in Ukrainian).
• 24. Bourne L. 2016. Stakeholder relationship management: at the maturity model for organizational implementation. CRC Press, New York, USA.
• 25. Friedman A., Miles S. 2006. Stakeholders: Theory and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• 26. Kerzner H. 2001. Strategic planning for project management maturity model. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
• 27. Malyi V. V., Mazurkevych O. I., Chernov S. K., Antonenko S. V., Zavhorodnii M. S. 2011. The elements of project management at an enterprise: Manual. Dnipropetrovsk: ІМА Press, 159. (in Ukrainian).
• 28. Chernov S. K., Malyi V. V. 2010. Project management: Training manual. Mykolaiv, NUSB, 354. (in Ukrainian).
• 29. Bushuev S. D. 1999. Dynamic leadership in project management: Monograph / S. D. Bushuev, V. V. Morozov. Кyiv, 312. (in Ukrainian).
• 30. Wideman M. R. 1998. How to Motivate All Stakeholders to Work Together // Field guide to project management / ed. by D. I. Cleland. USA: International Thompson Publishing Company.
• 31. Post J. E., Preston L. E., Sachs S. 2002. Redefining the Corporation: Stakeholder Management and Organizational Wealth // Stanford: CA, Stanford University Press.
• 32. Winn M. 2001. Building Stakeholder Theory with a Decision Modelling Methodology // Business & Society. 2001, Vol. 40, No. 2, 133-166.
• 33. Chernova L. S. 2011. Budgeting in the science-intensive enterprise strategic management. – Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies. 2011, No. 1/7 (49), 69-70.
• 34. Chernov S. K., Malyi V. V. 2010. Project management: Training manual. Mykolaiv, NUSB, 354. (in Ukrainian).

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2019).