The Influence of Biopreparations on the Growth and Development of Tomatoes under Biological Cultivation

• Autorzy: Nikonchuk Nataliia , Samoilenko Mykola

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12912/27197050/189236

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The study of the effect of biological preparations on the growth, development and yield of tomatoes was carried out at the experimental field of the Educational-Scientific-Practical Center of the Mykolaiv National Agrarian University under the conditions of the Southern Steppe of Ukraine according to generally accepted methods: field, laboratory and statistical. In order to study the elements of the organic tomato cultivation technology, a two-factor field experiment was conducted under the conditions of the Southern Steppe of Ukraine: Factor A: cultivar: 1. Rio Fuego; 2 Missouri. Factor B: complex fivefold treatment with biological preparations: Azotophyt-r, FitoHelp, Organic Balance, Mycohelp, Actoverm, Lepidocide during the growing season: first – 12–14 days after the emergence of seedlings, then every 12–14 days. As a result of the conducted research, the effect of biological preparations on biometric indicators of plant growth and development, namely plant weight, above-ground height and root length as well as dry weight accumulation in the vegetative mass of Rio Fuego and Missouri tomato cultivars. The above-ground mass of tomato plants of the Rio Fuego variety in the flowering phase in the variant with treatment was 196.8 g·piece^-1, which exceeded the weight of the plant from the control variant by 38.2 g·piece^-1, or 24.1%. The positive dynamics of the increase in raw vegetative mass during the treatment was noted during the fruiting period – 1036.4 g·piece^-1, in the control – 857.3 g·piece^-1. The increase in the raw mass of one plant, on average, was 20.9%. It was found that the use of biologics during the growing season of tomatoes contributed to an increase in the aboveground mass and a decrease in the percentage of roots to the total mass of the studied cultivars. The effect of biological preparations on the commercial yield of tomato fruit, which differed according to the years of research, was studied. The biologics used throughout the years with different agroclimatic conditions gave approximately the same results. The yield of the Rio Fuego cultivar increased in 11.1 Mg·ha^-1, or 24.9% due to the biologics. The Missouri cultivar turned out to be less productive throughout the years of research, but it was more responsive to the treatment with biologics, with the increase in the marketable fruit yield in comparison with the control being 10.9 Mg·ha^-1 (29.9%).

Słowa kluczowe

EN

biologics; Rio Fuego; Missouri tomato cultivars; fresh weight; dry weight; root system productivity; marketable tomato yield

• Wydawca: Lubelski Oddział Polskiego Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej ; Lublin University of Technology ; WNGB Wydawnictwo Naukowe
• Czasopismo: Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: Vol. 25, iss. 8
• Strony: 37--46
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 29 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Nikonchuk Nataliia

• Mykolayiv National Agrarian University, George Gongadze str. 9, Mykolayiv, 54020, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9425-2684

autor

Samoilenko Mykola

• Mykolayiv National Agrarian University, George Gongadze str. 9, Mykolayiv, 54020, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3292-9717

Bibliografia

• 1. Bona, E., Todeschini, V., Cantamessa, S., Cesaro, P., Copetta, A., Lingua, G., Massa, N. 2018. Combined bacterial and mycorrhizal binocular improve tomato quality at reduced fertilization. Scientia Horticulturae, 234, 160–165. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.02.026.
• 2. Borzykh, O.I., Sergiienko, V.G., Tytova, L.V., Biliavska, L.O., Boroday, V.V. Tkalenko, G.M. 2022. Potential of some bioagents in fungal diseases controlling and productivity enhancement of tomatoes. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection, 55(15), 1750–1765. DOI: 10.1080/03235408.2022.2116685.
• 3. Chowdappa, Р., Kumar, S.P.M., Lakshmi, M.J., Upreti, K.K. 2013. Growth stimulation and induction of systemic resistance in tomato against early and late blight by Bacillus subtilis OTPB1 or Trichoderma harzianum OTPB3. Biological Control, 65, 109– 117. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2012.11.009.
• 4. Surendra K.D. 2022. Biological inoculants and biopesticides in small fruit and vegetable production in California, 277–283. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-823355-9.00001-8.
• 5. Domaratskiy, Ye., Kozlova O., Kaplina A. 2020. Economic еfficiency of applying environmentally friendly fertilizers in production technologies in the South of Ukraine. Indian Journal of Ecology, 47(3), 624–629.
• 6. Domaratskіy, Ye. 2021. Leaf area formation and photosyntetic activity of sunflower plents depending on fertilizers and growth regulators. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 22(6), 99–105. DOI: 10.12911/22998993/137361.
• 7. Domaratskіy, Ye., Kozlova, O., Dobrovolskiy, A., Bazaliy, V. 2022. Optimization of water consumption of high-oleic sunflower hybrids under non-irrigated conditions of the steppe zone of Ukraine. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 23(6), 14–21. DOI: 10.12911/22998993/148150.
• 8. Gajc-Wolska, J., Mazur, K., Niedzińska, M., Kowalczyk, K., Żołnierczyk, P. 2018. The influence of foliar fertilizers on the quality and yield of sweet pepper (Capsicum annum L.). Folia Horticulturae, 30(2), 183–190. DOI: 10.2478/fhort-2018-0008.
• 9. Kalytka, V.V., Karpenko, K.M. 2011. The influence of different concentrations of the AKM growth regulator on seed quality and biometric parameters of tomato seedlings. Scientific Bulletin of the National University of Bioresources and Nature Utilization, Series Agronomy, 162(1), 247–252. http://elar.tsatu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/3015/1/4.pdf
• 10. Kalуtka, V.V., Karpenko, K.M. 2013. Effect of AKM growth regulator on the pigment complex and photosynthetic productivity of tomato plants. Scientific Bulletin of the National University of Bioresources and Nature Management of Ukraine. Ser.: Agronomy, 183(1), 72–77.
• 11. Karpenko, K.M., Kalytka, V.V. 2013. Economic and bioenergetic effectiveness of AKM growth regulator application in tomato cultivation. Herald of Agrarian Science of the Black Sea Region, 1(71), 122–128.
• 12. Karpenko, K.M., Gerasko, T.V., Vdovenko, S.A. 2018. Growth and development of tomato varieties in the open field under the influence of biologics. Bulletin of Agrarian Science of the Black Sea Region, 4(100), 68–74. DOI: 10.31521/2313-092X/2018-4(100)-10
• 13. Kipngeno, P., Losenge, T., Maina, N., Kahangi, E., Juma, P. 2015. Efficacy of Bacillus subtilis and Trichoderma asperellum against Pythium aphanidermatum in tomatoes. Biological Control, 90, 92–95. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2015.05.017.
• 14. Klochko, V.V., Chugunova, K.O., Kryuchkova, L.O., Bondar, T.I., Fedorenko, S.V., Avdeeva, L.V. 2018. Biologically active metabolites of Pseudomonas sp. 2303-inhibitors of phytopathogens and plant growth stimulators. Journal of Microbiology, 80(2), 67–79. DOI: 10.15407/microbiolj80.02.067.
• 15. Kolisnyk, Yu.L., Shapovalova, O.V., Strelnikov, L.S. 2016. Indicators of the intensity of growth of tomatoes treated with biological preparation Azotofit®-R. Modern achievements of pharmaceutical technology and biotechnology: coll. of science Ave. National Pharmaceutical University, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 317–327. https://dspace.nuph.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/11517/1/314-317.pdf
• 16. Kovalev, M.M. 2022. Agrobiological features and productivity of Diplotaxis tenuifolia plants when using biological preparations. Taurian scientific bulletin: Scientific journal. Agricultural sciences, 124, 56–63. DOI: 10.32851/2226-0099.2022.124.8.
• 17. Marian, M., Nishioka, T., Koyama, H., Suga, H., Shimizu, M. 2018. Biocontrol potential of Ralstonia sp. TCR112 and Mitsuaria sp. TWR114 against tomato bacterial wilt. Applied Soil Ecology, 128, 71–80. https://scholar.google.com.ua/scholar?cluster=6350836324844752333&hl=uk&as_sdt=0,5
• 18. Olanrewaju, O.S., Glick, B.R., Babalola, O.O. 2017. Mechanisms of action of plant growth promoting bacteria. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 33, 1–16. DOI: 10.1007%2Fs11274-017-2364-9.
• 19. Panfilova, A., Korkhova, M., Markova, N. 2023. Influence of biologics on the productivity of winter wheat varieties under irrigation conditions. Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 15(2), 11352. DOI: 10.55779/nsb15211352.
• 20. Panfilova, A., Korkhova, M., Gamayunova, V., Nikonchuk, N., Kovalenko, O. 2019. Formation of photosynthetic and grain yield of spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) depend on varietal characteristics and plant growth regulators. Agronomy Research, 17(2), 608–620. DOI: 10.15159/ar.19.099.
• 21. Pichura, V., Domaratskiy, Y., Potravka, L., Biloshkurenko, O., Dobrovol’skiy, A. 2023. Application of the Research on Spatio-Temporal Differentiation of a Vegetation Index in Evaluating Sunflower Hybrid Plasticity and GrowthRegulators in the Steppe Zone of Ukraine. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 24(6), 144–165. DOI: 10.12911/22998993/162782.
• 22. Rogach, V.V., Kuryata, V.G., Kosakivska, I.V., Voitenko, L.V., Shcherbatyuk, M.M. Rogach, T.I. 2022. Morphogenesis, pigment content, phytohormones and yield of tomatoes under the action of gibberellin and tebuconazole. Biosystems Diversity, 30(2), 150–156. DOI: 10.15421/012215.
• 23. Tytova, L.V., Sergienko, V.G. 2018. Effectiveness of the complex application of microbial preparations with fungicides for disease control and increasing the productivity of vegetable crops. Microbiology and biotechnology, 4, 30–41. DOI: 10.18524/2307-4663.2018.4(44).149359.
• 24. Varkey, S., Anith, K.N., Narayana, R., Aswini, S. 2018. A consortium of rhizobacteria and fungal endophyte suppress the root-knot nematode parasite in tomato. Rhizosphere, (5), 38–42. https://scholar.google.com.ua/scholar?cluster=8645282159735353303&hl=uk&as_sdt=0,5
• 25. Vdovenko, S.A. 2019. Complex system of growing vegetables in open ground.Planter, 2(44), 54–55. http://socrates.vsau.org/repository/getfile.php/24585.pdf
• 26. Yarovy, G.I., Kuzmenko, V.I. 2013. Effectiveness of biological preparations and plant growth regulators against tomato diseases. The Bulletin of Kharkiv National Agrarian University. Series Phytopathology and Entomology, 10, 187–191. https://repo.btu.kharkov.ua/bitstream/123456789/21944/1/2013_10_190-194_ yarovyi.pdf
• 27. Yashchuk, V.U., Vashchenko, V.M., Koretsky, A.P., Kryvosheya, R.M., Chaikovska, V.V. 2016. List of pesticides and agrochemicals approved for use in Ukraine. Kyiv: Univest Media LLC, 1024. https://dspace.nuft.edu.ua/handle/123456789/28217
• 28. Yeshchenko, V.O., Kopytko, P.G., Kostogryz, P.V., Opryshko, V.P. 2014. Basics of scientific research in agronomy. Vinnytsia: PE «TD Edelweiss and K». https://z-lib.io/book/16420705
• 29. Zhou, L., Yuen, G., Wang, Y., Wei, L., Ji, G. 2016. Evaluation of bacterial biological control agents for control of root-knot nematode disease on tomato. Crop Protection, 84, 8–13. https://scholar.google.com.ua/scholar?cluster=16426339865935239137&hl=uk&assdt=0,5