Optimisation of absorber parameters in the case of stochastic vibrations in a bridge with a deck platform for servicing pipelines

• Autorzy: Grosel Jacek , Podwórna Monika

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/sgem-2021-0030

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper focuses on the problem of optimising the cooperation between a dynamic vibration absorber (DVA) and a structure. The authors analyse a road beam bridge equipped with a working platform (deck) used to service pipelines installed on the structure. The paper studies the problem of choosing the optimal parameters for damping absorbers that reduce the random vibration of a beam subjected to a random sequence of moving forces with a constant velocity. The stochastic properties of the load are modelled by means of a filtering Poisson process. A single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) absorber model with a multi-degree-of-freedom (MDOF) primary structure model are is considered.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

urban network infrastructure; dynamic vibration absorber; DVA; vibration effect; dynamic analysis; Poisson process; random vibration

• Wydawca: De Gruyter
• Czasopismo: Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 43, nr s1
• Strony: 492--500
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 40 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Grosel Jacek

• Faculty of Civil Engineering, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Wyb. Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland

autor

Podwórna Monika

• Faculty of Civil Engineering, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Wyb. Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] Dallard P., Fitzpatrick T., Flint A., Low A., Smith R.R., Willford M., Roche M., 2001. London Millennium Bridge: Pedestrian-Induced Lateral Vibration, Journal of Bridge Engineering 6(6), 412–417.
• [2] Yau J.D., Yang Y.B., 2004. Vibration reduction for cable-stayed bridges traveled by high-speed trains, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 40, 341–359.
• [3] Majcher K., Wójcicki Z., 2014. Kinematically excited parametric vibration of a tall building model with a TMD. Pt. 1, Numerical analyses. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 14(1), 204–217.
• [4] Herbut A., Rybak J., Brząkała W., 2020. On a Sensor Placement Methodology for Monitoring the Vibrations of Horizontally Excited Ground Sensors 20(7), 1938; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20071938.
• [5] Den Hartog J.P., 1985. Mechanical Vibrations, 4th ed., Dover, New York.
• [6] Korenev B. G., Reznikov L.M., 1993. Dynamic vibration absorbers, John Wiley.
• [7] Soong T.T., Dargush G.F., 1997. Passive Energy dissipation systems in structural Engineering, Wiley, New York.
• [8] Jacquot R. Q., Hoppe D. H., 1973. Optimum random vibration absorbers, Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE 99, 612–616.
• [9] Cheung Y.L., Wong W.O., 2013. Optimization of a hybrid vibration absorber for vibration control of structures under force excitation, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 332, 494–509.
• [10] Sinha A., 2009, Optimal damped vibration absorber for narrow band random excitations a mixed H2/H∞ optimization, Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 24, 251–254.
• [11] Tigli O.F., 2012. Optimum vibration absorber (tuned mass damper) design for linear damped systems subjected to random loads, Journal of Sound and Vibration 331, 3035–3049.
• [12] Sieniawska R., Sniady P., Zukowski S., 1996. Optimization of stochastic vibrations absorbers with respect to structure's reliability, Structural Dynamics-EURODYN, Florence, 583–589.
• [13] Hua Y., Wong W., Cheng L., 2018. Optimal design of a beam-based dynamic vibration absorber using fixed-points theory, Journal of Sound and Vibration 421, 111–131.
• [14] Basili M., De Angelis M., Pietrosanti D., 2019. Defective two adjacent single degree of freedom systems linked by spring-dashpot-inerter for vibration control, Engineering Structures 188, 480–492.
• [15] Zuo L., Nayfeh S. A., 2006. The two-degree-of-freedom tuned-mass damper for suppression of single-mode vibration under random and harmonic excitation, Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, Transections of the ASME, 128(2), 56–65.
• [16] Barredo E., Larios J.G.M., Mayen J., Flores-Hernandez A.A., Colin J., 2019. Optimal design for high-performance passive dynamic vibration absorbers under random vibration, Engineering Structures, 195, 469–489.
• [17] Laurentiu M., Agathoklis G., 2014. Optimal design of novel tuned mass-damper-inerter (TMDI) passive vibration control configuration for stochastically support-excited structural systems, Probabilistic Engineering mechanics, 38, 156–164.
• [18] Jacquot R.G., 2001. Suppresion of random vibration in plates using vibration absorbers, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 248 (4), 585–596.
• [19] Shum K.M., 2015. Tuned vibration absorbers with nonlinear viscous damping for damped structures under random load, Journal of Sound and Vibrations, 346, 70–80.
• [20] Javidialesaadi A., Wierschem N.E., 2018. Optimal design of rotational inertial double tuned mass dampers under random excitation, Engineering Structures, 165, 412–421.
• [21] Yang F., Sedaghati R., Esmailzadeh E., 2021. Vibration suppression of Structures using tuned mass damper technology: A state-of-the-art review, Journal of Vibration and Control, https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546320984305.
• [22] Frahm H., 1911. Device for damping vibrations of bodies, United States Patent, 3576–3580.
• [23] Ormondroyd J., Den Hartog J.P., 1928. The theory of the dynamic vibration absorber, Transactions of ASME, Journal of Applied Mechanics 50 (7), 9–22.
• [24] Anh N. D., Nguyen N. X., Hoa L. T., 2013. Design of three-element dynamic vibration absorber for damped linear structures, Journal of Sound and Vibration 332, 4482–4495.
• [25] Asami T., Nishihara O., Baz A.M., 2002. Analytical solutions to H∞ and H2 optimization of dynamic vibration absorbers attached to damped linear systems, Transactions of ASME Journal of Vibration and Acoustics;124(2), 284–295.
• [26] Nishihara O., Asami T., 2002. Closed-form solutions to the exact optimizations of dynamic vibration absorbers (minimizations of the maximum amplitude magnification factors), Transactions of ASME Journal of Vibration and Acoustics 124(4), 576–582.
• [27] Sims N. D., 2007. Vibration absorbers for chatter suppression: a new analytical tuning methodology, Journal of Sound and Vibration 301 (3), 592–607.
• [28] Shen Y., Peng H., Li X., Yang S., 2017. Analytically optimal parameters of dynamic vibration absorber with negative stiffness, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 85, 193–203.
• [29] Issa J. S., 2013. Vibration absorbers for simply supported beams subjected to constant moving loads. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part K Journal of Multi-body Dynamics 226(4):398–404.
• [30] Samani F. S., Pellicano F., Masoumi A., 2013. Performances of dynamic vibration absorbers for beams subjected to moving loads. Nonlinear Dynamics 72(1–2).
• [31] Crandall S.H. and Mark W.D., 1963. Random Vibration in Mechanical Systems. New York: Academic Press.
• [32] Soong T.T., Grigoriu M., 1993. Random vibration of mechanical and structural systems, PTR Prentice-Hall, Inc.
• [33] Lin Y.K., Cai G.Q., 1995. Probabilistic structural dynamics: Advanced theory and applications, McGraw-Hill.
• [34] Solnes J., 1997. Stochastic processes and random vibrations, John Wiley & Sons.
• [35] Rystwej A., Śniady P., 2007. Dynamic response of an infinite beam and plate to a stochastic train of moving forces, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 299, 1033–1048.
• [36] Śniady P., 1989. Dynamic response of linear structures to a random stream of pulses, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 131, 1, 91–102.
• [37] Śniady P., 2000. Fundamentals of stochastic structure dynamics (in Polish), Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej.
• [38] Wolfram Mathematica 12. Wolfram Research ©Copyright 1988–2021.
• [39] Podwórna M., Grosel J., Śniady P., 2021. Absorbers impact on the reliability of structures subjected to random vibrations, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 1015.
• [40] Warburton G.B., 1982. Optimum absorber parameters for various combinations of response and excitation parameters. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 10, 381–401.