Violation of territorial integrity as a tool for waging long-term hybrid warfare (against the backdrop of power games in the South Caucasus region)

Iskandarov, Khayal Ibrahim; Gawliczek, Piotr; Soboń, Andrzej

doi:10.35467/sdq/174507

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Violation of territorial integrity as a tool for waging long-term hybrid warfare (against the backdrop of power games in the South Caucasus region)

Autorzy

Iskandarov Khayal Ibrahim , Gawliczek Piotr , Soboń Andrzej

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma

http://securityanddefence.pl

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.35467/sdq/174507

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

This paper seeks to examine the violation of territorial integrity as a stage of hybrid warfare. Grounded in the theoretical framework of neoclassical realism, this study analyses nations’ foreign policy strategies considering both global and domestic factors. Employing primarily qualitative research, this study concentrates on a case study of the South Caucasus region. Against the backdrop of the war which broke out in the early 2022 between Russia and Ukraine, the preservation of territorial integrity emerges as an imperative aspect of national security policy. Despite the longstanding recognition of territorial integrity as a fundamental tenet of international law over the centuries, this war has galvanised all nations with regard to the violation of territorial integrity. The paper delineates the principles of territorial integrity vis-à-vis the national security of the South Caucasus countries, substantiating the assertion that violation of the territorial integrity of the particular countries in this region serves the interests of external actors, either directly or indirectly, and is employed as a strategic tool in the pursuit of protracted hybrid warfare.

Słowa kluczowe

national security hybrid warfare territorial integrity territorial violation

Wydawca

Akademia Sztuki Wojennej

Czasopismo

Security and Defence Quarterly

Rocznik

2024

Tom

Vol. 45, No. 1

Strony

1--17

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 49 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Iskandarov Khayal Ibrahim

Military Scientific Research Institute, National Defence University, Yasamal District, Str. Academician Shafaet Mehdiev 136, AZ1065, Baku, Republic of Azerbaijan

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8975-6530

autor

Gawliczek Piotr

University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Elk Campus Branch, Tadeusz Kosciuszko Street 23, 19-300 Elk, Poland

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0462-1168

autor

Soboń Andrzej

a.sobon@pracownik.akademia.mil.pl

National Security Faculty, War Studies University, Al. Gen. Chrusciela 103, 00-910, Warsaw, Poland

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2540-2252

Bibliografia

1. Aliew N. (2018) ‘Prezident Armenii byl gotov na avtonomiyu Karabakha v sostave Azerbaydzhana. Ekskurs v istoriyu [Президент Армении был готов на автономию Карабаха в составе Азербайджана. Экскурсвисторию]’,], Media.Az. Available at: https://media.az/read/1067713668/ (Accessed: 17 August 2023).
2. Anglim S. (2021) ‘Azerbaijan’s victory: Initial thoughts and observations (and caveats for the “innovative”)’, Military Strategy Magazine, 7(3), pp. 10–17. Available at: https://.militarystrategymagazine.com/article/azerbaijans-victory-initial-thoughts-and-observations-and-caveats-for-the-innovative/ (Accessed: 2 October 2023).
3. Armenpress (2023) ‘Armenia ready to recognize Azerbaijan’s 86,600 km2 territorial integrity which includes Nagorno Karabakh – Pashinyan’. Available at: https://armenpress.am/eng/news/1111461.html (Accessed: 18 September 2023).
4. Baev P.K. (2017) ‘ Russia: A declining counter-change force’, in Cornell S.E. (ed.) The international politics of the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict: The original ‘frozen conflict’ and European security. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 71–87. doi: 10.1057/978-1-137-60006-6_4.
5. Batistich M. (1995) ‘The right to self-determination and international law’, Auckland University Law Review, 7(4), pp. 1013–1037. Available at: http://.nzlii.org/nz/journals/AukULRev/1995/7.html (Accessed: 15 August 2023).
6. Bivainis A. (2022) ‘Multi-dimensional assessment of the second Nagorno-Karabakh war’, Security and Defence Quarterly, 38(2), pp. 51–61. doi: 10.35467/SDQ/146180.
7. Blank S. (2014) ‘From Eurasia with Love’, American Foreign Policy Interests, 36(3), pp. 162–174. doi: 10.1080/10803920.2014.925338.
8. Broers L. (2020) ‘Perspectives. Did Russia win the Karabakh war?’, Eurasianet. Available at: https://eurasianet.org/perspectives-did-russia-win-the-karabakh-war (Accessed: 2 October 2023).
9. Caspersen N. (2017) ‘Moving beyond deadlock in the peace talks’, in Cornell S.E. (ed.) The international politics of the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict: The original ‘frozen conflict’ and European security. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 173–194. doi: 10.1057/978-1-137-60006-6.
10. Cornell S.E. (Ed.) (2017) The international politics of the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict: The original ‘frozen conflict’ and European security. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, doi: 10.1057/978-1-137-60006-6.
11. Forsberg T. (2022) ‘Finland and Sweden’s move to NATO’, PRIO Blogs. Available at: https://blogs.prio.org/2022/05/finland-and-swedens-move-to-nato/ (Accessed: 10 August 2023).
12. Gawliczek P. and Iskandarov K. (2023) ‘The Zangezur corridor as part of the global transport route (against the backdrop of power games in the South Caucasus region)’, Security and Defence Quarterly, 41(1), pp. 36–53. doi: 10.35467/sdq/161993.
13. Guner E., Iskandarov K. and Gawliczek P. (2022) ‘Theories of war in practice : Causes and termination (in the example of the second Karabakh War)’, Wiedza Obronna, 281(4). doi: 10.34752/2022-C281.
14. Heissler J. (2018) Finland’s reluctance to join NATO. Washington, DC: Heinrich Böll Stiftung. Available at: https://us.boell.org/en/2018/07/12/finlands-reluctance-join-nato (Accessed: 12 August 2023).
15. Heffter A. W. (1844) Das europäische Völkerrecht der Gegenwart. Berlin: E.H. Schroeder.
16. Office of the Historian (1975) Helsinki final act. Available at: https://.osce.org/helsinki-final-act (Accessed: 15 August 2023).
17. Iskandarov K. and Gawliczek P. (2021) ‘The second Karabakh war as a war of new generation’, Social Development and Security, 11(2), pp. 91–99. doi: 10.33445/SDS.2021.11.2.9.
18. Iskandarov K., Gawliczek P. and Mrozek J. (2023) NATO’s partnership policy in a dynamic security landscape: A simple look at a complex picture. Olsztyn: Centre for Eastern Europe Research UWM.
19. Iskandarov K., Gawliczek P. and Tomasik J. (2022) ‘Termination of war: Factors affecting the outcome (in the example of the second Karabakh War)’, Civitas Et Lex, 35(3), pp. 7–17. doi: 10.31648/cetl.7736.
20. Iskandarov K., Simons G. and Gawliczek P. (2019) ‘The South Caucasus: Stage for a “new great game” between NATO and Russia?’, Connections: The Quarterly Journal, 3(18), pp. 7–34. doi: 10.11610/Connections.18.3-4.01.
21. Kucera J. (2011) ‘Condoleezza Rice warned Georgian leader on war with Russia’, The Atlantic. Available at: https://.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2011/11/condoleezza-rice-warned-georgian-leader-on-war-with-russia/248560/ (Accessed: 4 August 2023).
22. Lambert M. (2017a) The Caucasus as a laboratory for Russian hybrid warfare, inside policy. Ottawa: Macdonald-Laurier Institute. Available at: https://macdonaldlaurier.ca/the-caucasus-as-a-laboratory-for--russian-hybrid-warfare-michael-lambert-for-inside-policy/ (Accessed: 5 August 2023).
23. Lambert M. (2017b) ‘Tracing the roots of Russia’s hybrid warfare tactics’, Eurasianet. Available at: https://eurasianet.org/tracing-the-roots-of-russias-hybrid-warfare-tactics (Accessed: 10 August 2023).
24. Markedonov S. (2017) ‘Russia’s evolving South Caucasus policy’, in Robbins M. (ed.) DGAPanalyse, 1, pp. 3–11. Available at: https://dgap.org/en/research/publications/russias-evolving-south-caucasus-policy (Accessed: 3 August 2023).
25. Markedonov S. (2018) ‘Russia and the conflicts in the South Caucasus: Main approaches, problems, and prospects’, Journal of Conflict Transformation, 3(2), pp. 24–47. Available at: https://caucasusedition.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Russia-and-the-conflicts-in-the-South-Caucasus-main-approaches-problems-and-prospects.pdf (Accessed: 26 July 2023).
26. Marxsen C. (2014) The concept of territorial integrity in international law – What are the implications for Crimea? Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2515911 (Accessed: 8 August 2023).
27. MRG (2023a) ‘Azerbaijan - World Directory of Minorities & Indigenous Peoples’, Minorityrights.Org. Available at: https://minorityrights.org/country/azerbaijan/ (Accessed: 6 August 2023).
28. MRG (2023b) ‘Armenia - World Directory of Minorities & Indigenous Peoples’, Minorityrights.Org. Available at: https://minorityrights.org/country/armenia/ (Accessed: 7 August 2023).
29. MRG (2023c) ‘Georgia - World Directory of Minorities & Indigenous Peoples’, Minorityrights.Org. Available at: https://minorityrights.org/country/georgia/ (Accessed: 3 August 2023).
30. Nasirov E., Iskandarov K. and Sadiyev S. (2017) ‘The South Caucasus: A playground between NATO and Russia?’, Connections: The Quarterly Journal, 16, pp. 47–56. doi: 10.11610/Connections.16.3.0.
31. news.az (2018) ‘Vnimaniyu pashinyana: Statya Ter-Petrosyana, kotoraya lishila yego vlasti [Вниманию Пашиняна: Статья Тер-Петросяна, которая лишила его власти]’, Available at: https://1news.az/news/20180521030012426-Vnimaniyu-Pashinyana-Statya-Ter-Petrosyana-kotoraya-lishila-ego-vlasti (Accessed: 17 August 2023).
32. Petrosyan A. (2021) ‘Role and place in the geopolitical environment of the South Caucasus’, EVN Report. Available at: https://.academia.edu/93988043/Armenias_Role_and_Place_in_the_Geopolitical_Environment_of_the_South_Caucasus (Accessed: 2 October 2023).
33. Piriyev H., Iskandarov K.I., Gawliczek P. and Mrozek J.J. (2023) The second Karabakh war: From causes to termination. Olsztyn: Centre for Eastern Europe Research UWM.
34. Popjanevski J. (2017) ‘International law and the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict’, in Cornell S.E. (ed.) The international politics of the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict: The original ‘frozen conflict’ and European security. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 23–47. doi: 10.1057/978-1-137-60006-6_2.
35. Rankin J. (2021) ‘Ex-NATO head says Putin wanted to join alliance early on in his rule’, The Guardian, 4 November. Available at: https://.theguardian.com/world/2021/nov/04/ex-nato-head-says-putin-wanted-to-join-alliance-early-on-in-his-rule (Accessed: 20 October 2023).
36. Sadiyev S. and Iskandarov K. (2018) ‘The evolution of the security environment in the South Caucasus since the end of the cold war’, in Niculescu G. and Labarre F. (eds.) What a ‘new European security deal’ could mean for the South Caucasus (RSSC SG), 17th RSSC SG Workshop Minsk, Belarus, 18–21 April 2018. Berlin, Germany: DOC Research Institute, pp. 47–53. Available at: https://.academia.edu/37852657/_What_a_New_European_Security_Deal_could_mean_for_the_South_Caucasus_ (Accessed: 19 August 2023).
37. Saha D., Giucci R., Lücke M., Kirchner R., Movchan V. and Zachmann G. (2018) ‘The economic effect of a resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict on Armenia and Azerbaijan’, Berlin Economics GmbH. Available at: https://berlin-economics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/The-economic-effect-of-a-resolution-of-the-Nagorno-Karabakh-conflict.pdf (Accessed: 3 August 2023).
38. Sari A. (2018) ‘Hybrid warfare, law, and the Fulda gap’, in Ford C. and Williams W. (eds) Complex battlespaces: The law of armed conflict and the dynamics of modern warfare, vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 161–190. doi: 10.1093/OSO/9780190915360.003.0006.
39. Shaffer B. (2017) ‘ The Islamic Republic of Iran’s policy toward the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict’, in Cornell S.E. (ed.) The international politics of the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict: The original ‘frozen conflict’ and European -security. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 107–124. doi: 10.1057/978-1-137-60006-6_6.
40. Sherr J. (2017) ‘Nagorno-Karabakh between old and new geopolitics’, in Cornell S. (eds) The international politics of the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 49–69. doi: 10.1057/978-1-137-60006-6_3.
41. Simons G., Manoylo A. and Trunov P. (2019) ‘Sweden and the NATO debate: Views from Sweden and Russia’, Global Affairs, 5(4–5), pp. 335–345. doi: 10.1080/23340460.2019.1681014.
42. Smith J. (2015) ‘A region of regions: The historical failure of integration in the South Caucasus’, in Palonkorpi M. (ed.) The South Caucasus beyond borders, boundaries and division lines: Conflicts, cooperation and development. Helsinki: Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland, pp. 1–8. Available at: https://researchportal.helsinki.fi/en/publications/the-south-caucasus-beyond-borders-boundaries-and-division-lines-c (Accessed: 22 August 2023).
43. Statista (2023) ‘Sweden: Perception of NATO membership 2023’, Statista Research Department. Available at: https://.statista.com/statistics/660842/survey-on-perception-of-nato-membership-in-sweden/ (Accessed: 2 August 2023).
44. Sterio M. (2018) ‘Self-determination and secession under international law: The cases of Kurdistan and Catalonia’, American Society of International Law 22, 22(1). Available at: https://.asil.org/insights/volume/22/issue/1/self-determination-and-secession-under-international-law-cases-kurdistan (Accessed: 18 July 2023).
45. Tahirov R., Iskandarov K.I. and Sadiyev S.S. (2020) ‘The updated Madrid principles in the “Karabakh Knot”‘, in Niculescu G.V. (ed.) How to break the current deadlock in Nagorno-Karabakh conflict resolution: Strategic dialogue on the peace process within a boosted peace context. Brussels, Belgium: European Geopolitical Forum, pp. 10–20. Available at: https://.academia.edu/44445595/How_to_Break_the_Current_Deadlock_in_Nagorno_Karabakh_Conflict_Resolution_Strategic_Dialogue_on_the_Peace_Process_within_a_Boosted_Peace_Context (Accessed: 18 July 2023).
46. Ter-Petrosyan L. (2022) ‘Voyna, ili mir? Pora stat seryezneye [Война, илимир? Порастатьсерьезнее]’, Aniarc. Available at: https://.aniarc.am/2022/01/09/war-or-peace-ter-petrosyan-1997/ (Accessed: 11 August 2023).
47. Tsygankov A.P. (2005) ‘Vladimir Putin’s vision of Russia as a normal great power’, Post-Soviet Affairs, 21(2), pp. 132–158. doi: 10.2747/1060-586X.21.2.132.
48. Tsygankov A.P. (2006) ‘If not by tanks, then by banks? The role of soft power in Putin’s foreign policy’, Europe-Asia Studies, 58(7), pp. 1079–1099. doi: 10.1080/09668130600926355.
49. Yepremyan T. (2021) ‘Extended European security complex and the South Caucasus: The US policy approaches’, The Review of European Affairs, 5(2), pp. 5–17. doi: 10.51149/ROEA.2.2021.1.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-83c5a892-55ab-4c68-b10a-41e4c82ca670