PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Crucial work environment factors for different generations’ employee : organisation fit

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
PL
Decydujące czynniki środowiska pracy dla pracowników różnych pokoleń : dopasowanie organizacji
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Recently, the challenges of managing different generations have been increasingly emphasised, arguing that different environmental factors are important for different generations, leading to the employee-organisation fit. Drawing upon the job demands-resources (JD-R) theory, employee-organisation fit approach, and cohort perspective, the purpose of this paper is to investigate the crucial work environment factors for different generations’ employee-organisation fit. While studying this issue, several presumptions were proposed and tested using a linear regression method. The quantitative data were collected from questionnaires distributed in Lithuania using simple random sampling (311 responses). The empirical research findings show that the factors of job resources (autonomy, feedback, trust, and leadership) affect the all different generations’ employee-organisation fit more substantially than job demands factors (workload, work pressure, and emotional demands). Moreover, results confirm that the employee-organisation fit for different generations is ultimately determined by different environmental factors.
PL
Ostatnio coraz częściej podkreśla się wyzwania związane z zarządzaniem pokoleniami, argumentując, że różne czynniki środowiskowe są ważne dla różnych pokoleń, co prowadzi do dopasowania pracowników do organizacji. Bazując na teorii zapotrzebowania na zasoby (JD-R), podejściu dopasowanym do organizacji pracowników i perspektywie kohortowej, celem tego artykułu jest zbadanie kluczowych czynników środowiska pracy dla dopasowania pracowników z różnych pokoleń. Podczas badania tego zagadnienia zaproponowano kilka założeń i przetestowano je za pomocą metody regresji liniowej. Dane ilościowe zebrano z kwestionariuszy rozprowadzanych na Litwie przy użyciu doboru celowego próby badawczej (311 kwestionariuszy). Wyniki badań empirycznych pokazują, że czynniki zasobów pracy (autonomia, informacja zwrotna, zaufanie i przywództwo) wpływają bardziej na organizację pracowniczą wszystkich pokoleń niż czynniki związane z wymaganiami pracy (obciążenie pracą, presja na pracę i wymagania emocjonalne). Ponadto wyniki potwierdzają, że organizacja pracowników dopasowana do różnych pokoleń jest ostatecznie zależna od różnych czynników środowiskowych.
Rocznik
Strony
364--375
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 47 poz., rys.
Twórcy
  • Kaunas University of Technology, Faculty of Economics and Management
  • Kaunas University of Technology, Faculty of Economics and Management
  • Kaunas University of Technology, Faculty of Economics and Management
  • Kaunas University of Technology, Faculty of Economics and Management
  • Czestochowa University of Technology, Faculty of Management
Bibliografia
  • 1. Afsar B., Badir Y., Khan M.M., 2015, Person-job fit, person-organization fit and innovative work behavior: The mediating role of innovation trust, “The Journal of High Technology Management Research”, 26(2).
  • 2. Bakker A.B., Demerouti E., 2017, Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward, “Journal of Occupational Health Psychology”, 22(3).
  • 3. Bakker A.B., Demerouti E., 2007, The job demands-resources model: State of the art, “Journal of Managerial Psychology”, 22(3).
  • 4. Bennett J., Pitt M., Price S., 2012, Understanding the impact of generational issues in the workplace, “Facilities”, 30(7/8).
  • 5. Berthelsen H., Hakanen J.J., Westerlund H., 2018, Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire - A validation study using the Job Demand-Resources model, “PLoS ONE”, 13(4).
  • 6. Bursch D., Kelly K., 2014, Managing the multigenerational workplace, http://www.kenan-flagler.unc.edu/~/media/Files/documents/executivedevelopment/managingthe-multigenerational-workplace-white-paper.pdf.
  • 7. Cable D.M., Judge T.A., 1996, Person-organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry, “Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process”, 67(3).
  • 8. Carrington V., Rowsell J., Priyadharshini E., Westrup R. (Eds.), 2015, Generation Z: Zombies, Popular Culture and Educating Youth, Springer.
  • 9. Crampton S.M., Hodge J.W., 2009, Generation Y: Unchartered Territory, “Journal of Business & Economics Research”, 7(4).
  • 10. Crumpacker M., Crumpacker J.M., 2007, Succession planning and generational stereotypes: Should HR consider age-based values and attitudes a relevant factor or a passing fad? “Public Personnel Management”, 36.
  • 11. Cucina J.M., Byle K.A., Martin N.R., Peyton Sh.T., Gast I.F., 2018, Generational differences in workplace attitudes and job satisfaction: Lack of sizable differences across cohorts, “Journal of Managerial Psychology”, 33(3).
  • 12. Delery J., Gupta N., 2016, Human resource management practices and organizational effectiveness: internal fit matters, “Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance”, 3(2).
  • 13. Dolot A., 2018, The characteristic of Generation Z, “E-mentor”, 2(74).
  • 14. Farzaneh J., Farashah A.D., Kazemi M., 2014, The impact of person-job fit and person-organization fit on OCB: The mediating and moderating effects of organizational commitment and psychological empowerment, “Personnel Review”, 43(5).
  • 15. Fogg P., 2009, When generations collide, “Education Digest”, 74.
  • 16. Gentry W.A., Griggs T.L., Deal J.J., Mondore S.P., Cox B.D., 2011, A comparison of generational differences in endorsement of leadership practices with actual leadership skill level, “Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research”, 63(1).
  • 17. Gursoy D., Chi C.G.Q., Karadag E., 2013, Generational differences in work values and attitudes among frontline and service contact employees, “International Journal of Hospitality Management”, 32.
  • 18. Hackman J.R., Oldham G.R., 1976, Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory, “Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes”, 16.
  • 19. Hillman D.R., 2014, Understanding multigenerational work-value conflict resolution, “Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health”, 29(3).
  • 20. Howe N., Strauss W., 2009, Millennials rising: The next great generation, Vintage.
  • 21. Karasek R.A., 1979, Job demands, decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign, “Administrative Science Quarterly”, 24
  • 22. Kristof A.L., 1996, Person-Organization Fit: An integrative review of its concept-tualizations, measurement and implications, “Journal of Personnel Psychology”, 49.
  • 23. Kristof-Brown A.L., Zimmerman R.D., Johnson E.C., 2005, Consequences of Individuals’ fit at work: a meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit, “Journal of Personnel Psychology”, 58.
  • 24. Lewis R., 2015, Generation Y at work: insight from experiences in the hotel sector, “International Journal of Business and Management”, 3(1).
  • 25. Lithuania in figures, 2018, Lithuania Statistics, https://osp.stat.gov.lt/services-portlet/pub-edition-file?id=30020.
  • 26. Liu B., Liu J., Hu J., 2010, Person-Organization Fit, Job Satisfaction, and Turnover Intention: An Empirical Study in the Chinese Public Sector, “Social Behavior and Personality”, 38(5).
  • 27. Lyons S., Kuron L., 2014, Generational differences in the workplace: A review of the evidence and directions for future research, “Journal of Organizational Behavior”, 35(S1).
  • 28. Marcinkus Murphy W., 2012, Reverse mentoring at work: Fostering cross-generational learning and developing millennial leaders, “Human Resource Management”, 51(4).
  • 29. Mehmood M., Awais M., Afzal M.M., Shahzadi I., Khalid U., 2017, The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Organizational Performance, “International Journal of Engineering and Information Systems”, 1(9).
  • 30. Memon M.A., Salleh R., Baharom M.N.R., Harun H., 2014, Person-Organization Fit and Turnover Intention: The Mediating Role of Employee Engagement, “Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal”, 6(3).
  • 31. Murphy K., Torres E., Ingram W., Hutchinson J., 2018, A review of high performance work practices (HPWPs) literature and recommendations for future research in the hospitality industry, “International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management”, 30(1).
  • 32. Posthuma R.A., Campion M.C., Masimova M., Campion M.A., 2013, A High Performance Work Practices Taxonomy: Integrating the Literature and Directing Future, “Research Journal of Management”, 39(5).
  • 33. Roczniewska M., Retowski S., Higgins E.T., 2018, How Person-Organization Fit Impacts Employees’ Perceptions of Justice and Well-Being, “Front. Psychol.”, 8(2318).
  • 34. Rudolph C.W., Rauvola R.S., Zacher H., 2017, Leadership and generations at work: a critical review, “The Leadership Quarterly”.
  • 35. Sekiguchi T., Huber V.L., 2011, The use of person-organization fit and person-job fit information in making selection decisions, “Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes”, 116(2).
  • 36. Siegrist J., 1996, Adverse health effects of high effort-low reward conditions, “Journal of Occupational Health Psychology”, 1(27).
  • 37. Singh A., Gupta B., 2015, Job involvement, organizational commitment, professional commitment, and team commitment - a study of generational diversity, “Benchmarking: An International Journal”, 22(6).
  • 38. Singh A.S., Masuku M.B., 2014, Sampling techniques & determination of sample size in applied statistics research: An overview, “International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management”, 2(11).
  • 39. Smits I.A., Dolan C.V., Vorst H.C., Wicherts J.M., Timmerman M.E., 2011, Cohort differences in big five personality factors over a period of 25 years, “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, 100.
  • 40. Twenge J.M., Campbell S.M., Hoffman B.J., Lance C.E., 2010, Generational differences in work values: Leisure and extrinsic values increasing, social and intrinsic values decreasing, “Journal of Management”, 36(5).
  • 41. Twenge J.M., Campbell W.K., Gentile B., 2012, Generational increases in agentic selfevaluations among American college students, 1966-2009, “Self and Identity”, 11(4).
  • 42. Twenge J.M., Konrath S., Foster J.D., Campbell W.K., Bushman B.J., 2008, Egos inflating over time: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory, “Journal of Personality”, 76
  • 43. Vincent J.A., 2005, Understanding generations: political economy and culture in an ageing society, “The British Journal of Sociology”, 56(4).
  • 44. Warner J., Sandberg A., 2010, Generational Leadership, Ready To Manage Inc, http://www.kiwata.com/pdf/Generational-Leadership.pdf.
  • 45. Williams K.C., Page R.A., Petrosky A.R., Hernandez E.H., 2010, Multi-Generational Marketing: Descriptions, Characteristics, Lifestyles, and Attitudes, “Journal of Applied Business and Economics”, 11(2).
  • 46. Yang J., Matz-Costa C., 2017, Age Diversity in the Workplace: The Effect of Relational Age within Supervisor-Employee Dyads on Employees’ Work Engagement, “The International Journal of Aging and Human Development”, 87(2).
  • 47. Zhang M., Yan F., Wang W., Guohong L., 2017, Is the effect of person-organisation fit on turnover intention mediated by job satisfaction? A survey of community health workers in China, “BMJ Open”, 7.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2019).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-833d6a80-7d55-46b0-9dbb-4ca297fc98bb
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.