Contribution to the evaluation of the ordinary biodiversity and environmental status of the Chettaba forest (Algeria) by the potential biodiversity index

Rached-Kanouni, Malika; Benoumeldjadj, Maya; Zerrouki, Alia; Ratiba, Bousba; Touafchia, Boutheyna

doi:10.12912/27197050/200801

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Contribution to the evaluation of the ordinary biodiversity and environmental status of the Chettaba forest (Algeria) by the potential biodiversity index

Autorzy

Rached-Kanouni Malika , Benoumeldjadj Maya , Zerrouki Alia , Ratiba Bousba , Touafchia Boutheyna

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12912/27197050/200801

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

The degradation of forest habitats and the resulting loss of biodiversity is a major global problem. To integrate biodiversity in the current management of forests, managers need tools based on established scientific knowledge and adapted to their needs and constraints. The objective of the present work is to study the characteristics of the biodiversity of the Chettaba forest (East of Algeria) in order to develop a management plan. In this perspective, a description of the dendrometric properties and the capacity of reception of the forest was carried out. This description was carried out through the implementation of a multifunctional inventory composed of a dendrometric inventory and a potential biodiversity inventory (PBI), a rapid habitat assessment method widely used in France. The results obtained show an average PBI in the Chettaba forest. With total scores ranging from 15 to 31 with percentages from 30 to 62% of the maximum potential. The PBI values related to the factors related to the stand and its forest management are considered average ranging from 31% to 63%, while the PBI values of the factors related to the context vary between 27% and 60% for all plots of the forest. The average tree density is 457 individuals/ha, with an average diameter of 16.31 cm and an average height of 4.35 m for an average basal area of 11.77 m2/ha. Overall, this work provides an overview of the distribution of plots with different levels of potential biodiversity. The current decline in biodiversity shed light on the critical need to develop tools and methods to improve the effectiveness of biodiversity conservation and monitoring in managed and protected areas.

Słowa kluczowe

Chettaba forest biodiversity dendrometric parameters potential biodiversity index

Wydawca

Lubelski Oddział Polskiego Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej
Lublin University of Technology
WNGB Wydawnictwo Naukowe

Czasopismo

Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology

Rocznik

2025

Tom

Vol. 26, iss. 4

Strony

150--160

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 37 poz., rys., tab

Twórcy

autor

Rached-Kanouni Malika

kmalikbio@yahoo.frhttps://www.ecoeet.com/Contribution-to-the-evaluation-of-the-ordinary-biodiversity-and-environmental-status,200801,0,2.html#:~:text=10%2E12912%2F27197050%2F200801https://www.ecoeet.com/Contribution-to-the-evaluation-of-the-ordinary-biodiversity-and-environmental-status,200801,0,2.html#:~:text=10%2E12912%2F27197050%2F200801

Larbi Ben M’hidi University, Department of Natural and Life Sciences, Exact Sciences and Natural and Life Sciences Faculty, Oum El Bouaghi, Algeria
AUTES research Laboratory, University of Constantine 3, Salah Boubnider, Constantine city, Algeria

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8957-5710

autor

Benoumeldjadj Maya

AUTES research Laboratory, University of Constantine 3, Salah Boubnider, Constantine city, Algeria
Larbi Ben Mhidi University Oum El Bouaghi, Department of Architecture, Earth Sciences and Architecture Faculty, Algeria

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6235-1090

autor

Zerrouki Alia

Larbi Ben M’hidi University, Department of Natural and Life Sciences, Exact Sciences and Natural and Life Sciences Faculty, Oum El Bouaghi, Algeria

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8560-3024

autor

Ratiba Bousba

Department of Biology and Plant Ecology, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Life, Frères, Mentouri University, Constantine 25000, Algeria

https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1580-0042

autor

Touafchia Boutheyna

Larbi Ben M’hidi University, Department of Natural and Life Sciences, Exact Sciences and Natural and Life Sciences Faculty, Oum El Bouaghi, Algeria

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5577-3244

Bibliografia

1. Angiolini, C., Foggi, B., Sarmati, S., Gabellini, A., Gennai, M., Castagnini, P., Mugnai, M., Borie, M., & Hulme, M. (2015). Framing global biodiversity: IPBES between mother earth and ecosystem services. Environmental Science & Policy, 54, 487– 496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.009
2. Baiges, T., Cervera, T., Gonin, P., Larrieu, L., & Palero, N. (2019). Posada a punt de l’Índex de Biodiversitat Potencial (IBP): un termòmetre per a mesurar la capacitat d’allotjar biodiversitat dels boscos (gestionats) de Catalunya. Revista Silvicultura, 80, 26-36. https://cpf.gencat.cat/web/.content/or_organismes/or04_centre_propietat_forestal/03_linies_ actuacio/transferencia_de_coneixement/IBP_CAT/ Binaris/IBP_Silvicultura_2019.pdf
3. Borie, M., & Hulme M. (2015). Framing global biodiversity: IPBES between mother earth and ecosystem services. Environmental Science & Policy, 54, 487–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. envsci.2015.05.009.
4. Chazdon, R. L., Brancalion, P.H., Lamb, D., Laestadius, L., Calmon, M. & Kumar, C. (2017). A policy‐driven knowledge agenda for global forest and landscape restoration. Conservation Letters, 10(1), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12220.
5. Douda, J., Boublík, K., Doudová, J. & Kyncl, M. (2017). Traditional forest management practices stop forest succession and bring back rare plant species. Journal of Applied Ecology, 54(3): 761-771. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12801.
6. Emberger, C., Larrieu, L. & Gonin, P. (2016). Dix facteurs clés pour la diversité des espèces en forêt. Comprendre l’Indice de Biodiversité Potentielle (IBP). Paris: Institut pour le développement forestier, déc. 2016, 58.
7. Emberger, C., Larrieu, L., & Gonin, P. (2021). Dix caractéristiques clés pour l’accueil d’une diversité d’espèces en forêt. Forêt-Nature,101, 10–11
8. Emberger, C., Larrieu, L., Gonin, P., Baiges, T., Cervera, T., & Palero, N. (2020). Els nostres boscos són plens de vida. Descobrim l’Índex de Biodiversitat Potencial (IBP). CPF, CNPF, INRAE Dynafor, 4.
9. Gonin, P., Larrieu, L. & Deconchat, M. (2017). L’Indice de biodiversité potentielle (IBP) : comment l’étendre à l’ensemble des forêts méditerranéennes? Forêt méditerranéenne. 38(3), 335–342. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03556536
10. Gonin, P., Larrieu, L. & Martel, S. (2012). L’indice de biodiversité potentielle (IBP) en région méditerranéenne. Forêt méditerranéenne. 33(2), 133–142. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03573282.
11. Gosselin, F. & Larrieu, L. (2020). Developing and using statistical tools to estimate observer effect for ordered class data: The case of the IBP (Index of Biodiversity Potential). Ecological Indicators, 110: 105884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ecolind.2019.105884
12. Gosselin, M., & Laroussinie, O. (2004). Biodiversité et Gestion forestière : connaître pour préserver. Synthèse bibliographique. Co-édition GIP Ecofor-Cemagref, Antony. pp. 320.
13. Gosselin, M., Valadon, A., Bergès, L., Dumas, Y., Gosselin, F., Baltzinger, C. & Archaux, F. (2006). Prise en compte de la biodiversité dans la gestion forestière : état des connaissances et recommandations, Paris, Office national des forêts, pp. 161.
14. Hofmeister, J., Hošek, J., Malíček, J., Palice, Z., Syrovátková, L, Steinová, J. & Černajová, I. (2016). Large beech (Fagus sylvatica) trees as ‘lifeboats’ for lichen diversity in central European forests. Biodiversity and Conservation, 25(6), 1073–1090. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10531-016-1106-x.
15. Kebrle, D., Zasadil, P., Hošek, J., Barták, V. & Šťastný, K. (2021). Large trees as a key factor for bird diversity in spruce-dominated production forests: Implications for conservation management. Forest Ecology and Management, 496, 119460. https://doi.org /10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119460.
16. Kok, M.T., Kok, K., Peterson, G.D., Hill, R., Agard, J. & Carpenter S R. (2017). Biodiversity and ecosystem services require IPBES to take novel approach to scenarios. Sustainability Science, 12(1): 177– 181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0354-8.
17. Larrieu, L., Courbaud, B., Drénou, C., Goulard, M., Bütler, R., Kozák, D., Kraus, D. & Krumm, F. (2022). Key factors determining the presence of Tree-related Microhabitats: A synthesis of potential factors at site, stand and tree scales, with perspectives for further research. Forest Ecology and Management, 515, 120235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120235
18. Larrieu, L., Gonin, P., & Deconchat, M. (2013). Le domaine d ’ application de l’indice de biodiversité potentielle (ibp). Rev. For. Française (August 2015). https://doi.org/10.4267/ 2042/50657
19. Larrieu, L., & Gonin, P. (2008). L’indice de Biodiversité Potentielle (IBP): une méthode simple et rapide pour évaluer la biodiversité potentielle des peuplements forestiers. Revue forestière française, 60(6), 727–748. https://dx.doi.org/10.4267/2042/28373.
20. Larrieu, L., & Gonin, P. (2010). L’indice de biodiversité potentielle ou IBP : un outil pratique au service de la biodiversité ordinaire des forêts. Forêt entreprise, 190, 52–57. https://prodinra.inra.fr/ record/40015.
21. Larrieu, L., Gosselin, F., Archaux, F., Chevalier, R., Corriol, G., Dauffy-Richard, E., Deconchat, M., Gosselin, M., Ladet, S., Savoie, J.M., Tillon, L., & Bouget, C. (2019). Assessing the potential of routine stand variables from multi-taxon data as habitat surrogates in European temperate forests. Ecological Indicators, 104, 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1016 /j.ecolind.2019.04.085
22. Larrieu, L., Paillet, Y., Winter, S., Bütler, R., Kraus, D., Krumm, F., Lachat, T., Michel, A.K., Regnery, B., & Vandekerkhove, K. (2018). Tree related microhabitats in temperate and Mediterranean European forests: A hierarchical typology for inventory standardization. Ecological Indicators, 84, 194–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.08.051.
23. Lassauce, A., Paillet, Y., Jactel, H., & Bouget, C. (2011). Deadwood as a surrogate for forest biodiversity: meta-analysis of correlations between deadwood volume and species richness of saproxylic organisms. Ecological Indicators, 11(5), 1027–1039. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.02.004.
24. Lemouissi, S., Rached-Kanouni, M., Hadef, A., Amine-Khoja, M., & Alatou, D. (2014). Adaptation of Holm oak (Quercus ilex L.) to seasonal climate variations. International Journal of Management Sciences and Business research, 3(5): 30–35. http:// www.oiirj.org/
25. Mancosu, E., Marín, A.I., Malak, D.A., Trombetti, M. & Bastrup-Birk, A. (2018). Setting priorities for the management of primary forest areas: the importance of a harmonized inventory for supporting regional conservation and restoration efforts. In 5th Forum Carpaticum.
26. Márialigeti, S., Tinya, F., Bidló, A., & Ódor, P. (2016). Environmental drivers of the composition and diversity of the herb layer in mixed temperate forests in Hungary. Plant Ecology, 217(5), 549–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-016-0599-4.
27. Mildrexler, D.J., Berner, L.T., Law, B.E., Birdsey, R.A., & Moomaw, W.R. (2020). Large trees dominate carbon storage in forests east of the cascade crest in the United States Pacific Northwest. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 3, 594274. https://doi.org/ 10.3389/ffgc.2020.594274.
28. Ngom, D., Fall, T., Sarr, O., Diatta, S., & Akpo, L.E. (2013). Caractéristiques écologiques du peuplement ligneux de la réserve de biosphère du Ferlo (Nord Sénégal). Journal of Applied Biosciences, 66, 5008– 5023. https://doi.org/10.4314/jab.v65i0.89644.
29. Oettel, J., & Lapin, K. (2021). Linking forest management and biodiversity indicators to strengthen sustainable forest management in Europe. Ecological Indicators, 122, 107275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107275.
30. Pagano, U. (2021). Ecological transition and new dwelling paradigms. Science & Philosophy, 9(2), 97–114. http://dx.doi.org/10.23756/sp.v9i2.692.
31. Pievani, T. (2015). La sesta estinzione di massa. Ambiente Rischio Comunicazione, 10, 8-16).
32. Rached-Kanouni, M., Kadi, Z., Khammar, H., Bousba, R., Amrane, R., Chellal, B., & Ababsa, L. (2020). Sanitary situation of Aleppo pine and holm oak on the Sidi R’Ghies forest, Algeria. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity, 21(9), 3954– 3960. https://doi.org/ 10.13057/biodiv/d210905.
33. Rossi, M., & Vallauri, D. (2013). Evaluer la naturalité. Guide pratique, version 1.2. World Wildlife Fund, Marseille.
34. Widerberg, M.K., Ranius, T., Drobyshev, I., & Lindbladh, M. (2018). Oaks retained in production spruce forests help maintain saproxylic beetle diversity in southern Scandinavian landscapes. Forest Ecology and Management, 417, 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.foreco.2018.02.048.
35. Yao, J., Zhang, C., de C´aceres, M., Legendre, P., & Zhao, X. (2019). Variation in compositional and structural components of community assemblage and its determinants. J. Veg. Sci, 30, 257–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12708.
36. Zeller, L., Baumann, C., Gonin, P., Heidrich, L., Keye, C., Konrad, F., Larrieu, L., Meyer, P., Sennhenn-Reulen, H., Müller, J., Schall, P., & Ammer, C. (2022). Index of biodiversity potential (IBP) versus direct species monitoring in temperate forests. Ecological Indicators, 136, 108692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108692
37. Zerrouki, A., Rached-Kanouni, M., Redjaimia, L., Kara, K., Touafchia, B., & Ababsa, L. (2022). Evaluation de l’état sanitaire de chêne vert de la forêt de Chettaba (Constantine). Revue des

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-831862d5-658e-4836-a2f0-0ccd0ab5910c