Comparative analysis of effect of thermal shock on adhesive joint strength

• Autorzy: Kłonica M.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12913/22998624/66509

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of this study was a comparative analysis of static shear strength of single-lap adhesive joints of 316L steel adherends, measured prior to and after mechanical treatment with a P320 grit coated abrasive tool. The study was of comparative nature and focused on adhesive joints subjected to thermal cycling. The tests were carried out on joints bonded with Epidian 5 and Epidian 6 epoxy adhesives hardened with Z1 and PAC curing agents. The static shear strength tests results of single-lap adhesive joints were analysed with regard to different surface treatment variants. The scope of tests covered a relatively short fatigue cycle, i.e. 200 cycles in the range of temperatures between -40o C and +60o C. This paper includes the surface free energy and selected surface roughness parameters of substrates and images showing the surface of adherends before and after mechanical treatment with P320 grit coated abrasive tool.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

adhesive joint; epoxy adhesive; thermal cycling

• Wydawca: Lublin University of Technology ; Polish Society of Ecological Engineering (PTIE), Branch of PTIE in Lublin
• Czasopismo: Advances in Science and Technology. Research Journal
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: Vol. 10, nr 32
• Strony: 263--268
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 11 poz., fig., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Kłonica M.

• Department of Production Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Lublin University of Technology, 36 Nadbystrzycka St., 20-618 Lublin, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Godzimirski J. Problemy klejenia konstrukcyjnego. Technologia i Automatyzacja Montażu, 1, 2009, 25–31.
• 2. Sadowski T., Balawender T., Śliwa R., Golewski P. and Kneć M. Modern hybrid joints in aerospace: modeling and testing. Archives of Metallurgy and Materials, 58(1), 2013, 163–169.
• 3. Kłonica M. Impact of thermal fatigue on Young’s modulus of epoxy adhesives. Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, 9(28), 2015, 103–106.
• 4. Humfeld G. R., Jr. Mechanical behavior of adhesive joints subjected to thermal cycling. Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Blacksburg, Virginia, 1997.
• 5. Kuczmaszewski J. Fundamentals of metal-metal adhesive joint design. Politechnika Lubelska, Oddział PAN w Lublinie, Lublin, 2006.
• 6. Kłonica M., Kuczmaszewski J., Kwiatkowski M. and Ozonek J. Polyamide 6 surface layer following ozone treatment. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 64, 2016, 179–187.
• 7. Kwiatkowski M. P., Kłonica M., Kuczmaszewski J. and Satoh S. Comparative analysis of energetic properties of Ti6Al4V titanium and EN-AW- 2017A(PA6) aluminum alloy surface layers for an adhesive bonding application. Ozone: Science& Engineering: The Journal of the International Ozone Association, 35(3), 2013, 220–228.
• 8. Fic S., Kłonica M. and Szewczak A. Adhesive properties of low molecular weight polymer modified with nanosilica and disintegrated ultrasonically for application in waterproofing ceramics. Polimery, 60(11-12), 2015, 730–734.
• 9. Żenkiewicz M. Comparative study on the surface free energy of a solid calculated by different methods. Polymer Testing, 26(1), 2007, 14–19.
• 10. Żenkiewicz M. Methods for the calculation of surface free energy of solids. Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, 24(1), 2007, 137–145.
• 11. Korzyński M. Metodyka eksperymentu, planowanie, realizacja i statystyczne opracowanie wyników eksperymentów technologicznych. WNT Warszawa, 2006.

Uwagi

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę.