Influence of Mesophilic Bacteria Inoculation with Chicken Manure for Biogas Production Enhancement in Anaerobic Digestion (AD) Process

• Autorzy: Alkarimiah Rosnani

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.59440/ceer/175795

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The objective of this study is to investigate biogas production by anaerobic digestion using mesophilic bacteria mixed with Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME). This project aims to determine the volume of biogas generation and volatile fatty acid (VFA) production from chicken manure via the anaerobic digestion process. Anaerobic digestion (AD) of chicken manure (CM) often faces obstacles, including high total ammonia nitrogen (TAN) concentration, inorganic soil particles, and wood chips. The digestion process was carried under batch mode conditions in Scott bottles of 1.0 L active volume. The bottles were immersed in a water bath to control their temperature at 37℃. The characteristics of total solid, volatile solid of mass fraction, pH, and temperature on the amount of biogas produced were studied. The investigation showed that biogas production can be enhanced by inoculation of another material. The optimum biogas composition in the AD system was recorded by Inoculum I, which was achieved on Day 2 at 560 mL/L. The highest cumulative methane yield was observed in the leachate with Inoculum (I), which was 8976 mL/gVS, while the CML produced 4 mL/g VS. The anaerobic digestion (AD) process augmented with inoculum demonstrated heightened efficacy in biogas generation and VFA concentration reduction during the acidogenic phase, surpassing the observed performance in chicken manure leachate.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

anaerobic digestion; POME; chicken manure; methane production; bacteria

PL

fermentacja beztlenowa; ścieki z olejarni; olej palmowy; obornik kurzy; produkcja metanu; bakterie

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Uniwersytetu Zielonogórskiego
• Czasopismo: Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: Vol. 33, no. 3
• Strony: 33--49
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 14 poz., fot., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Alkarimiah Rosnani

• School of Civil Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Nibong Tebal, Penang, Malaysia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8821-4614

Bibliografia

• 1. Zakaria, Z, Kamarudin, SK, Abd Wahid, KA and Abu Hassan, SH 2021. The progress of fuel cell for malaysian residential consumption: Energy status and prospects to introduction as a renewable power generation system. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 144, 110984. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2021.110984.
• 2. Poudel, RC, Khatiwada, D, Aryal, P and Sapkota, M 2021. Large-scale biogas upgrading plants: future prospective and technical challenges. Emerging Technologies and Biological Systems for Biogas Upgrading, 467-491. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12- 822808-1.00017-9.
• 3. Pavičić, J, Mavar, KN, Brkić, V and Simon, K 2022. Biogas and Biomethane Production and Usage: Technology Development, Advantages and Challenges in Europe. Energies 15(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/en15082940.
• 4. Molaey, R, Bayrakdar, A, Sürmeli, RÖ and Çalli, B 2018. Anaerobic digestion of chicken manure: Mitigating process inhibition at high ammonia concentrations by selenium supplementation. Biomass and Bioenergy, 108, 439-446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.10.050
• 5. MD Kamal, NI 2022. The Study Of Biogas Production From Chicken Manure (Cm) With Different Inoculum By Using The Anaerobic Digestion (Ad) Process. School Of Civil Engineering Universiti Sains Malaysia.
• 6. Cai, Y, Janke, L, Zheng, Z, Wang, X, Pröter, J and Schäfer, F 2021. Enhancing anaerobic digestion of chicken manure leachate: Effects of trace elements supplementation on methane production. Bioresource Technology Reports 14, p.100662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100662.
• 7. Singh, D, Tembhare, M, Machhirake, N and Kumar, S 2023. Biogas generation potential of discarded food waste residue from ultra-processing activities at food manufacturing and packaging industry. Energy 263, 126138. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2022.126138.
• 8. Dikinya, O and Mufwanzala, N 2010. Chicken manure-enhanced soil fertility and productivity: Effects of application rates. Journal of soil science and environmental management 1(3), pp.46-54.
• 9. Wang, F, Pei, M, Qiu, L, Yao, Y, Zhang, C and Qiang, H 2019. Performance of anaerobic digestion of chicken manure under gradually elevated organic loading rates. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH16122239.
• 10. Sarker, S, Lamb, JJ, Hjelme, DR and Lien, KM 2019. A review of the role of critical parameters in the design and operation of biogas production plants. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 9(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/APP9091915.
• 11. Dioha, IJ, Ikeme, CH, Nafi’u, T, Soba, NI and Yusuf, MBS 2013. Effect of carbon to nitrogen ratio on biogas production. International Research Journal of Natural Sciences 1(3), pp.1-10.
• 12. Wang, T, Xing, Z, Zeng, L, Peng, C, Shi, H, Cheng, JJ and Zhang, Q 2022. Anaerobic codigestion of excess sludge with chicken manure with a focus on methane yield and digestate dewaterability. Bioresource Technology Reports 19, p.101127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2022.101127.
• 13. Borowski, S and Weatherley, L 2013. Co-digestion of solid poultry manure with municipal sewage sludge. Bioresource technology 142, pp.345-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.05.047.
• 14. Cameselle, C and Gouveia, S 2013. Advances in Electrokinetic Remediation for the Removal of Organic Contaminants in Soils. In: Rashed, MN (ed) Organic Pollutants - Monitoring, Risk and Treatment. InTech Open, 209-229.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024)