An Innovative Design Approach for Charcoal Briquette Packaging Design to Meet Customer Requirements

• Autorzy: Wangphanich Pilada , Kongprasert Nattapong

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/mper.2022.142390

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

To survive in the competitive challenges, the products have to be designed to meet the needs and requirements of customers, differ from the competitors, and be friendly with the environment. This research was to propose an innovative design approach for charcoal briquette packaging design to meet the customer requirements. The customer requirements were explored and translated to product characteristics by using quality function deployment. The customers’ perceptions to product visual forms were explored through the emotional design approach. Customers’ requirements and customer perceptions were integrated to create a new charcoal briquette packaging. A new packaging design and process during its life cycle was evaluated an impact on the environment through carbon footprint values. The result showed that the innovative design approach can be used to guide designer design the charcoal briquette packaging to meet the requirements and perceptions of customers, illustrate the product identity and be friendly with the environment.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

customer requirement; emotional design; quality function deployment; brand identity; life cycle assessment

• Wydawca: Production Engineering Committee of the Polish Academy of Sciences ; Polish Association for Production Management
• Czasopismo: Management and Production Engineering Review
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Vol. 13, No. 4
• Strony: 3--15
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 48 poz., il., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Wangphanich Pilada

• Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Srinakharinwirot University, Thailand

autor

Kongprasert Nattapong

• Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Srinakharinwirot University, 63 Moo 7, Rangsit-Nakhon Nayok Road, 26120, Nakhon Nayok, Thailand

Bibliografia

• Akao Y. (1990), Quality function deployment: integrating customer requirements into product design, Cambridge: Productivity Press, USA.
• Ashtiany M.S. and Alipour A. (2016), Integration Axiomatic Design with Quality Function Deployment and Sustainable design for the satisfaction of an airplane tail stakeholders, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 53, pp. 142–150. DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.06.102.
• Battarbee K. and Mattelmaki T. (2003), Meaningful product relationships, Design and Emotion, Vol. 1, pp. 337–344.
• Bouchard C., Mantelet, F., Aoussat A., Solves C., Gonzales C.J., Coleman S. and Pearce K. (2009), A European emotional investigation in the field of shoes design, International Journal of Product Development, Vol. 7, No. 1/2, pp. 3–27. DOI: 10.1504/IJPD. 2009.022274.
• Buratti C., Fantozzi F., Barbanera M., Lascaroa E., Chiorri M. and Cecchini L. (2017), Carbon footprint of conventional and organic beef production systems: An Italian case study, Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 576, pp. 129–137. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.075.
• Chan L.K. and Wu M.L. (2002), Quality Function Deployment: A Comprehensive Review of Its Concepts and Methods, Quality Engineering, Vol. 15, pp. 23–35. DOI: 10.1081/QEN-120006708.
• Chen L.H. and Weng M.C. (2006), An evaluation approach to engineering design in QFD processes using fuzzy goal programming models, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 172, pp. 230–24. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.10.004.
• Choi K. and Jun C. (2007), A systematic approach to the Kansei factors of tactile sense regarding the surface roughness, Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 38, pp. 53–63. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2006.01.003.
• Cimini A. and Moresi M. (2018), Are the present standard methods effectively useful to mitigate the environmental impact of the 99% EU food and drink enterprises? Trends in Food Science & Technology, Vol. 77, pp. 42–53. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2018.05.005.
• Crilly N., Moultrie J. and Clarkson P.J. (2004), Seeing things: consumer response to the visual domain in product design, Design Studies, Vol. 25, No. 6, pp. 547–577. DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2004.03.001.
• Giama E. and Papadopoulos A.M. (2015), Assessment tools for the environmental evaluation of concrete, plaster and brick elements production, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 99, pp. 75–85. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.006.
• Ji S. and Chena B. (2016), LCA-based Carbon Footprint of a typical wind farm in China, Energy Procedia, Vol. 88, pp. 250–256. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro. 2016.06.160.
• He B., Xiao J. and Deng Z. (2018), Product design evaluation for product environmental footprint, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 172, pp. 3066–3080. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.104.
• Huang Y., Chen C.H. and Khoo L.P. (2012), Products classification in emotional design using a basicemotion based semantic differential method, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 42, pp. 569–580. DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2012.09.002.
• Kapferer J.N. (2008), New strategic brand management: creating and sustaining brand equity long term, London: Kogan Page, UK.
• Karjalainen T.M. (2003), Strategic brand identity and symbolic design cues, Proceedings of the 6th Asian Design International Conference, Japan, 14–17 Oct.
• Karjalainen T.M. (2007), It looks like a Toyota: Educational approaches to designing for visual brand recognition, International Journal of Design, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 67–81.
• Karjalainen T.M., Rahe U., Ljungman I., Lodin K. and Starodub K. (2006), NOYO – CREATING YOUR EXPERIENCE: A case study on the creation of affective brand script and visual product identity, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Design & Emotion, Sweden, 27–29 Sep.
• Karjalainen T.M. and Warell A. (2005), Do You Recognise This Tea Flask? Transformation of brand-specific product identity through visual design cues, Proceedings of the International Design Congress (IASDR 2005), Taiwan, 1–4 Nov.
• Kongprasert N. (2012), Emotional design approach to design teak wood furniture, Proceedings of the Asia Pacific Industrial Engineering & Management Systems Conference 2012 (APIEMS 2012), Bangkok, Thailand, 2–5 Dec.
• Kongprasert N. (2014), Development a Latex Pillow to Meet Customer Requirements, Proceedings of the Asia Pacific Industrial Engineering & Management Systems Conference 2014 (APIEMS 2014), South Korea, 12–15 Oct.
• Kongprasert N. (2015), Product design to meet customer requirements, Srinakharinwirot Engineering Journal, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 53–63.
• Kongprasert N., Brissaud D., Bouchard C., Aoussat A. and Butdee S. (2008), How to design and process brand identity through an integrated innovative approach, Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM2008), Singapore, 8–11 Dec.
• Kongprasert N. and Butdee S. (2017), A methodology for leather goods design through the emotional design approach, Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 170–179. DOI: 10.1080/21681015.2016.1240722.
• Kongprasert N., Wangphanich P. and Jutilarptavorn A. (2019), Charcoal briquettes from Madan wood waste as an alternative energy in Thailand, Procedia Manufacturing, Vol. 30, pp. 128–135. DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.019.
• Lianga Y., Sua J., Xia B., Yuc Y., Ji D., Suna Y., Cuia C. and Zhua J. (2017), Life cycle assessment of lithiumion batteries for greenhouse gas emissions, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 117, pp. 285–293. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.08.028.
• Lo C.H., Tseng K.C. and Chu C.H. (2010), One-Step QFD based 3D morphological charts for concept generation of product variant design, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 37, pp. 7351–7363. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.04.028.
• Lu W. and Petiot J.F. (2014), Affective design of products using an audio-based protocol: Application to eyeglass frame, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 44, pp. 383–394. DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2014.01.004.
• Mata T.M., Smith R.L., Young D.M. and Costa C.A.V. (2003), Life cycle assessment of gasoline blending options, Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 37, No. 16, pp. 3724–3732. DOI: 10.1021/es034024s.
• Mata T.M., Smith R.L., Young D.M. and Costa, C.A.V. (2005), Environmental analysis of gasoline blending components through their life cycle, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 517–523. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2003.09.006.
• McCormack J.P., Cagan J. and Vogel C.M. (2004), Speaking the Buick language: capturing, understanding, and exploring brand identity with shape grammars, Design Studies, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 1–29. DOI: 10.1016/S0142-694X(03)00023-1.
• Mohamad S.M. and Yusoff A.R. (2013), Improvement of Take-Away Water Cup Design by Using Concurrent Engineering Approach, Procedia Engineering, Vol. 53, pp. 536–541. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.02.069.
• Morais S., Mata T.M. and Ferreira E. (2010), Life cycle assessment of soybean biodiesel and LPG as automotive fuels in Portugal, Chemical Engineering Transactions, Vol. 19, pp. 267–272. DOI: 10.3303/CET 1019044.
• Myers D.G. (2004), Psychology, 7th ed., New York: Worth Publishers, USA.
• Myint S. (2003), A framework of an intelligent quality function deployment (IQFD) for discrete assembly environment, Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 45, pp. 269–283.
• Norman D.A. (2004), Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things, New York: Basic Books, USA.
• O’Brien D., Capper J.L., Garnsworthy P.C., Grainger C. and Shalloo L. (2014), A case study of the carbon footprint of milk from high-performing confinement and grass-based dairy farms, Journal of dairy science, Vol. 97, No. 3, pp. 1835–1851. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2013-7174.
• PAS 2050, (2011), Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services, British Standards Institution, UK.
• Raharjo H., Brombacher A.C. and Xie M. (2008), Dealing with subjectivity in early product design phase: A systematic approach to exploit Quality Function Deployment potentials, Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 26, pp. 253–278. DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2007.12.012.
• Razza B. and Paschoarelli L.S. (2015), Affective perception of disposable razors: A Kansei Engineering approach, Procedia Manufacturing, Vol. 3, pp. 6228–6236. DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.750.
• Shieh M.D. and Yeh Y.E. (2013), Developing a design support system for the exterior form of running shoes using partial least squares and neural networks, Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 65, pp. 704– 718. DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2013.05.008.
• Sularto L., Wardoyo and Yunitasari T. (2015), User Requirements Analysis for Restaurant POS and Accounting Application Using Quality Function Deployment, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 169, pp. 266–280. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.310.
• Vergara M., Mondragón S., Sancho-Bru J.S., Company P. and Agost M.J. (2011), Perception of products by progressive multisensory integration: A study on hammers, Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 42, pp. 652–664. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2010.09.014.
• Warell A. (2015), Identity references in product design: An approach for inter-relating visual product experience and brand value representation, Procedia Manufacturing, Vol. 3, pp. 2118–2125. DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.350.
• Warell A., Fjellner C. and Stridsman-Dahlström J. (2006), Visual product identity: Understanding identity perceptions conveyed by visual product design, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Design & Emotion 2006, Sweden, 27–29 Sep.
• Wood L.C., Wang C., Abdul-Rahman H. and AbdulNasir N.S.J. (2016), Green hospital design: integrating quality function deployment and end-user demands, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 112, pp. 903–913. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.101.
• Wu Y.H. and Ho C.C. (2015), Integration of green quality function deployment and fuzzy theory: a case study on green mobile phone design, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 108, pp. 271–280. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.013.
• Xu, P. and Liu, D. (2019), Product engagement and identity signaling: The role of likes in social commerce for fashion products, Information & Management, Vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 143–154. DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2018. 04.001.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023)