PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Using PLS-SEM to analyze the criteria for the optimum cost of green MICE projects in Indonesia based on value engineering and lifecycle cost analysis

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Starting in May 2021, green building is mandatory for new buildings in Indonesia. Greenship is a green building certification system in Indonesia issued by the Green Building Council Indonesia (GBCI) which is a member of the World GBC for the conservation and efficiency of resources (energy, water, land, materials, and nature). Greenship will be implemented in MICE which is a building for Meetings, Incentives, Conventions, and Exhibitions that has a strong economic attractiveness in Indonesia, which has a population of 270 million. Using the SEM-PLS it was quickly concluded that energy is the most influential factor in achieving platinum ratings from GBCI. With the value engineering (VE) method and life cycle cost analysis (LCC), it is needed an additional 4,689% cost for the platinum grade green costs through energy optimization will get a payback period of 3 years and 10 months. The novelty of this research, since the design, it is necessary to take steps to measure energy efficiency and other resources with a selection of materials/machines and working methods of the green concept to know the amount of additional initial costs that do not much burden investment costs compared with some future benefits of green MICE
Rocznik
Strony
555--570
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 18 poz., il., tab.
Bibliografia
  • [1] Z.X. Zeng, B.X. Song, Q.T. Wang, “A literature review on the research of circular economy-based green mice”, Advanced Materials Research, 2013, vol. 616-618, pp. 1615-1619; DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.616-618.1615.
  • [2] L. Tiecheng, “An Empirical Study of the Economic Impact of the MICE Industry in China Using Interregional Input-output Models”, American Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 2018, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 44-52; DOI: 10.11648/j.ajmse.20180305.12.
  • [3] H. Setyawan, “Daya Saing Destinasi MICE di Indonesia”, Jurnal Pariwisata Terapan, 2018, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 26-32; 2018; DOI: 10.22146/jpt.35379.
  • [4] J. An, H. Kim, D. Hur, “Keeping the competitive edge of a convention and exhibition center in MICE environment: Identification of event attributes for long-run success”, Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, no. 9; DOI: 10.3390/su13095030.
  • [5] V. Basten, I. Crévits, Y. Latief, M.A. Berawi, “Conceptual development of cost benefit analysis based on regional, knowledge, and economic aspects of green building”, International Journal of Technology, 2019, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 81-93; DOI: 10.14716/ijtech.v10i1.1791.
  • [6] M.T. Lakhiar, M.T. Lakhiar, A.H. Abdullah, “Occupational health and safety performance in high-rise building projects in Pakistan: a systematic literature review”, Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 2021, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 99-114; DOI: 10.31181/oresta2040199l.
  • [7] E. Plebankiewicz, M. Juszczyk, R. Kozik, “Trends, costs, and benefits of green certification of office buildings: A Polish perspective,” Sustainability, 2019, vol. 11, no. 8; DOI: 10.3390/su11082359.
  • [8] GBCI, “Perangkat Penilaian GREENSHIP (GREENSHIP Rating Tools), Greenship New Building Versi 1.2, April, 2013". [Online]. Available: http://elib.artefakarkindo.co.id/dok/Tek_RingkasanGREENSHIPNBV1.2--id.pdf.
  • [9] N. Aghili, M. Amirkhani, “SEM-PLS Approach to Green Building”, Encyclopedia, 2021, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 472-481; DOI: 10.3390/encyclopedia1020039.
  • [10] L. Zhao, B. Wang, J. Mbachu, Z. Liu, “New Zealand building project cost and its influential factors: A structural equation modelling approach”, Advances in Civil Engineering, 2019, vol. 2019, art. ID 362730; DOI: 10.1155/2019/1362730.
  • [11] Y. Latief, M.A. Berawi, V. Basten, Riswanto, R. Budiman, “Construction Performance Optimization toward Green Building Premium Cost Based on Greenship Rating Tools Assessment with Value Engineering Method”, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2017, vol. 877, no. 1; DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/877/1/012041.
  • [12] B.G. Hwang, L. Zhu, Y. Wang, X. Cheong, “Green Building Construction Projects in Singapore”, Project Management Journal, 2017, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 67-79; DOI: 10.1177/875697281704800406.
  • [13] A. Imron, A.E. Husin, “Value engineering and lifecycle cost analysis to improve cost performance in green hospital project”, Archives of Civil Engineering, 2021, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 497-510; DOI: 10.24425/ace.2021.138514.
  • [14] K.K.K. Wong, Mastering Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) with SmartPLS in 38 Hours. iUniverse, 2019.
  • [15] E. Plebankiewicz, A. Lesniak, E. Vitkova, V. Hromadka, “Models for estimating costs of public buildings maintaining - Review and assessment”, Archives of Civil Engineering, 2022, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 335-351; DOI: 10.24425/ace.2022.140171.
  • [16] A. Prihantoro, A.E. Husin, “Value increase of jetty project based on system dynamics”, Civil Engineering and Architecture, 2021, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 892-898; DOI: 10.13189/CEA.2021.090331.
  • [17] A.E. Husin, “Waste reduction at mechanical electrical plumbing ( MEP ) works based on lean construction in high rise building”, International Journal of Scientific Research Engineering & Technology, 2019, vol. 8, no. 1.
  • [18] S.G. Al-Ghamdi, M.M. Bilec, “Green Building Rating Systems and Whole-Building Life Cycle Assessment: Comparative Study of the Existing Assessment Tools”, Journal of Architectural Engineering, 2017, vol. 23, no. 1; DOI: 10.1061/(asce)ae.1943-5568.0000222.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-82ab0143-4c33-4625-900a-134791f62a74
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.