Superstructure of ISO/TS 16949 for the measurement of material-technological parameters of the products in automotive production

• Autorzy: Seňová Andrea , Štofová Lenka , Szaryszová Petra , Dugas Jaroslav

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/mspe-2021-0022

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper is aimed at measuring innovation and qualification of technological operations in automotive production within the quality management system. Quality requirements according to ISO/TS 16949 promote a process approach for the design and development, production, installation and servicing of automotive products, which can result in increased quality, reduced variation and increase of efficiency. The solution focuses on the process of approval of parts in series production (Production Part Approval Process – PPAP). The PPAP purpose is to determine whether an organization properly understood all customer requirements listed in the specifications and records of the technical design of the product. PPAP further verifies that the process has the potential to produce a product in series production so that customer requirements will be met, in actual production volume and at the agreed rate of production. Specifically, a toothed winch of hydroelectric generator is solved by the case study.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

automotive production; comprehensive quality; supply chain; series production; part approval process

• Wydawca: STE GROUP
• Czasopismo: Management Systems in Production Engineering
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: nr 3 (29)
• Strony: 178--183
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 28 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Seňová Andrea

• Technical University of Kosice Faculty of Mining, Ecology Process Control and Geotechnology Letna 9, 042 00 Kosice, Slovak Republic

autor

Štofová Lenka

• University of Economics in Bratislava Faculty of Business Economics with seat in Kosice Tajovského 13, Košice, Slovak Republic

autor

Szaryszová Petra

• University of Economics in Bratislava Faculty of Business Economics with seat in Kosice Tajovského 13, Košice, Slovak Republic

autor

Dugas Jaroslav

• University of Economics in Bratislava Faculty of Business Economics with seat in Kosice Tajovského 13, Košice, Slovak Republic

Bibliografia

• [1] J. Smutná, R. Farana. “Understanding the quality concept in the higher education”. Acta Montanistica Slovaca, vol. 15, no 1, 2010, pp. 54-57.
• [2] K. Chad. "Effective ISO/TS 16949 Audits“. Quality, vol. 45, no 2, 2006, pp. 44-47.
• [3] P.W. Brennecke. “Safety Aspects in Radioactive Waste Management”. Acta Montanistica Slovaca, vol. 12, no 1, 2007, pp. 42-47.
• [4] A. Lavrin, M. Zelko. “Moving toward the digital factory in raw material resources area”. Acta Montanistica Slovaca, vol. 15, no 3, 2010, pp. 225-231.
• [5] A.B. Pop, A.M. Ţîţu. “Implementation of Advanced Product Quality Planning in the Aerospace Industry A Way to improve the Quality Management. Calitatea: Access la Success; Bucharest”. Quality – Access to Success, vol. 21, no 177, 2020, pp. 56-61.
• [6] J. Kuba. (2012). Production and Part Approval Process. Available: https://members.marticonet.sk/jkuba/QMS/ PPAP%20prirucka.pdf.
• [7] S. Hasan, S. Shah and J. Gao. “A collaboration framework to support decision making in new product development with the supply chain,” In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Manufacturing Research (ICMR2013), Cranfield University, UK, 19th-20th September 2013, pp. 531-536.
• [8] D.C. Montgomery. Introduction to Statistical Quality Control. Sixth Edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2009.
• [9] Z. Alot. “The Model of the Production Process for the Quality Management”. Foundations of Management, vol. 9, no 1, 2017, pp. 43-60.
• [10] Z. Alot, W. Izdebski.” Identification of model of the production process for the purposes of quality management.” Materialy dokladov Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii “Sotsial'no-ekonomi-cheskoye razvitiye organizatsiy iregionov Belarusi: effektivnost' iinnovatsii” (ed. Vankevich Ye.V., Sharstnev V.L., Kasayeva T.V., Prokof'yeva N.L., Savitskaya T.B., Yasheva. Witebsk: UO ”WGTU”, 2015, pp. 84-96.
• [11] J. Gonos, M. Muchová, L. Domaracká. “Controlling as an efficient tool for the strategic management of industrial companies”. Acta Montanistica Slovaca, vol. 21, no 3, 2016, pp. 229-237.
• [12] K. Jiang, D.P. Lepak, J. Hu and J.C. Baer. “How Does Human Resource Management Influence Organizational Outcomes? A Meta-analytic Investigation of Mediating Mechanisms”. AMJ, vol 55, 2012, pp. 1264-1294, https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0088.
• [13] D.F. Dianda, M.B. Quaglino, J.A. Pagura. “Performance of Multivariate Process Capability Indices Under Normal and Non-Normal Distributions”. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, vol. 32, no 7, 2016, pp. 2165-2632.
• [14] H.Ch. Co. Effectiveness of high-priority supplier selection process for advanced product quality planning implementation on new model programs at a North American automaker. Eastern Michigan University, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 2000.
• [15] A.R. Mileham, S.J. Culley, G.W. Owen, R.I. McIntosh. “Rapid changeover – a pre-requisite for responsive manufacture”. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, vol. 19, no 8, 1999, pp. 785-796.
• [16] B. Tanguy, J. Besson, R. Piques, A. Pineau. “Ductile to brittle transition of an A508 steel characterized by Charpy impact test: Part II: Modelling of the Charpy transition curve”. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, vol. 72, no 3, 2005, pp. 413-434.
• [17] J.S. Oakland. Total Quality Management and Operational Excellence: Text with Cases. Fourth Edition. New York, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. 2014.
• [18] K.L. Chen, K.S. Chen, R.K. Li. “Suppliers capability and price analysis chart”. International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 98, no 3, 2005, pp. 315-327.
• [19] M.A. Broy. “A logical approach to systems engineering artifacts: semantic relationships and dependencies beyond traceability – from requirements to functional and architectural views”. Software and Systems Modeling, vol. 17, no 2. 2018, pp. 365-393.
• [20] F. Misopoulos, R. Michaelides, M. Salehuddin, V. Manthou, Z. Michaelides. “Addressing Organisational Pressures as Drivers towards Sustainability in Manufacturing Projects and Project Management Methodologies”. Sustainability, vol. 10, no 6, 2018.
• [21] Kulkarni, Damodar, Deore, Pankaj. “Cost reduction in Lowcost Emerging Economies for Sustainable Growth – Principles, Processes, Tools & Techniques”. SAE Technical Paper Series. 2015.
• [22] Hebei Shida Seal Group Co. (2016). Ltd. Production Part Approval Process (PPAP). Available: http://www.shidarubber.com/technical-resources/production-part-approval-process-ppap/.
• [23] Y. J. Chen. “Structured methodology for supplier selection and evaluation in a supply chain”. Journal of Information science, vol. 18, no 1, 2010, pp. 1651-1670.
• [24] PPAP Documents. (2017). Available http://ppapdocuments.com/ppap-documents/.
• [25] I. Petrašová I. Proces schvalování dílů do sériové výroby (PPAP): referenční příručka. 4. vyd. Praha: Česká společnost pro jakost. 69 p. 2006.
• [26] B. Jung Hyun, H. Tack-Don. „PPAP: Perspective Projection Augment Platform with Pan – Tilt Actuation for Improved Spatial Perception“. Sensors, vol. 19, no 12, 2019.
• [27] D. Edgar. “Valid data demanded”. Modern machine shop, vol. 88, no 11, 2016.
• [28] D. McCoy. Production Part Approval Process (PPAP). Global Standard. 2010.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).