A Possibility of Functioning Biogas Plant at a Poultry Farm

• Autorzy: Janczak Damian , Mazurkiewicz Jakub , Czekała Wojciech , Myszura Magdalena , Kozłowski Kamil , Jeżowska Aleksandra

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12911/22998993/114090

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The biogas production constitutes one of renewable energy sources (RES) . In addition, wastes are preferred for energy production. In the case of some wastes, e.g. poultry manure, it is difficult to conduct anaerobic digestion in monofermentation. The aim of this work was to plan the biogas plant, in which the main substrate is the waste from a poultry farm. The scope of work included: preparation of a biogas plant technological project, determining the amount of biogas and methane that can be produced annually on the example of the selected poultry farm, performing the energy and financial calculations for the current conditions prevailing on the renewable energy market in Poland. The installation project assumed the location of a biogas plant at an existing poultry farm – the source of the substrate. The micro-biogas plant includes a fermentation tank with a capacity of 500 m³ and storage of digestate pulp with a capacity of 700 m³. The assumed power biogas plant will generate 112 kW of electricity and 120 kW of heat. The installation will operate in a single-stage mesophilic technology (39 °C), which will avoid incurring additional costs related to heating and the construction of additional fermentation tanks. The use of poultry manure by anaerobic digestion provides benefits through biogas technology. It is necessary to examine the technology in terms of biogas production, which is carried out under better sanitary and environmental conditions. This work was undertaken to investigate the environmentally friendly removal of poultry manure through biogas technology to obtain the best economic effect, and employ it further, e.g. as a fertilizer.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

poultry waste; biogas; renewable energy; environmental protection; sustainable development; animal production

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej ; Lublin University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Journal of Ecological Engineering
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: Vol. 20, nr 11
• Strony: 225--231
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 26 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Janczak Damian

• Institute of Biosystems Engineering, Poznań University of Life Sciences, ul. Wojska Polskiego 50, 60-627 Poznań, Poland

autor

Mazurkiewicz Jakub

• Institute of Soil Science and Environment Shaping, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, ul. St. Leszczyńskiego 7, 20-069 Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland

autor

Czekała Wojciech

• Institute of Biosystems Engineering, Poznań University of Life Sciences, ul. Wojska Polskiego 50, 60-627 Poznań, Poland

autor

Myszura Magdalena

• Institute of Soil Science and Environment Shaping, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, ul. St. Leszczyńskiego 7, 20-069 Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland

autor

Kozłowski Kamil

• Institute of Biosystems Engineering, Poznań University of Life Sciences, ul. Wojska Polskiego 50, 60-627 Poznań, Poland

autor

Jeżowska Aleksandra

• Institute of Biosystems Engineering, Poznań University of Life Sciences, ul. Wojska Polskiego 50, 60-627 Poznań, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. AMA. 2017. Register of agricultural biogas producers. Agricultural Market Agency. Current data as at 31.08.2017.
• 2. Amanullah, M., Sekar S., Muthukrishnan P. 2010. Prospects and Potential of Poultry Manure. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 9, 4, 172–182. doi:10.3923/ajps.2010.172.182
• 3. Anaswara, MG. 2015. Design and fabrication of low cost biogas digester using poultry waste and pig manure. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 2/4. https://www.irjet.net/archives/V2/i4/Irjet-v2i4312.pd
• 4. Arshad, M., Bano, I., Shahzad, M., Younus, M., Abbas, M. 2018. Electricity generation from biogas of poultry waste: An assessment of potential and feasibility in Pakistan. Renewable and sustianable energry reviews, 81, 1241–1246. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.007.
• 5. Bayrakdar A., Molaey R., Sürmeli RÖ., Sahinkaya E., Çalli B. 2017. Biogas production from chicken manure: Co-digestion with spent poppy straw, International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 119, 205–210. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.10.058
• 6. Brown, D., Li, Y. 2013. Solid state anaerobic codigestion of yard waste and food waste for biogas production. Bioresource Technology, 127, 275–280. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.09.081
• 7. Chaump, K., Preisser, M., Shanmugam, S., Prasad, R., Adhikari, S., Higgins, B. 2018. Leaching and anaerobic digestion of poultry litter for biogas production and nutrient transformation. Waste Management. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2018.11.024.
• 8. Cieślik, M., Dach, J., Lewicki, A., Smurzyńska, A., Janczak, D., Pawlicka-Kaczorowska, J., Boniecki, P., Cyplik, P., Czekała, W. & Jóźwiakowski, K. 2016. Methane fermentation of the maize straw silage under mesoand thermophilic conditions. Energy, 115/2, 1495–1502. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.06.070.
• 9. Çoban V., Çağman S., Eyidoğan M., Çanka Kılıç F., Kaya D. 2016. Economic Analysis of Biogas Production from Chicken Manure. 8th International Ege Energy Symposium and Exhibition – 2016.
• 10. http://akademikpersonel.kocaeli.edu.tr/volkan.coban/bildiri/volkan.coban17.01.2017_17.45.39bildiri.pdf
• 11. Czekała W., Dach J., Ludwiczak A., Przybylak A., Boniecki P., Koszela K., Zaborowicz M., Przybył K., Wojcieszak D., Witaszek K. 2015. The use of image analysis to investigate C:N ratio in the mixture of chicken manure and straw. Proc. SPIE. 9631, Seventh International Conference on Digital Image Processing (ICDIP 2015), 963117. (July 06, 2015) doi: 10.1117/12.2197041
• 12. Czekała W., Jeżowska A., Chełkowski D. 2019. The Use of Biochar for the Production of Organic Fertilizers. Journal of Ecological Engineering 20(1), 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/93869
• 13. Czekała W., Dach J., Lewicki A., Gajewska K., Staszak Ż. 2017. Utilization of digestate obtained from methane fermentation of chicken manure. IX International Scientific Symposium “Farm Machinery and Processes Management in Sustainable Agriculture”, Lublin, Poland, 2017. DOI: 10.24326/fmpmsa.2017.17
• 14. Cucui, G., Ionescu, C., Goldbach, I., Coman, M., Marin, E. 2018. Quantifying the Economic Effects of Biogas Installations for Organic Waste from Agro-Industrial Sector. Sustainability, 10/7. doi:10.2582. 10.3390/su10072582.
• 15. Duan, N., Ran, X., Li, R., Kougias, P.G., Zhang, Y., Lin, C., Liu, H. 2018. Performance Evaluation of Mesophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure with Algal Digestate. Energies, 11/7, 1829. doi:10.3390/en11071829
• 16. Harremoes P. 1991. Danes nutrient battle depends on agricultural action. Water quality international, 3, 44-48.
• 17. Kian Heng L. 2017. Bio Gas Plant Green Energy From Poultry Wastes In Singapore. Energy Procedia, 143, 436–441. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.708
• 18. Kozłowski, K.; Dach, J.; Lewicki, A.; Cieślik M.; Janczak, D.; Czekała W.; Mazurkiewicz J.; Sołowiej, P; Brzoski, M. 2017. Application Of Agri-Food Industry Waste To Biogas Production In Poland. Conference: 3rd Internacional Conference on Energy and Environment (ICEE) – Bringing Together Economics and Engineering Location: Porto, PORTUGAL Date: JUN 29–30, 2017. ICEE International Conference on Energy & Environment, 603-608
• 19. Lewicki A., Kozłowski K., Pietrowski M., Zbytek Z. 2016. Methane fermentation of chicken droppings, Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering, 61/4, 28-30
• 20. Miah M.R., Rahman, A.K.M.L., Akanda, M.R., Pulak, A., Rouf, M.A. 2015. Production of biogas from poultry litter mixed with the co-substrate cow dung. Journal of Taibah University for Science, 10, 497504. doi.org/10.1016/j.jtusci.2015.07.007
• 21. Nahm KH. 2007. Efficient phosphorus utilization in poultry feeding to lessen the environmental impact of excreta. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 63/4, 625-654 doi.org/10.1017/S0043933907001663
• 22. Pokój T., Gusiatin ZM., Bułkowska K., Dubis B. 2014. Production of biogas using maize silage supplemented with residual glycerine from biodiesel manufacturing. Archives of Environmental Protection, 40/4, 17-29. doi: 10.2478/aep-2014–0035
• 23. Sądej W., Żołnowski AC, Marczuk O. 2016. Content of phenolic compounds in soils originating from two long-term fertilization experiments. Archives of Environmental Protection, 42/4, 104-113. doi: 10.1515/aep-2016–0047
• 24. Subedi, S., Srivastava, A., Sharma, MD., Shah, SC. 2018. Effect of organic and inorganic nutrient sources on growth, yield and quality of radish (Raphanus sativus L.) varieties in Chitwan, Nepal. SAARC Journal of Agriculture, 16/1, 61-69, doi:10.3329/sja.v16i1.37423.
• 25. Wang, X., Lu, X., Li, F., Yang, G. 2014. Effects of Temperature and Carbon-Nitrogen (C/N) Ratio on the Performance of Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Dairy Manure, Chicken Manure and Rice Straw: Focusing on Ammonia Inhibition. PloS ONE 9/5, e97265. doi:org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097265
• 26. Wolna-Maruwka A., Mocek-Płóciniak, A., Głuchowska, K., Schroeter-Zakrzewska, A., Borowiak, K., Niewiadomska, A., Starzyk, J., Dach, J. 2015. Assessment of the influence of composts on microbiological and biochemical parameters of substrates and the morphological traits of scarlet sage. Archives of Environmental Protection, 41(3)/3, 28-38.