Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Impact of Jute Retting on Phytoplankton Diversity and Aquatic Health: Biomonitoring in a Tropical Oxbow Lake

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Phytoplankton acts as a primary producer and biological filter of aquatic ecosystem. Jute retting during monsoon is a common anthropological activity in the rural Bengal. Quantitative seasonal bio-monitoring of phytoplankton community composition with relative abundance and its diversity indices was carried out in this study from April 2013 to March 2014 to assess water quality and the impact of jute retting on phytoplankton diversity of a tropical fresh water oxbow lake in Nadia district of India. We recorded a total of 34 genera of 5 distinct classes, Chlorophyceae (15), Bacillariophyceae (13), Cyanophyceae (4), Dinophyceae (1) and Euglenophyceae (1). Members of Chlorophyceae dominated throughout the year. Unlike Cyanophyceae, Bacillariophyceae was found to be significantly increased during monsoon when compared to the rest of the year. Average phytoplankton density was highest in post-monsoon (8760/L) followed by monsoon (4680/L) and pre-monsoon (3650/L). Owing to the dominance of class Chlorophyceae and Bacillariophyceae we found this lake to be oligotrophic to mesotrophic. Indices values of genera richness, Shannon-Wiener, evenness and Simpson’s diversity reached their lowest 14, 1.61, 0.61 and 0.68 in monsoon and highest 23, 2.42, 0.77 and 0.86 in post monsoon respectively. The lowest diversity values during monsoon clearly suggested that the selected lake has highest anthropogenic pollution due to jute retting which impacted significantly on phytoplankton diversity. Therefore, the lake is not conducive for fish growth especially during monsoon and we opine that there is a need to regulate jute retting process, intensity and its density in the lake during the monsoon to ensure enhanced biodiversity for sustainable management and conservation of aquatic environment of this Oxbow lake.
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 47 poz., tab., rys.
  • Department of Ecological Engineering and Environmental Management, University of Kalyani, West Bengal, India
  • Department of Ecological Engineering and Environmental Management, University of Kalyani, West Bengal, India
  • 1. Abujam S.S.K., Dakua S., Bakalial B., Saikia A.K., Biswas S.P., Choudhury P. 2011. Diversity of Plankton in Maijan Beel, Upper Assam. Asian J. Exp. Biol. Sci., 2(4), 562–568.
  • 2. Bala G. and Mukherjee A. 2011. Physico-Chemical properties of sediments and their role in the production process of some wetlands of Nadia District, West Bengal. J. Environ. And Sociobiol., 8(2), 253–256.
  • 3. Beyhan T. and Gonulol A. 2007. An ecologic and taxonomic study on phytoplankton of a shallow lake. Turkey. J. Environ. Biol., 28, 439–445.
  • 4. Biligram I. 1988. Biological monitoring of rivers, problems and prospects in India. de Kruijf et al. (Eds) Aquatic Ectovicol, Proc. Indo. Dutch Symp. 245–250.
  • 5. Chakraborty I, Dutta S, Chakraborty C. 2004. Limnology and plankton abundance in selected Beels of Nadia District of West Bengal. Environment and Ecology, 22(3), 576–578.
  • 6. Cox E.J. 1996. Identification of freshwater diatoms from live material. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 158.
  • 7. Dasgupta M., Goswamy S., Goswamy A. 2006. Effect of jute retting on the physic-chemical and biological condition of water. Indian Journal of Fisheries. 53(4), 455–457.
  • 8. Desikachary T.V. 1959. Cyanophyta, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, pp. 686.
  • 9. Ghosh D. and Biswas J.K. 2014. Rotifera diversity indices: Assessment of aquatic health of an oxbow lake ecosystem in West Bengal. Intern. J. of Current Res., 6(12), 10554–10557.
  • 10. Ghosh D. and Biswas J.K. 2015a. Zooplankton Diversity Indices: Assessment of an Ox-Bow Lake Ecosystem for Sustainable Management in West Bengal. Intern. J. of Adv. Biotechnol. and Res,, 16(1), 37–43.
  • 11. Ghosh D. and Biswas J.K. 2015b. Macro invertebrates’ diversity indices: quantitative bio-assessment of ecological health status of an ox-bow lake in eastern India. J. of Adv. in Environ. Health Res., 3(2) (retrieved from php/jaehr/article/view/192).
  • 12. Ghosh D. and Biswas J.K. 2015c. Impact of jute retting on native fish diversity and aquatic health of roadside transitory water bodies: an assessment in Eastern India. J. of Ecol. Engin., 16(4), 14–21.
  • 13. Ghosh D. and Biswas J.K. 2015d. Biomonitoring macrophytes and abundance for rating aquatic health of an oxbow lake ecosystem in Ganga River basin. American Journal of Phytomedicine and Clinical Therapeutics, 3(10), 602–621.
  • 14. Hustedt F. 1930. Bacillariophyta (Diatomaceae). In: Pascher A. (Ed.) Susswasserflora von Milleleuropas. Heft 10, Gustav Fischer, Jena, pp. 466.
  • 15. Huynh M. and Serediak N. 2006. Algae Identification field guide. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, pp. 40.
  • 16. Jamal A., Yusoff F.M, Banerjee S., Shariff M. 2014. Littoral and limnetic phytoplankton distribution and biodiversity in a tropical Man-Made Lake, Malaysia. Adv. Studies in Biology, 6(4), 149–168.
  • 17. Karr J.R., Allen J.D., Benke A.C. 2000. River conservation in the United States and Canada. In: Boon P.J., Davies B.R,. Petts G.E. (Eds.) Global perspectives on river conservation. science, policy and practice. Chichester, Wiley.
  • 18. Keshri J.P., Ghosh S., Bhattacharyya S. 2013. A Survey of Phytoplankton Diversity in Baishar Beel of Nadia District of West Bengal. Int J Cur Res Rev., 5(19), 8–13
  • 19. Komarek J. and Anagnostidis K. 2005. Cyanoprokaryota, Teil 2, Oscillatoriales, Susswasserflora von Mitteleuropa 19/2, Elsevier, Munchen, pp. 759.
  • 20. Komarek J., Anagnostidis K. 1998. Cyanoprokaryota, Teil 1, Chroococcales, Susswasserflora von Mitteleuropa 19/1, Gustav Fisher, Jena, pp. 548.
  • 21. Kumar A. and Sharma M.P. 2014. Application of water quality index and diversity index for pollution assessment of Kankaria Lake at Ahmedabad, India. J. Civil Environ. Eng. 4(144), doi: 10.4172/ 2165-784X.1000144.
  • 22. Kumar R.N., Solanki R., Kumar N.J.I. 2012. Spatial variation in phytoplankton diversity in the Sabarmati River at Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India. Annals of Environmental Science. Vol. 6, 13–28.
  • 23. Kumari P., Dhadse S., Chaudhari P.R., Wate S.R. 2008. A biomonitoring of plankton to assess quality of water in the lakes of Nagpur city. In: Sengupta M. and Dalwani R. (Eds). Proc. of Taal. The 12th World Lake Conference, 160–164.
  • 24. Lackey J.B. 1938. The manipulation and counting of river plankton and changes in some organisms due to formalin preservation. Public Health Reports, 53, 2080–2093.
  • 25. Laskar H.S. and Gupta S. 2013. Phytoplankton community and limnology of Chatla floodplain wetland of Barak valley, Assam, North-East India. Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems, 411, DOI: 10.1051/kmae/2013073.
  • 26. Mandal S., Mandal D., Palit D. 2003. Apreliminary survey of wetlands plants in Purulia District, west Bengal. J. Applied and Pure Biol., 18(2), 247–252.
  • 27. Mandal S. and Mukherjee A. 2007. Wetlands and their macrophytes in Purulia District, West Bengal. J. Env. and Ecology, 25(3), 564–570.
  • 28. Mukherjee A., Palit D. 2001. Macrophyte diversity in wetlands of Birbhum District, West Bengal. Economic prospect. In: L. Dadhich (Ed.) Biodiversity: Strategies for conservation. APH Publishing Corporation, New Delhi, 245–262.
  • 29. Mukherjee B., Nivedita M., Mukherjee D. 2010. Journal of Environmental Biology, 31(5), 827–839.
  • 30. Nandan S.N. and Aher N.H. 2005. Algal community used for assessment of water quality of Haranbaree Dam and Mosam River of Maharashtra. J. Environ. Biol., 26, 223–227.
  • 31. Palit D., Bala G., Mukherjee A. 2006. Sedges of wetlands of Birbhum District, West Bengal. Flora and Fauna, 12(2), 269–274.
  • 32. Palit D. and Mukherjee A. 2007. An inventory of wetlands in Birbhum District, West Bengal and their successional characteristics. Env. and Ecol., 25(1), 173–176.
  • 33. Pielou E.C. 1966. An introduction to mathematical Ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
  • 34. Pillai N.K. 1986. Introduction to Planktonology. Ist ed. Himalaya Publishing House, Bombay.
  • 35. Prescott G.W. 1982. Algae of the Western Great Lakes Area. Otto Koeltz Science Pub., Koengstein, pp. 977.
  • 36. Shannon C.E. and Wiener W. 1963. The Mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, USA, 117.
  • 37. Shekhar T.R.S., Kiran B.R., Puttaiah E.T., Shivaraj Y., Mahadevan K.M. 2008. Phytoplankton as index of water quality with reference to industrial pollution. J. of Environ. Biology, 29(2), 233–236.
  • 38. Simpson E.H. 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature, 163–188.
  • 39. Smith G.M. 1950. The freshwater algae of the United States. McGraw Hill, New York, pp. 719.
  • 40. Steven R.J., Pan Y. 1999. Assessing environmental conditions in rivers and streams using diatoms. In: Stoermer E.F., Smol J.P., (Eds.) The diatoms. Applications for the environmental and earth sciences. Cambridge University Press., 11–40.
  • 41. Das T., Pathak K., Devi B.M. 2011. Phytoplankton and zooplankton communities of an Oxbow Lake in Barak Valley, Assam. Assam University Journal of Science and Technology, Biological and Environmental Sciences, 7(1), 67–75.
  • 42. Trivedy R.K. and Goel P.K. 1986. Chemical and biological method for water pollution studies. Environmental Publications, Karad. India, pp. 215.
  • 43. Turner W.B. 1982. The freshwater algae of East India. Kongl. Sv. Vet. Akademiens Handlingar, pp. 187.
  • 44. Verma J.P. and Mohanty R.C., 1994. Evaluation of water quality of two fresh water ponds. Pollut. Res., 13, 69–74.
  • 45. Vuuren J.V.S., Taylor J., Gerber A., Ginkel V.C. 2006. Easy identification of the most common freshwater algae. A guide for the identification of microscopic algae in South African freshwaters. North-West University and Department of Water Affairs and Forestry.
  • 46. Wehr J.D., Sheath R.G. 2003. Freshwater algae of North America, Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 918.
  • 47. Wu J.T. 1984. Phytoplankton as bioindicator for water quality in Taipei, Bot. Bull. Academia Sinica, 25, 205–214.
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.