Tytuł artykułu
Treść / Zawartość
Pełne teksty:
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
This study aims to assess the lecturers’ opinions about the use of e-learning tools to support distance and blended learning in higher education in Portugal, evidently reinforced by the COVID-19 pandemic. This research was based on a qualitative methodology, specifically, a focus group with professors from five higher education institutions from different geographical areas in Portugal. The obtained results were analysed along four main dimensions: (1) the level of knowledge of e-learning tools, (2) the reasons for using or (3) not using them, and, finally, (4) the opinion of lecturers on the student assessment process using these tools. The results showed that in addition to the concerns with smooth running classes and the appropriate delivery of the syllabus, the lecturers considered the transition to the e-learning context to have been easy. They noted a high level of literacy in the used tools, believed in the continued use of e-learning in the post-pandemic context, indicated several advantages for those involved in the e-learning context and a majority of limitations related to the time required for the adoption of more tools; and, finally, underlined the student assessment issue, which was pointed out as the most sensitive topic in the whole e-learning context. The study informed on the lecturers’ perspective on e-learning and the used tools and provided insight into their perceived usefulness and benefits for lecturers and students. An especially strong concern was verified on the part of lecturers to optimise e-learning tools to provide better knowledge delivery to students.
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
23--34
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 32 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
autor
- IPVC — Polytechnic Institute of Viana do Castelo, Portugal
- UNIAG — Unidade de Investigação Aplicada em Gestão, Portugal
autor
- ADiT-LAB, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Portugal
autor
- ADiT-LAB, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Portugal
autor
- University of Porto, Porto Portugal Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Portugal
Bibliografia
- Al Rawashdeh, A. Z., Mohammed, E. Y., Al Arab, A. R., Alara, M., & Al-Rawashdeh, B. (2021). Advantages and disadvantages of using e-learning in university education: Analyzing students’ perspectives. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 19(3), 107-117.
- Ali, M., Hossain, S. K., & Ahmed, T. (2018). Effectiveness of E-Learning for University Students: Evidence from Bangladesh. Asian Journal of Empirical Research, 8(10), 352-360. doi: 10.18488/journal.1007/2018.8.10/1007.10.352.360
- Aljawarneh, S., Muhsin, Z., Nsour, A., Alkhateeb, F., & AlMaghayreh, E. (2010). e-Learning Tools and Technologies in Education. A Perspective. LINC Proceedings.
- Alkhawaja, M. I., & Abd Halim, M. S. B. (2019). Challenges of e-learning system adoption in Jordan higher education. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(9), 487-494.
- Almajali, D., Al-Okaily, M., Barakat, S., Al-Zegaier, H., & Dahalin, Z. M. (2022). Students’ perceptions of the sustainability of distance learning systems in the post-COVID-19: a qualitative perspective. Sustainability, 14(12), 7353.
- Ayu, M. (2020). Online Learning: Leading e-Learning at Higher Education. The Journal of English Literacy Education: The Teaching and Learning of English as a Foreign Language, 7(1), 47-54. doi: 10.36706/jele.v7i1.11515
- Baber, H. (2021). Modelling the acceptance of e-learning during the pandemic of COVID-19-A study of South Korea. International Journal of Management Education, 19(2), 100503. doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100503
- Costa, C. R., Garcia, J. E., Serra da Fonseca, M. J., & Teixeira, A. (2021). Data Analysis in Content Marketing Strategies. 16th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), Chaves, Portugal, 1-6. doi: 10.23919/cisti52073.2021.9476377
- Ejdys, J., & Szpilko, D. (2021). Teachers’ Perception of e-learning on the Example of Bialystok University of Technology. Przegląd Organizacji, 9(980), 27-39. 10.33141/po.2021.9.04
- Eneterio, N. da P., Major, C. R., Oliveira, E., Rolindo, J., Freitas, M., Ferreira, M., Abreu, S., & Morais, T. (2020). O E-Learning Como Ferramenta Estratégica Na Pandemia Covid-19. Anais do Seminário de Atualização de Práticas Docentes, 163-167. Retrieved from http://45.4.96.34/index.php/praticasdocentes/article/view/5742
- Eze, S. C., Chinedu-Eze, V. C., Okike, C. K., & Bello, A. O. (2020). Factors influencing the use of e-learning facilities by students in a private Higher Education Institution (HEI) in a developing economy. Humanities and social sciences communications, 7(1), 133.
- Garcia, J. E., Rodrigues, P., Simões, J., & Serra da Fonseca, M. J. (2022). Gamification Strategies for Social Media. In J. Remondes, & S. Teixeira (Eds.), Implementing Automation Initiatives in Companies to Create Better-Connected Experiences (pp. 137–159). IGI Global. doi: 10.4018/978-1-6684-5538-8.ch007
- Ho, N. T. T., Sivapalan, S., Pham, H. H., Nguyen, L. T. M., Pham, A. T. V., & Dinh, H. V. (2021). Students’ adoption of e-learning in emergency situation: the case of a Vietnamese university during COVID-19. Interactive Technology and Smart Education,18(2), 246- 269. doi: 10.1108/ITSE-08-2020-0164
- Irfan, M., Kusumaningrum, B., Yulia, Y., & Widodo, S. A. (2020). Challenges During the Pandemic: Use of E. Learning in Mathematics Learning in Higher Education. Infinity Journal, 9(2), 147. doi: 10.22460/infinity. v9i2.p147-158
- Jones, A. Q., Dewey, C. E., Doré, K., Majowicz, S. E., McEwen, S. A., Waltner-Toews, D., Henson, S. J., & Mathews, E. (2005). Public perception of drinking water from private water supplies: Focus group analyses. BMC Public Health, 5, 1-12. doi: 10.1186/1471- 2458-5-129
- King, E., & Boyatt, R. (2015). Exploring factors that influ¬ence adoption of e-learning within higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(6), 1272-1280.
- Kulikowski, K., Przytuła, S., & Sułkowski, Ł. (2022). E-learning? Never again! On the unintended consequences of COVID-19 forced e-learning on academic teacher motivational job characteristics. Higher Education Quarterly, 76(1), 174-189.
- Kumar Basak, S., Wotto, M., & Bélanger, P. (2018). E-learning, M-learning and D-learning: Conceptual definition and comparative analysis. E-Learning and Digital Media, 15(4), 191-216. doi: 10.1177/2042- 753018785180
- Magano, J., Castro, A. V., & Carvalho, C. V. (2008). O e-Learning no Ensino Superior: um caso de estudo. Educação, Formação & Tecnologia, 1(1), 79-92.
- Mamede, S. M. P. (2014). Comportamento do consumidor digital: o caso do e-learning nas licenciaturas do ensino superior português. Retrieved from http:// search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsrca&AN=rcaap.openAccess.10400.22.5454
- Pereira, A., Quintas-Mendes, A., & Morgado, L. (2012). Educação on-line no Ensino Superior: um programa de doutoramento em educação a distância e e-learning na Universidade Aberta (Portugal). Revista Teias, 13, 313-333.
- Phutela, N., & Dwivedi, S. (2020). A qualitative study of students› perspective on e-learning adoption in India. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 12(4), 545-559. doi: 10.1108/JARHE-02-2019- 0041
- Pokhrel, S., & Chhetri, R. (2021). A Literature Review on Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Teaching and Learning. Higher Education for the Future, 8(1), 133- 141. doi: 10.1177/2347631120983481
- Regueras, L. M., Verdu, E., Munoz, M. F., Perez, M. A., De Castro, J. P., & Verdu, M. J. (2009). Effects of competitive e-learning tools on higher education students: A case study. IEEE Transactions on Education, 52(2), 279-285.
- Rehman, M. A., Soroya, S. H., Abbas, Z., Mirza, F., & Mahmood, K. (2021). Understanding the challenges of e-learning during the global pandemic emergency: the students’ perspective. Quality Assurance in Education, 29(2/3), 259-276. doi: 10.1108/QAE-02-2021- 0025
- Rodrigues, M. I., Fonseca, M. J., & Garcia, J. E. (2022). The Use of CRM in Marketing and Communication Strategies in Portuguese Non-Profit Organizations. In J. Andrade, & T. Ruão (Eds.), Navigating Digital Communication and Challenges for Organizations (pp. 223-244). IGI Global. doi: 10.4018/978-1-7998- 9790-3.ch013
- Sebele-Mpofu, F. Y. (2020). Saturation controversy in qualitative research: Complexities and underlying assumptions. A literature review. Congent Social Sciences, 6(1). doi: 10.1080/23311886.2020.1838706
- Sree Reddy, B. (2015). Challenges and Opportunity of E-Learning in Developed and Developing Countries- A Review. International Journal of Emerging Research in Management & Technology, 46, 2278-9359.
- Valencia-Arias, A., Chalela-Naffah, S., & Bermúdez- Hernández, J. (2019). A proposed model of e-learning tools acceptance among university students in developing countries. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1057-1071.
- Wilkinson, S. (1998). Focus group methodology: A review. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 1(3), 181-203. doi: 10.1080/13645579.1998.10846874
- Yamoah, F. A. ., & ul Haque, A. . (2022). Strategic Management Through Digital Platforms for Remote Working in the Higher Education Industry During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 10(2), 111-128. doi: 10.23762/FSO_ VOL10_NO2_6
- Zethembe, M. (2020). A Literature Review of E-Learning and E-Teaching in the Era of Covid-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 5(10), 588-597.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-822129d5-46e7-4e67-b10c-5c2f2759ec49