A workflow-oriented approach to Propagation Models in Heliophysics

• Autorzy: Pierantoni G. , Carley E. , Byrne J. , Perez-Suarez D. , Gallagher P. T.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.7494/csci.2014.15.3.271

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The Sun is responsible for the eruption of billions of tons of plasma and the generation of near light-speed particles that propagate throughout the solar system and beyond. If directed towards Earth, these events can be damaging to our tecnological infrastructure. Hence there is an effort to understand the cause of the eruptive events and how they propagate from Sun to Earth. However, the physics governing their propagation is not well understood, so there is a need to develop a theoretical description of their propagation, known as a Propagation Model, in order to predict when they may impact Earth. It is often difficult to define a single propagation model that correctly describes the physics of solar eruptive events, and even more difficult to implement models capable of catering for all these complexities and to validate them using real observational data. In this paper, we envisage that workflows offer both a theoretical and practical framework for a novel approach to propagation models. We define a mathematical framework that aims at encompassing the different modalities with which workflows can be used, and provide a set of generic building blocks written in the TAVERNA workflow language that users can use to build their own propagation models. Finally we test both the theoretical model and the composite building blocks of the workflow with a real Science Use Case that was discussed during the 4th CDAW (Coordinated Data Analysis Workshop) event held by the HELIO project. We show that generic workflow building blocks can be used to construct a propagation model that succesfully describes the transit of solar eruptive events toward Earth and predict a correct Earth-impact time.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

heliophysics; workflow; TAVERNA; Coronal Mass Ejection; propagation models

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwa AGH
• Czasopismo: Computer Science
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: Vol. 15 (3)
• Strony: 271--291
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 29 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Pierantoni G.

• https://www.scss.tcd.ie/Gabriele.Pierantoni/

autor

Carley E.

• http://www.tcd.ie/Physics/Astrophysics/carley.php

autor

Byrne J.

• http://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/~jbyrne/

autor

Perez-Suarez D.

autor

Gallagher P. T.

• http://www.tcd.ie/Physics/people/Peter.Gallagher/

Bibliografia

• [1] ER-FLOW Project Page –http://www.http://www.erflow.eu/.
• [2] Grid Ireland Web Page – https://grid.ie/.
• [3] HELIO Project Page – http://www.helio-vo.eu/.
• [4] SCI-BUS Project Page – https://www.sci-bus.eu/web/guest.
• [5] Bentley R., Brooke J., Csillaghy A., Fellows D., Blanc A. L., Messerotti M., P ́erez-Su ́arez D., Pierantoni G., Soldati M.: HELIO: Discovery and analysis of data in heliophysics. Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 29 (8), pp. 2157–2168, 2013. ISSN 0167-739X. http://dx.doi.org//10.1016/j.future.2013.04.006.
• [6] Blanc A., Brooke J., Fellows D., Soldati M., Prez-Surez D., Marassi A., Santin A.: Workflows for Heliophysics. Journal of Grid Computing, vol. 11 (3), pp. 481–503, 2013. ISSN 1570-7873. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10723-013-9256-5.
• [7] Bougeret J. L., Kaiser M. L., Kellogg P. J., Manning R., Goetz K., Monson S. J., Monge N., Friel L., Meetre C. A., Perche C., Sitruk L., Hoang S.: Waves: The Radio and Plasma Wave Investigation on the Wind Spacecraft. Space Science Reviews, vol. 71, pp. 231–263, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00751331.
• [8] Brueckner G. E., Howard R. A., Koomen M. J., Korendyke C. M., Michels D. J., Moses J. D., Socker D. G., Dere K. P., Lamy P. L., Llebaria A., Bout M. V., Schwenn R., Simnett G. M., Bedford D. K., Eyles C. J.: The Large Angle Spectroscopic Coronagraph (LASCO). Solar Physics, vol. 162, pp. 357–402, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00733434.
• [9] Cremades H., St. Cyr O. C., Kaiser M. L.: A tool to improve space weather forecasts: Kilometric radio emissions from Wind/WAVES. Space Weather, vol. 5, S08001, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007SW000314.
• [10] Deelman E., Gannon D., Shields M., Taylor I.: Workflows and e-Science: An Overview of Workflow System Features and Capabilities. Future Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 25 (5), pp. 528–540, 2009. ISSN 0167-739X. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2008.06.012.
• [11] Domingo V., Fleck B., Poland A. I.: The SOHO Mission: an Overview. Solar Physics, vol. 162, pp. 1–37, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00733425.
• [12] Gil Y., Deelman E., Ellisman M., Fahringer T., Fox G., Gannon D., Goble C., Livny M., Moreau L., Myers J.: Examining the Challenges of Scientific Workflows. Computer, vol. 40 (12), pp. 24–32, 2007. ISSN 0018-9162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MC.2007.421.
• [13] Gressl C., Veronig A. M., Temmer M., Odstrˇcil D., Linker J.A., Miki ́c Z., Riley P.: Comparative Study of MHD Modeling of the Background Solar Wind. Solar Physics, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11207-013-0421-6.
• [14] Hovestadt D., Hilchenbach M., B ̈urgi A., Klecker B., Laeverenz P., Scholer M., Gr ̈unwaldt H., Axford W. I., Livi S., Marsch E., Wilken B., Winterhoff H. P., Ipavich F. M., Bedini P., Coplan M. A., Galvin A.B., Gloeckler G., Bochsler P., Balsiger H., Fischer J., Geiss J., Kallenbach R., Wurz P., Reiche K. U., Gliem F., Judge D. L., Ogawa H. S., Hsieh K. C., M ̈obius E., Lee M. A., Managadze G. G., Verigin M. I., Neugebauer M.: CELIAS – Charge, Element and Isotope Analysis System for SOHO. Solar Physics, vol. 162, pp. 441–481, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00733436.
• [15] Hull D., Wolstencroft K., Stevens R., Goble C., Pocock M. R., Li P., Oinn T.: Taverna: a tool for building and running workflows of services. Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 34 (suppl 2), pp. W729–W732, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl320.
• [16] Lemen J. R., Title A. M., Akin D. J., Boerner P. F., Chou C., Drake J. F., Duncan D. W., Edwards C. G., Friedlaender F. M., Heyman G. F., Hurlburt N. E., Katz N. L., Kushner G. D., Levay M., Lindgren R. W., Mathur D. P., McFeaters E. L., Mitchell S., Rehse R. A., Schrijver C. J., Springer L. A., Stern R. A., Tarbell T. D., Wuelser J. P., Wolfson C. J., Yanari C., Bookbinder J. A., Cheimets P. N., Caldwell D., Deluca E. E., Gates R., Golub L., Park S., Pod-gorski W. A., Bush R. I., Scherrer P. H., Gummin M. A., Smith P., Auker G., Jerram P., Pool P., Soufli R., Windt D. L., Beardsley S., Clapp M., Lang J., Waltham N.: The Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA) on the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO). Solar Physics, vol. 275, pp. 17–40, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11207-011-9776-8.
• [17] Maloney S. A., Gallagher P. T., McAteer R. T. J.: Reconstructing the 3-D Trajectories of CMEs in the Inner Heliosphere. Solar Physics, vol. 256, pp. 149–166, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11207-009-9364-3.
• [18] McKenna-Lawlor S. M. P., Dryer M., Kartalev M. D., Smith Z., Fry C. D., Sun W., Deehr C. S., Kecskemety K., Kudela K.: Near real-time predictions of the arrival at Earth of flare-related shocks during Solar Cycle 23. Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), vol. 111, A11103, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011162.
• [19] Nelson G. J., Melrose D.B.: Type II bursts, pp. 333–359. 1985.
• [20] Oinn T., Addis M., Ferris J., Marvin D., Senger M., Greenwood M., Carver T., Glover K., Pocock M. R., Wipat A., Li P.: Taverna: a tool for the composition and enactment of bioinformatics workflows. Bioinformatics, vol. 20 (17), pp. 3045–3054, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth361.
• [21] Pierantoni G., Coghlan B., Kenny E.: The Architecture of HELIO. In: Krakow Grid Workshop . 2010.
• [22] Pierantoni G., Coghlan B., Kenny E., Gallagher P., Perez-Suarez D.: Extending the SHEBA Propagation Model to reduce Parameter-Related Uncertainties. Computer Science, vol. 14(2), pp. 253–272, 2012.
• [23] Pulupa M., Bale S. D.: Structure on Interplanetary Shock Fronts: Type II Radio Burst Source Regions. Astrohpysicsl Journal, vol. 676, pp. 1330–1337, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/526405.
• [24] Pulupa M. P., Bale S. D., Kasper J. C.: Langmuir waves upstream of interplanetary shocks: Dependence on shock and plasma parameters. Journal of Geophys ical Research (Space Physics), vol. 115, A04106, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JA014680.
• [25] Roure D.D., Goble C., Stevens R.: The Design and Realisation of the myExperiment Virtual Research Environment for Social Sharing of Workflows. Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 25, pp. 561–567, 2009.
• [26] Stone E. C., Frandsen A. M., Mewaldt R. A., Christian E. R., Margolies D., Ormes J. F., Snow F.: The Advanced Composition Explorer. Space Science Reviews, vol. 86, pp. 1–22, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1005082526237.
• [27] Uchida Y.: On the Exciters of Type II and Type III Solar Radio Bursts. Publications of the Astronimical Society of Japan, vol. 12, p. 376, 1960.
• [28] Webb D. F., Howard T. A.: Coronal Mass Ejections: Observations. Living Reviews in Solar Physics, vol. 9, p. 3, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.12942/lrsp-2012-3.
• [29] Yurchyshyn V., Yashiro S., Abramenko V., Wang H., Gopalswamy N.: Statistical Distributions of Speeds of Coronal Mass Ejections. Astrophysical Journal, vol. 619, pp. 599–603, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/426129.