Znaczenie zaufania dla zarządzania ryzykiem w ujęciu sieciowym

• Autorzy: Nowacki F.

Warianty tytułu

EN

The meaning of trust for risk management – network approach

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

PL

Artykuł prezentuje znaczenie zastosowania zaufania dla zarządzania ryzykiem, stanowiącego alternatywne rozwiązanie w stosunku do istniejących metod systemowych. Celem artykułu jest zaprezentowanie zaufania, stanowiącego element budowania długotrwałych relacji pomiędzy podmiotami jako potencjalnej metody zarządzania ryzykiem. Okazuje się, że zaufanie może zastępować kontrakty, a poprzez jego połączenie z silnymi relacjami oraz aspektem współpracy możliwe jest jego zastosowanie na potrzeby zarządzania ryzykiem. Nie tylko stanowi to prostsze rozwiązanie od istniejących metod systemowych, ale także znacznie tańsze w implementacji, wymagające wyłącznie nakładu dodatkowej pracy.

EN

The article presents the importance of trust for risk management, which is an alternative solution to existing system methods. The aim of the article is to present the trust, which is responsible for building long-term relationships between entities as a potential risk management method. It turns out that trust can replace contracts, and through its connection with strong relations and cooperation it is possible to use it for the purposes of risk management. Not only is it simpler solution than the existing system methods, but also much cheaper in implementation, while requiring only additional work.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

zarządzanie ryzykiem; zaufanie biznesowe

EN

risk management; business reliance

• Wydawca: Sieć Badawcza Łukasiewicz - Poznański Instytut Technologiczny
• Czasopismo: Logistyka
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: nr 6
• Strony: 308--312, CD
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 22 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Nowacki F.

• Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu, Wydział Gospodarki Międzynarodowej, Katedra Marketingu Międzynarodowego

Bibliografia

• [1]. Andersen, P.H. & Kumar, R. (2006). Emotions, trust and relationship development in business relationships: A con-ceptual model for buyer – seller dyads. Industrial Marketing Management, 35 (4), 522-535.
• [2]. Aramo-Immonen, H. & Breite, R. (2011). Trust-Related Dynamics in the Supply Chain Relationship. The paper was published at the 27th IMP-conference in Glasgow, Scotland.
• [3]. Atkinson, S. & Butcher, D. (2003). Trust in managerial relationships. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 18 (4), 282-304.
• [4]. Beccerra, M. & Gupta, A.K. (1999). Trust Within the Organization: Integrating the Trust Literature With Agency Theory and Transaction Costs Economics. Public Administration Quarterly, 23 (2), 177-203.
• [5]. Bönte, W. (2008). Inter-firm trust in buyer–supplier relations: Are knowledge spillovers and geographical proximity relevant? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 67 (3/4), 855-870.
• [6]. Brito, C. & Roseira, C. (2003). A Model For The Understanding Of Supply Chain Networks. The paper was published at the 19th IMP-conference in Lugano, Switzerland.
• [7]. Christopher, M. & Peck, H. (2003). Building the Resilient Chain. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 15 (2), 1-14.
• [8]. Galli, G. & Nardin, G. (2003). Choice under Uncertainty: The Role of Trust. The paper was published at the 19th IMP-conference in Lugano, Switzerland.
• [9]. Håkansson, H., (ed.) (1982). International Marketing and Purchasing of Industrial Goods: An Interaction Approach, Chicester: John Wiley.
• [10]. Handfield, R.B. & Bechtel, C. (2002). The role of trust and relationship structure in improving supply chain respon-siveness. Industrial Marketing Management, 31, 367-382.
• [11]. Harland, C., Powell, P., Caldwell, N., Zheng, J., Woerndl, M. & Xu, S. (2003). Supply Networks Risks Arising From E-business: Findings From Empirical Research. The paper was published at the 19th IMP-conference in Lugano, Switzerland.
• [12]. Hill, C.W. (1990). Cooperation, opportunism, and the invisible hand: implications for transaction cost theory. Acade-my of Management Review, 15, 500-513.
• [13]. Hoffmann, P., Schiele H., Song, M. & Krabbendam, K. (2011). Supply risk management from a transaction cost and social exchange theory perspective. The paper was published at the 27th IMP-conference, Glasgow, Scotland.
• [14]. Högberg, B. (2002). Trust and Opportunism in Supply Chain Relationships-The Commercial Vehicle Industry. The paper was published at the 18th IMP-conference in Dijon, France.
• [15]. Kwon, I.-W.G. & Suh, T. (2005). Trust, commitment, ad relationship in supply chain management: a path analysis. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 10 (1), 26-33.
• [16]. Narasimhan, R. & Talluri, S. (2009). Perspective on risk management in supply chains. Journal of Operations Man-agement, 27, 114-118.
• [17]. Roseira, C., Brito, C. & Henneberg, C. (2010). Managing interdependencies in supplier networks. Industrial Market-ing Management, 39 (6), 925-935.
• [18]. Sung, S. & Kang, S. (2013). Effects of Trust Determinants on Firm Performance in the Buyer-Supplier Relationships: Empirical Evidence from the Warehousing firms in Busa. South Korea.
• [19]. Szczepański, R. & Szczepańska-Światowiec, J. (2012). Risk Management System in Business Relationships: Polish Case Studies. Industrial Marketing Management, 41 (5), 790-799.
• [20]. Walter, A., Mueller, T.A. & Helfert, G. (2000). The Impact of Satisfaction, Trust, and Relationship Value on Com-mitment: Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Results. The paper was published at the 16th IMP-conference in Bath, UK.
• [21]. Young, L. (2006). Trust: looking forward and back. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 21 (7), 439-445.
• [22]. Zaheer, A., McEvily, B. & Perrone, V. (1998). Does Trust Matter? Exploring the Effects of Interorganizational and Interpersonal Trust on Performance. Organization Science, 9 (2), 141-159.