A critical overview of methods for rules interoperability. Position paper

• Autorzy: Kaczor K. , Nalepa G.J.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Ograniczenia i wady metod wymiany wiedzy regułowej. Stan badań

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Rules are commonly used as a declarative method for knowledge representation. In the past, they were used in Rule-Based expert systems. Today they found application in such technologies as Complex Event Processing (CEP), Business Rules (BR), Business Processes Model and Notation and Semantic Web (SW). Despite their maturity, many unsolved problems still exist. One of them is related with rules interoperability and knowledge interchange. During the years many research were conducted and several methods were developed. Nevertheless, these methods suffer from their general and complex nature, which causes that the practical tool support is very weak.

PL

Reguły są powszechnie stosowana metoda deklaratywnej reprezentacji wiedzy. Dawniej wykorzystywane w ekspertowych systemach regułowych, dzisiaj znajdują nowe zastosowania. Pomimo swojej dojrzałości wciąż aktualny jest problem wymiany wiedzy pomiędzy różnymi reprezentacjami i formatami reguł. Istniejące technologie nie dostarczają efektywnych metod, a ponadto zawierają skomplikowane modele reprezentacji wiedzy, co skutkuje brakiem wsparcia narzędziowego. Niniejszy artykuł prezentuje obecny stan badań w obszarze wymiany wiedzy regułowej.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

rule interchange; knowledge interoperability; rule languages; rule representation; expert systems; rules; business rules

PL

wymiana wiedzy; wymiana reguł; jeżyki regułowe; reprezentacja wiedzy; systemy ekspertowe; reguły; reguły biznesowe

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwa AGH
• Czasopismo: Automatyka / Automatics
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: Vol. 17, no. 1
• Strony: 53--58
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 26 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Kaczor K.

• AGH University of Science and Technology, Krakow, Poland

autor

Nalepa G.J.

• AGH University of Science and Technology, Krakow, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] Adrian W.T., Nalepa G.J., Kaczor K., Noga M., Overview of selected approaches to rule representation on the Semantic Web. Technical Report CSLTR 2/2010, AGH University of Science and Technology 2010.
• [2] Antoniou G., Harmelen F., A Semantic Web Primer. The MIT Press 2008.
• [3] Baader F., Calvanese D., McGuinness D.L., Nardi D., Patel-Schneider P.F. (Eds), The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. Cambridge University Press 2003.
• [4] Boley H., Tabet S., Wagner G., Design rationale for ruleml: A markup language for semantic web rules, [in:] Isabel F. Cruz, Stefan Decker, Jérôme Euzenat, and Deborah L. McGuinness (Eds), SWWS, 2001, pp. 381-401.
• [5] Fensel D., Angele J., Landes D., KARL: A knowledge acquisition and representation language. [in:] J.C. Rault (Ed.), Proceedings of the 11th International Conference Expert Systems and their Applications, vol. 1 (Tools, Techniques & Methods), pp. 513-528, Avignon, 1991. EC2, Nanterre.
• [6] Friedman-Hill E., Jess in Action, Rule Based Systems in Java. Manning 2003.
• [7] Giurca A., Gasevic D., Taveter K. (Eds), Handbook of Research on Emerging Rule-Based Languages and Technologies: Open Solutions and Approaches. Information Science Reference, Hershey, New York, May 2009.
• [8] Hitzler P., Krötzsch M., Parsia B., Patel-Schneider P.F., Sebastian Rudolph, OWL 2 Web Ontology Language -primer. W3C recommendation, W3C, October 2009.
• [9] Hopgood A.A., Intelligent Systems for Engineers and Scientists. CRC Press, Boca Raton London New York Washington, D.C., 2nd ed., 2001.
• [10] Horrocks I., Patel-Schneider P.F., Boley H., Tabet S., Grosof B., Dean M., SWRL: A semantic web rule language combining OWL and RuleML, W3C member submission 21 may 2004. Technical report, W3C, 2004.
• [11] Kaczor K., Nalepa G.J., Extensible design and verification enviroment for XTT rule bases. [in:] Ryszard Tadeusiewicz, Antoni Ligęza, Wojciech Mitkowski, and Maciej Szymkat (Eds), CMS'09: Computer Methods and Systems: 7th conference, 26-27 November 2009, Kraków, Poland, pp. 99-104, Cracow, 2009. AGH University of Science and Technology, Cracow, Oprogramowanie Naukowo-Techniczne.
• [12] Kaczor K., Nalepa G.J., HaDEs -presentation of the HeKatE design environment, [in:] Joachim Baumeister and Grzegorz J. Nalepa (Eds), 5th Workshop on Knowledge Engineering and Software Engineering (KESE2009) at the 32nd German conference on Artificial Intelligence: September 15, 2009, Paderborn, Germany, pp. 57-62, Paderborn, Germany, 2009.
• [13] Kaczor K., Nalepa G.J., Lysik L., Kluza K., Visual design of Drools rule bases using the XTT2 method, [in:] Radosław Katarzyniak, Tzu-Fu Chiu, Chao-Fu Hong, and Ngoc Nguyen (Eds), Semantic Methods for Knowledge Management and Communication, vol. 381 of Studies in Computational Intelligence, pp. 57-66. Springer-Verlag, 2011. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-23418-7.
• [14] Kifer M., Boley H., RIF overview. W3C working draft, W3C, October 2009. http://www.w3.org/TR/rif-overview.
• [15] Liebowitz J. (Ed.), The Handbook of Applied Expert Systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1998. [16] Ligęza A., Expert systems approach to decision support. European Journal of Operational Research, 37(1), 1988, pp. 100-110.
• [17] Ligęza A., Logical Foundations for Rule-Based Systems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006.
• [18] Nalepa G.J., Semantic Knowledge Engineering. A Rule-Based Approach. Wydawnictwa AGH, Kraków 2011.
• [19] Nalepa G.J., Ligęza A., Special section: Semantic knowledge engineering. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, 21(1), 2011.
• [20] Nalepa G.J., Ligęza A., Kaczor K., Formalization and modeling of rules using the XTT2 method. International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools, 20(6), 2011, pp. 1107-1125.
• [21] OMG. Semantics of Business Vocabulary and Business Rules (SBVR). Technical Report dtc/06-03-02, Object Management Group, 2006.
• [22] Ross R.G., The RuleSpeak Business Rule Notation. Business Rules Journal, 7(4), April 2006.
• [23] Russell S., Norvig P., Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Prentice-Hall, 3rd ed., 2009.
• [24] Harmelen F., Balder J., (ML)2: A formal language for KADS models, [in:] ECAI, 1992, pp. 582-586.
• [25] Wagner G., Giurca A., Lukichev S., R2ml: A general approach for marking up rules, [in:] F. Bry, F. Fages, M. Marchiori, and H. Ohlbach (Eds), Principles and Practices of Semantic Web Reasoning, Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings 05371, 2005.
• [26] Wagner G., How to design a general rule markup language, [in:] XML Technology for the SemanticWeb (XSW2002), Lecture Notes in Informatics, HU Berlin, 2002, pp. 19-37.