PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Is Globalization Driving the Use of Renewable Energy? A Global Macro Perspective

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
PL
Czy globalizacja sprzyja rozwojowi energii odnawialnej? Globalna makro-perspektywa
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The contemporary world has become increasingly interdependent in terms of economic, social and political development. These various forms of interdependence, usually termed globalization, help disseminate ideas, information, products, and services around the world. Increase in globalization has also increased path-dependence, affecting economic, social, and institutional development and completing some industries, products and technologies to grow in line with the global demand and changing standards. While the role of globalization in economic growth, technology transfer and institutional development is established in literature, the role of globalization in reversing environmental deterioration is not explored yet. The current study looks at how globalization has affected renewable energy use in high, upper middle and lower middle income countries. The empirical results based on a fixed effects model show that countries differ in terms of taking advantage of different types of globalization, i.e., economic, social and political, while transitioning towards renewable energy (RE) projects. Economic globalization has a positive influence on RE usage in the case of high and lower middle income countries, Social globalization in case of high and upper middle income countries. Contrary to the positive impacts of economic and social globalization, political globalization has a negative impact on RE usage in the case of high income countries. In addition to globalization, the effect of government effectiveness, GDP per capita and CO2 vary across the groups of countries.
PL
Współczesny świat staje się coraz bardziej współzależny pod względem rozwoju gospodarczego, społecznego i politycznego. Te różne formy współzależności, zwykle nazywane globalizacją, pomagają rozpowszechniać idee, informacje, produkty i usługi na całym świecie. Wzrost globalizacji zwiększył również inne współzależności, wpływając na rozwój gospodarczy, społeczny i instytucjonalny oraz ukończenie niektórych gałęzi przemysłu, produktów i technologii, tak aby rozwijały się zgodnie z globalnym popytem i zmieniającymi się standardami. Chociaż rola globalizacji we wzroście gospodarczym, transferze technologii i rozwoju instytucjonalnym jest ustalona w literaturze, rola globalizacji w odwracaniu degradacji środowiska nie jest jeszcze zbadana. Obecne badanie dotyczy wpływu globalizacji na wykorzystanie energii odnawialnej w krajach o wysokim, średnim i niskim średnim dochodzie. Wyniki empiryczne oparte na modelu efektów stałych pokazują, że kraje różnią się pod względem wykorzystania różnych rodzajów globalizacji, tj. gospodarczej, społecznej i politycznej, podczas przechodzenia na projekty związane z energią odnawialną (OZE). Globalizacja gospodarcza ma pozytywny wpływ na wykorzystanie OZE w przypadku krajów o wysokim i niskim średnim dochodzie, Globalizacja społeczna w przypadku krajów o wysokim i wyższym średnim dochodzie. W przeciwieństwie do pozytywnych skutków globalizacji gospodarczej i społecznej, globalizacja polityczna ma negatywny wpływ na wykorzystanie OZE w przypadku krajów o wysokich dochodach. Oprócz globalizacji wpływ skuteczności rządów, PKB na mieszkańca i CO2 jest różny w poszczególnych grupach krajów.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Strony
68--80
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 36 poz., fig., tab.
Twórcy
autor
  • School of Social Sciences and Humanities, National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), H-12, Islamabad, Pakistan
autor
  • School of Social Sciences and Humanities, National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), H-12, Islamabad, Pakistan
autor
  • School of Social Sciences and Humanities, National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), H-12, Islamabad, Pakistan
Bibliografia
  • 1. ABBASI M. A., PARVEEN S., KHAN S., KAMAL M. A., 2020, Urbanization and energy consumption effects on carbon dioxide emissions: evidence from Asian-8 countries using panel data analysis, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(15): 18029-18043.
  • 2. ABBASI K., JIAO Z., SHAHBAZ M., KHAN A., 2020, Asymmetric impact of renewable and non-renewable energy on economic growth in Pakistan: New evidence from a nonlinear analysis, Energy Exploration & Exploitation, 38(5): 1946-1967.
  • 3. ADEDOYIN O. B., SOYKAN E., 2020, Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: the challenges and opportuni-ties, Interactive learning environments: 1-13.
  • 4. AMIR M., KHAN S. Z., 2021, Assessment of renewable energy: Status, challenges, COVID-19 impacts, opportunities, and sustainable energy solutions in Africa, Energy and Built Environment.
  • 5. ANTWEILER W., COPELAND B. R., TAYLOR M. S., 2001, Is free trade good for the environment? American eco-nomic review, 91(4): 877-908.
  • 6. AWERBUCH S., SAUTER R., 2006, Exploiting the oil-GDP effect to support renewables deployment, Energy Policy, 34(17): 2805-2819.
  • 7. AWODUMI O. B., ADEWUYI A. O., 2020, The role of non-renewable energy consumption in economic growth and carbon emission: evidence from oil producing economies in Africa, Energy Strategy Reviews, 27: 100434.
  • 8. BAYER P., DOLAN L., URPELAINEN J., 2013, Global patterns of renewable energy innovation, 1990-2009, Energy for Sustainable Development, 17(3): 288-295.
  • 9. BIN, L., JI, H., 2021, Energy security and economic development in large energy user countries. International Journal of Social Sciences and Sustainability, 1, 4.
  • 10. BALOCH Z. A., TAN Q., KAMRAN H. W., NAWAZ M. A., ALBASHAR G., HAMEED J., 2022, A multi-perspective assessment approach of renewable energy production: policy perspective analysis, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(2): 2164-2192.
  • 11. BOUTE A., 2020, Regulatory stability and renewable energy investment: The case of Kazakhstan, Renewable and Sus-tainable Energy Reviews, 121: 109673.
  • 12. BOWDEN N., PAYNE J. E., 2010, Sectoral analysis of the causal relationship between renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and real output in the US, Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 5(4): 400-408.
  • 13. CHEON A., URPELAINEN J., 2012, Oil prices and energy technology innovation: An empirical analysis, Global Envi-ronmental Change, 22(2): 407-417.
  • 14. DREHER A., 2006, Does Globalization Affect Growth? Evidence from a new Index of Globalization call made, Applied Economics 38, 10: 1091-1110.
  • 15. ERGUN S. J., OWUSU P. A., RIVAS M. F., 2019, Determinants of renewable energy consumption in Afri-ca, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(15): 15390-15405.
  • 16. ETOKAKPAN M. U., SOLARIN S. A., YORUCU V., BEKUN F. V., SARKODIE S. A., 2020, Modelling natural gas consumption, capital formation, globalization, CO2 emissions and economic growth nexus in Malaysia: Fresh evidence from combined cointegration and causality analysis, Energy Strategy Reviews, 31: 100526.
  • 17. GOZGOR G., MAHALIK M. K., DEMIR E., PADHAN H., 2020, The impact of economic globalization on renewable energy in the OECD countries, Energy Policy, 139: 111365.
  • 18. IBRAHIEM D. M., HANAFY S. A., 2020, Dynamic linkages amongst ecological footprints, fossil fuel energy consump-tion and globalization: an empirical analysis, Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal.
  • 19. KOSKINA A., FARAH P. D., IBRAHIM I. A., 2020, Trade in clean energy technologies: sliding from protection to protectionism through obligations for technology transfer in climate change law, or Vice Versa?, The Journal of World En-ergy Law & Business, 13(2): 114-128, https://doi.org/10.1093/jwelb/jwaa013.
  • 20. KUTAN A. M., PARAMATI S. R., UMMALLA M., ZAKARI A., 2018, Financing renewable energy projects in major emerging market economies: Evidence in the perspective of sustainable economic development, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 54(8): 1761-1777.
  • 21. LEE H. S., SHEPLEY M., HUANG C. S., 2009, Evaluation of off-leash dog parks in Texas and Florida: A study of use patterns, user satisfaction, and perception, Landscape and urban planning, 92(3-4): 314-324.
  • 22. LYULYOV O., PIMONENKO T., KWILINSKI A., DZWIGOL H., DZWIGOL-BAROSZ M., PAVLYK V., BAROSZ P., 2021, The impact of the government policy on the energy efficient gap: The evidence from Ukraine, Energies, 14(2): 373.
  • 23. MATEI I., 2017, Is there a Link between Renewable Energy Consumption and Economic Growth? A Dynamic Panel Investigation for the OECD Countries, Revue d'economie politique, 127(6): 985-1012.
  • 24. MEHRARA M., REZAEI S., RAZI D. H., 2015, Determinants of renewable energy consumption among ECO countries; based on Bayesian model averaging and weighted-average least square, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 54: 96-109.
  • 25. MUHAMMAD B., KHAN S., 2021, Understanding the relationship between natural resources, renewable energy con-sumption, economic factors, globalization and CO2 emissions in developed and developing countries, Natural Resources Forum, 45(2): 138-156.
  • 26. MURSHED M., ELHEDDAD M., AHMED R., BASSIM M., THAN E. T., 2022, Foreign direct investments, renewable electricity output, and ecological footprints: do financial globalization facilitate renewable energy transition and environmental welfare in Bangladesh?, Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 29(1): 33-78.
  • 27. MURSHED M., AHMED Z., ALAM M. S., MAHMOOD H., REHMAN A., DAGAR V., 2021, Reinvigorating the role of clean energy transition for achieving a low-carbon economy: evidence from Bangladesh, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(47): 67689-67710.
  • 28. NAWAZ, S. M. N., RIAZ, T., 2021, Examining People Behavioral Responses to COVID-19: The Role of Socioeconom-ics, Risk Perceptions, and Media in Pakistan. International Journal of Social Sciences and Sustainability, 1(1).
  • 29. NAWAZ, S. M. N., ALVI, S., AKMAL, T. (2021). The impasse of energy consumption coupling with pollution haven hypothesis and environmental Kuznets curve: a case study of South Asian economies. Environmental Science and Pollu-tion Research, 28(35), 48799-48807.
  • 30. NCHOFOUNG T. N., ACHUO E. D., ASONGU S. A., 2021, Resource rents and inclusive human development in developing countries, Resources Policy, 74: 102382.
  • 31. Omri A., Nguyen D. K., 2014, On the determinants of renewable energy consumption: International evidence, Energy, 72: 554-560.
  • 32. PADHAN H., PADHANG P. C., TIWARI A. K., AHMED R., HAMMOUDEH S., 2020, Renewable energy consump-tion and robust globalization (s) in OECD countries: Do oil, carbon emissions and economic activity matter?, Energy Strat-egy Reviews, 32: 100535.
  • 33. PARAMATI S. R., UMMALLA M., APERGIS N., 2016, The effect of foreign direct investment and stock market growth on clean energy use across a panel of emerging market economies, Energy Economics, 56: 29-41.
  • 34. PENG X., LIU Z., JIANG D., 2021, A review of multiphase energy conversion in wind power generation, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 147: 111172.
  • 35. SHAHBAZ M., SHAHZAD S. J. H., MAHALIK M. K., SADORSKY P., 2018, How strong is the causal relationship between globalization and energy consumption in developed economies? A country-specific time-series and panel analy-sis, Applied Economics, 50(13): 1479-1494.
  • 36. SHEKHAR J., SURI D., SOMANI P., LEE S. J., ARORA M., 2021, Reduced renewable energy stability in India fol-lowing COVID-19: Insights and key policy recommendations, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 144: 111015.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-8141f927-16f4-445a-aefb-3e80f1787321
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.