Analysis of crack propagation in a "pull-out" test

• Autorzy: Gontarz Jakub , Podgórski Jerzy

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/sgem-2019-0015

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The article describes a computer analysis of the pull-out test used to calculate the force needed to pull out a rock fragment and determine the shape of this broken fragment. The analyzed material is sandstone and porphyry. The analysis included the first approach to using own subroutine in the Simulia Abaqus system, that is, which task is undertaken to accurately determine the crack path of the Finite Element Method model. The work also contains a description of laboratory tests and analytical considerations.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

pull-out test; rock mechanics; fracture mechanics; numerical modeling of fracture

• Wydawca: De Gruyter
• Czasopismo: Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: Vol. 41, nr 3
• Strony: 160--170
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 16 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Gontarz Jakub

• Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Lublin University of Technology, Lublin, Poland

autor

Podgórski Jerzy

• Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Lublin University of Technology, Lublin, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] Abaqus V 6.14.2 User’s Manual. (2014). Retrieved from https://www. sharcnet.ca/Software /Abaqus/6.14.2/v6.14/books/usb/ default.htm?startat=pt04ch10s07at36.html
• [2] Bower, A. F. (2010). Applied mechanics of solids. CRC Press.
• [3] Brencich, A. (2015). A post-installed insert for pull-out tests on concrete up to 70 MPa. Construction and Building Materials, 95, 788–801. https://doi.org/10.1016/ J.CONBUILDMAT.2015.07.055
• [4] Brown, W. F., & Srawley, J. E. (1966). Plane Strain Crack Toughness Testing of High Strength Metallic Materials. Philadelphia: ASTM International. https://doi.org /10.1520/STP410-EB
• [5] Contrafatto, L., & Cosenza, R. (2014). Behaviour of post-installed adhesive anchors in natural stone. Construction and Building Materials, 68, 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. conbuildmat.2014.05.099
• [6] Elices, M., Guinea, G. V. G., Gómez, J., Planas, J., & Gomez, J. (2002). The cohesive zone model: advantages, limitations and challenges. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 69(2), 137–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7944(01)00083-2
• [7] European Technical Assessment ETA-99/0009 of 06/01/2015 for Hilti HDA and HDA-R anchor. (n.d.).
• [8] Gontarz, J., & Podgórski, J. (2016). Explanation of the mechanism of destruction of the cylindrical sample in the Brazilian test. In M. Kleiber, T. Burczyński, K. Wilde, J. Górski, K. Winkelmann, & Ł. Smakosz (Eds.), Advances in Mechanics : Theoretical, Computational and Interdisciplinary Issues (pp. 479–483). Gdańsk: Boca Raton.
• [9] Hasanpour, R., & Choupani, N. (2008). Mixed-Mode Study of Rock Fracture Mechanics by using the Modified Arcan Specimen Test. International Journal of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2(5), 716–721.
• [10] Jonak, J., Kalita, M., Siegmund, M., & Podgórski, J. (2019). Raport NCN project RODEST nr 2015/19/B/ST10/02817.
• [11] Mier, J. G. M. van. (1996). Fracture processes of concrete. CRC Press.
• [12] Mohammadi, S. (Soheil). (2008). Extended finite element method for fracture analysis of structures. Blackwell Pub.
• [13] Podgórski, J. (1984). Limit state condition and the dissipation funcion for isotropic materials. Arch. Mech., 36(3), 323–342.
• [14] Podgórski, J. (1985). General Failure Criterion for Isotropic Media. Journ. Eng. Mech. ASCE, 111(2), 188–201.
• [15] Podgórski, J. (2017). The criterion for determining the direction of crack propagation in a random pattern composites. Meccanica, 52(8), 1923–1934. https://doi.org/10.1007 /s11012-016-0523-y
• [16] Wang, D., Wu, D., Ouyang, C., He, S., & Sun, X. (2017). Simulation analysis of large-diameter post-installed anchors in concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 143, 558–565. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.149

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2019).