Binocular summation evaluated by early and late visual evoked potentials

• Autorzy: Czaińska M. , Przekoracka-Krawczyk A. , Naskręcki R. , van der Lubbe R.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5277/oa180113

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The visual evoked potential technique makes it possible to explore the visual system with a high temporal resolution, thereby providing information about different phases of binocular integration. The aim of the study was to characterize the amplitude, latency and scalp distribution of pattern-reversal gratings visual evoked potentials related to binocular viewing. 12 adult participants without any pathology of the visual system were examined by electroencephalography (EEG), with three viewing conditions: the dominant eye, non-dominant eye, and both eyes. They were tested with reversed checkerboard patterns presented with a frequency of 1.02 Hz. The amplitudes of visual evoked potentials were calculated to detect the effect of binocular integration. The strongest binocular summation was observed on the N75 component. P100 component was also affected by binocular viewing, mainly above parieto-occipital cortex. In the later time window binocular summation was reflected in changes in amplitude of N145 component over the right parieto-occipital region. The obtained results suggest that binocular summation is not limited to occipital cortex as its influence was also observed above parieto-occipital regions. Changes in amplitude of N75 component looks to be a good predictor of binocular summation.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

binocular summation; binocular vision; visual evoked potentials

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej
• Czasopismo: Optica Applicata
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: Vol. 48, nr 1
• Strony: 137--148
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 59 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Czaińska M.

• Laboratory of Vision Science and Optometry, Faculty of Physics, Adam Mickiewicz University of Poznań, Umultowska 85, 61-614 Poznań, Poland
• Vision and Neuroscience Laboratory, NanoBioMedical Centre, Adam Mickiewicz University of Poznań, Umultowska 85, 61-614 Poznań, Poland

autor

Przekoracka-Krawczyk A.

• Laboratory of Vision Science and Optometry, Faculty of Physics, Adam Mickiewicz University of Poznań, Umultowska 85, 61-614 Poznań, Poland
• Vision and Neuroscience Laboratory, NanoBioMedical Centre, Adam Mickiewicz University of Poznań, Umultowska 85, 61-614 Poznań, Poland

autor

Naskręcki R.

• Laboratory of Vision Science and Optometry, Faculty of Physics, Adam Mickiewicz University of Poznań, Umultowska 85, 61-614 Poznań, Poland
• Vision and Neuroscience Laboratory, NanoBioMedical Centre, Adam Mickiewicz University of Poznań, Umultowska 85, 61-614 Poznań, Poland
• Quantum Electronic Laboratory, Faculty of Physics, Adam Mickiewicz University of Poznań, Umultowska 85, 61-614 Poznań, Poland

autor

van der Lubbe R.

• Laboratory of Vision Science and Optometry, Faculty of Physics, Adam Mickiewicz University of Poznań, Umultowska 85, 61-614 Poznań, Poland
• Cognitive Psychology and Ergonomics, University of Twente, Enschede, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB Enschede, the Netherlands

Bibliografia

• [1] BLAKE R., SLOANE M., FOX F., Further developments in binocular summation, Perception and Psychophysics 30(3), 1981, pp. 266–276.
• [2] APKARIAN P.A., NAKAYAMA K., TYLER, C.W., Binocularity in the human visual evoked potential: facilitation, summation and suppression, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 51(1), 1981, pp. 32–48.
• [3] DI SUMMA A., POLO A., TINAZZI M., ZANETTE G., BERTOLASI L., BONGIOVANNI L.G., FIASCHI A., Binocular interaction in normal vision studied by pattern-reversal visual evoked potential (PR-VEPS), Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences 18(2), 1997, pp. 81–86.
• [4] MATSUMOTO C.S., NAKAGOMI R., MATSUMOTO H., MINODA H., SHINODA K., IWATA T., MIZOTA A., Binocular interaction of visually evoked cortical potentials elicited by dichoptic binocular stimulation, Journal of Vision 14(11), 2014, pp. 1–9.
• [5] PINELES S.L., VELEZ F.G., ISENBERG S.J., FENOGLIO Z., BIRCH E., NUSINOWITZ S., DEMER J.L., Functional burden of strabismus: decreased binocular summation and binocular inhibition, JAMA Ophthalmology 131(11), 2013, pp. 1413–1419.
• [6] PRZEKORACKA-KRAWCZYK A., CZAIŃSKA M., VAN DER LUBBE R., Binocular facilitation with parvoand magno-cellular stimulation reflected in EEG oscillations, Proceedings of the VII European/I World Meeting in Visual and Physiological Optics, Wrocław, Poland, August 25–27, 2014, pp. 259–262.
• [7] VEDAMURTHY I., SUTTLE C.M., ALEXANDER J., ASPER L.J., A psychophysical study of human binocular interactions in normal and amblyopic visual systems, Vision Research 48(14), 2008, pp. 1522–1531.
• [8] HOME R., Binocular summation: a study of contrast sensitivity, visual acuity and recognition, Vision Research 18(5), 1978, pp. 579–585.
• [9] HERAVIAN J.S., JENKINS T.C.A., DOUTHWAITE W.A., Binocular summation in visually evoked responses and visual acuity, Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 10(3), 1990, pp. 257–261.
• [10] HOROWITZ M.W., An analysis of the superiority of binocular over monocular visual acuity, Journal of Experimental Psychology 39(5), 1949, pp. 581–596.
• [11] POINTER J.S., Influence of selected variables on monocular, interocular, and binocular visual acuity, Optometry and Vision Science 85(2), 2008, pp. 135–142.
• [12] CAMPBELL F.W., GREEN D.G., Monocular versus binocular visual acuity, Nature 208(5006), 1965, pp. 191–192.
• [13] ARDITI A.R., ANDERSON P.A., MOVSHON J.A., Monocular and binocular detection of moving sinusoidal gratings, Vision Research 21(3), 1981, pp. 329–336.
• [14] LEGGE G.E., Binocular contrast summation. I. Detection and discrimination, Vision Research 24(4), 1984, pp. 373–383.
• [15] PARDHAN S., A comparison of binocular summation in young and older patients, Current Eye Research 15(3), 1996, pp. 315–319.
• [16] MEESE T.S., GEORGESON M.A., BAKER D.H., Binocular contrast vision at and above threshold, Journal of Vision 6(11), 2006, pp. 1224–1243.
• [17] LEGGE G.E., RUBIN G.S., Binocular interactions in suprathreshold contrast perception, Perception and Psychophysics 30(1), 1981, pp. 49–61.
• [18] NELSON-QUIGG J.M., CELLO K., JOHNSON C.A., Predicting binocular visual field sensitivity from monocular visual field results, Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 41(8), 2000, pp. 2212–2221.
• [19] CRABB D.P., FITZKE F.W., HITCHINGS R.A., VISWANATHAN A.C., A practical approach to measuring the visual field component of fitness to drive, British Journal of Ophthalmology 88(9), 2004, pp. 1191–1196.
• [20] ASAOKA R., CRABB D.P., YAMASHITA T., RUSSELL R.A., YA XING WANG, GARWAY-HEATH D.F., Patients have two eyes!: binocular versus better eye visual field indices, Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 52(9), 2011, pp. 7007–7011.
• [21] ARORA K.S., BOLAND M.V., FRIEDMAN D.S., JEFFERYS J.L., WEST S.K., RAMULU P.Y., The relationship between better-eye and integrated visual field mean deviation and visual disability, Ophthalmology 120(12), 2013, pp. 2476–2484.
• [22] SNOWDEN R., ROSSITER M., Stereoscopic depth cues can segment motion information, Perception 28(2), 1999, pp. 193–201.
• [23] PORRILL J., FRISBY J.P., ADAMS W.J., BUCKLEY D., Robust and optimal use of information in stereo vision, Nature 397(6714), 1999, pp. 63–65.
• [24] BAGOLINI B., PORCIATTI V., FALSINI B., Binocular interaction and steady-state visual evoked potentials. I. A study in normal subjects and in subjects with defective binocular vision, Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 226(5), 1988, pp. 401–406.
• [25] GIUSEPPE N., ANDREA F., Binocular interaction in visual-evoked responses: summation, facilitation and inhibition in a clinical study of binocular vision, Ophthalmic Research 15(5), 1983, pp. 261–264.
• [26] BAGOLINI B., FALSINI B., CERMOLA S., PORCIATTI V., Binocular interactions and steady-state VEPs. A study in normal and defective binocular vision (Part II), Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 232(12), 1994, pp. 737–744.
• [27] SREBRO R., The visually evoked response. Binocular facilitation and failure when binocular vision is disturbed, Archives of Ophthalmology 96(5), 1978, pp. 839–844.
• [28] TYLER C.W., APKARIAN P.A., Effects of contrast, orientation and binocularity in the pattern evoked potential, Vision Research 25(6), 1985, pp. 755–766.
• [29] LEGUIRE L.E., ROGERS G.L., BREMER D.L., Visual-evoked response binocular summation in normal and strabismic infants. Defining the critical period, Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 32(1), 1991, pp. 126–133.
• [30] SCLAR G., OHZAWA I., FREEMAN R.D., Binocular summation in normal, monocularly deprived, and strabismic cats: visual evoked potentials, Experimental Brain Research 62(1), 1986, pp. 1–10.
• [31] TOBIMATSU S., KATO M., The effect of binocular stimulation on each component of transient and steady -state VEPs, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 100(3), 1996, pp. 177–183.
• [32] SHEA S.L., ASLIN R.N., MCCULLOCH D., Binocular VEP summation in infants and adults with abnormal binocular histories, Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 28(2), 1987, pp. 356–365.
• [33] DOWLING J.E., RIPPS H., Adaptation in skate photoreceptors, Journal of General Physiology 60(6), 1972, pp. 698–719.
• [34] OOSTENVELD R., PRAAMSTRA P., The five percent electrode system for high-resolution EEG and ERP measurements, Clinical Neurophysiology 112(4), 2001, pp. 713–719.
• [35] ROMBOUTS S.A., BARKHOF F., SPRENGER M., VALK J., SCHELTENS P., The functional basis of ocular dominance: Functional MRI (fMRI) findings, Neuroscience Letters 221(1), 1996, pp. 1–4.
• [36] BOBAK P., BODIS-WOLLNER I., GUILLORY S., The effect of blur and contrast on VEP latency: comparison between check and sinusoidal and grating patterns, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 68(4), 1987, pp. 247–255.
• [37] BLAKE R., WILSON H., Binocular vision, Vision Research 51(7), 2011, pp. 754–770.
• [38] DI RUSSO F., MARTÍNEZ A., SERENO M.I., PITZALIS S., HILLYARD S.A., Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential, Human Brain Mapping 15(2), 2002, pp. 95–111.
• [39] MARTÍNEZ A., DI RUSSO F., ANLLO-VENTO L., SERENO M.I., BUXTON R.B., HILLYARD S.A., Putting spatial attention on the map: timing and localization of stimulus selection processes in striate and extrastriate visual areas, Vision Research 41(10–11), 2001, pp. 1437–1457.
• [40] GOMEZ-GONZALEZ C.M., CLARK V.P., FAN S., LUCK S.J., HILLYARD S.A., Sources of attention-sensitive visual event-related potentials, Brain Topography 7(1), 1994, pp. 41–51.
• [41] JEFFREYS D.A., AXFORD J.G., Source locations of pattern-specific component of human visual evoked potentials. I. Component of striate cortical origin, Experimental Brain Research 16(1), 1972, pp. 1–21.
• [42] JEFFREYS D.A., AXFORD J.G., Source locations of pattern-specific component of human visual evoked potentials. II. Component of extrastriate cortical origin, Experimental Brain Research 16(1), 1972, pp. 22–40.
• [43] MAIER J., DAGNELIE G., SPEKREIJSE H., VAN DIJK B.W., Principal components analysis for source localization of VEPs in man, Vision Research 27(2), 1987, pp. 165–177.
• [44] LESEVRE N., JOSEPH J.P., Modifications of pattern-evoked potential (PEP) in relation to the stimulated part of the visual field (clues for the most probable origin of each component), Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 47(2), 1979, pp. 183–203.
• [45] OSSENBLOK P., SPEKREIJSE H., The extrastriate generators of EP to checkerboard onset. A source localization approach, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 80(3), 1991, pp. 181–193.
• [46] KRISS A., HALLIDAY A., A comparison of occipital potentials evoked by pattern onset, offset, and reversal, [In] Evoked Potentials, C. Barber [Ed.], UMP Press, Lancaster, UK, 1980, pp. 205–212.
• [47] MARTÍNEZ A., DI RUSSO F., ANLLO-VENTO L., HILLYARD S.A., Electrophysiological analysis of cortical mechanisms of selective attention to high and low spatial frequencies, Clinical Neurophysiology 112(11), 2001, pp. 1980–1998.
• [48] DI SUMMA A., FUSINA S., BERTOLASI L., VICENTINI S., PERLINI S., BONGIOVANNI L.G., POLO A., Mechanism of binocular interaction in refraction errors: study using pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials, Documenta Ophthalmologica 98(2), 1999, pp. 139–151.
• [49] BANTON T., LEVI D.M., Binocular summation in vernier acuity, Journal of the Optical Society of America A 8(4), 1991, pp. 673–680.
• [50] WOOD J.M., COLLINS M.J., CARKEET A., Regional variations in binocular summation across the visual field, Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 12(1), 1992, pp. 46–51.
• [51] MIZOTA A., HOSHINO A., ADACHI-USAMI E., FUJIMOTO N., Binocular summation in visual evoked cortical potential in patients who have significantly different P100 peak latencies in their two eyes, Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 242(9), 2004, pp. 762–766.
• [52] SLOPER J.J., COLLINS A.D., Reduction in binocular enhancement of the visual evoked potential during development accompanies increasing stereoacuity, Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus 35(3), 1998, pp. 154–158.
• [53] CLARK V.P., FAN S., HILLYARD S.A., Identification of early visually evoked potential generators by retinotopic and topographic analysis, Human Brain Mapping 2(3), 1994, pp. 170–187.
• [54] MARTÍNEZ A., ANLLO-VENTO L., SERENO M.I., FRANK L.R., BUXTON R.B., DUBOWITZ D.J., WONG E.C., HINRICHS H., HEINZE H.J., HILLYARD S.A., Involvement of striate and extrastriate visual cortical areas in spatial attention, Nature Neuroscience 2(4), 1999, pp. 364–369.
• [55] DARCEY T.M., ARY J.P., FENDER D.H., Spatio-temporal visually evoked scalp potentials in response to partial-field patterned stimulation, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 50(5–6), 1980, pp. 348–355.
• [56] SREBRO R., The topography of scalp potentials evoked by pattern pulse stimuli, Vision Research 27(6), 1987, pp. 901–914.
• [57] BODIS-WOLLNER I., BRANNAN J., NICOLL J., FRKOVIC S., MYLIN L., A short latency cortical component of the foveal VEP is revealed by hemifield stimulation, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 84(3), 1992, pp. 201–208.
• [58] CLARK V.P., HILLYARD S.A., Spatial selective attention affects early extrastriate but not striate components of the visual evoked potential, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 8(5), 1996, pp. 387–402.
• [59] HARTER M.R., SEIPLE W.H., SALMON L., Binocular summation of visually evoked responses to pattern stimuli in humans, Vision Research 13(8), 1973, pp. 1433–1446.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2018).