Implementation and use of remote work tools

• Autorzy: Wojtkowiak Grzegorz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2022.159.39

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The aim of this article is to describe employees’ expectations and managers’ practices in the implementation and use of tools supporting remote work. Design/methodology/approach: To this end, employee opinion surveys were conducted using the Computer-Assisted Web Interview (CAWI) method (n = 500) and structured interviews were performed with managers (n = 14). Cross tabulation was employed to quantitatively verify statistically significant relationships and coding of the interview contents was applied in the qualitative analysis. Findings: Based on the results, the impact of personal skills, IT support and tool selection on the use of remote work tools (and employee satisfaction) are assessed. Research limitations/implications: In view of the newly emerging employee challenges it seems critical to refer to the latest research and constantly update the knowledge of all those involved. Hybrid work can change employees’ opinions and attitudes and further diversify teams’ expectations towards managers as well as the tools they use. Practical implications: Good practices are identified and recommendations are formulated regarding the application of the tools by managers in practice. Originality/value: The article organizes the issues of using technical tools for management during forced remote work. It shows employees expectations and best practices, which could be valuable for managers.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

remote work tools; remote work

PL

narzędzia pracy zdalnej; praca zdalna

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: z. 159
• Strony: 489--499
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 19 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Wojtkowiak Grzegorz

• Poznan University of Economics and Business, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Beňo, M., Hvorecký, J., Šimúth, J. (2021). E-panopticon of face-to-display workers: from the office to the home. Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, Vol. 11, No. 1.
• 2. Borissova, D., Dimitrova, Z., Dimitrov, V. (2020). How to Support Teams to be Remote and Productive. Group Decision-Making for Distance Collaboration Software Tools, Information & Security: An International Journal, Vol. 46, No. 1.
• 3. Ilag, B.N. (2021). Tools and Technology for Effective Remote Work General Terms Tools and Technology for Effective Remote Work. International Journal of Computer Applications, Vol. 174, No. 21.
• 4. Kaufman, G., Taniguchi, H. (2021). Working from Home and Changes in Work Characteristics during COVID-19. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, Vol. 7, No. 1.
• 5. Kondratowicz, B., Godlewska-Werner, D., Połomski, P., Khosla, M. (2022). Satisfaction with job and life and remote work in the COVID-19 pandemic: the role of perceived stress, self-efficacy and self-esteem. Personality Psychology, Vol. 10, No. 1.
• 6. Laker, B., Godley, W., Patel, C., Cobb, D. (2020). How to monitor remote workers — ethically, MIT Sloan Management Review [Preprint], https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/93709/1/Surveillance-andhowtomonitorremoteworkingethically.docx, 19.04.2022.
• 7. Lin, J.-H., Bao, S. (2019). The effect of sit-stand schedules on office work productivity: A pilot study. Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation, Vol. 64, No. 3.
• 8. Lis, T., Ptak, A., Lis, M. (2021). Trust as an element of the functioning of the information system in management in conditions of forced remote work. Energies, Vol. 14, No. 21.
• 9. Maltseva, I., Shulgina, Y., Kalimov, O. (2021). Features of social and labour monitoring in the conditions of transition to remote employment. Economic Annals – XXI, Vol. 186, No. 11-12.
• 10. Martin, L., Hauret, L., Fuhrer, C. (2022). Digitally transformed home office impacts on job satisfaction, job stress and job productivity. COVID-19 findings. PLoS ONE, Vol. 17, No. 3.
• 11. Mohanty, V., Jyotirmaya, S. (2021). Post – Pandemic Metamorphosis in HR Curvatures, Parikalpana. KIIT Journal of Management, Vol. 17, No. 1.
• 12. PwC (2020a). COVID-19: The impact for Global Mobility and the mobile workforce, https://www.pwc.co.uk/human-resource-services/assets/EMRS/impact-on-global 8 mobility-mobile-workforce-survey.pdf, 28.04.2022.
• 13. PwC (2020b). When everyone can work from home, what’s the office for? PwC’s US Remote Work Survey, https://www.pwc.com/us/remotework?utm_campaign=sbpwc&utm_medium=site&utm_source=articletext, 28.04.2022.
• 14. Raghuram, S., Hill, N.S., Gibbs, J.L., Maruping, L.M. (2019). Virtual work: Bridging research clusters. Academy of Management Annals, Vol. 13, No. 1.
• 15. Ruiner, C., Klumpp, M. (2020). Arbeitskräfte zwischen Autonomie und Kontrolle – Auswirkungen der Digitalisierung auf Arbeitsbeziehungen in der Logistik. Industrielle Beziehungen, Vol. 27, No. 2.
• 16. Steude, D.H. (2021). Challenges of Remote Leadership in a Digitalized Working World 4.0. Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, Vol. 85, No. 1.
• 17. Trziszka, M. (2017). Narzędzia komunikacji wykorzystywane w modelu pracy zdalnej w firmach rodzinnych. Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie, Vol. XVIII, No. 6.
• 18. Urbaniec, M., Małkowska, A., Włodarkiewicz-Klimek, H. (2022). The Impact of Technological Developments on Remote Working: Insights from the Polish Managers’ Perspective. Sustainability, Vol. 14, No. 1.
• 19. Yamamoto, J.I., Fukui, T., Nishii, K., Kato, I., Pham, Q.T. (2022). Digitalizing Gratitude and Building Trust through Technology in a Post-COVID-19 World—Report of a Case from Japan. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, Vol. 8, No. 1.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).