Changes in Forest Area of Coastal Communes of Baltic Sea as a Result of the Impact of Tourist and Recreational Loads

• Autorzy: Parzych Krzysztof , Parzych Agnieszka

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12911/22998993/119797

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The seaside area is one of the most forested in the country. At the same time, the forests in the coastal zone are exposed to a strong anthropogenic pressure due to a high concentration of tourism development and tourism. The aim of the study was to analyze the changes in the forest area availability of the coastal tourist municipalities of the Baltic Sea Coast in connection with the changes in the area of tourism development and tourism in this area. The analysis was conducted in dynamic terms, taking into account the years 2000-2016. In this study, all the communes that directly border the Baltic Sea were taken into account as seaside communes. The statistical data of the Local Data Bank of the Central Statistical Office were used as the source material for the implementation of the research problem addressing: the changes in the area of total forests in all coastal communes of the Baltic Sea Coast in 2000-2016, the changes in the area and population of communes, and selected data on the tourist function of the coastal communes including the data on the number of facilities and beds as well as the number of tourists visiting the coastal communes of the Baltic Sea Coast between 2000-2016. In the coastal communes, in the years 2000-2016, the forest cover index increased from 23.3 to 24.1%. Since 2000, the forest area per 1 inhabitant increased from 1741 m² to 2149 m². The increase in the forest area and average forest area per capita occurred mainly in the rural communes, large communes with the highest forest cover indicators, in the urban communes while in the communes with a strongly developed tourism function, there was an opposite tendency. The increase in the tourism load on the forest areas and decrease in the availability of forests for tourists in the municipalities and communes with the largest tourist investment (Kołobrzeg, Międzyzdroje, Władysławowo) is observed. The anthropogenic pressure and the availability of forest decreases in communes with lower population and the marginal role of tourism in their socio-economic development (Choczewo, Trzebiatów, Smołdzino, Kamień Pomorski).

Słowa kluczowe

EN

seaside community; forest areas; tourist use; forest indicator

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej ; Lublin University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Journal of Ecological Engineering
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: Vol. 21, nr 4
• Strony: 46--54
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 24 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Parzych Krzysztof

• Institute of Socio-Economic Geography and Tourism, Pomeranian University of Slupsk, ul. Partyzantów27, 76-200 Słupsk, Poland

autor

Parzych Agnieszka

• Institute of Biology and Earth Sciences, Pomeranian University of Slupsk, ul. Arciszewskiego 22b, 76-200 Slupsk, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Ciesielska K., Ciesielski M. 2017. Lesistość w Polsce w przekrojach terytorialnych. Wiadomości statystyczne, Rok LXII 5 (672): 62–78.
• 2. Cieszewska A. 2008. Zasady organizacji turystyki i wypoczynku na obszarach leśnych w krajach Unii Europejskiej. Studia i Materiały CEPL 10, 3(19): 179–192.
• 3. Falencka-Jabłońska M. 2017. Forest economy versus sustainable development. Journal of Ecological Engineering 18, 6: 30–35. DOI: 10.12911/22998993/76832
• 4. Fonder W. 2002. Organizacyjne i ekonomiczne aspekty zwiększania lesistości w Polsce. Post. Nauk Roln. 3: 41–50.
• 5. Grzywacz A. 2002. Problemy zalesień w wielofunkcyjnym rozwoju obszarów wiejskich. Post. Nauk Roln. 3: 5–18.
• 6. GUS (2016). Forestry 2016, Warsaw. (in Polish)
• 7. Hermy M., Verheyen K. 2002: Legacies of the past in the present-day forest biodiversity: a review of past land-use effects on forest plant species composition and diversity. Ecological Research 22: 361–371.
• 8. Jabłoński M. 2015. Forest land – causes of change and coherence of data sources. Wiadomości Statystyczne 11: 54–68. (in Polish)
• 9. Kaliszewski A. 2012. „National Program for Expanding of Forest Cover” following Poland’s accession to the European Union. Forest Research Papers 73: 189–200.
• 10. Kluczyński B., Kreft A. 2003. Ilościowy oraz biologiczny stan starodrzewów sosnowych (Pinus sylvestris L.) w Słowińskim Parku Narodowym. Parki Narodowe i Rezerwaty Przyrody 22, 2: 197–226. (in Polish)
• 11. Jalinik M. 2016. Obszary leśne w rozwoju turystyki. Ekonomia i Środowisko 3: 313–323.
• 12. Kunz M. 2012. The changes in woodiness of West Pomerania During the last 400 years. Annals of Geomatics 10, 4(54): 145–155. (in Polish)
• 13. Łonkiewicz B. 1994. Przestrzenne modele kształtowania lesistości kraju. Człowiek i środowisko 18, 97: 97–114.
• 14. Nyrek K. 1997. Uwagi o przyczynach zmian zalesienia ziem polskich w latach 1772–1918. Słupskie Studia Historyczne 5: 91–98.
• 15. Parzych A. 2014. Heavy metals accumulation in moss Pleurozium schreberi (Brid.) Mitt. and Hylocomium splendens (Hedw.) B.S.G. in the Słowiński National Park. J. Elem. 2: 471–482. Doi: 10.5601/jelem.2014.19.2.460.
• 16. Parzych K. 2001. Tourism movement in Slowinski National Park in 1995–1999. Wyższa Pomorska Szkoła Turystyki i Hotelarstwa. Zeszyty Naukowe 1: 253–263. (in Polish)
• 17. Parzych A., Jonczak J. 2013. Content of heavy metals in needles of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in selected of pine forest in the Slowinski National Park. Arch. Environ. Prot. 1, 39: 41–51.
• 18. Parzych A., Sobisz Z., Trojanowski J. 2012. Prognosis content of heavy metals in soil and herbaceous plants in selected of pine forest in the Slowinski National Park. Arch. Environ. Prot. 4, 38: 35–47.
• 19. Pasek M, Zalewska A. 2011. Obciążenie rekreacyjne lasów oliwskich w świetle ich chłonności naturalnej. Journal Ecological Health 15 (4): 199–202.
• 20. Piotrowska H. 2003. Diversity and dynamics of coastal forests and scrub in Poland. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Bogucki, Poznań-Gdańsk, 102pp.
• 21. Polna M. 2017. Changes in the woodiness of rural areas in Poland in the years 1995–2016. Roczniki Naukowe Stowarzyszenia Ekonomistów Rolnictwa i Agrobiznesu 19 (2): 194–199. (in Polish)
• 22. Stępień E. 2005. Możliwości promowania i ograniczenia rozwoju turystyki i rekreacji w lasach. Turystyka i Rekreacja 1: 39–42.
• 23. Sulewski P. 2018. Conditions, scope and economic effects of afforestation of marginal soils on farms in Poland. Problems of Agricultural Economics 1 (354): 149–169.
• 24. Szymura T.H., Dunajski A., Ruczakowska A.M. 2010. Changes of forest cover in the Karkonosze National Park area in 1747–1977 period. Opera Corcontica 47 Suppl. (1): 159–166.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).