Sustainability and Industry 4.0 in the packaging and printing industry: a diagnostic survey in Poland

• Autorzy: Gladysz Bartlomiej , Krystosiak Krzysztof , Buczacki Aleksander , Quadrini Walter , Ejsmont Krzysztof , Kluczek Aldona , Park Jonghun , Fumagalli Luca

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/emj-2024-0013

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Industry 4.0 (I4.0) became an important paradigm to bridge the gap between technologies and humans. The paper aims to diagnose sustainability performance and I4.0 maturity in Poland’s printing and packaging sector and identify research areas where further actions for improvements are necessary. This article adopts a mixedmethod study combining in-depth interviews of eleven heterogeneous enterprises, supported with a quantitative survey on a representative sample of 301 companies. The findings revealed an insignificant correlation from a statistical point of view (0.44) between the adopted I4.0 technologies currently used and sustainable best practices. Internet of Things technologies are more often adopted in the printing industry (27.2 %) than in the packaging industry (14 %). The study concludes that using I4.0 technologies boosts the execution of sustainable practices and/or realising sustainable development practices requires I4.0 technology adoption. The paper clarifies that more in-depth analyses are needed to help achieve sustainable objectives for printing and packaging companies through digital technologies. The methodology is replicable and might be applied in other economies across separate multinational enterprises to influence sustainable digitalised business strategy.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Industry 4.0; packaging; printing; smart manufacturing; survey; sustainability

PL

Przemysł 4.0; opakowanie; druk; inteligentna produkcja; badanie; zrównoważony rozwój

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Białostockiej
• Czasopismo: Engineering Management in Production and Services
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: Vol. 16, no. 2
• Strony: 51--67
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 60 poz., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Gladysz Bartlomiej

• Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Narbutta 85, Warsaw, 02-523 Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0619-0194

autor

Krystosiak Krzysztof

• Toronto Metropolitan University, Graphic Communications Management at the Creative School, 350 Victoria Street, ON M5B 2K3, Toronto, Canada

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6708-4702

autor

Buczacki Aleksander

• Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical and Industrial EngineeringNarbutta 85, Warsaw, 02-523 Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6890-5661

autor

Quadrini Walter

• Politecnico di Milano, School of Management via Lambruschini 4, IT 20156, Milano, Italy

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0081-2255

autor

Ejsmont Krzysztof

• Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Narbutta 85, Warsaw, 02-523 Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1516-0878

autor

Kluczek Aldona

• Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Narbutta 85, Warsaw, 02-523 Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0156-4604

autor

Park Jonghun

• Toronto Metropolitan University, Graphic Communications Management at the Creative School, 350 Victoria Street, ON M5B 2K3, Toronto, Canada

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3960-017X

autor

Fumagalli Luca

• Politecnico di Milano, School of Management via Lambruschini 4, IT 20156, Milano, Italy

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3827-0546

Bibliografia

• Ani, U. P. D., He, H. (Mary), & Tiwari, A. (2017). Review of cybersecurity issues in industrial critical infrastructure: manufacturing in perspective. Journal of Cyber Security Technology, 1(1), 32-74. doi: 10.1080/23742917.2016.1252211
• Avelino, F., Wittmayer, J. M., Kemp, R., & Haxeltine, A. (2017). Game-changers and transformative social innovation’, Ecology and Society, 22(4). doi: 10.5751/ ES-09897-220441
• Baccarelli, E., Naranjo, P. G., Scarpiniti, M., Shojafar, M., & Abawajy, J. H. (2017). Fog of Everything: Energy-Efficient Networked Computing Architectures, Research Challenges, and a Case Study. IEEE Access, 5, 9882-9910. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS. 2017.2702013
• Barbier, E. (2010). How is the Global Green New Deal going? Nature, 464(7290), 832-833. doi: 10.1038/464832a
• Ben-Daya, M., Hassini, E., & Bahroun, Z. (2019). Internet of things and supply chain management: a literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 57(15-16), 4719-4742. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2017.1402140
• Bernus, P., Nemes, L., & Schmidt, G. (eds) (2003) Handbook on Enterprise Architecture. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-24744-9
• Bisnode. (2022). Single point information source for business needs. Bisnode - Dun & Bradstreet. Retrieved from https://www.dnb.com/en-gb/products-and-services/ business-data-and-data-quality/business-data/
• Campos, I. S., Alves, F. M., Dinis, J., Truninger, M., Vizinho, A., & Penha-Lopes, G. (2016). Climate adaptation, transitions, and socially innovative action-research approaches. Ecology and Society, 21(1). doi: 10.5751/ ES-08059-210113
• Cattaneo, L., Fumagalli, L., Macchi, M., & Negri, E. (2018). Clarifying Data Analytics Concepts for Industrial Engineering. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51(11), 820-825. doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.440
• Clark, W. C., & Harley, A. G. (2020). Sustainability Science: Toward a Synthesis. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 45(1), 331-386. doi: 10.1146/annurevenviron- 012420-043621
• Dalenogare, L. S., Benitez, G. B., Ayala, N. F., & Frank, A. G. (2018). The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 204, 383-394. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.019
• Demjanovičova, M., & Varmus, M. (2021). Changing the Perception of Business Values in the Perspective of Environmental Sustainability. Sustainability, 13(9), 5226. doi: 10.3390/su13095226
• DESD. (2014). Exploring Sustainable Development: A Multiple- Perspective Approach. Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform. UNESCO. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/index.php? page=view&type=400&nr=732&menu=35
• Directan. (2022). Directan Database. Retrieved from https://directan.pl/database/?lang=en
• Ejsmont, K., Gladysz, B., & Kluczek, A. (2020). Impact of Industry 4.0 on Sustainability—Bibliometric Literature Review. Sustainability, 12(14), 5650. doi: 10.3390/su12145650
• Ejsmont, K., Gladysz, B., Corti, D., Castano, F., Mohammed, W. M., Martinez Lastra, J. L., & Foroudi, P. (2020). Towards 'Lean Industry 4.0'– Current trends and future perspectives. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1). doi: 10.1080/23311975.2020.1781995
• Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the Sustainable Corporation: Win-Win-Win Business Strategies for Sustainable Development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90-100. doi: 10.2307/41165746
• Eniro. (2022). Eniro. Retrieved from https://www.enirogroup. com/
• Fragapane, G., Ivanov, D., Peron, M., Sgarbossa, F., & Strandhagen, J. O. (2022). Increasing flexibility and productivity in Industry 4.0 production networks with autonomous mobile robots and smart intralogistics. Annals of Operations Research, 308(1), 125-143. doi: 10.1007/s10479-020-03526-7
• Friedman, M. (1970). A Friedman doctrine - The Social Responsibility Of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. The New York Times, 13 September. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/1970/09/13/archives/ a-friedman-doctrine-the-social-responsibility-ofbusiness- is-to.html
• George, G., & Schillebeeckx, S. J. D. (2022). Digital transformation, sustainability, and purpose in the multinational enterprise. Journal of World Business, 57(3), 101326. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2022.101326
• Ghobakhloo, M. (2020). Industry 4.0, digitization, and opportunities for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252, 119869. doi: 10.1016/j. jclepro.2019.119869
• Ghosh, A., Edwards, D. J., & Hosseini, M. R. (2020). Patterns and trends in Internet of Things (IoT) research: future applications in the construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 28(2), 457-481. doi: 10.1108/ECAM-04-2020- 0271
• Gladysz, B., Ejsmont, K., Kluczek, A., Corti, D., & Marciniak, S. (2020). A method for an integrated sustainability assessment of RFID technology. Resources, 9(9). doi: 10.3390/resources9090107
• Gladysz, B., Krystosiak, K., Ejsmont, K., Kluczek, A., & Buczacki, A. (2021). Sustainable Printing 4.0—Insights from a Polish Survey. Sustainability, 13(19), 10916. doi: 10.3390/su131910916
• Grace, A. (2021). Intergraf Activity report 2020-2021. Brussels: European Affairs Team. Retrieved from https:// www.intergraf.eu/communications/publications/ item/315-annual-activity-report
• Gupta, S., & Rhyner, J. (2022). Mindful Application of Digitalization for Sustainable Development: The Digitainability Assessment Framework. Sustainability, 14(5), 3114. doi: 10.3390/su14053114
• Heikkurinen, P., Young, C. W., & Morgan, E. (2019). Business for sustainable change: Extending eco-efficiency and eco-sufficiency strategies to consumers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 218, 656-664. doi: 10.1016/j. jclepro.2019.02.053
• Heshmati, A. (2018). An empirical survey of the ramifications of a green economy. International Journal of Green Economics, 12(1), 53-85. doi: 10.1504/ IJGE.2018.092359
• Holliday, C. O. J., Schmidheiny, S., & Watts, P. (2017) Walking the Talk: The Business Case for Sustainable Development. 1st edition. Routledge.
• ISO. (2013). IEC 62264-1:2013. Online: ISO. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/cms/render/live/en/sites/ isoorg/contents/data/standard/05/73/57308.html
• Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., Sokolov, B., Werner, F., & Ivanova, M. (2016). A dynamic model and an algorithm for short-term supply chain scheduling in the smart factory industry 4.0. International Journal of Production Research, 54(2), 386-402. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2014.999958
• Jennings, G. R. (2005). Business, Social Science Methods Used. In: K. Kempf-Leonard (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Social Measurement (pp. 219-230). New York: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B0-12-369398-5/00270-X
• Kaptein, M., & Wempe, J. (2002) The Balanced Company: A Theory of Corporate Integrity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof: oso/9780199255504.001.0001
• Kiel, D., Arnold, C., & Voigt, K. I. (2017). The influence of the Industrial Internet of Things on business models of established manufacturing companies – A business level perspective. Technovation, 68, 4-19. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2017.09.003
• Kluczek, A., Gladysz, B., & Ejsmont, K. (2021). Application of Lifecycle Measures for an Integrated Method of Environmental Sustainability Assessment of Radio Frequency Identification and Wireless Sensor Networks. Energies, 14, 2794. doi: 10.3390/en14102794
• Liao, Y., Deschamps, F., Loures, E. de F. R., & Ramos, L. F. P. (2017). Past, present and future of Industry 4.0 - a systematic literature review and research agenda proposal. International Journal of Production Research, 55(12), 3609-3629. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2017.1308576
• Młynarczyk, M. (2022). Cyfryzacja w poligrafii. Jak nowe technologie zmieniają branżę druku? - Magazyn BrandsIT. Retrieved from https://magazyn.brandsit. pl/cyfryzacja-w-poligrafii-jak-nowe-technologiezmieniaja- branze-druku/
• Mubarik, M. S., Naghavi, N., Mubarik, M., Kusi-Sarpong, S., Khan, S. A., Zaman, S. I., & Kazmi, S. H. (2021). Resilience and cleaner production in industry 4.0: Role of supply chain mapping and visibility. Journal of Cleaner Production, 292, 126058. doi: 10.1016/ j.jclepro.2021.126058
• Müller, J. M., Buliga, O., & Voigt, K. I. (2018). Fortune favors the prepared: How SMEs approach business model innovations in Industry 4.0. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 132, 2-17. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore. 2017.12.019
• Negri, E., Fumagalli, L., & Macchi, M. (2017). A Review of the Roles of Digital Twin in CPS-based Production Systems. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 939-948. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.198
• Nguyen, A.T., Parker, L., Brennan, L., & Lockrey, S. (2020). A consumer definition of eco-friendly packaging. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252, 119792. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119792
• Nucera, D. D., Quadrini, W., Fumagalli, L., & Scipioni, M. P. (2021). Data-Driven State Detection for an asset working at heterogenous regimens. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 54(1), 1248-1253.
• Oesterreich, T. D., & Teuteberg, F. (2016). Understanding the implications of digitisation and automation in the context of Industry 4.0: A triangulation approach and elements of a research agenda for the construction industry. Computers in Industry, 83, 121-139. doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2016.09.006
• Polenghi, A., Roda, I., Macchi, M., & Pozzetti, A. (2020). A Conceptual Model of the IT Ecosystem for Asset Management in the Global Manufacturing Context. In: B. Lalic et al. (Eds.) Advances in Production Management Systems. Towards Smart and Digital Manufacturing. Cham: Springer International Publishing (pp. 711-719). doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-57997-5_82
• Poligrafika.pl. (2023). Najważniejsze trendy w druku przemysłowym na rok 2023. 12 January. Retrieved from https://poligrafika.pl/en/2023/01/12/najwazniejszetrendy- w-druku-przemyslowym-na-2023-rok/
• Quadrini, W., Negri, E., & Fumagalli, L. (2020). Open interfaces for connecting automated guided vehicles to a fleet management system. Procedia Manufacturing, 42, 406-413. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.02.055
• Shrouf, F., Ordieres, J., & Miragliotta, G. (2014). Smart factories in Industry 4.0: A review of the concept and of energy management approached in production based on the Internet of Things paradigm. in 2014 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 697-701. doi: 10.1109/IEEM.2014.7058728
• Söderholm, P. (2020). The green economy transition: the challenges of technological change for sustainability. Sustainable Earth, 3(1), 6. doi: 10.1186/s42055-020- 00029-y
• Statistics Poland. (2022). Statistics Poland. Retrieved from https://stat.gov.pl/en/
• Stock, T., & Seliger, G. (2016). Opportunities of Sustainable Manufacturing in Industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP, 40, 536-541. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.129
• Szpilko, D., & Ejdys, J. (2022). European Green Deal — research directions. a systematic literature review. Economics and Environment, 2(81), 8-39. doi: 10.34659/ eis.2022.81.2.455
• UN. (2021). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2016-2021. United Nations. Retrieved from https:// www.un-ilibrary.org/content/books/9789210049603
• UN. (2022). The Sustainable Development Agenda. United Nations Sustainable Development. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/development- agenda/
• van Marrewijk, M. (2003). Concepts and Definitions of CSR and Corporate Sustainability: Between Agency and Communion. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2), 95-105. doi: 10.1023/A:1023331212247
• Villalonga, A., Negri, E., Biscardo, G., Castaño, F., Haber, R.E., Fumagalli, L., & Macchi, M. (2021). A decision- making framework for dynamic scheduling of cyber-physical production systems based on digital twins. Annual Reviews in Control, 51, 357-373. doi: 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2021.04.008
• Wilson, J. P. (2015). The triple bottom line : Undertaking an economic, social, and environmental retail sustainability strategy. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 43(4/5), 432-447. doi: 10.1108/IJRDM-11-2013-0210
• World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://archive.org/details/ ourcommonfuture00worl
• Worthington, I., & Patton, D. (2005). Strategic intent in the management of the green environment within SMEs: An analysis of the UK screen-printing sector. Long Range Planning, 38(2), 197-212. doi: 10.1016/j. lrp.2005.01.001
• Zhang, D., Wang, C., & Dong, Y. (2023). How Does Firm ESG Performance Impact Financial Constraints? An Experimental Exploration of the COVID-19 Pandemic. The European Journal of Development