Study of selected determinants of the further environment on the development of creativity in the organization

• Autorzy: Sokół Aneta

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2024.200.31

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: In recent years there has been a fundamental change in the approach to the issue of creativity in management. Therefore, a special role is seen in factors of the downstream environment as important determinants of organizational development. The main research problem, which is also the subject of the study, was to find out the relationship between the creative life orientations of the respondents and their relationship with the factors of the further environment determining the development of the organization. And the main goal of the research was: using scientific procedures and appropriate methodology, to learn about the external factors of the environment of creativity development determining the activities of the organization. Design/methodology/approach: The article reviews research on the impact of cognitive, theoretical and methodological issues, as well as empirical issues using Cudowska's (2014) survey questionnaire for determining respondents' life orientations and selected factors of the further environment. Findings: The results of this study illustrate the role of the determinants of the downstream environment and its impact on the development of creativity in organizations. Research limitations/implications: Despite the author's efforts to produce the article at the highest possible quality level, a few basic limitations should be mentioned. First, there is a geographical limitation. The article uses empirical data from a survey conducted in the West Pomeranian region and focused on people (working students) representing creative life orientations. The second limitation concerns the survey method. A third limitation is the one¬time nature of the study conducted. Originality/value: As a result of the literature and empirical research, the boundaries of existing knowledge on the impact of downstream environment factors on the development of organizations, including creativity, the importance of creativity as a resource was pointed out, especially when this factor is the main source of value creation, the factors stimulating and limiting the downstream environment for the development of creativity in the organization were identified, and areas of support were identified that should be of interest to managers at the national level, or locally.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

creativity; creative organization; further environment; life orientations; creative life orientations

PL

kreatywność; kreatywna organizacja; otoczenie dalsze; orientacje życiowe; twórcze orientacje życiowe

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: z. 200
• Strony: 419--432
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 35 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Sokół Aneta

• Univeristy of Szczecin

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4675-2182

Bibliografia

• 1. Amabile, T.M. (1982). Children's artistic creativity: Detrimental effects of competition in a field setting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, pp. 573-578, doi.org/10.1177/0146167282083027.
• 2. Amabile, T.M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), pp. 357-377.
• 3. Amabile, T.M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), pp. 357-377.
• 4. Amabile, T.M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In: B.M. Staw, L.L. Cummings (eds.), Research in organizational behavior, 10, pp. 123-167. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
• 5. Amabile, T.M. (1996). Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity. Boulder: Westview Press, doi.org/10.4324/9780429501234.
• 6. Amabile, T.M. (1998). How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review, 76, pp. 77-87.
• 7. Amabile, T.M., Conti, R. (1994). Environmental determinants of work motivation, creativity, and innovation: The case of R&D downsizing. Technological Oversights and Foresights Conference. Stern School of Business, New York University.
• 8. Amabile, T.M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39, pp. 1154-1184, doi.org/10.2307/256995.
• 9. Bhopal, K. (2020). Gender, ethnicity and career progression in UK higher education: A case study analysis. Research Papers in Education, 35(6), pp. 706-721, doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2019.1615118.
• 10. Bratnicka, K. (2015). Creativity and effectiveness in organizations. A new approach to an old question. Management, 19(1). doi.org/10.1515/manment-2015-0003
• 11. Bratnicka-Myśliwiec, K. (2019). Bogactwo społeczno-emocjonalne i twórczość organizacyjna w przedsiębiorstwie. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego.
• 12. Brooking, A., Motta, E. (1996). A taxonomy of intellectual capital and a methodology for auditing it. Paper presented at the 17th Annual National Business Conference. Hamilton, Ontario, Canada: McMaster University.
• 13. Burke, W.W., Litwin, G.H. (1992). A causal model of organizational performance and change. Journal of Management, 8(3), pp. 523-546, doi.org/10.1177/014920639201800.
• 14. Choi, H.S., Thompson, L. (2005). Old wine in a new bottle: Impact of membership change on group creativity. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 98(2), pp. 121-132, doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.06.003.
• 15. Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1). Special Issue: Technology, Organizations, and Innovation, pp. 128-152, doi.org/0.2307/2393553.
• 16. Cudowska, A. (2014). Twórcze orientacje życiowe w dialogu edukacyjnym. Studium teoretyczno-empiryczne. Białystok: Trans Humana.
• 17. Franková, E. (2011). Kreativita a inovace v organizaci. Praha, Grada.
• 18. Hadrian, P. (2006). Analiza dalszego otoczenia przedsiębiorstwa. Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Ekonomicznej w Krakowie, 720.
• 19. Hennessey, B.A. (2003). The social psychology of creativity. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Psychology, 47, pp. 253-71, doi.org/10.1080/00313830308601
• 20. Jiang, K., Messersmith, J. (2018). On the shoulders of giants: A meta-review of strategic human resource management. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(1), pp. 6-3, doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1384930.
• 21. Koch, F., Hoellen, M., Konrad, E., Kock, A. (2023). Innovation in the creative industries: Linking the founder's creative and business orientation to innovation outcomes. Creativity and Innovation Management, 32(2), doi.org/10.1111/caim.12554.
• 22. Krzyminiewska, G. (2010). Kultura ekonomiczna młodzieży wiejskiej i jej znaczenie w rozwoju społeczno-gospodarczym obszarów wiejskich. Poznan: Univeristy of Economics.
• 23. Kuenzi, M., Schminke, M. (2009). Assembling Fragmented Literature?: A review, critique, and proposed research agenda of the work climate literature. Journal of Management, 35, pp. 634-717, doi.org/10.1177/0149206308330559.
• 24. Laužikas, M., Miliūtė, A. (2020). Human resource management effects on sustainability of high-tech companies: what Lithuania and South Korea can learn from each other. Insights into Regional Development, 2(2), pp. 562-579, doi.org/10.9770/IRD.2020.2.2(5).
• 25. Mubarik, M., Evelyn, D., Chandran, Govindaraju (2020). Human capital and export performance of small and medium enterprises in Pakistan. International Journal of Social Economics, 47, pp. 643-647, doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-03-2019-0198.
• 26. Nelson, R.R. (1985). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press.
• 27. Penc, J. (2003). Zarządzanie w warunkach globalizacji. Warsaw: Difin.
• 28. Ryu, G., Dong-Chul S. (2020). Developmental leadership, skill development, and work engagement. International Review of Public Administration, 25, pp. 64-79, doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2020.1738978.
• 29. Schneider, B., Brief, A.P., Guzzo, R.A. (1996). Creating a climate and culture for sustainable organizational change. Organizational Dynamics, Spring, pp. 7-18.
• 30. Setiawan, R., Aprillia, A. (2022). Organizational commitment through core self-evaluation, social support, and motivation. Jurnal Manajemen Maranatha, 22(1), pp. 95-108, doi.org/10.28932/jmm.v22i1.5223.
• 31. Takeshita, S. (2016). Social and human capital among Japanese-Turkish families in Japan. Asian Ethnicity, 17(3), pp. 456-466, doi.org/10.1080/14631369.2015.1062071.
• 32. Tapsell, S. (1998). Making Money From Brainpower: The new wealth of nations. Management - Auckland, 45(6).
• 33. Unger, J.M., Rauch, A., Frese, M., Rosenbusch, N. (2011). Human capital and entrepreneurial success: a metaanalytical review. J. Bus. Ventur., 26(3), doi.org/10.1016/ j.jbusvent.2009.09.004.
• 34. Wronowska, G. (2005). Koncepcja kapitału ludzkiego - ujęcie historyczne [The concept of human capital - historical approach]. In: D. Kopycińska (ed.), Teoretyczne aspekty gospodarowania [Theoretical aspects of management]. Szczecin: Uniwersytet Szczeciński.
• 35. Zhuang, L., Hao, R. (2013). The incentive system of human capital innovation in science and technology enterprise. Paper presented at 2012 International Conference on Cybernetics and Informatics 2014, Baku, Azerbaijan, September 12-14. New York: Springer.