The effect of value-added activities of key suppliers on the performance of manufacturing firms

• Autorzy: Jum'a Luay

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17512/pjms.2020.22.1.15

Warianty tytułu

PL

Wpływ działalności wartościowej kluczowych dostawców na skuteczność firm produkcyjnych

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The impact of value-added activities provided by key suppliers on the performance of manufacturing firms was measured in this study. Based on a literature review, four added-value activities: supplier customized services, logistics collaboration, information sharing, and innovation and development were focused on. Data collected from various levels of managers in manufacturing firms in Amman, Jordan was used to test the proposed research model. A quantitative approach was employed, and a survey (structured questionnaire) conducted to collect primary data. The final sample included 126 respondents, representing a 63% response rate. The proposed research model was analyzed and tested using SPSS version 22. All value-added activities were found to have a statistically significant effect on the manufacturing firms in Jordan and the dimension of logistics collaboration had the greatest effect on performance. This research model can be applied to future studies of multiple sectors in Jordan or the same sector in multiple countries to examine the effect of value-added activities on different firm’s performance levels.

PL

W niniejszym badaniu mierzono wpływ działań o wartości dodanej świadczonych przez kluczowych dostawców na wyniki firm produkcyjnych. Na podstawie przeglądu literatury skoncentrowano się na czterech działaniach o wartości dodanej: usługach dostosowanych do potrzeb dostawców, współpracy logistycznej, wymianie informacji oraz innowacjach i rozwoju. Do przetestowania proponowanego modelu badawczego wykorzystano dane zebrane od różnych szczebli menedżerów w firmach produkcyjnych w Ammanie w Jordanii. Zastosowano podejście ilościowe i przeprowadzono ankietę (ustrukturyzowany kwestionariusz) w celu zebrania danych pierwotnych. Ostateczna próba obejmowała 126 respondentów, co odpowiadało 63% wskaźnikowi odpowiedzi. Zaproponowany model badawczy został przeanalizowany i przetestowany przy użyciu SPSS w wersji 22. Stwierdzono, że wszystkie działania o wartości dodanej miały statystycznie istotny wpływ na firmy produkcyjne w Jordanii, a wymiar współpracy logistycznej miał największy wpływ na wyniki. Ten model badawczy można zastosować w przyszłych badaniach wielu sektorów w Jordanii lub tego samego sektora w wielu krajach w celu zbadania wpływu działań o wartości dodanej na poziomy wydajności różnych firm.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

key suppliers; value-added activities; manufacturing firms; supplier collaboration; supplier relationship management

PL

kluczowi dostawcy; działalność dodana; firmy produkcyjne; współpraca z dostawcami; dostawca; zarządzanie relacjami z dostawcami

• Wydawca: Czestochowa University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Management Studies
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: Vol. 22, No. 1
• Strony: 231--246
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 42 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Jum'a Luay

• Supply Chain Management, School of Management and Logistics Sciences, German Jordanian University, Amman, Jordan

Bibliografia

• 1. Amedofu, M., Asamoah, D. and Agyei-Owusu, B., (2019). Effect of supply chain management practices on customer development and start-up performance. Benchmarking: An International Journal. 26 (7), 2267-2285.
• 2. Bhasin, S., Burcher, P., (2006). Lean viewed as a philosophy. Journal of manufacturing technology management. 17(1), 56-72.
• 3. Chopra, S., Meindl, P., & Kalra, D. V., (2013). Supply chain management: strategy, planning, and operation (Vol. 232). Boston, MA: Pearson.
• 4. Chopra, S., Meindl, P., & Kalra, D. V., (2013). Supply chain management: strategy, planning, and operation (Vol. 232). Boston, MA: Pearson.
• 5. Colicev, A., De Giovanni, P. and Vinzi, V. E., (2016). An empirical investigation of the antecedents of partnering capability. International Journal of Production Economics, 178, 144-153.
• 6. Cousins, P., Lamming, R., Lawson, B., & Squire, B., (2008). Strategic supply management: principles, theories and practice. Pearson Education.
• 7. de Araújo, M. C. B., Alencar, L. H. and Viana, J. C., (2015). Structuring a model for supplier selection. Management Research Review. 38(11), 1213-1232.
• 8. Devaraj, S., Krajewski, L. and Wei, J. C., (2007). Impact of eBusiness technologies on operational performance: the role of production information integration in the supply chain. Journal of Operations Management, 25(6), 1199-1216.
• 9. Duhaylongsod, J. B., De Giovanni, P., (2019). The impact of innovation strategies on the relationship between supplier integration and operational performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. 49(2),156-177.
• 10. Dyer, J. H., Singh, H., (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of management review, 23(4), 660-679.
• 11. Flynn, B. B., Huo, B. and Zhao, X., (2010). The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency and configuration approach. Journal of operations management, 28(1), 58-71.
• 12. Goldsby, T. J., Griffis, S. E. and Roath, A. S., (2006). Modeling lean, agile, and leagile supply chain strategies. Journal of business logistics, 27(1), 57-80.
• 13. Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B. and Anderson, R., (2014). Exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate data analysis, 7th Pearson new international ed. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
• 14. Hallikas, J., Immonen, M., Pynnönen, M. and Mikkonen, K., (2014). Service purchasing and value creation: Towards systemic purchases. International Journal of Production Economics, 147, 53-61.
• 15. Hallstedt, S. I., Thompson, A. W. and Lindahl, P., (2013). Key elements for implementing a strategic sustainability perspective in the product innovation process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 51, 277-288.
• 16. Ho, W., Xu, X. and Dey, P. K., (2010). Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review. European Journal of operational research, 202(1), 16-24.
• 17. Jajja, M. S. S., Kannan, V. R., Brah, S. A. and Hassan, S. Z., (2016). Supply chain strategy and the role of suppliers: evidence from the Indian sub-continent. Benchmarking: An International Journal. 23(7), 1658-1676.
• 18. Kähkönen, A. K., Lintukangas, K., Ritala, P. and Hallikas, J., (2017). Supplier collaboration practices: implications for focal firm innovation performance. European Business Review.
• 19. Kisperska-Moron, D., De Haan, J., (2011). Improving supply chain performance to satisfy final customers:“Leagile” experiences of a polish distributor. International Journal of Production Economics, 133(1), 127-134.
• 20. Knoppen, D., Johnston, D. and Sáenz, M. J., (2015). Supply chain relationships as a context for learning leading to innovation. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 26(3), 543-567.
• 21. Lin, R. J., Tan, K. H., Geng, Y., (2013). Market demand, green product innovation, and firm performance: evidence from Vietnam motorcycle industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 40, 101-107.
• 22. Liu, S., Leat, M., Moizer, J., Megicks, P. and Kasturiratne, D., (2013). A decision-focused knowledge management framework to support collaborative decision making for lean supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 51(7), 2123-2137.
• 23. Makkonen, H., Vuori, M. and Puranen, M., (2016). Buyer attractiveness as a catalyst for buyer-supplier relationship development. Industrial Marketing Management, 55, 156-168.
• 24. Marodin, G. A., Tortorella, G. L., Frank, A. G. and Godinho Filho, M., (2017). The moderating effect of Lean supply chain management on the impact of Lean shop floor practices on quality and inventory. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. 22(6), 473-485.
• 25. Matopoulos, A., Viachopoulou, M. and Manthou, V., (2009). Electronic integration of supply chain operations: context, evolution and practices. In Supply Chain Management and Knowledge Management (pp. 217-231). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
• 26. Murphy P. R. & Knemeyer, Jr., A., (2015) Contemporary logistics 11th edition, New Jersey, US, Pearson Education Inc.
• 27. Nix, N. W., Zacharia, Z. G., (2014). The impact of collaborative engagement on knowledge and performance gains in episodic collaborations. The International Journal of Logistics Management. 25(2), 245-269.
• 28. O’Brian, J., (2014). Supplier Relationship Management. Unlocking the hidden value in your supply base. London, Philadelphia, New Delhi: KoganPage.
• 29. Pallant, J., (2013). SPSS survival manual. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
• 30. Riley, J. M., & Klein, R., (2019). How logistics capabilities offered by retailers influence millennials’ online purchasing attitudes and intentions. Young Consumers.
• 31. Shashi, S., Singh, R., (2015). A key performance measures for evaluating cold supply chain performance in farm industry. Management Science Letters, 5(8), 721-738.
• 32. Sheth, JN, Sharma, A, (2007) Relationship management, Global Supply Chain Management, 361-71, California, Sage.
• 33. So, S., Sun, H., (2010). Supplier integration strategy for lean manufacturing adoption in electronic-enabled supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 15(6), 474-487.
• 34. Sofka, W., Grimpe, C., (2010). Specialized search and innovation performance - evidence across Europe. R&d Management, 40(3), 310-323.
• 35. Soinio, J., Tanskanen, K. and Finne, M., (2012). How logistics-service providers can develop value-added services for SMEs: a dyadic perspective. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 23(1), 31-49.
• 36. Soosay, C. A., & Hyland, P., (2015). A decade of supply chain collaboration and directions for future research. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20 (6), 613-630.
• 37. Tanskanen, K., Aminoff, A., (2015). Buyer and supplier attractiveness in a strategic relationship - A dyadic multiple-case study. Industrial Marketing Management, 50, 128-141.
• 38. Tseng, S. M., (2014). The impact of knowledge management capabilities and supplier relationship management on corporate performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 154, 39-47.
• 39. Vickery, S. K., Droge, C., Setia, P. and Sambamurthy, V., (2010). Supply chain information technologies and organisational initiatives: complementary versus independent effects on agility and firm performance. International Journal of Production Research, 48(23), 7025-7042.
• 40. Yang, P. Y., Xi, Y., Zhang, X., Luo, L. M., Li, C. S. J., Yang, Y. C. and Lee, S. H., (2013). The rise of the manufacturing service industry: the perspective of value-added chain model. Chinese Management Studies, 7(3), 403-418.
• 41. Yuan, L., Zhongfeng, S. and Yi, L., (2010). Can strategic flexibility help firms profit from product innovation?. Technovation, 30(5-6), 300-309.
• 42. Zhou, H., Benton Jr, W. C., (2007). Supply chain practice and information sharing. Journal of Operations management, 25(6), 1348-1365.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).