PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Powiadomienia systemowe
  • Sesja wygasła!
  • Sesja wygasła!
Tytuł artykułu

Research methods in landscape architecture; an analytical framework as basis for research for the redesign of 19th century public parks in Central and Eastern Europe

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
PL
Metody badawcze w architekturze krajobrazu; analityczne struktury jako podstawy badań przy projektach rekompozycji XIX-wiecznych parków publicznych w Europie Środkowej i Wschodniej
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
This article will focus on an analytical framework as a research tool in design disciplines. Key problem for an analytical framework in landscape architecture is how to deal with the dynamics of landscape form, design and use in the design process. We start with a short overview will be given of analytical frameworks. In the second part some generic principles of analytical frameworks will be applied in three case studies of 19th century public parks. The third part will focus on how results of such an analysis can be used for the future and how results of people environment studies can be part of that. One of the conclusions is, that people-environment studies can play a role before, during and after the design process. In most cases results of people-environment studies cannot be applied directly but rather as part of an iterative process of research and design
PL
Artykuł skupia się na strukturach analitycznych jako narzędziach badawczych w dyscyplinach projektowania. Kluczowym problemem dla struktur analitycznych w architekturze krajobrazu jest sposób radzenia sobie z dynamiką formy krajobrazu i wykorzystania jej w procesie projektowania. Zaczynamy od krótkiego przeglądu struktur analitycznych. W drugiej części niektóre ogólne zasady struktur analitycznych zostaną zastosowane w trzech studiach przypadków dziewiętnastowiecznych parków publicznych. Trzecia część skoncentruje się na tym, w jaki sposób wyniki takiej analizy mogą być wykorzystane w przyszłości. Jednym z wniosków jest to, że badania ludzie-środowisko mogą odgrywać rolę przed, w trakcie i po procesie projektowania. W większości przypadków wyniki badań ludzie-środowisko nie mogą być stosowane bezpośrednio, ale jako część iteracyjnego procesu badań i projektowania.
Twórcy
  • St. István UniversityFaculty of Landscape Architecture and Urbanism, Budapest École Nationale Supérieure de Paysage (ENSP) Versailles Delft University of Technology Faculty of Architecture
  • Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra (SPU Nitra) Faculty of Horticulture and Landscape Engineering (FZKI) Department of Garden and Landscape Architecture (KZKA)
  • University of Zagreb Faculty of Agriculture Department of Ornamental Plants, Landscape Architecture and Garden Art School of Landscape Architecture
autor
  • Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra (SPU Nitra) Faculty of Horticulture and Landscape Engineering (FZKI) Department of Garden and Landscape Architecture (KZKA)
  • University of Belgrade Faculty of Forestry Department of Landscape Architecture and Horticulture
Bibliografia
  • Baljon, L. (1992), Designing parks - An examination of contemporary approaches to design in landscape architecture, based on a comparative design analysis of entries for the Concours International: Parc de la Villette Paris 1982–1983, Amsterdam: A&N Press.
  • Barzilay, M., Hayward, C., Lombard–Valentino, L. (1984), L’invention du parc - Parc de la Villette, Paris - Concours International, International competition 1982–1983, Paris: Graphite.
  • Brown, R. D., Corry, R. C. (2011), ‘Evidence-based landscape architecture: the maturing of a profession’, Landscape and Urban Planning, 100 (4), pp. 327–329.
  • Buchanan, R. (1992), ‘Wicked Problems in Design Thinking’, Design Issues, 8 (2), pp. 5–21.
  • Chave, P. A. (2002), The EU Water Framework Directive - An introduction, London: IWA Publishing.
  • Coral, C., Bokelmann, W. (2017), ‘The Role of Analytical Frameworks for Systemic Research Design, Explained in the Analysis of Drivers and Dynamics of Historic Land-Use changes’, Systems, 5–1.
  • Ćorović, D. (2010), ‘Three parks in nineteenth-century Belgrade’, Serbian Studies: Journal of the North American Society of Serbian Studies, 24 (1/2), pp. 75–89.
  • Delarue, S., Dufour, R. (eds) (2018), Landscapes of confl ict - ECLAS Conference 2018, Ghent, Belgium - Conference proceedings, Ghent: University College Ghent.
  • Directive 2000/6 - establishing a framework for Community action in the fi eld of water policy, Brussels, EU.
  • Dolenc, N., Grbac Žiković, R., Knežević, R. (2012), ‘Analysis of the touristic valorization of Maksimir Park in Zagreb (Croatia)’, Turizam, 16 (3), pp. 88–101.
  • Donadieu, P., van den Toorn, M., Vacherot, M., & L., Vexlard, G. (2012), ‘Precedent analysis and the analysis of plans at the Master’s level: in search of design knowledge’ [in:] Dymitryszyn, I., Kaczynska, M., Maksymiuk, G. (eds.), The power of landscape - Peer reviewed proceedings of ECLAS 2012 Conference at Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW, Warsaw, ECLAS/SGGW, pp. 450–454.
  • Francis, M. (1999), A case study method for landscape architecture, Washington: Landscape Architecture Foundation.
  • Goossens, J., Guinée, A., Oosterhoff, W. (1995), Public space - design, layout and management of public open space in Rotterdam, Rotterdam: 010.
  • Gutkind, E. A. (1972), Urban development in East-Central Europe: Poland, Czechoslovakia, and Hungary - International history of city development Volume VII, New York/London: The Free Press/Collier-MacMillan Ltd.
  • Jelavich, B. (1991) [1], History of the Balkans - eighteenth and nineteenth centuries - Volume 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, (repr.).
  • Jelavich, B. (1999) [2], History of the Balkans - eighteenth and nineteenth centuries - Volume 2, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, (repr.).
  • Lavedan, P. (1952), Histoire de l’urbanisme III - Époque contemporaine, Paris: Henri Laurens Éd.
  • Lawson, B. (1980), How designers think, London: The Architectural Press Ltd.
  • Loannidou, A. (2014), Green fl ows: connecting the post-industrial riverfront of Belgrade with the city, Delft: Faculty of Architecture.
  • Motloch, J. L. (2010), Introduction to Landscape Design, New York, 2nd ed.
  • Nasar, J. L. (2008), Landscape Post-Occupancy Evaluation, Research, Design Connections, Summer.
  • Ogrin, D. (1993), The World Heritage of Gardens, London: Thames and Hudson.
  • Pinon, P. (1994), Composition urbaine - II - Projets, Paris: STU.
  • Rapoport, A. (1969), House form and culture, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall Inc., 5th pr.
  • Rechner Dika, I., van den Toorn, M. (2018), The design history of Maksimir Park: plan evolution and contemporary use as basis for future plan development [in:] Delarue, Dufour, 2018, p 472–479.
  • Rittel, H. W. J., Webber, M. M. (1973), ‘Dilemmas in a general theory of planning’, Policy Sciences 4 (2), pp. 155–169.
  • Rowe, P. G. (1987), Design thinking, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
  • Šćitaroci, M. O., Šćitaroci, B. B. O. (2014), ‘Public parks in Croatia in the 19th century within a European context’, Annales, Series Historia et Sociologia, 24 (1), pp. 95–112.
  • Taylor, P. (ed.) (2008), The Oxford companion to the garden, Oxford: OUP.
  • Tóth, A., van den Toorn, M. (2018), Sad Janka Kral’a park, Bratislava - An approach to planning, design and management of 19th century public parks [in:] Delarue, Dufour (2018), pp. 747–752.
  • van den Toorn, M. (2015), ‘The changing role of designers in environmental design; from facilitating participation to evidence-based design’ [in:] Ninn, G., Mishra, H. S. (eds.), Landscapes in flux - ECLAS conference Tartu 2015 - Book of proceedings, Tartu: Deptartment of Landscape Architecture, pp. 445–452.
  • van den Toorn, M. (2017), ‘An analytical framework as a research tool in precedent analysis in landscape architecture’ [in:] Goodwin, D., Kotzen, B., Wall, E., Waterman, T., Creation/Reaction - ECLAS Conference Proceedings 2017, Greenwich: Department of Landscape Architecture, pp. 1327–1352.
  • van den Toorn, M., Guney, A. (2011), ‘Precedent analysis in landscape architecture; in search of an analytical framework’ [in:] Roozenburg, N., Diversity and unity - I ASDR 2011 - 4th World Conference on Design Research, Delft: Delft University of Technology.
  • van den Toorn, M., & Rechner Dika, I. (2018), The future of the Maksimir park: historical urban parks in a new local and global context [in:] Delarue, Dufour (2018), p. 431–440.
  • Vrzić, D., Grozdanić, M. (2011), ‘An overview of the Belgrade fortress area in historical maps and urban plans as a contribution to the prospective planning process’, Belgrade, Institute for the Protection of Cultural Monuments of Belgrade (2011)–12, pp. 219–245.
  • Yin, R. K. (2003), Case Study Research - Design and methods, Thousand Oaks/London, 3rd ed.
  • Zeisel, J. (2006), rev. ed, Inquiry by design - Environment/ Behavior/Neuroscience in architecture, interiors, landscape and planning, New York: Norton & Co.,
  • Zimring, C. M., Reizenstein, J. E. (1980), ‘Post-occupancy evaluation - An overview’ Environment and Behavior, 12 (4), pp. 429–450.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-7e9ee670-ca2f-4352-ad79-27cfbc91b10d
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.