Effect of elliptical deformation of the acetabulum on the stress distribution in the components of hip resurfacing surgery

• Autorzy: Stempin R. , Dragan S. Ł. , Kulej M. , Filipiak J. , Dragan S.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5277/ABB-00804-2016-01

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Hip resurfacing surgery is a matter of controversy. Some authors present very good late results of 99% survival outcomes. However, national records of implants point to the series of complications connected with biomechanical flaws of the implant. These results implicate the experimental research on biomechanical properties of HRS. The aim of the research was to define the nature of cooperation between the components of hip resurfacing surgery (HRS) and the influence of the deformation of acetabulum, the size of the implant and the nature of the bone surface on the stress distribution in the acetabulum and the femoral component. The calculations were run with the use of the finite element method (FEM), using the ANSYS bundle for this purpose. Four decrete models of the studied system were made: a model with the elements of the system connected with glue, a perfect spherical model with cooperating surfaces, a model reflecting an elliptical deformation of the acetabulum, and a model with different sizes of the implant. The results indicate that the stress values obtained for models with the ideally spherical acetabulum cannot cause significant deformation of cooperating implants. In the case of loads of the elliptically deformed acetabulum significant point stress concentrations can be observed in the spots of joint. The size of the acetabular and femoral components of HRS has influence on the stress concentration on the internal surface of the acetabulum as well as in the bone tissue surrounding the madrel of the femoral component. Moreover, physical properties of the base surface surrounding the HRS components have influence on the size of stress in the acetabulum and the femoral component.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

hip resurfacing; stress distribution; finite element analysis

PL

alloplastyka stawu biodrowego; rozkład naprężeń; FEM

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej
• Czasopismo: Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: Vol. 19, no. 4
• Strony: 35--41
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 31 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Stempin R.

• Orthopedic Surgery Department of Promienista Clinic, Poznań

autor

Dragan S. Ł.

• Department and Clinic of Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Surgery, Wrocław Medical Unversity

autor

Kulej M.

• Department and Clinic of Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Surgery, Wrocław Medical Unversity

autor

Filipiak J.

• Faculty of Mechanical Engineering; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Mechatronics and Theory of Mechanisms, Wrocław University of Science and Technology

autor

Dragan S.

• Department and Clinic of Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Surgery, Wrocław Medical Unversity

Bibliografia

• [1] Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Annual Report. Adelaide: AOA, 2009.
• [2] AMSTUTZ H.C., GRIGORIS P., Metal-on-metal bearings in hip arthroplasrty, Clin. Orthop., 1996, 329S, S11–34.
• [3] BERGMANN G., GRAICHEN F., ROHLMANN A., BENDER A., HEINLEIN B., DUDA G., HELLER M., MORLOCK M., Realistic loads for testing hip implants, Biomedical Materials and Engineering, 2010, 20(2), 65–75.
• [4] BRADLEY G.W., FREEMAN M.A., Revision of failed hip resurfacing, Clin. Orthop., 1983, 178, 236–240.
• [5] CAPELLO W.N., TRANCIK T.M., MISAMORE G., EATON R., Analysis of revision surgery of resurfacing hip arthroplasty, Clin. Orthop., 1982, 170, 50–5.
• [6] CORTEN K.I., MACDONALD S.J., Hip resurfacing data from national joint registries: what do they tell us? What do they not tell us?. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 2010 Feb, 468(2), 351–357.
• [7] CHARNLEY J., Arthroplasty of the hip. A new operation, Lancet, 1961, 277, 1129–1132.
• [8] CHARNLEY J., Tissue reactions to polytetrafluroethylene, Lancet, 1963, 282, 1379.
• [9] CHARNLEY J., Letter to the editor, J. Bone Joint Surg., [Am], 1966, 48–A:819.
• [10] DANIEL J., PYNSENT P.B., MCMINN D., Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis, J. Bone Joint Surg., [Br] 2004, 86- B:177–184.
• [11] DE HAAN R., PATTYN C., GILL H.S., MURRAY D.W., CAMPBELL P.A., Correlation between inclination of the acetabular component and metal ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing replacement, J. Bone Joint Surg., 2008, [Br] 90, 1291–1297.
• [12] DOWSON D., History of tribology, John Wiley & Sons, 2nd ed. London, 1998.
• [13] FENG LIU, ZHEFENG CHEN, YANQING GU, QING WANG, WEIDING CUI, WEIMIN FAN., Deformation of the Durom Acetabular Component and Its Impact on Tribology in a Cadaveric Model – A Simulator Study, PLoS One, 2012, 7(10), e45786.
• [14] HARKNESS J.W., CROCKARELL J.R., Arthroplasty of the hip, [in:] S.T. CANALE, J.H. Beaty, ed. Campbell’s Operative Orthopaedics, Vol. 1, Eleventh ed. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier, 2008, 312–481.
• [15] HUISKES R., The various stress patterns of press-fit, ingrown, and cemented femoral stems, Clin. Orthop., 1990, 261, 27–38.
• [16] GRAMMATOPOULOS G., PANDIT H., KWON Y.M., GUNDLE R., MCLARDY-SMITH P., BEARD D.J., MURRAY D.W., GILL H.S., Hip resurfacings revised for inflammatory pseudotumour have a poor outcome, J. Bone Joint Surg. [Br], 2009, 91-B, 1019–24.
• [17] LANGTON D.J., JAMESON S.S., JOYCE T.J., WEBB J., NARGOL A.V., The effect of component size and orientation on the concentrations of metal ions after resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip, J. Bone Joint Surg.[Br], 2008, 90, 1143–1151.
• [18] MCMINN D., TREACY R., LIN K., PYNSENT P., Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip, Clin. Orthop., 1996, 329S, S89–98.
• [19] MARKEL D., DAY J., SISKEY R., LIEPINS I., KURTZ S., Deformation of metal-backed acetabular components and the impact of liner thickness in a cadaveric model, Int. Orthop., 2011, 35, 1131–1137.
• [20] MURAT ALI, KEN MAO, Contact mechanics and wear simulations of hip resurfacing devices using computational methods, Acta Bioeng. Biomech., 2014, Vol. 16, No. 2.
• [21] National Joint Register for England and Wales: 6th Annual Report 2009. Hemel Hempstead: NJR, 2009.
• [22] NIKODEM A., Correlations between structural and mechanical properties of human trabecular femur bone, Acta Bioeng. Biomech., 2012, Vol. 14, No. 2, 37–46.
• [23] ONG K.L., KURTZ S.M., MANLEY M.T., RUSHTON N., MOHHAMED N.A., FIELD R.E., Biomechanics of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty, Journal of Bone and Joint Surg., August 2006, Vol. 88-B, No. 8, 1110–1115.
• [24] ROBERTS P., GRIGORIS P., BOSCH H., TALWAKER. Minisymposium: Hip replacement. (III) Resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2005, 19, 263–279.
• [25] SCHMALZRIED T.P., SZUSZCZEWICZ E.S., AKIZUKI K.H., PETERSEN T.D., AMSTUTZ H.C., Factors correlating with long term survival of McKee-Farrar total hip prostheses, Clin. Orthop., 1996, 329, S48–59.
• [26] SMITH-PETERSEN M.N., Evolution of mould arthroplasty of the hip joint, J. Bone Joint Surg. [Br], 1948, 30-B, 59–75.
• [27] TOMANIK M., NIKODEM A., FILIPIAK J., Microhardness of human cancellous bone tissue in progressive hip osteoarthritis, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2016, 64, 86–93.
• [28] WATANABE Y., SHIBA N., MATSUO S., Biomechanical study of the resurfacing hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis of the femoral component, J. Arthroplasty, 2000, 15, 505–511.
• [29] YEW A., JIN Z.M., DONN A., MORLOCK M.M., ISAAC G., Deformation of press-fitted metallic resurfacing cups. Part 2: Finite element simulation, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H. 2006 Feb, 220(2), 311–319.
• [30] Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhds/4procedures/2010pro4_numberprocedureage.pdf
• [31] Available from: http: //www.njrcentre.org.uk

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2018).