A new simple local muscle recovery model and its theoretical and experimental validation

Ma, L.; Zhang, W.; Wu, S.; Zhang, Z.

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

A new simple local muscle recovery model and its theoretical and experimental validation

Autorzy

Ma L. , Zhang W. , Wu S. , Zhang Z.

Identyfikatory

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

This study was conducted to provide theoretical and experimental validation of a local muscle recovery model. Muscle recovery has been modeled in different empirical and theoretical approaches to determine work-rest allowance for musculoskeletal disorder (MSD) prevention. However, time-related parameters and individual attributes have not been sufficiently considered in conventional approaches. A new muscle recovery model was proposed by integrating time-related task parameters and individual attributes. Theoretically, this muscle recovery model was compared to other theoretical models mathematically. Experimentally, a total of 20 subjects participated in the experimental validation. Hand grip force recovery and shoulder joint strength recovery were measured after a fatiguing operation. The recovery profile was fitted by using the recovery model, and individual recovery rates were calculated as well after fitting. Good fitting values (r2 > .8) were found for all the subjects. Significant differences in recovery rates were found among different muscle groups (p < .05). The theoretical muscle recovery model was primarily validated by characterization of the recovery process after fatiguing operation. The determined recovery rate may be useful to represent individual recovery attribute.

Słowa kluczowe

muscle recovery muscle recovery model validation electromyography

praca mięśni elektromiografia odpoczynek po wysiłku regeneracja mięśni

Wydawca

Taylor & Francis

Czasopismo

International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics

Rocznik

2015

Tom

Vol. 21, No. 1

Strony

86--93

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 27 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Ma L.

liangma@tsinghua.edu.cn

Department of Industrial Engineering, Tsinghua University, P.R.China

autor

Zhang W.

Department of Industrial Engineering, Tsinghua University, P.R.China

autor

Wu S.

Department of Industrial Engineering, Tsinghua University, P.R.China

autor

Zhang Z.

Department of Industrial Engineering, Tsinghua University, P.R.China

Bibliografia

1. Rohmert W. Problems in determining rest allowances Part 1: use of modern methods to evaluate stress and strain in static muscular work. Appl Ergon. 1973;4(2):91-95. doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(73)90082-3
2. Chaffin DB, Andersson GBJ, Martin BJ. Occupational biomechanics. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley-Interscience; 1999.
3. Nanthavanij S. Quantitative analysis of heart rate recovery profile during recovery from physical work. Int J Ind Ergon. 1992;9(4):329-342. doi: 10.1016/0169-8141(92)90065-8
4. Konz S. Work/rest: Part ii-the scientific basis (knowledge base) for the guide. Int J Ind Ergon. 1998;22(1-2):73-99. doi: 10.1016/S0169-8141(97)00069-3
5. Shin H, Kim J. Measurement of trunk muscle fatigue during dynamic lifting and lowering as recovery time changes. Int J Ind Ergon. 2007;37(6):545-551. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2007.03.006
6. Edwards R, Hill D, Jones D, Merton P. Fatigue of long duration in human skeletal muscle after exercise. J Physiol. 1977;272(3):769-778. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp012072
7. Wood D, Fisher D, Andres R. Minimizing fatigue during repetitive jobs: optimal work-rest schedules. Hum Factors. 1997;39(1):83-101. doi: 10.1518/001872097778940678
8. Duong B, Low M, Moseley A, Lee R, Herbert R. Time course of stress relaxation and recovery in human ankles. Clin Biomech. 2001;16(7):601-607. doi: 10.1016/S0268-0033(01)00043-2
9. Yassierli M, Iridiastadi H, Wojcik L. The influence of age on isometric endurance and fatigue is muscle dependent: a study of shoulder abduction and torso extension. Ergonomics. 2007;50(1):26-45. doi: 10.1080/00140130600967323
10. Milner N, Corlett E, O'Brien C. A model to predict recovery from maximal and submaximal isometric exercise. In: The ergonomics of working postures: models, methods and cases: the proceedings of the First International Occupational Ergonomics Symposium, Zadar, Yugoslavia, 15-17 April 1985. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1985. p. 126–136.
11. Rohmert W, Rutenfranz J. Erholung und pause. Praktische Arbeitsphysiologie [Recovery and pause. Practical physiology of work]. Stuttgart: G Thieme; 1983.
12. Rohmert W, Rutenfranz J. Erholung und pause. Praktische Arbeitsphysiologie [Recovery and pause. Practical physiology of work]. Stuttgart: G Thieme; 1983.
13. Westgaard R, Winkel J. Guidelines for occupational musculoskeletal load as a basis for intervention: a critical review. Appl Ergon. 1996;27(2):79-88. doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(95)00062-3
14. Carnahan B, Norman B, Redfern M. Incorporating physical demand criteria into assembly line balancing. IIE Trans. 2001;33(10):875-887.
15. Liu J, Brown R, Yue G. A dynamical model of muscle activation, fatigue, and recovery. Biophys J. 2002;82(5):2344-2359. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75580-X
16. Zakaria D, Robertson J, Macdermid J, Hartford K, Koval J. Work-related Cumulative trauma disorders of the upper extremity: Navigating the epidemiologic literature. Am J Ind Med. 2002;42(3):258-269. doi: 10.1002/ajim.10100
17. Kennedy C, Amick III B, Dennerlein J, Brewer S, Catli S, Williams R, Serra C, Gerr F, Irvin E, Mahood Q. Systematic review of the role of occupational health and safety interventions in the prevention of upper extremity musculoskeletal symptoms, signs, disorders, injuries, claims and lost time. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(2):127-162. doi: 10.1007/s10926-009-9211-2
18. Fulco C, Rock M, Lammi F, Cymerman A, Butterfield G, Moore L, Braun B, Lewis S. Slower fatigue and faster recovery of the adductor pollicis muscle in women matched for strength with men. Acta Physiol Scand. 1999;167(3):233-239. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-201x.1999.00613.x
19. Ma L, Chablat D, Bennis F, Zhang W, Hu B, Guillaume F. A novel approach for determining fatigue resistances of different muscle groups in static cases. Int J Ind Ergon. 2011;41(1):10-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2010.11.005
20. Short K, Sedlock D. Excess postexercise oxygen consumption and recovery rate in trained and untrained subjects. J Appl Physiol. 1997;83(1):153-159.
21. Bol M, Pipetz A, Reese S. Finite element model for the simulation of skeletal muscle fatigue. Materialwiss Werkstofftech. 2009;40(1-2):5-12. doi: 10.1002/mawe.200800372
22. Xia T, Frey Law L. A theoretical approach for modeling peripheral muscle fatigue and recovery. J Biomech. 2008;41(14):3046-3052. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.07.013
23. Winter DA. Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. 4th ed. New York: Wiley; 2009.
24. El Ahrache K, Imbeau D. Comparison of rest allowance models for static muscular work. Int J Ind Ergon. 2009;39(1):73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2008.10.012
25. Ma L, Chablat D, Bennis F, Zhang W. A new simple dynamic muscle fatigue model and its validation. Int J Ind Ergon. 2009;39(1):211-220. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2008.04.004
26. Rodríguez I, Boulic R, Meziat D. A model to assess fatigue at joint-level using the half-joint concept. In: Visualization and data analysis, proceedings of the SPIE, Santa Clara (CA). 2003; p. 21-27.
27. Ding J, Wexler AS, Binder-Macleod SA. A predictive model of fatigue in human skeletal muscles. J Appl Physiol. 2000;89(4):1322-1332.

Uwagi

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-7e6b1656-26f4-4dff-bc4f-94acdfb1a762