Application of the simple additive weighting method in the assessment process of air pollution on the campus of the Silesian University of Technology

• Autorzy: Zajusz-Zubek Elwira , Korban Zygmunt

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/acee-2023-0060

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The article presents the measurement results of the concentration of dust PM10 and PM2.5 as well as SO2, NO, NO2 and NOx based on a mobile laboratory located on the campus of the Silesian University of Technology (Poland, Gliwice, Konarskiego 20B, 50.292934N, 18.682164E), in the so-called “winter period” in 2020 (from 01/01/2020 to 31/03/2020 and from 01/10/2020 to 31/12/2020). The obtained results were used to carry out a synthetic (aggregated) assessment of the threat to the anthropogenic environment, the so-called “objects”, i.e. days on which the measurements were made, interpreted as points in the multidimensional space with coordinates corresponding to the measurement results of the concentration of dust pollutants: PM10 and PM2.5 and gaseous pollutants: SO2, NO, NO2 and NOx. The determined synthetic values additionally allowed for ordering (creating rankings) of the examined “objects” in terms of air quality. For the calculations, the Simple Additive Weighting method (SAW) was used, which belongs to the group of single-criteria synthesis methods.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

environmental monitoring; hazardous substances; single-criteria synthesis method; ordering of the examined “objects”

PL

monitorowanie środowiska; substancje niebezpieczne; metoda syntezy jednokryterialnej; porządkowanie badanych "obiektów"

• Wydawca: Silesian University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Architecture Civil Engineering Environment
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: Vol. 16, no. 4
• Strony: 167--174
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 29 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Zajusz-Zubek Elwira

• Associate Prof., DSc Eng.; Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Energy and Environmental Engineering (Department of Air Protection), Konarskiego 20B, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland

autor

Korban Zygmunt

• Associate Prof., DSc Eng.; Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Mining, Safety Engineering and Industrial Automation (Department of Safety Engineering), Akademicka 2, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] Francová, A., Chrastný, V., Vítková, M., Šillerová, H., Komárek M. (2020). Health risk assessment of metal(loid)s in soil and particulate matter from industrialized regions: A multidisciplinary approach. Environmental Pollution, 260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114057.
• [2] Świelik R., Trojanowska M. (2022). Review Chemical Fractionation in Environmental Studies of Potentially Toxic Particulate-Bound Elements in Urban Air, Toxics; 10(3), 124. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10030124
• [3] Paplińska-Goryca M., Misiukiewicz-Stępień P., Proboszcz M., Nejman-Gryz P., Górska K., Zajusz-Zubek E., Krenke R. (2021). Interactions of nasal epithelium with macrophages and dendritic cells variously alter urban PM-induced inflammation in healthy, asthma and COPD. Scientific Reports, (art. no. 13259). 11, 1–21. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-92626-w.
• [4] Mainka A., Zajusz-Zubek E. (2015). Indoor air quality in urban and rural preschools in Upper Silesia, Poland: particulate matter and carbon dioxide, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12, 7697–7711.
• [5] Lopuszanska-Dawid M., Kołodziej H., Lipowicz A., Szklarska A., Kopiczko A., Bielicki T. (2020). Social class-specific secular trends in height among 19-year old Polish men: 6th national surveys from 1965 till 2010, Economics and Human Biology, 37, 100832. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31924589/.
• [6] PN-EN 14212:2013-02/AC:2014-06E Ambient air quality – Standard method for the measurement of the concentration of sulphur dioxide by ultraviolet fluorescence.
• [7] PN-EN 14211:2013-02 Ambient air quality - Standard method for the measurement of the concentration of nitrogen dioxide and nitrogen monoxide by chemiluminescence.
• [8] PN-EN 12341:2014-07 Ambient air - Standard gravimetric measurement method for the determination of the PM10 or PM2,5 mass concentration of suspended particulate matter.
• [9] Afshari, A., Mojahed M., Yusuff R. (2010). Simple Additive Weighting approach to personnel selection problem. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 1(5), 511–515.
• [10] Alinezhad, A., Sarrafha, K., Amini, A. (2014). Sensitivity analysis of SAW technique: the impact of changing the decision making matrix elements on the final ranking of alternatives. Iranian Journal of Operations Research, 5(1), 82–94.
• [11] Chen, T.Y. (2012). Comparative analysis of SAW and TOPSIS based on interval-valued fuzzy sets: discussions on score functions and weight constraints. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(2), 1848–1861.
• [12] Churchman, C.W., Ackoff, R.L. (1954). An approximate measure of value. Journal of Operations Research Society of America, 2(1), 172–187.
• [13] Deni, W., Sudana, O., Sasmita, A. (2013). Analysis and implementation fuzzy multi-attribute decision making SAW method for selection of high achieving students in faculty level. International Journal of Computer Science, 10(1), 674–680.
• [14] Goodridge, W. S. (2016). Sensitivity analysis using Simple Additive Weighting method. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications, 8(5), 27–33.
• [15] Huang, Y.S., Chang, W.C., Li, W.H., Lin, Z.L. (2013). Aggregation of utility-based individual preferences for group decision-making. European Journal of Operational Research, 229(2), 462–469.
• [16] Hwang, C. L., Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making methods and application. Springer, United States.
• [17] Janssen, R. (1996). Multiobjective decision support for environmental management. Kulwer Academic Publishers, Holland.
• [18] Kobryń, A. (2014). Wielokryterialne wspomaganie decyzji w gospodarowaniu przestrzenią. Difin, Polska.
• [19] Koffka, K., Goodridge, W. (2015). Fault tolerant multi-criteria multi-path routing in wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications, 7(6), 55–63.
• [20] Kumar, M., Jayaswal, P., Kushwah K. (2013). Exploring fuzzy SAW method for maintenance strategy selection problem of material handling equipment. International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology, 3(2), 600–605.
• [21] Memariani, A., Amini, A., Alinezhad, A. (2009). Sensitivity analysis of simple additive weighting method (SAW): the results of change in the weight of one attribute on the final ranking of alternatives. Journal of Industrial Engineering, 4, 13–18.
• [22] Mokhtari, E., Khamehchian, M., Montazer, G., Nikudel, M. (2016). Landfill site selection using Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method and artificial neural network method; a case study from Lorestan province, Iran. International Journal of Geography and Geology, 5(10), 209–223.
• [23] Putra, D. W. T., Punggara A. A. (2018). Comparison analysis of simple additive Weighting (SAW) and weigthed product (WP) in decision support systems. In: MATEC Web of Conferences. [on line] 215(1), 1003. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/705b/2d3c3ba9e882f113f53c83ec185f7aef6425.pdf?_ga=2.165226936.624443085.1618500084-257788093.1618500084 [Accessed 25 Jan. 2021].
• [24] Simanaviciene, R., Ustinovichius, L. (2010). Sensitivity analysis for multiple criteria decision making methods: TOPSIS and SAW. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(6), 7743–7744.
• [25] Tahyudin, I., Rosyidi, R., Ahmar, A. S., Haviluddin, H. (2018). Comparison of the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) with the Technique for Others Reference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) methods. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(2.2), 87–89.
• [26] Trzaskalik, T. (2014). Wielokryterialne wspomaganie decyzji. Przegląd metod i zastosowań. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej, 74, 239–263.
• [27] Trzaskalik, T. (red.), (2014). Wielokryterialne wspomaganie decyzji. Metody i zastosowania. Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, Polska.
• [28] https://www.traseo.pl/mapy-turystyczne/mapa/74/gliwice-i-okolice-polska-galileos
• [29] Rozporządzenie Ministra Środowiska z dnia 11 grudnia 2020 r. w sprawie dokonywania oceny poziomów substancji w powietrzu (Dz.U. z 2020 r., poz. 2279).