Analyzing external environmental costs of cruise traffic in the port of Split

• Autorzy: Slišković M. , Hadžić A. P. , Vukić L.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17402/221

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper analyzes the external environmental costs and revenues of cruise traffic in the port of Split in 2015. In order to explore the perspectives of increasing the current mode of cruise traffic in the future, results were compared with those previously known for the port of Venice. The use of the same research methodology was an important condition for this comparison. The cruise tourism business has a negative balance sheet when comparing the costs and revenues in both cities: the external costs are higher than the revenues. Growing cruise traffic leads to further growth of the external costs, deepening the negative cost-benefit ratio. Valorization of damage is a sensitive topic which conflicts with the interests of various parties but is also an important factor in the apparent unsustainability of the current mode of cruise tourism. The authors want to highlight the similar problems of the two cities and encourage the authorities to implement the necessary controls to limit such damage.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

cost-benefit ratio; cruise traffic; environmental external cost; port of Split; port of Venice; tourism

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Akademii Morskiej w Szczecinie
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Morskiej w Szczecinie
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: nr 50 (122)
• Strony: 91--97
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 19 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Slišković M.

• Faculty of Maritime Studies, University of Split Ruđera Boškovića 37, 21000 Split, Croatia

autor

Hadžić A. P.

• Faculty of Maritime Studies, University of Rijeka Studentska 2, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia

autor

Vukić L.

• Faculty of Maritime Studies, University of Split Ruđera Boškovića 37, 21000 Split, Croatia

Bibliografia

• 1. Carić, H. (2010) Direct pollution cost assessment of cruising tourism in the Croatian Adriatic. Financial Theory and Practice 34(2), pp. 161–180.
• 2. Horak, S. (Ed.) (2007) Study of sustainable development of cruise tourism in Croatia. Institute for Tourism, Zagreb.
• 3. IMO (2008) The ‘2008 Amendments (Tier II/III)’ – Annex VI amendments adopted in October 2008, enters into force on 1 July 2010, 1997 Protocol (Tier I) – The ‘1997 Protocol’ to MARPOL. [Online] Available from: https://www.dieselnet.com/standards/inter/imo.php [Accessed: February 15, 2016]
• 4. Kristensen, H.O. (2012) Energy demand and exhaust gas emissions of marine engines. Project No. 2010-56, Work Package 2, Report No. 05, Technical University of Denmark. [Online] Available from: https://www.shipowners. dk/services/beregningsvaerktoejer/download/Basic_Model_Linkarea_Link/164/wp-2-report-5-energy-demand-andemissions-of-marine-engines.pdf [Accessed: February 20, 2016]
• 5. Merk, O. (2014) Shipping Emissions in Ports. International Transport Forum, Paris, France, Discussion Paper No. 2014- 20, OECD Publishing, Paris.
• 6. Miola, A., Paccagnan, V., Mannino, I., Massarutto, A., Perujo, A. & Turvani, M. (2009) External costs of Transportation, Case study: maritime transport. European Commission Joint Research Centre, Institute for EnviroNMent and Sustainability, European Communities, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
• 7. Molocchi, A. (2006) Maritime Transport. [Online] Available from: http://www.externalcosts.eu/setv4.html [Accessed: July 12, 2016]
• 8. Rodrigue, J.P. & Notteboom, T. (2013) The cruise industry. In: Rodrigue, J.P. (Ed.) The Geography of Transport Systems, Routledge, New York.
• 9. Sieber, N. & Kummer, U. (2008) Environmental Costs of Maritime Shipping in Europe, Networks for Mobility. 4th International Symposium Stuttgart, September 25–26, 2008. [Online] Available from: http://www.niklas-sieber. de/Publications/Env_Cost_Ship09_9.pdf [Accessed: July 12, 2016]
• 10. Split Port Authority (2015) Archive of visits. [Online] Available from: http://loc.portsplit.com/pdfshipsplans/index/2015/2015 [Accessed: July 05, 2016]
• 11. Split Port Authority (2016) Tariffs of Port Dues of Port Authority Split. [Online] Available from: http://portsplit. com/wp-content/uploads/Tarife-luckih-pristojbi-PROSINAC-20160-Oporavljeno.pdf [Accessed: July 05, 2016]
• 12. Tattara, G. (2013) É solo la punta dell’iceberg! Costi e ricavi del crocierismo a Venezia. Note di Lavoro, No. 02, Università Ca’ Foscari, Venezia.
• 13. Tattara, G. (2014) Quantifying Cruising. Study on the economic impact of large cruise ships at Venice, Corte del Fontego, Venice.
• 14. Than, K. (2015) Estimated social cost of climate change not accurate, Stanford scientists say, Stanford News January 12, 2015. [Online] Available from: http://news.stanford. edu/2015/01/12/emissions-social-costs-011215/ [Accessed: July 05, 2016]
• 15. TRT (2007) (Trasporti e Territorio srl.) External cost of maritime transport. Rapporto richiesto da European Parliament Committee on Transport and Tourism, Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies, IP/B/TRAN/ FWC/2006-156/Lot4/C1-SC2 11/06/2007, PE 379.227.
• 16. TU DELFT (2012) The Model of the Eco-costs / Value Ratio (EVR). [Online] Available from: http://www.ecocostsvalue.com/EVR/model/theory/subject/2-eco-costs.html [Accessed: July 12, 2016]
• 17. Vogtlander, J.G., Baetens, B., Bijma, A., Brandjes, E., Lindeijer, E., Segers, M., Witte, J.P.M., Brezet, J.C. & Hendriks C.F. (2009) LCA-based assessment of sustainability: the eco-costs/value ratio (evr). Sustainable design series of the Delft University of Technology, VSSD, Delft.
• 18. White Paper (2011) Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system. COM/2011/0144 final. [Online] Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52011DC0144 [Accessed: May 02, 2016]
• 19. Winnes, H. & Fridell, E. (2009) Particle Emissions from Ships: Dependence on Fuel Type. J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 59, pp. 1391–1398.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (zadania 2017)