A Text-Mining Approach to the Evaluation of Sustainability Reporting Practices: Evidence from a Cross-Country Study

• Autorzy: Kumar Ajay , Das Niladri

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.35784/pe.2021.1.06

Warianty tytułu

PL

Analiza znaczeniowa praktyk raportowania zrównoważonego rozwoju: perspektywa światowa

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This study examines the sustainability reports (SRs)of 200 firms in both developed and emerging economies in order to identify the words most frequently used in disclosing sustainability practices within the Triple Bottom Line (TBL) approach to reporting (which emphasizes economic, environmental, and social dimensions). Its aim is to evaluate these sustainability reports under the umbrella of the GRI framework. It adopts a semi-automated Text-Mining (TM) technique to evaluate the corporate SRs of select firms from the top ten economies by GDP at current prices. Based on the GRI Standards guidelines, a total of 208 keywords were identified for analysis. The disclosures were then awarded points based on the appearance of these keywords so that the appearance of one resulted in the awarding of a score of one; if a keyword did not appear then the report was scored a zero for that word. Furthermore, a wordcloud was also generated in order to better understand the inclination of reporting language towards various TBL reporting categories. This analysis of the SRs of 200 firms from the top ten economies of the world sheds light on the differences in reporting practices and priorities as they relate to various aspects of the GRI Standards guidelines. The results indicate that SR practices have grown rapidly in the last half decade of the period selected for study (2013-2017) as compared to the first half (2008-2012). Canada ranked highest for its disclosure practices in this analysis followed by the UK, Germany, US, Japan, France, Italy, Brazil, India, and China. This study found that all included countries improved their sustainability performance over the period 2008-2017.

PL

W niniejszym artykule przeanalizowano raporty dotyczące zrównoważonego rozwoju (SR) z 200 firm, zarówno w gospodarkach rozwiniętych, jak i wschodzących, w celu zidentyfikowania słów najczęściej używanych przy ujawnianiu praktyk zrównoważonego rozwoju w ramach podejścia do raportowania treaple bottom line (TB, które kładzie nacisk na ekonomię, środowisko i wymiary społeczne. Celem jest ocena raportów dotyczących zrównoważonego rozwoju w ramach GRI. Przyjęto półautomatyczną technikę Text-Mining (TM) do oceny korporacyjnych praktyk na rzecz zrównoważonego rozwoju (SR) wybranych firm z dziesięciu największych gospodarek według PKB w cenach bieżących. W oparciu o wytyczne standardów GRI do analizy wytypowano łącznie 208 słów kluczowych. Przyznano im następnie punkty w oparciu o częstotliwość ich występowania, tak że pojawienie się jednorazowe skutkowało przyznaniem jednej punktacji; jeśli słowo kluczowe nie pojawiło się, raport był oceniany jako zero dla tego słowa. Ponadto utworzono chmurę słów, aby lepiej zrozumieć skłonność języka raportowania do różnych kategorii raportów TBL. Ta analiza rekomendacji 200 firm z dziesięciu największych gospodarek świata rzuca światło na różnice w praktykach i priorytetach raportowania, które odnoszą się do różnych aspektów wytycznych GRI. Wyniki wskazują, że praktyki zrównoważonego rozwoju (SR) gwałtownie wzrosły w ostatniej połowie dekady wybranej do badania (2013-2017), w porównaniu z pierwszą połową (2008-2012). W tej analizie Kanada zajęła najwyższe miejsce pod względem praktyk ujawniania informacji, a następnie Wielka Brytania, Niemcy, Stany Zjednoczone, Japonia, Francja, Włochy, Brazylia, Indie i Chiny. Badanie wykazało, że wszystkie uwzględnione kraje poprawiły swoje wyniki w zakresie zrównoważonego rozwoju w latach 2008–2017.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

sustainability reporting; GRI; CSR; top ten economies; text mining; word cloud

PL

raportowanie zrównoważonego rozwoju; GRI; CSR; 10 największych gospodarek; znaczenie tekstu; chmura słów

• Wydawca: Lublin University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Problemy Ekorozwoju
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 16, nr 1
• Strony: 51--60
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 46 poz., fig., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Kumar Ajay

• Department of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM) Dhanbad, Jharkhand-826004, India

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2448-8322

autor

Das Niladri

• Department of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM) Dhanbad, Jharkhand-826004, India

Bibliografia

• 1. ARENA C., LIONG R., VOURVACHIS P., 2018, Carrot or stick: CSR disclosures by Southeast Asian companies, in: Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 9(4), p. 422-454.
• 2. BALASUBRAMANIAM N.K., KIMBER D., SIEMENSMA F., 2005, Emerging opportunities or traditions reinforced? An analysis of the attitudes towards CSR, and trends of thinking about CSR India, in: Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 17, p. 79-92.
• 3. BAUGHN C., BODIE N., MCINTOSH J., 2007, Corporate social and environmental responsibility in Asian countries and other geographical regions, in: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 14(4), p. 189-205.
• 4. BEATTIE V., 2014, Accounting narratives and the narrative turn in accounting research: Issues, theory, methodology, methods and a research framework, in: The British Accounting Review, 46, p. 111–34.
• 5. BJØRN A., BEY N., GEORG S., RØPKE I., HAUSCHILD M.Z., 2017, Is Earth recognized as a finite system in corporate responsibility reporting?, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 163, p. 106-117.
• 6. BLEI D.M., NG A.Y., JORDAN M.I., 2003, Latent dirichlet allocation, in: Journal of machine Learning research, 3, p. 993-1022.
• 7. CHAPPLE W., MOON J., 2005, Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Asia: A seven-country study of CSR web site reporting, in: Business & society, 44(4), p. 415-441.
• 8. CHO C.H., MICHELON G., PATTEN D.M., 2012, Enhancement and obfuscation through the use of graphs in sustainability reports: An international comparison, in: Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 3(1), p. 74-88.
• 9. CRAIN S.P., ZHOU K., YANG S.H., ZHA H., 2012, Dimensionality reduction and topic modeling: From latent semantic indexing to latent dirichlet allocation and beyond, in: Mining text data, Springer, Boston, MA, p. 129-161.
• 10. CRAWFORD CAMICIOTTOLI B., 2010, Earnings calls: Exploring an emerging financial reporting genre, in: Discourse & Communication, 4(4), p. 343- 359.
• 11. DEEGAN M., SHORT H., ARCHER D., BAKER P., MCENERY T., RAYSON P., 2004, Computational linguistics meets metadata, or the automatic extraction of key words from full text content, in: RLG Diginews, 8(2).
• 12. DFAIT 2009, Mining materials, https://www.nrcan. gc.ca/mining-materials/publications/8776 (12.05.2018).
• 13. ELKINGTON J., 1994, Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development, in: California management review, 36(2), p. 90-100.
• 14. FIFKA M., 2012, The development and state of research on social and environmental reporting in global comparison, in: Journal für Betriebswirtschaft, 62(1), p. 45-84.
• 15. FREUNDLIEB M., TEUTEBERG F., 2013, Corporate social responsibility reporting-a transnational analysis of online corporate social responsibility reports by market-listed companies: contents and their evolution, in: International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 7(1), p. 1-26.
• 16. FRIEDLIN J., MAHOUI M., JONES J., JAMIESON P., 2011, Knowledge discovery and data mining of free text radiology reports, in: Healthcare Informatics, Imaging and Systems Biology (HISB), 2011 First IEEE International Conference on, p. 89-96.
• 17. GRI, 2016, 20 years on – is sustainability reporting actually making a difference, https://www.globalreporting.org/information/news-and-press-center/Page s/20-years-on-Is-sustainability-reporting-actually-ma king-a-difference.aspx (11.05. 2018).
• 18. GRI, 2018, Global reporting, http://database.globalreporting.org/search/ (10.05.2018).
• 19. HEDBERG C.J., VON MALMBORG F., 2003, The global reporting initiative and corporate sustainability reporting in Swedish companies, in: Corporate social responsibility and environmental management, 10(3), p. 153-164.
• 20. IPCC 1996, Second assessment on climate change, International panel on climate change, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
• 21. JAWORSKA S., NANDA A., 2016, Doing well by talking good: A topic modelling-assisted discourse study of corporate social responsibility, in: Applied Linguistics, 39(3), p. 373-399.
• 22. KAYGUSUZ K., 2009, Energy and environment issues relating to greenhouse gas emissions for sustainable development in Turkey, in: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13, p. 253-270.
• 23. KOLK A., 2004, A decade of sustainability reporting: developments and significance, in: International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 3(1), p. 51-64.
• 24. KOLLER V., HARDIE A., RAYSON P., SEMINO E., 2008, Using a semantic annotation tool for the analysis of metaphor in discourse, in: Metaphorik. de, 15(1), p. 141-160.
• 25. KPMG 2016, CSR survey, https://assets.kpmcg.com./content/dam/kpmg/in/pdf/2017/02/CSR-Survey2016.pdf (05.05. 2018).
• 26. KRESTEL R., FANKHAUSER P., NEJDL W., 2009, Latent dirichlet allocation for tag recommendation, in: Proceedings of the third ACM conference on Recommender systems, p. 61-68.
• 27. KUASSI M., ZINSOU CH., 2018, Integrated or non-integrated reports: French listed companies at a crossroads?, in: Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 9(3), p. 253-288, DOI: 10.1108/SAMPJ-09-2017-0114.
• 28. KUMAR A., DAS N., 2018, Sustainability Reporting Practices in Emerging Economies: A Cross-Country Study of BRICS Nations, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, 13(2), p. 17- 25.
• 29. LIEW W. T., ADHITYA A., SRINIVASAN R., 2014, Sustainability trends in the process industries: A text mining-based analysis, in: Computers in Industry, 65(3), p. 393-400, DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2014.01.004
• 30. LINNENLUECKE M.K., GRIFFITHS A., 2010, Corporate sustainability and organizational culture, in: Journal of world business, 45(4), p. 357-366.
• 31. MAC, 2017, Facts and figures 2017, http://mining.ca/sites/default/files/documents/Facts-and-Figur es-2017.pdf (20.05.2018).
• 32. McDONALD D., MCNICOLL I., WEIR G., REIMER T., REDFEARN J., JACOBS N., BRUCE R., 2012, The value and benefits of text mining, in: JISC Digital infrastructure.
• 33. MERKL-DAVIES D.M., KOLLER V., 2012, Metaphoring’ people out of this world: A Critical Discourse Analysis of a chairman's statement of a UK defence firm in: Accounting Forum, 36(3), p. 178- 193.
• 34. MODAPOTHALA J.R., ISSAC B., 2009, Evaluation of corporate environmental reports using data mining approach, in: 2009 International Conference on Computer Engineering and Technology, IEEE. p. 543- 547.
• 35. MODAPOTHALA J.R., ISSAC B., JAYAMANI E., 2010, Appraising the corporate sustainability reportstext mining and multi-discriminatory analysis, in: Innovations in Computing Sciences and Software Engineering, Springer, Dordrecht, p. 489-494.
• 36. NASA, 2016, NASA NOAA data show 2016 warmest year on record globally, https://www.nasa.gov/pres s-release/nasa-noaa-data-show-2016-warmest-yearon-record-globally (20.01.2018).
• 37. PRASAD A.K., RAMAKRISHNA S., KUMAR D.S., RANI B.P., 2010, Extraction of radiology reports using text mining, in: International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering, 02(05), p. 1558- 1562.
• 38. SEARCY C., BUSLOVICH R., 2014, Corporate perspectives on the development and use of sustainability reports, in: Journal of business ethics, 121(2), p. 149-169.
• 39. SHIRATA C.Y., TAKEUCHI H., OGINO S., WATANABE H., 2011, Extracting Key Phrases as Predictors of Corporate Bankruptcy: Empirical Analysis of Annual Reports by Text Mining, in: Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 8(1), p. 31- 44, DOI: 10.2308/jeta-10182.
• 40. SPUERK S., DROBE M., AND LOTTERMOSER B.G., 2017, Evaluating resource efficiency at major copper mines, Minerals Engineering, 107, p. 27- 33.
• 41. SZÉKELY N., AND VOM BROCKE J., 2017, What can we learn from corporate sustainability reporting? Deriving propositions for research and practice from over 9,500 corporate sustainability reports published between 1999 and 2015 using topic modelling technique, in: PloS one, 12(4).
• 42. TREGIDGA H., MILNE M., KEARINS K., 2007b, The role of discourse in bridging the text and context of corporate social and environmental reporting, in: Asia-Pacific Interdisciplinary Research into Accounting Conference, Auckland, NZ, 7-9 July.
• 43. TREGIDGA H., MILNE M.J., KEARINS K., 2007b, The role of discourse in bridging the text and context of corporate social and environmental reporting, in: Department of Accountancy, Finance and Information Systems, University of Canterbury.
• 44. UNWCED, 1987, Our Common Future, http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future. pdf (01.05. 2018). WEF, 2018, The world’s biggest economies in 2018, https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/04/the-world s-biggest-economies-in-2018/ (30.04.2018).
• 45. WILSON A., & RAYSON P., 1993, Automatic Content Analysis of Spoken Discourse, in:), Corpus Based Computational Linguistics, eds. Souter C., Atwell E., Rodopi, Amsterdam, p. 215-226.
• 46. WORLD BANK, 2018, GDP, https://data.worldbank .org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD?end=2016&start =1960&view=chart&year_high_desc=true (22.04.2018).

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).