Research on the Influence of the Mechanism of Technology Convergence on China's Textile Industry Performance

• Autorzy: Xu Qian , Cheng Hua , Yu Yabin

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0014.9290

Warianty tytułu

PL

Badania nad mechanizmem wpływu konwergencji technologii na wydajność chińskiego przemysłu tekstylnego

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Technology convergence (TC) can integrate new technologies, methods and processes into traditional industries. It can accelerate the transformation and upgrading of these industries, and is of great significance to their development. The purpose of our research is to reveal the impact of the mechanism of technology integration on the textile industry and conduct empirical research. This study firstly builds the linear and non-linear mechanism of the impact of TC on the development of China's textile industry. Empirical research is conducted based on the panel fixed effect model and panel threshold model. The results are as follows: (1) TC significantly contributes to the performance of China's textile industry, as endogenous convergence can significantly promote industrial performance, while the effect of exogenous convergence is insignificant; (2) TC has a double-threshold effect, with its coefficient being largest at a medium level; and (3) TC has an enterprise scale threshold, in which its effect indicates that only when the scale exceeds the threshold can TC more effectively foster industry performance. The significance of these results for the development of China's textile industry is that they strengthen the level of TC for it to be convergent with emerging industries, as well as increase the size and absorptive capacity of enterprises.

PL

Konwergencja technologii (TC) może zintegrować nowe technologie, metody i procesy z tradycyjnymi gałęziami przemysłu. Może przyspieszyć transformację i modernizację tych branż i ma ogromne znaczenie dla ich rozwoju. Celem badań było ujawnienie wpływu mechanizmu integracji technologii na przemysł włókienniczy oraz przeprowadzenie badań empirycznych. Badanie to w pierwszej kolejności buduje liniowy i nieliniowy mechanizm wpływu TC na rozwój przemysłu tekstylnego w Chinach. Badania empiryczne prowadzone były w oparciu o panelowy model efektu stałego oraz model progu panelowego. Wyniki były następujące: (1) TC znacząco przyczynia się do wydajności chińskiego przemysłu tekstylnego, ponieważ konwergencja endogeniczna może znacząco promować wydajność przemysłową, podczas gdy efekt konwergencji egzogenicznej jest nieznaczny; (2) TC ma efekt podwójnego progu, przy czym jego współczynnik jest największy na średnim poziomie; oraz (3) TC ma próg skali przedsiębiorstwa, w którym jego efekt wskazuje, że tylko wtedy, gdy skala przekracza próg, TC może skuteczniej wspierać wydajność branży. Znaczenie uzyskanych wyników dla rozwoju przemysłu włókienniczego w Chinach polegało na tym, że wzmacniają one poziom KT, aby był on zbieżny z branżami wschodzącymi, a także zwiększają wielkość i chłonność przedsiębiorstw.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

technology convergence; industrial performance; endogenous convergence; exogenous convergence; threshold regression

PL

konwergencja technologii; wydajność przemysłu; konwergencja endogeniczna; konwergencja egzogeniczna; regresja progowa

• Wydawca: Sieć Badawcza Łukasiewicz - Łódzki Instytut Technologiczny
• Czasopismo: Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 29, no. 5 (149)
• Strony: 14--21
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 36 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Xu Qian

• China Jiliang University, School of Economics and Management, Hangzhou 310018, China
• Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, School of Economics and Management, Hangzhou 310018, China

autor

Cheng Hua

• Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, School of Economics and Management, Hangzhou 310018, China

autor

Yu Yabin

• China Jiliang University, School of Economics and Management, Hangzhou 310018, China
• Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, School of Economics and Management, Hangzhou 310018, China

Bibliografia

• 1. Iansiti M. Technology Integration: Managing Technological Evolution in a Complex Environment. Research Policy 1995; 24: 521-542.
• 2. Fleming L, Sorenson O. Technology as a Complex Adaptive System: Evidence from Patent Data. Research Policy 2001; 30: 1019-1039.
• 3. Karvonen M, Kassi T. Analysis of Convergence in Paper and Printing Industry. International Journal of Engineering Management & Economics 2011; 1(4): 269-293.
• 4. Athreye S, Keeble D. Technological Convergence, Globalisation and Ownership in the UK Computer Industry. Technovation 2000; 20(5): 227-245.
• 5. Hacklin F. Management of Convergence in Innovation: Strategies and Capabilities for Value Creation Beyond Blurring Industry Boundaries. Physica-Verlag GmbH, 2008.
• 6. Hacklin F, Wallin MW. Convergence and Interdisciplinarity in Innovation Management: Areview, Critique, and Future Directions. The Service Industries Journal 2013; 33(7-8): 774-788.
• 7. Nordmann A. Converging Technologies-Shaping the Future of European Societies. Office for official Publications of the European Communities (EUR 21357) 2004; Luxembourg.
• 8. Bainbridge WS. Montemagno C, Roco MC. Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Integrating From the Nanoscale. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 2002; 4(4): 281-295.
• 9. Curran CS. The Anticipation of Converging Industries [M]. Springer, 2013.
• 10. Rosenberg N. Technological Change in the Machine Tool Industry, 1840-1910 The Journal of Economic History 1963; 23(4): 414-443.
• 11. Islam N, Miyazaki K. Nanotechnology Innovation System: Understanding Hidden Dynamics of Nanoscience Fusion Trajectories. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2009; 76(1): 128-14.
• 12. Patel P, Pavitt K. National Innovation Systems: Why They are Important, and How They Might be Measured and Compared. Economics of Innovation & New Technology 1994; 3(1): 77-95.
• 13. Lei D T. Industry Evolution and Competence Development: the Imperatives of Technological Convergence [J]. International Journal of Technology Management, 2000, 19(7-8): 699-738.
• 14. Jae C, Seongkyoon J, Kyunam K. A Study on Diffusion Pattern of Technology Convergence: Patent Analysis for Korea[J]. Sustainability 2015; 7(9): 11546-11569.
• 15. Lee, Kongrae. Patterns and Processes of Contemporary Technology Fusion: The Case of Intelligent Robots [J]. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation 2007; 15(2): 45-65.
• 16. Lee WS, Han EJ, Sohn SY. Predicting the Pattern of Technology Convergence Using Big-Data Technology on Large -Scale Triadic Patents [J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2015; 100: S0040162515002310.
• 17. Li Yaya, Zhao Yulin, LIYa-ya, et al. Patented Technology Fusion Analysis Method and its Application [J]. Studies in Science of Science 2016; 34 (2): 203-211.
• 18. Liu Na, Rong Xueyun, Mao Jianqi. Research on Technology Convergence Model and Identification – Taking Energy Storage Field as an Example [J]. Information Magazine 2018; 37 (12): 24-31.
• 19. Feng Ke, Zeng Deming, Zhou Xin. Dynamic Evolution Path of Technology Fusion [J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2019 (6): 986-995.
• 20. Li Lingshen, Gu Qingliang, Zhu Xiusen. Technological Innovation and Industrial Upgrade of China’s Textile Industry [J]. Journal of Textile Research 2007; (05): 125-128.
• 21. Gambardella A, Torrisi S. Does Technological Convergence Imply Convergence In Markets? Evidence from the Electronics Industry [J]. Research Policy 1998; 27(5): 445-463.
• 22. Banker RD, Chang HH, Majumdar SK, Economies ofscope in the US telecommunications industry. Information Economics and Policy 1998; 10(2): 253-272.
• 23. Zhao Yulin, Li Yaya. Technology Integration, Competition Synergy and Performance Improvement of Emerging Industries: An Empirical Study Based on the Global Biochip Industry [J]. Research Management 2017; (08): 14-21.
• 24. Yao Mu. Status and Prospects of Intelligent Development of Textile Industry [J]. Cotton Textile Technology 2016; (2).
• 25. Garcia, Calvo, Fakih, et al. Diffuse Liver Hemangiomatosis: An Atypical Liver Transplantation Indication in Adult: 1739 [J] 2006; 209 (Part 20): 3984-3989.
• 26. Llerena P, Meyer-Krahmer F. Interdisciplinary Research and the Organization of the University: General Challenges and a Case Study. In A. Geuna, J. A. Salter, & W. Steinmueller (Eds.), Science andinnovation: Rethinking the rationales for funding and governance 2003; pp. 69-88. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
• 27. Jeong S, Lee S, Kim J, et al. Organizational Strategy for Technology Convergence. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering 2012; 6(8): 1989-1995.
• 28. Betz F. Strategic Technology Management. McGraw-Hill, New York. 1993. 26. Katz ML. Remarks on the economic implications of convergence. Ind. Corp. Change 1996; 5 (4), 1079-1095.
• 26. Katz ML,. Remarks on the economic implications of convergence. Ind. Corp. Change 1996; 5 (4), 1079-1095.
• 29. Nieto M. Performance Analysis of Technology Using the S Curve Model: The Case Of Digital Signal Processing (DSP) Technologies. Technovation 1998; 18: 439-457.
• 30. Yoffie DB. Competing in the Age of Digital Convergence. California Management Review 1996; 4, 31-53.
• 31. Galbraith J K. American Capitalism: The Concept of Countervailing Power [M]. 1956.
• 32. Fai F, Tunzelmann NV, Fai F. von Tunzelmann N. Industry-Specific Competencies and Converging Technological Systems: Evidence from Patents. 12(2), 141-170 [J]. Structural Change.
• 33. Lin Juanjuan, Chen Xiangdong. Empirical Research on ICT Technology Convergence Based on Network Graph Analysis [J]. Scientific Research Management 2014; (04): 36-45.
• 34. Lee BK, Sohn SY. Patent Portfolio-Based Indicators to Evaluate the Commercial Benefits of National Plant Genetic Resources. Ecol. Indic. 2016; 70, 43-52.
• 35. Dibiaggio L, Nasiriyar M, Nesta L, Substitutability and Complementarity of Technological Knowledge and the Inventive Performance of Semiconductor Companies. Research Policy 2014; 43(9): 1582-1593.

Uwagi

Błędna numeracja w bibliografii (po pozycji 28).